For years, we’ve been following reports – first in Iraq and then in Afghanistan – of US forces, particularly JSOC teams, using night raids and air strikes to terrorize local citizens. All too often, these attacks not only terrify civilians, they kill them.
Following each such killing, we hear that US forces are going to be more careful and will change tactics. While there are reports of fewer air strikes, the extensive use of night raids continues.
Now we learn that US forces are once again proclaiming a new improved approach that includes more “sensitivity” to local concerns. Canadian Press reports that “NATO spokesman Rear Adm. Gregory Smith,” referencing a new directive expected soon from Gen. McChrystal said:
“It addresses the issue that’s probably the most socially irritating thing that we do – and that is entering people’s homes at night,” Smith said Wednesday at his office in Kabul.
“Socially irritating” is an interesting way to describe what has been close to SOP. As Anand Gopal describes in his important report at TomDispatch:
It was the 19th of November 2009, at 3:15 am. A loud blast awoke the villagers of a leafy neighborhood outside Ghazni city, a town of ancient provenance in the country’s south. A team of U.S. soldiers burst through the front gate of the home of Majidullah Qarar, the spokesman for the Minister of Agriculture. Qarar was in Kabul at the time, but his relatives were home, four of whom were sleeping in the family’s one-room guesthouse. One of them, Hamidullah, who sold carrots at the local bazaar, ran towards the door of the guesthouse. He was immediately shot, but managed to crawl back inside, leaving a trail of blood behind him. Then Azim, a baker, darted towards his injured cousin. He, too, was shot and crumpled to the floor. The fallen men cried out to the two relatives remaining in the room, but they — both children — refused to move, glued to their beds in silent horror.
The foreign soldiers, most of them tattooed and bearded, then went on to the main compound. They threw clothes on the floor, smashed dinner plates, and forced open closets…
Gopal goes on the describe the detention of two men from the family, one later released, one still missing – presumably in the secret prisons Gopal describes and Jeff Kaye wrote about today.
These raids, a mainstay of US operations in Iraq as well, were called out to President Obama by Human Rights Watch back in March as a significant issue:
Afghans frequently complain about night raids that appear to use unnecessary or excessive force, insult local customs, and antagonize the civilian population. Human Rights Watch has learned of recent night raids by US forces where women and children have been killed. …
Human Rights Watch urges the United States to:
* Conduct a review of the use of night raids in conjunction with the government of Afghanistan to develop alternative arrest strategies that will not alienate the local population.
* Exercise precaution in the use of force during night raids to minimize harm to the civilian population.
* Where the circumstances surrounding the arrest reflect a policing rather than an armed conflict situation, exercise restraint in the use of force and act in proportion to the legitimate objective to be achieved.
* Improve transparency about the involvement of US personnel in raids and acknowledge responsibility where civilian harm has occurred.
Mullah Omar’s COIN guidance … Reiterated prohibitions on the following:
Mistreating population
Forcibly taking personal weapons
Taking children to conduct jihad
Punishment by maiming
Forcing people to pay donations
Searching homes
Kidnapping people for money
(page 6, ISAF December briefing)
While the DoD continues to ignore such sensible advice (and it’s own earlier promises to minimize night raids) the December 22, 2009 ISAF Briefing “State of the Insurgency:Trends, Intentions and Objectives” (h/t Col. Pat Lang) describes Mullah Omar’s directives to Taliban fighters in the July 2009 Taliban Code of Conduct, which the powerpoint describes as the Taliban’s “COIN guidance.” These guidelines are quite clear – and prohibit searches of houses.
Meanwhile, Afghan citizens are rightly frightened by the US surge and with news of the imminent NATO offensive in Helmand. “U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top NATO commander in Afghanistan, said the success of the operation depends on convincing civilians that the government will improve services once the militants are gone” according to the Toronto Star but Afghans are piling up their belongings and fleeing:
Mohammad Hakim, a 55-year-old tribal leader in Marjah, said fear has risen over the past two weeks and he knows at least 20 families who had left. He himself planned to take his wife, nine sons, four daughters and grandchildren to live with relatives in Lashkar Gah…
Ghulan Nabi, a wheat and poppy farmer with seven children in Marjah, said his family planned to leave soon and wait out the offensive in a nearby district.
“We have a good house, a nice life, but now I will have to rent a home,” he said. “But we want peace and security. We don’t care who comes here. We just want peace in our village.




56 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Aloha, Siun…! I did post a new diary…! ;-)
Thanks for sharing the link CT – this mega battle sounds like a disaster in the making.
Btw, Siun, Al Jazeera reported today…
Well, D’uh…! Calling us hypocrites even…! The sheer audacity of ‘em…! ;-)
The Taliban Code of Conduct????
why not post the entire text of that?
*groan* The veritable ‘Mother of All Wars’ even…! 8-(
WTF..?
*heh* Didn’t I already…? Silly me…! ;-)
Ah Macaquerman, if you read the post, you’d note that it’s from an ISAF presentation. You can read the whole briefing at the link.
You forgot Omar’s Rules for Successful Dating and Goat Grooming.
Shame on ya, Siun…! Ya should’ve given the powerpoint presentation… Instead…! ;-)
Are you really afraid of 11th century thinkers, who are a mere fraction of 1% of the planet?
I’m not.
What we’re not doing a good job of is staying OUT of other people’s countries. Shoe on the other foot, well we wouldn’t be so happy about that either, would we?
be serious. They’re humans just as we are. Their thinking may be 11th century but they aren’t any less resourceful or intelligent.
Saints??? !!!
Who Dat…? *g*
Nawlins will be mighty fat on Fat Tuesday…! ;-)
As long as Starbuck’s CEO donates to the IDF, and MSNBC can’t really cover
anything relavent, I guess I still need my FDL.
SAINTS.
What was that call?? huh
I am being serious.
I believe we are overreacting to a relative handful of people. Regardless of how SCARY they might be/seem.
I’m not afraid of Jihadists, Talibanists, Christianists, Corporations or anyone else. You can be fearful if you want, but I’m not.
They pose problems, all of them. But fear? That’s up to you.
fear is your word, kelly.
SAINTS
Can you believe it???
easily the better team and the best in the league this year.
Excellent. You agree that we just have some problems.
Then the problems posed should only be met with the solutions which are necessary.
Please pose solutions alternative to the killings mentioned in the post, unless you believe killing people is the solution.
Thanks, Siun. McChrystal won’t learn anything. He’s too set on winning the insurgency militarily. Even his deployment of resources mirrors the Soviets’.
Ball game…!
Btw, I’ve cited our unfounded fear before…!
All of NO needs the boost in spirit after all they have been through!!
OMFG!!!!!!!
Go Saints!!!!!
kelly, I have deep, deep problems with some of the lunacy posted, but I’ve never, ever, ever believed in killing the people posting.
never even thought that more than a good, bracing hug would solve all the world’s problems.
*g*
Hey Mary can ya believe that??
the hard-core republicans are probably gonna filibuster to hold up the trophy presentation.
Beautiful game.
Sorry. I won’t be O.T. any longer.
Hurray!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you have any ideas to put into the discussion or are you limited to condescending criticism of posters and commenters?
*hugs mac*
Well, you know my pet name for Siun?
“Siun-Tzu”:
I cannot go along with the otherwise laudable HRW on this one. We’re way past a “review” of the night raids or how to arrest. Only a full withdrawal of U.S./NATO troops is acceptable. Afterwards, we can consider how to support those within Afghanistan who oppose Taliban or reactionary religious fundamentalism. But you cannot win over the populace by dangling a few goodies, but mostly delivering terror, imprisonment, disappearances, torture, and death. This is not a response to 9/11. It is aggressive imperialism.
amen
Oh, and I forgot. That was a great article, Siun.
Congrats, too, Saints.
We lost this one the day we started this kinda shit.
I’m pretty limited, but every now and again I have an idea.
I did have this one Sun Tsu quote that I dropped in editing…!
Please stop referring to our military an 11th century thinkers. It’s insulting.
Their weapons are modern.
Isn’t creating refugees what we do best? Sad
I’ll have to check The Soviet-Afghan War but the organizational charts for the Taliban in the PPP are awfully similar to the organizational charts the Soviets used, which the editor writes had no basis in reality but reflected the military’s desire for such organizational structure to exist. The Soviets were untrained in unconventional warfare.
Great post, Siun. Isn’t it “reassuring” to know we still employ a tactic that the Taliban has rejected?
I think Kelly was talking about the Taliban being 11th century thinkers.
and I think that you’re correcting a joke.
Sun Tsu just does not understand modern wars. Generals get promoted by wagin lengthy campaigs, which need ever more demands from the treasurey, more men under your command, more weapons bought from merchants, which requires a promotion.
Winning puts an end to this cycle. Sun Tsu just does not understand modern armies.
Kelly – thank you!
and Jeff Kaye – I agree completely. Thank you for your amazing work.
It is stunning – and tragic that we’ve completely missed that point.
Southern Dragon – I am always rather worried by the DoDs fascination with these powerpoints. Petreaus sold his horrors in Iraq to the traveling members of congress with his, now McChrystal’s team shows their “intelligence” in little org charts.
Somehow now inspiring military leadership …
No… Rather, the first MIC wasn’t around at the time…! ;-)
When Micro$oft first came out with PP the federal govt went apeshit. Overnight everything was done by PP. The old game of making statistics show what you want them to show live and in living colour. DOD lives and breathes by them.
It used to be that briefing officers would bring in these black 3-ring binders full of “position papers.” They’d be read or summarized and then left with whomever was being briefed to go over. PP saved a lot of time and paper. The military generates an unimaginable amount of paper, all of which must be filed/stored somewhere.
One of my all time favorite articles:
PowerPoint is evil
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/ppt2.html
Good article. Thanks. I’ve heard recently that some firms have outlawed PP presentations.
Gen. Smedley Butler did. He said that “War is a Racket”.
A good idea. In my day job, I do a lot of client presentations – I use 2 slides and then open a conversation. Much more effective and we all learn a lot from each other.
We have a Commander in Chief. Wonder what he’s up to these days. White House galas? Kowtow sessions with Republicans? Golf? Straightening his crown and grinning, just like the Old King did? That’s busy. No wonder nobody’s at the helm anymore, anywhere you look.
we americans are imperialist to the core.
and we dont have clue we are.
we actually think we are the good guys in the world as we invade third world countries for our wars for profits.
and our 720 military bases around the world the very definition of imperialism.
the end result: bankruptcy and less suffering in the world from america’s wars for profits.
if most americans had their way they would kill every muslim in the world.
they wont say that to anyone but if you talk to them in private you find a deep hatred for all muslims.
as I heard most americans that I talked to state during both iraq wars nuke them all and let god pick out the good ones.
these are religious wars pretending to be wars on terrorism.
of course and the capitalist agenda of wars for oil reserves.
we are a corrupt nation to the core one only has to look to wash to see that. congress and supreme court and military are just a reflection of the american mentality. a giant mirror.
we even call our soldiers heros for fighting in these wars for profits. corrupt to the core.
patroitism can overwhelm the rational mind.
ask the germans about patroitism.