“People are so thirsty for real leadership they will crawl across the desert for it and when they find out it’s a mirage they will drink the sand.”
I ought to needlepoint that quote on a pillow for the Oval Office for you. You campaigned on hope, to people who wanted meaningful change.
You said that you wanted health CARE reform, not health insurance mandates, but when the time came to articulate to Congress what you wanted to see in the draft bills, you took a back seat and let the two chambers come up with incompatible bills. For goodness sake, you let Sen. Max Baucus take the lead on the Senate bill and dawdle for months. Mr. President, it was supposed to be YOUR vision for health care reform, not his. Max Baucus isn’t our president, you are.
Now, after having promised to restore the independence of the U.S. Department of Justice, you are not supporting the U.S. Attorney General’s decision to hold the trial of Khalid Sheik Mohammed in the federal courthouse in Manhattan, close to Ground Zero. This despite the fact that the U.S. Marshall’s Service — guys who will be putting their own lives on the line moving this prisoner around — have determined that the SDNY courthouse is the safest place to hold the trial.
Instead, you have non-lawyers and non-marshals at the White House running around infecting this decision with tawdry politics. White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel isn’t president, you are.
And if you want to close Guantanamo, do it. And do it faster than Sen. Lindsey Graham can pass his “strip the money” legislation. Once it’s a fait accompli, it will be too late to deny funding. Allowing Graham to dictate whether or not civilian trials can be held is nothing short of non feasance in office on your part. Lindsey Graham is not the president, you are.
The list goes on and on. During the campaign, you laid out a whole series of policy initiatives. People didn’t elect you because they liked YOU; they elected you because they liked the policies you were proposing. I assume that you actually thought about those policies and decided you actually liked them before campaigning on them. Mr. President, you must support your own decisions.
Anyone who has ever read this blog knows that I have no love for George W. Bush. In his entire presidency, he only got one thing right. He knew how to be decisive. Right or wrong, once he decided to do a thing, he didn’t let anyone or anything get in his way (until his wrong decisions got overturned in court). I‘m not suggesting that you go off half-cocked, or that you make every single thing a “my way or the highway” contest; but there are some things important enough to fight for.
In your case, it might not even take a “fight.” Just a “get out in front of the crowd, point in the direction you want to go and march toward the goal” kind of leadership. You have a golden tongue, and the post-presidential campaign activist group Organizing for America has an email list of millions.
If you want real health care (not health insurance) reform, scrap the piece of **** bill in the Senate and go tell them what you want to see in a new bill. If you have to roll up your sleeves and get out a pencil and help the write it, then maybe you should do that. Think it’s too risky? You could not fail on health care more than you already are.
You want to restore American rule of law and the international prestige that comes with that? You go to New York City, put up a sound stage in Foley Square and tell the people why it is legally and morally necessary to hold the KSM trial there and that, no matter the nay saying of cowards back in Washington, you will act upon the expertise of the lawyers of the Justice Department and the lawyers of the Department of Defense and the security experts of the U.S. Marshal’s Service. These people are experts in their fields, and the president should not only be able to rely upon that expertise, but should also publicly endorse that expertise.
I know you get accused of not being tough on terror, but I think the polling that trends that way has less to do with your terror policies, than with the incredible timidity and excessive deference you keep showing towards Congress. Look, the Constitution gives Congress enormous power; they don’t need help from you in holding or wielding power. However, the people of this country elected YOU president. You don’t need permission from Congress to be a president, you already are the president.
The people are looking to you to lead; to toughen up and go out there and do the things you promised on the campaign trail. In the absence of real leadership, the populist anger out there can be co-opted by the likes of Dick Army, who’s trying to manipulate the tea party movement, or even by a grifter like Sarah Palin. Talk about a mirage of leadership — sheez!
People aren’t angry with Democrats because they failed to pass a health care bill. People are angry with Democrats because they came up with something which they had the nerve to call a health care bill, that was really giant piece of corporate welfare that would do little to improve the lives of ordinary citizens.
People aren’t mad at Democrats just because they continued the bail out of Wall Street, they are mad that the bailout came with almost no strings attached, and with no regulatory reform.
People aren’t mad because you have proposed unqualified or outrageous nominees ( you didn’t) , they are mad because you have allowed those nominees to wither on the vine for months, while the important work they are supposed to be doing, goes undone. Yeah, I’m talking about DOJ Office of Legal Counsel nominee Dawn Johnsen right now, too. You have that recess appointment power for a reason.
The people of this country elected you to lead them. It’s time to toughen up and get to the leading part.



75 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
In short:
Mr President, lead, follow, or get out of the way so we can have a real leader!
Wow. Thanks, Cynthia. I had to get that off my chest and you did it for me.
Well said, Cynthia.
Even the super ferocious Independents are singing your song these days.
I was apoplectic when he caved on FISA. Only the spectre of Shiva Palin kept me working for his election. I am increasingly disappointed.
Never in my lifetime, sixty-four years, have I ever witnessed a mandate of the proportions that were bestowed on the President, for menaingful and most needful change.
Never have I seen ANY politician fritter such support and heartfelt encouragement away through dithering and disembling, through the incredible embrace of the actors who have been major “players” in the deliberate destruction of trust and good governance, the econommic titans and the leaders of the previous, essentially crimminal administratiion.
The Sunstein axiom is odious and Obama’s embrace of the “savvy”, “doing God’s work” Wall Street thugs is absolutely confounding.
Righteous! Sing it Cynthia!
This piece is right on target and so are your comments on this Administration. We are all in dispair over the squandering of this opportunity.
It gives me major heartburn to think that I may have to yet again make the Shiva Palin decision.
He’s no leader that’s for sure.
It’s the populists versus the corporatists, it’s the Beltway class versus the working class. Unfortunately Obama shows no signs of being either a populist or a working class representative. This is all about the ruling elite taking care of themselves, and leaving us out in the cold.
Kelly, your comments on Book Salon about language are most important.
Could you recommend a book or consider speaking further to those issues?
DW
A remarkable article that express’ most FDL’ers opinions. I hope the President reads this. He claims to read everything placed on his desk.
Perhaps thats the problem: he’s locked in his office reading! LOL
I’ve followed politics for some time, and this is a new one for me: someone who strives to become president, achieves that goal, and then kind of says, “OK, whatever you guys want to do is fine with me” to his opponents. Then he disses his base.
It’s puzzling. And maddening.
Yeah well, Barack Obama ain’t no Andrew Shepherd. Anyone who was listening carefully could easily discern that the only place Obama was interested in leading us was into a Bush-lite, right-wing accomodationist agenda. His emphasis on bipartisanship, his cynical reversal on the FISA bill, his support (which continues) for the Bush faith-based funding initiative, his support for corporate welfare for the nuclear energy industry and his blatantly obvious saber rattling on Afghanistan were there for all to see and hear.
He has not sold out. He has not failed to lead. He has merely been who he is and has always been. If you thought Obama was liberal or progressive and are shocked and disappointed – get over it. You were punked. Obama told you enough of what you wanted to hear to make you think he was with you. He isn’t – and never was. He wants you to be with him – to abandon your dirty fucking (yes, I am going to spell out my swear words – I mean what the fuck is all this “****” and “fracking” shit? It’s like Lenny Bruce and George Carlin never fucking lived) hippie dreams and get with the neoliberal, coroporatist, new Dem program.
Let’s stop wasting time trying to get Obama to live up to a manufactured image that was never intended to last beyond the campaign and start treating him as a determined adversary who needs to be boxed into doing the right thing. He has to be made to know that he does not have our support unless he earns it by deeds and not words.
Classic post, Cynthia. Brava!
This one’s going on my wall, for when those f—ing DNC types call for money.
An open letter to President Obama
Heartfelt, right on, but too timid.
This clown needs to be told that, if the Dem majorities are lost in the fall because of his cowardice, he is TOAST. Running this guy again would be INSANITY.
Hear Hear!!!
I don’t think he is stupid, so the only other explanation is that he wanted that blow job of an Insurance Bill.
Why he wants to capitulate to cheap right wing talking points on holding the trial in downtown New York is beyond me.
It is almost like he is trying to undercut his own authority.
For what end?
Amen…! And I even caucused for Obama…! 8-(
Aloha, Pups…! Happy Valentine’s…! *g*
Let’s just run Cynthia. It’s called a reasoned arguement and speaking truth to power….equal smarts & courage, IMHO
Thanks – there’s lots of books. I’ll do a diary and try to pull together the main points about language difference, and then offer some resources.
About a month ago a commenter suggested that we need to begin thinking “post-Obama”, which may be sooner rather than later.
Personally, I now convinced that the political class will not do what is needful, the previous book salon suggests much of what those “needful” comprise … therefore (and henceforth) whatg is most important is what the people may find the courage to INSIST upon.
And, we, if not “them”, MUST do so non-violently, as if we are conscience personified.
DW
Thanks, Kelly.
DW
**standing on chair clapping**
Thank you, Cynthia. Brava!
Well said—indeed, respect is earned, not an entitlement.
Heh – start with tis very funny book!
http://www.pollyplatt.com/pages/frenchfoe.htm
Precisely, 300SDL.
DW
But, aren’t they ‘entitled’ from the very outset…? Or, at the very least, ‘anointed’…? ;-)
We thought we were electing Winston Churchill but it turns out we elected Neville Chamberlain.
Maybe if you pretend to be a Republican or a Blue Cross Dinocrat, he’ll listen. Rahm made clear that he wants no progressive input and he runs the show.
He’ll be in touch…6 months before he has to worry about his re-election bid.
Obama’s stewardship of that corporate teat that we call the “Federal government” is based upon the bureaucrat’s dependence upon stability. We’ll see what happens when the whole thing starts to destabilize.
That is an insult to Neville Chamberlin.
Chamberlin wanted, as did Marshall Petain of France, not to have another WW I. Another blood bath were the young men dies in their millions in the Flander mud, which had evded only 20 years earlier.
Chamberlin was wrong, yes. Is Obama as principled as Chamberlin?
Great post but unfortunately it will fall on deaf ears in the WH. Until liberals, progressives etc. have a real movement willing to put feet on the ground transformation will never occur. All the grousing in the world on the net will not change a thing. Boots on the ground.
He has to be made to know that he does not have our support unless he earns it by deeds and not words.
Yes. AND he has to be made to know that we REJECT his fundamental approach to governing, depending as it does on a willingness to trade cherished liberal goals for nothing at all but “popularity” and bipartisanship.
He has to be made to know SPECIFICALLY that we do not trust him to negotiate on our behalf on ANYTHING related to the social safety net.
I expect that should some half-assed health insurance reform is eventually passed Obama will go before the cameras waving the bill over his head and declaring in a triumphant tone, “We have health care in our time.” BS artist extraordinaire.
(thanks for missing the last six years)
Cynthia, the sad part is even if BHO reads this letter the only thing he’d do is go on and write a 20,000 word speech with glorious prose and uplifting content explaining why he has to govern in a “bi-partisan” way.
His worldview seems to be influenced by his short tenure in the US Senate where he was the low man on the seniority totem pole and he had to sit back and listen before speaking because he was the FNG. He probably was fooled into thinking that the comity of the Senate would extend to policy discussions/making which is both naive and a bit unsophisticated… he’s not the JR Senator from Illinois anymore he’s the Big Dog and can get what he wants. Sadly what he wants is for Rahm and his other senior circle to cocoon him into a web of deniable detachment where he can say “it’s not so bad”, and think he means it.
He was elected with no “executive” experience beyond hiring a couple of sharp operators, Plouffe, Axelrod et al to run his campaign. He nor Hillary had the experience from an executive leadership standpoint to actually “take charge and move out”… neither sadly, does Biden or we might have him pushing Reid in the Senate to enact a program that more closely carried out Obama’s campaign promises (aka “the phantom agenda”).
If Obama can’t show some semblance of Leadership (with a capital “L”) by 2012, he’s a one-hit wonder… fer sherr…
Rham may run the show but Obama runs Rham. If Rham was not doing what Obama wanted Obama would have fired him. If there were any daylight between what Obama wanted and what Rahm wanted then Rham would never have been hired as COS in the first place.
Cane we stop with this delusion that Obama is being undermined by his staff? He’s the fucking president. It’s HIS agenda that’s being carried out.
Hmmm.
You don’t write Obama’s scripts do ya, Bluetoe?
Bet you called that great future moment verbatum.
And when that day dawns, Bluetoe, you will be praised for your prescience.
DW
Great letter. Did you send it to the President? Should we all send it (with the proper citation to you)? Seems like a good idea, along with the comments. I think he isn’t listening to anyone outside of his “trusted advisors.”
Few who are paying attention would disagree with you, fred.
DW
Really great idea! Print it out and send it in lieu of money.
Obama’s staredown of McConnell is a step in the right direction. His threat of recess appointments seemed to make McConnell blink. I was expecting Obama to pull all contested nominations. He didn’t. Maybe this is a start of some real leadership.
Or it’s an anomaly and Obama will relapse to the usual “screw the base and capitulate to the GOP at all times” philosophy. We’ll see.
Great Post. I hope that someone is the White House is reading these posts and I hope they are relating them to the POTUS .
Me likey.
Thank you, Kelly.
DW
Capital idea, Loo Hoo!
;~DW
Right on!
*standing on chair clapping wildly*
wow that really does say all that needs to be said — thank you
By the way what was up with the President giving Max Baucus all that authority anyway. I mean he literally gave away the Healthcare Bill to supposedly bipartisanship and got kicked in the mouth for it because if you listen to the Republicans Obama and the democrats never did invite them to the table. The problem is the media never reports what really happen they just likes to start controversy instead of reporting the facts.
I think Biden’s been pretty good. Maybe a write-in.
Thank you. Speaks for me, too.
Banderson2, Cynthia — Obama put Baucus’s Chief of Staff, Jim Messina, on as one of his WH Deputy Chiefs of Staff.
…Specializing in the health insurance reform, which is what Obama calls healthcare reform when he’s being honest or slips.
As far as I know, there were no staffers from Ted Kennedy’s staff added to the WH staff. Now, isn’t that special? Interesting? Revealing?
So the direct communication was right there to Baucus (a WaPo write up says Baucus and Messina see themselves as family, like father and son) — Obama didn’t have to make any public statements to communicate with Baucus (not that he would have anyway). And Baucus did nothing that Obama did not want done. It was all set up to get the Corporatists’ viewpoint front, center, and no glaring fingerprints from Obama.
The fix was in from from the gitgo. Obama had no intention of not ensuring continued high profitability to the big private health insurance companies and other BHIPpers (Big Health Industry Players).
Obama is a Corporatist and he was selected by Wall St to run as their protection against any real liberal Democrats.
That’s an ironic video clip to choose for this piece, because in it, that POTUS said” The people don’t drink the sand because they’re thirsty. They drink the sand because they don’t know the difference.” And that’s our real problem – lack of education. It’s a simple fact that the biggest Obama/Dem supporters are more educated than the general population. Now we, including white Americans, voted in the first [light-skinned non-dialect-using] black POTUS and expect him to be treated no worse than a Clinton – as if Clinton wasn’t treated badly! Like my grandma used to say, so much education, so little common sense.
We are all losing the public debates on policies, not just O. We are all being accused of being fascists and communists, not just O.
Most of us have gone back to Dem/Repub fight club scenarios, and abandoned the outreach to independents and Repubs that we did with a vengeance during the campaign. That outreach had tons to do with O’s win, and the lack of it has tons to do with our losses since then.
The only ones profiting from our stupid fight club are the media owners. We’re the only ones keeping them afloat with our partisan viewing/listening/reading, and we’re burying ourselves by doing little else – like reaching out to the teaparty crew (ouch!) or at least to moderate Repubs.
Hopefully, we’re all past the practice of teaching our kids by calling them “dumb asses” and “wussies”. Why do we think we’re going to win a shouting match aka partisan debate by joining in the name-calling? Demonstrations/marches can help educate/attract some, if well-managed to not insult the people we’re supposedly trying to convince. But education is key, and if we don’t educate our opposition respectfully (I fail too sometimes, calling them “teabaggers” etc), then we will simply shout demands at each other and gratify the multibillionaire multinationals – including media conglomerates – ruling our nation, unobstructed.
Our first African American POTUS is fighting the only way a black man can fight: showing no anger, using reason, being as non-threatening as possible. And is it ending racist attacks against him? Is it reducing the number of death threats he faces daily? Maybe by a smidgen, but not much.
What would happen if Obama starts supporting truly socialist policies, if he starts pounding on the podium and shouting like FDR did? He’d be killed or impeached – for chrissakes, a white Dem who stuck a cigar in his young female aide got impeached! Having done nothing to please us libs (judging by the utter dismissal of all he’s managed to get done so far – though there’s much he’s done that no Repub would’ve done that I’m pleased with), already 35% of Repubs want him impeached!
Yes, O has to make a stand, and it seems he plans to, after giving bipartisanship a chance, however small that chance was. He plans on using executive powers more. Are we going to scream at him that he’s too Unitary Executive then? I’ll bet many on these blogs will.
It does not matter who we elect as POTUS, we will not immediately or even in 4 years get: An end to all wars, or a drastically-reduced military footprint, or a single-payer health system, or an all-green-energy policy, or a redistribution of massively skewed wealth to only the top 2%, or campaign finance and corporate reform.
It took decades to overturn Jim Crow, to get our Voting Rights for women and people of color, for pity’s sakes! If we’d quit because we didn’t get it in a year or two, O couldn’t even have run and won, and Hillary wouldn’t have been his biggest challenger.
We have 435 representatives, and we have 100 senators/divas, to organize for/against, with billion$ in political donations against us – and most of us can’t even name our 2 senators and 1 rep. Whatever we get done, or fail to get done, is more due to our own civic education and participation (or lack thereof) than to our POTUS. FDR only got the New Deal through because of massive demonstrations, long-term organized activists, and some righteous hard-won media coverage. Same for the Civil Rights laws, minimum-wage and all workers’ rights won. If we won’t quit our complaining and organize at least 4 hrs/wk to educate and recruit, we’ve got it coming.
In sum, if you want a savior, get thee to a church/temple/mosque. If you want civic transformation, make civic participation a priority.
Great letter Cynthia. If the Whitehouse, Dems and Obama are not hearing the roar that is the voice of the regular people yet, they will come election time. The man seems to be a fuddle duddle.
I guess I’m not the only one that listens to Thom Hartmann. I’ll by his updated book as soon as it’s available.
He ran to be THE President of the United States. If he wasn’t up to the task, he shouldn’t have ran for the job. Don’t make excuses for him. His staff, and partisan loyalists have already been doing that for a year. Excuses don’t get a person re-elected and excuses solve no problems. Maybe he should hire a speech writer that isn’t good enough to raise expectations.
I think I vote for “anointed.”
I don’t believe many here are looking for a “messiah,” rather, we are looking for honest, quality leadership that is willing to take some genuine risk rather than pander to the public with their good intentions that they don’t intend to deliver because it’s politically inconvenient.
Very well said! Especially:
“The only ones profiting from our stupid fight club are the media owners. We’re the only ones keeping them afloat with our partisan viewing/listening/reading, and we’re burying ourselves by doing little else – like reaching out to the teaparty crew (ouch!) or at least to moderate Repubs.”
and:
“Our first African American POTUS is fighting the only way a black man can fight: showing no anger, using reason, being as non-threatening as possible. And is it ending racist attacks against him? Is it reducing the number of death threats he faces daily? Maybe by a smidgen, but not much.”
That’s really the truth.
Thanks.
Wow, the race card. The man was judged by what we thought was the content of his character when he was elected, not by the color of his skin. And he won. The man is in fact a liar and apparently without character of any kind, as seen by his actions since then. Making excuses for him that he has to ‘talk nice’ because he’s black don’t change that.
Leadership in the embodiment of Obama is not going to ever happen. Why do we persist?
The left has a different agenda from Obama and the Democrats if we beleive in anything at all. A collaborative not for profit system of health care is a basic tenet of the left and this approach is anathema to Obama and always will be. He favors the profit motive of financing of helath care by private insurers.
Obama favors the public transfer of public funds for the enrichment of financial firms and the left does not. We favor the nationalization or the assumption of losses by stockholders of any instittion that fails.
There are irreconcialable differences between Obama and the left and we should accept that. We simply should stop pretending that he will change his stripes and we should place our effort and support for change to come about in the House. We shoudl make a clean break from Obama and let him find electoral support from conservatives or whatever remnant of Democrats are not fed up with him.
The left should make it plain to Obama that he will not find any electoral support here.
Clearly so, and well said.
Bipartisanship is the Coward’s substitute for courage.
President Obama has principles.
But if Republicans don’t like them, he has others.
I think it is slowly dawning on President Obama just how unfit he is to lead this nation at this time.
I want to look forward also – to when he is defeated in the primary.
Hissssss! /s
Seriously, don’t hold back Cyn. LOL
What I hope is that all the Dems learn a couple of key lessons from Obama’s first year and you’ve pointed to several.
Don’t try for bipartisanship so much. It’s not worth the political cost & time.
Don’t stretch out debate. Assume you’ve got it down already and go do it.
Kick Joe Lieberman’s or any other obstructionist Blue Dog’s ass. No reason.
Try to show more certified results along the way to assure everyone of progress.
Put the people’s welfare first (or tied for first).
Do one thing at a time. Congress, God love ‘em, can’t walk and tie their shoes.
Sell legislation to the public as well as Congress. Shoot from outside some.
Don’t hang out with thugs like Repugs & bankers. It ruins your rep.
Good list?
Cynthia,
This is a fantastic letter. I will copy it and add my signature!
Thanks,
Bob in AZ
I don’t quite know what happened with MA, but losing the super-majority (in appearance) limits the Dems and presents them with an opportunity. The question now is whether the Dem senate has courage and whether they’ll change debate rules to kill delay-tactic-filibusters.
I wonder what Obama thinks about that. This would be a great issue for him to lead the charge on.
My impression was that it was inevitable certain committees would take a whack at the legislation and Baucus had some right to be in there. So, it wasn’t so much that he was handed it. But, that said, once it took off there had to be a target for the Republicans to attack and when the President’s ‘favorite’ chairman or bill gave them a target they went after it. But, Obama said he liked the Senate bill and Baucus had the bipartisanship thing going and the House had (what was it?) 3 committees joined together, so it was hard to know where the focus was, where the core of the legislation would originate.
That kept the Repugs uncertain and, in the end, they helped some and just slowed things as much as they could. They couldn’t kill this blob oozing from all points with no one leader (like Obama) behind it.
It was ugly. No doubts about that. But, here we are. The bill is very nearly done.
Did that not happen?
he ran well in the primarys and we all thought it was due to great leadership.
as it turned out he was not in charge of his own camp.
great speeches works wonders check out history on that one.
reagan gave good speechs and no one has done more damage to american than reagan.
this pres is a weak leader along with reid and nancy.
the demos are spineless for a reason.
follow the money and find out who they really represent.
not you middle class
A blob oozing certainly describes so-called HCR
“Shiva Palin” sounds like the inspiration for one of darkblack’s wittier graphics.
Or maybe “Kali Palin”?
There was an article about a week ago about the campaign insiders who came into the WhiteHouse with Obama. A thing many people forget, Rahm was NOT part of that successful campaign team.
So, if I WAS part of the successful campaign team, and a guy who was NOT an architect of that success tried to shift my guy away from the stuff that got him elected–and if there were more of the successful team than of the non team member–
Well, I might consider ganging up on the non team member to keep the president on the same track that got him elected.
Just a thought.
I agree with you about OUR responsibility. But if you look at the list of things I put in my letter, they are allthe kinds of actions that Shrub would not have thought twice about doing without consulting anybody and with zero concern who he pissed off.
Not thta Obama should become a dictator like Shrub, but these are all matters where –literally– a word from Obama would make all the difference inthe world.
And if death threats make him timid–what did he think was going to happen?
I agree that getting angry in public and pounding the podium would not work well for him, but simply telling folks what he wants done, instead of dithering and making them guess…?
One of the most important tools of management is to clearly articualte goals and performance standards. When you have really smart senators like Al Franken pulling the President aside and ASKING for the marching orders and still they get no instructions…..
Sorry, that’s failure to lead. They just want to know which way to march.
EGGGGGZZZZAlent list!
Thanks for saying what needs to be said. I hope that Obama listens.
Thanks to both of you. I do not understand why Obama (no matter who he really is) would surround himself with such a bunch of demonstrated losers, no matter how “loyal” they appeared. They are not competent to perform loyally. I guess there are a couple of unfortunate answers why Obama would choose this team but it’s so clearly a losing approach it’s hard to imagine the root cause could be anything but self-sabotage. Where is his ambition? MIA at this point. Is the office of president so inherently and completely mystifying and corrupting????