
photo: SacredDestinations via Flickr
On Monday, Scott Horton blew a hole straight through the government’s lies when Harpers Magazine published the results of his investigation into the supposed suicides of three Guantanamo prisoners in June 2006. It’s clear now that the men were murdered — possibly tortured to death — at a secret heretofore undisclosed black site at Guantanamo, and then made to look as if they killed themselves, while other evidence to the contrary was ignored or suppressed or destroyed.
But this is not the first time that murders have been cooked up to look like suicide. Recently, Human Rights Watch has been publicizing the case of Afghan citizen Abdul Basir, who was tortured while in custody of Afghan security forces last Decemenber. His captors then threw him out a window and claim he died jumping in a suicide attempt, which is what his family was also told. But when the family received the body it had marks of torture all over it, and now HRW has posted pictures of the evidence on Basir’s body.
The Basir case is very important, as it highlights the actions of Afghan security forces, who have long been accused of torture, just as the U.S. has announced that it will turn over administration of its Bagram prison to the Afghan government.
As for the CIA, it has been accused of using assassination to remove supposed “enemies” of the United States. Plots involving the assassination of Congolese leader Patrice Lumumba and multiple attempts on the life of Fidel Castro by the CIA were investigated by the Church Committee and the Rockefeller Commission in the 1970s.
Indeed, the CIA had published an assassination manual (HTML text version), for in-house use only, in the 1950s. Within its strange and clinically stilted prose, delineating the various modes of killing people, one finds the following (keeping in mind the Basir case mentioned above):
The most efficient accident, in simple assassination, is a fall of 75 feet or more onto a hard surface. Elevator shafts, stair wells, unscreened windows and bridges will serve. Bridge falls into water are not reliable. In simple cases a private meeting with the subject may be arranged at a properly-cased location. The act may be executed by sudden, vigorous [excised] of the ankles, tipping the subject over the edge. If the assassin immediately sets up an outcry, playing the “horrified witness”, no alibi or surreptitious withdrawal is necessary. In chase cases it will usually be necessary to stun or drug the subject before dropping him. Care is required to insure that no wound or condition not attributable to the fall is discernible after death.
I found the above quote first in an article by journalist H.P. Albarelli, writing about the decades-old murder case of U.S. government bioweapons specialist, Frank Olson. Olson worked in a top secret directorate at the military’s Fort Detrick, a biological weapons research site. In the early morning hours of Saturday, November 28, 1953, he jumped (or was pushed or thrown) out of the tenth floor window of his room at New York’s Statler Hotel. In the room was his CIA handler, who told the family he was taking Olson for psychiatric care because he was disturbed. The death was ruled suicide.
The case made headlines in the mid-1970s when the Rockefeller Commission admitted that rather than suicide, Olson had been drugged with LSD at a November 19, 1953 rural retreat-meeting of CIA and Ft. Detrick Special Operations Division personnel. This new story carried the same claims of suicide, but now had Olson reacting poorly to the LSD, and ultimately killing himself.
But the whole story never fit together, and various investigators over the years have tried to solve the case and prove that Frank Olson was murdered. Author H.P. Albarelli surveys these various theories, and expands upon the background material in the Olson case, while providing compelling proof of both who killed the civilian contractor father of three, and why, in his new book, A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA’s Cold War Experiments.
The somewhat surprising death of an otherwise little-known Midwestern scientist would become for contemporary historians, journalists, and researchers — years after the event — a crucial nexus providing a gathering point for the multitudinous strands connecting a welter of secretive Cold War intelligence and military programs.
Mr. Albarelli will be a guest this coming Saturday, January 23, at FDL’s Book Salon, from 5-7pm, Eastern Time. I will be hosting the get-together, and I believe it be both entertaining and rewarding, as Mr. Albarelli has written an account of more than a dusty expose of an antiquated crime. The Olson murder touches upon issues that are as important and crucial as today’s most shocking headlines, and demonstrates that U.S. government involvement in torture and research into coercive interrogations has been a scandal decades in the making.



90 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
When Quakers and anti war groups are suspect in a country…you know the country is up to no good.
decades ago, in my high school history class, i predicted that within my lifetime the usa would become more stalinist than stalin’s ussr.
my classmates laughed.
i think i got the totalitarian scheme of the usa accurately a long time ago.
and some still wonder how the citizens of germany acquiesced to the nazi regime.
what do mirrors reveal in the usa? everyone wearing brownshirts and swastikas?
or stars of david?
May I point out the incompetence? How could a suicide shove rags down his throat beyond the gag point, tie his hands & feet, then string himself up. This was not cooked up. This was f’d up.
Horton up next on KO.
DoJ called KO to complain about his one-sided coverage.
The DoJ took this matter seriously, reviewed it carefully and found there was nothing there. Move along.
KO says DOJ has said Justice Dept told him they weren’t happy with his report on the Gitmo suicide. But Amnesty Intl and
Bravo Keith and Scott Horton for not backing down on this!
Liveblogging the segment:
KO recounts the story of the “suicides” and the cover-up.
ed board St. Louis Post Dispatch calls for an investigation
Mark Denbeaux of Seton Hall is being interviewed. His theory? There’s some reason DOJ doesn’t want to investigate. Recounts the improbablity of the suicide. No guard was ever disciplined if there was dereliction of duty.
Why did we go to Congress and the press. We just wanted the story out. Nothing happened from Feb to April until Denbeaux contacted DOJ. He recounts more about the Obama DOJ disinterest. Finally they took one of the corroborative witnesses with a few questions over a meal at Dennys. The next day they closed the investigation. No real investigation happened after Feb 6.
That’s it. KO turns to the BRown election and the rightwings reaction.
One of the Seton-Hall investigators was interviewed at Denny’s. Presumably no one in the party was black.
Misunderstood. Keith’s guest was from Seton-Hall, not Scott Horton.
Are you being ironic?
That would be the very same DOJ that lied to the FISA Court as documented this very evening on page 135 of this report:
A Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Use of Exigent Letters and Other Informal Requests for Telephone Records, January 2010 (Beware! 306 page PDF)
Numerous other FBI and DOJ crimes abound in the DOJ IG report, but the bottom line is just as you say:
Denny’s was outed for discriminating against blacks years ago. Slow seating, slow service, bad tables, etc. Don’t remember the outcome, may have paid a fine or, more likely promised not to do it again. Probably with fingers crossed behind their backs.
Yes, still infuriating, but SOP for W & O DoJ.
Addendum to this article: note I said nothing about the Cheney assassination team premised by S. Hersh or the Predator assassinations. Nor did I reference the JFK or other 60s assassinations. Assassination is possibly the true third rail of American politics.
Hey Jeff, someone months ago criticized me for calling the Predator attacks assassinations, a term which this person argued was reserved for famous people. Don’t agree, but just so you’re prepared.
.Strenously disagree. Americans couldn’t care less about assassinations. The Church Committee was a unique moment in U.S. history when some pols had spines.
The American people are not informed about this. The outrage was great enough in the 1970s that President Ford had to issue an executive order banning executive order. Since then, everything is supposed to be hunky-dory.
As for assassination:
It may depend upon your definition of “prominent”. The political element is primary in my opinion. In any case, the attacks by Predator are aimed at killing leading, i.e., prominent members of the Taliban and AQ.
I called my blue dog congressman and demanded an explanation.
Mentioned taking 10(?) kids in hand cuffs and murdering them over there.
Asked if he heard about cutting a prisoner’s penis with a scalpal?
I mentioned this is looking alot like Nazi Germany.
Patiently awaiting his written reply demanding a congressional investigation.
Time’s up treason torture trials now Mr. Holder or resign because of non-feasance.
And their offspring.
We’ll agree to disagree about whether Americans care about assassination. My memory of the 1970s is dim and I’m not going to read up on it. Ford could have been reacting to pressure from the committee, not to voters.
As for “prominent,” my guess is that because the commenter never heard of these people, they were automatically designated “not prominent” in the commenter’s mind. Not to get into the weeds, I responded: fine. Call it murder. Didn’t know that was legal for the CIA either.
Oh, and Jeff, the public has been well informed about the drone attacks, including the 30 killed each time. Including civilians, mentioned in MSM. Don’t see any outrage.
Going crosswise with the CIA must be very depressing. Makes you want to hang yourself (DC Madam) or shoot yourself in the head…twice (Gary Webb) or ride in convertible in Dallas.
Not depressing for very long, as you point out. Well, except for the loved ones. But that’s another story.
Evening, firedogs and firedogettes
Evening PPDCUS. In the lull, would you like to explain your screen name? Guessing it’s an interesting story.
No problem …. in fact, this week several FDL’ers who must regularly play Sunday Weekend Edition puzzlers with Will Shortz got Karl Kassel’s voice on their home answering machine by figuring out the riddle.
*sigh* What I’d give to see that again…! ;-)
Every word you typed is a complete mystery to me. But thanks for deepening my confusion. *g*
Do you agree that it was unique in U.S. history? At least the history I have lived through.
The recipe for getting out from under one of these things seems to be to mix it with many other similar outrages so the public feels like the best way to ignore the Hydra is to hide.
When I first registered on FDL in 2005 or 2006, I thought — like Curly in City Slickers I — what is the one thing missing in this country right then. Preserve, Protect & Defend the Constitution of the United States. Voila` PPDCUS
If there wasn’t any outrage about the American murder of millions of innocent (Stalin’s comment about statistics notwithstanding), there won’t be any about the occasional one-couple-thirty.
The outrage is outside the U.S.
The idea that the U.S. could ever be the bad guy is still totally beyond the ability of almost all Americans to conceive.
“I’ll never apologize for the United States of America. Ever. I don’t care what the facts are.” – President George H.W. Bush, after the U.S. shoot down of Iran Air Flight 655, killing all 290 passengers.
Brilliant. And congratulations for thinking of it.
And though many of the names have been changed to protect the guilty, this nick still identifies a huge gap between our founding document ideals and our current lawless state.
Ding. Ding. Ding. That is my observation too. Your quote is a good one, but there are many others, in fact whole books on American exceptionalism, that could be placed in evidence.
The only thing that makes an empire be responsible for it’s actions, constitution notwithstanding, is the brave and relentless acts of the few. Like Scott Horton & Seton Hall, the subject of this post.
“I’ll never apologize for the United States of America. Ever. I don’t care what the facts are.” – President George H.W. Bush, after the U.S. shoot down of Iran Air Flight 655, killing all 290 passengers.
Yeah, that type of arrogant, lawless state sactioned crimes against humanity that makes me proud to be an outspoken progressive.
Say what you will about GHWBush, he was better than his spawn.
That about sums it up…! ;-)
Replying to eCAHNomics various posts, pessimistic about the response of the American people to these crimes:
One would have to be naive or asleep not to have noticed the seeming disinterest with which these events are received by many people. However, when you talk with people — and in my job I talk with a wide cross-section of people — I find a dull resignation, and a sense of frustration that there is nothing one can do. In part, this is the old condundrum about whether leaders lead, or are pushed by their constituency.
In the end, both things occur in history. One would have to have an overly pessimistic view of humanity to believe that such outrages can occur without response forever. I think one has to take into account the monopoly ownership of the press, the ease with which critics have pulled in their quills when confronted with charges of being conspriacists or crackpots or ultra-leftists. Believe me, if the public were so naturally indolent, the government wouldn’t have to spend the time and money figuring out how to manipulate them, or control them, or deceive them. (Remember the scandal about paid consultants from DoD on the Iraq War… or consider Marcy’s work on the Gruber scandal.)
It took many thousands of years to produce an Enlightenment, an American and French revolution, and create the kind of environment where a segment of the population (ourselves) can process and analyze these events and try and change the course of events.
It takes a lot of patience (which I’ll admit I don’t always have). I learned a lot about patience by doing my dissertation on the life of Charles Darwin. He spent a great deal of time pacifying his more radical followers who were dismayed that natural selection and evolution had not won the day over more superstitious modes of considering nature. He was sympathetic, but with an expanded overview explained that one has to stick to the truth and explain it over and over again, and that progress (as in evolution) can sometimes come quite slowly. Sometimes, though, one looks up and sees that more has changed than one thought.
That time may be coming. It may not. What does one do? One’s work.
City Slickers might have been improved if Curly had been Edward Abbey.
Human beings dissociate when faced with the reality of mass murder. That is human nature. Often, it is the crime against a single human being, or a few, that comes to exemplify the frustrations of the mass. One example is the killing of Frank Olson, which has remained a touchstone of passions and a window into CIA crimes for a generation now.
One might remember that the few who fell at Concord, and the few who remained imprisoned in the Bastille, became the clarion call around which two revolutions rallied. One just never knows who or when the change comes. We are living in reactionary times, but things do change. History may have been built on human skulls, as Engels was famously reported to have said, but it moves forward nevertheless. I wish it weren’t so. You wish it weren’t so.
In the end, what would you have us do. For me, as I’ve said, I continue with my work.
Then being hit with the terrible OJ jokes that he could not have done the murders because he was waiting in line at Denny’s….you have to love it. Thanks for the reminder.
Not better. Smarter.
And that’s also why scapegoating the few bad apples works every time. Toture? Lynndie England. Case closed.
Oh, there are other forces that hold crumbling empires to account for their actions:
Justice Robert L. Jackson’s full opening statement at Nuremberg is found here.
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/jackson.html
Agree. But still object to your “third rail” characterization. I reserve that for items that immediately affect a large segment of important voters. And, as we have seen with HCR, even that can be overcome by a sophisticated propaganda operation.
My candidate for today’s third rail is defense spending. It’s what the Rs do, and the Ds can’t not do it out of fear of being accused of being weak.
Well, have any winners of wars ever been tried for war crimes? Germany was no longer an empire when those trials occurred. Your example makes my point, not refute it.
Agreed. Being DCIA, and VP during Iran/Contra made him alot smarter; not a bit better.
Nostalgia.
Rachel just bringing up private security corps advertising on their website that they will do “high threat exterminations” in Haiti
Da plaaaaane, da plaaaasne!
It’s only a matter of time before this country is held to account for its actions, Obama’s Magical Mystery Tour Rhetoric aside.
Will it happen from within? The eight ball message says ……. no chance, and welcome to Fantasy Island. I am your host, Mr. Rourke.
Why would the victorious instruments of God’s divine will ever be considered guilty of anything, let alone war crimes? Their victory is evidence of God’s approval.
The U.S. will be held to account after it is no longer an empire. Not in my lifetime, probably not in my son’s lifetime.
That too.
Unfortunately, the smirking chimp was our hundredth monkey.
Indeed, the Mills of the Gods grind slowly, but EXCEEDINGLY fine.
And, the heavier the millstone, the finer the grind.
Oh, PPDCUS, I never understood anything about the bombing of Germany by the U.S. & U.K. until I went with my SIL to visit where she and my late husband grew up in Dusseldorf, and saw all the reconstructed apt buildings. I have subsequently read a couple of books on the bombing, which was not much more than collective punishment of civilians. Usual rationalization that the civilians would turn against their govt if they felt the consequences of supporting their govt. Rationale still popular today, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. U.S. & U.K. bombing of Germany was a war crime. And that was the “good” war.
Maybe if the Germans had acted they could have avoided the loss and devastation they endured for ignoring the law “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”
Because it hasn’t happened yet doesn’t mean it will never happen.
We are not static in our barbarity but rather growing into worse actions. The end will come to wars with brains or nuclear braun but war will end one fine day.
Before or after the destruction of the planet?
I believe I am using the term correctly. See Merriam-Webster definition (and others):
Not so sure about that. We could have a third world country encounter with the IMF and World Bank like we’ve repeatedly imposed on south and central america.
A massive default triggered by over testosteroned politicians might convince America’s friends and foes alike that lending us more money to betray their interests and destroy their way of life isn’t as profitable as it once was.
The United States of Iceland
Can’t argue technically with MW. In common usage though on def. 2 it is uusually reserved for an issue that will immediately provoke voter outrage, or more mildly, action.
It’s the same rationale that the crazy neocons keep spounting to bomb Iran back into the Stone Age, so all of the dead, former human beings appreciate how we’ve freed them from their tyrranical mullahs.
Now I’m wondering about the architecture at Guantanamo.
Another nudge in the direction of America’s most sinister incompetent.
That’s the self justifying principle of the GWOT:
The only free terrorist state or non-state, is a dead one.
Went to the annual forecasting meeting of New York Assn of Bus Economists today. Will write diary tomorrow, mainly about forecast for U.S. economy. But the woman who spoke about developing countries made a BIG point that, in aggregate, despite Iceland, they weathered the financial storm much better than G3. They have learned about disaster capitalism and have taken steps to shelter themselves from it. Measures like accumulate gigundo reserves so that they can thumb their noses at IMF, WB, setting up funds when resource prices are high to finance their economies when resource prices are low. Iceland learned that (too late) and are going back to basics, like fishing I heard in a quick snippet on NPR today.
Yep.
Not until the party or powers associated with those crimes were thrown out of power, or were prosecuted from abroad or internationally. But after the criminals regime or party were ousted, yes. Let’s see, there were Charles II (for torture), Milosevic, the Nazis at various tribunals, the recent Rwandan tribunals, etc.
And this:
Maybe most apposite were the 1921 Leipzig War Crimes Trials, where “Several German military commanders of the First World War were tried in 1921 by the German Supreme Court for war crimes.” (this quote from the Wikipedia article, but the following quote from an English
)
Jeff … everyone should check out Glennzilla’s piece from yesterday: The Crime of “Not Looking Backward”
Yes, and thanks for the additional examples, especially the 1474 one. Americans tend to think history began when they were born, or maybe yesterday, when these issues go back a long way in human history.
I heard the same ATC piece tonight.
Good post. But he didn’t mention the real reason for looking forward not backward, which is that O is continuing the W policies. He’s just trying to hide them better.
You are being ornery this evening, aren’t you ;-)
God knows I’ll be pilloried now, but I think this explanation from William Safire, whose politics did not extend, so far as I know, into his linguistic interests, describes the sense from which I use the term, from an old NYT column:
So your feeling that health care reform was a kind of third rail has some relevancy, as it appeared dangerous (and has proven so) to address it. My use of “assassination as a third rail” is also correct. I believe you give the term too wide an associative meaning. But this is FWIW not a political disagreement.
Jeff, somewhat off topic.
In regard to the thread about the Guantanamo “suicides “, I was interested in the timing of this incident.
To my understanding, these deaths occurred on June 9,2006.
I do not recall reading,in Horton’s article-though I may have missed it- a reference to THIS-occurring just a few days earlier.
Could there be a possible correlation?
“The day after President Obama signed the three executive orders, I sat in a courtroom for a hearing in the case of Syed Fahad Hashmi. Hashmi is a 29-year-old Muslim American citizen being held in solitary confinement at the federal Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in Lower Manhattan. He is charged with two counts of providing and conspiring to provide material support and two counts of making and conspiring to make a contribution of goods or services to Al Qaeda. If convicted, Hashmi faces seventy years in prison. He is also a former student of mine at Brooklyn College who graduated in 2003 and received his master’s degree in international relations at London Metropolitan University in 2005.
Hashmi was apprehended in Britain on June 6, 2006, on a US warrant; his arrest was featured as the top story on the CBS and NBC nightly news programs, which used graphics blaring Terror Trail and Web of Terror. Held for eleven months without incident at Belmarsh Prison, he became the first US citizen to be extradited by Britain under new policies relaxing the standard for extradition in terrorism cases.”
Link to follow
Goofed on the link to the English “legal source”:
http://www.lawreports.co.uk/Newsletter/OnlineArticles/LeipzigWarTrialsAug05.htm
Oh dear, Jeff, you are fighting me to the ground on this one, which is not what I intended. So I’ll agree that you are techinically correct.
@72
Guantánamo at HomeGuantánamo at Home. By Jeanne Theoharis … down the network of secret CIA prisons and shuttering the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, within a year. …
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090420/theoharis – Cached – Similar
Here’s a link (though it’s originally a Nation srory).
I can’t see any association to the Gitmo murders, except relative contiguity in time.
I have to, as I need to be convinced myself, since I’m planning an article with the title, “Assassination: The Third Rail of American Politics”. You inadvertently wandered into that internal struggle of mine over the rightness of that title. I had to make sure I was relatively correct.
Thanks for being my helpful critic, challenging me on this.
Please continue to track this down. And even if you don’t get to a resolution to whether the events are related soon, write it up as a diary posing the question. Then send a link to Scott Horton. (I have his email if it’s not otherwise available.)
Heh. One of the stories of my life, wandering into OP’s internal struggles without having a clue that I was doing so. To avoid other eCAHNs, may I suggest you change the “the” to “another” in the title?
The problem with Justice, with capital J, in America today
We have John Yoo when we need Robert H. Jackson.
We have Barack Obama when we need Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Moving upstairs. Great discussion all.
eCAHN, you are asking me do do things far beyond my expertise.
Perhaps someone less technically challenged could carry the banner forward as per a Seminal Diary-or contacting Horton.
I am more than willing to take the “me” out of the message.
And thank you for seeing the potential significance.
Greenwald knows all too well why the George W. Obama administration is compulsively forward looking.
And in last week’s Village Voice, so does Nat Hentoff.
why would someone or someones apologize for acts they are proud of? in the CIA headquarters, becasue its secret and off limits to the GP, they keep a “museum” which is really a collection of and memorial to the things they’ve stolen and people they’ve killed around the world since the late 40′s Some or the personal effects of thier murder victims like reading glasses, diarys, wedding rings etc., they have a few things taken from Che Guevaras Body after he was murdered by Bolivian troops and a U.S. CIA agent. Thye keep these things as trophys, the way ted bundy kept the underwear of his rape and murder victims.
A few years ago there was a movie with Angelina Jolie and one of those men that all look alike to me about a CIA guy. In that movie, the 1950s CIA “suicide” was portrayed. I wonder if there will be a time that the current suicides will enter popular culture? George Clooney will be in that movie when it is made, perhaps.
She’s referring to the subway rail that carries high voltage to move the trains. One touch, and you’re a crispy critter.
I have heard of the third way, which is a slower, more painful political demise.
Ever been to the British National Museum? Perhaps not so personal, but certainly the cultural equivalent of the places where the sun never set.
Today Scaife etal. leave their political assassination victims still walking around after the hit — witness Elliot Spitzer.
No kiddin’.
Thank you Jeff for wading into this swamp.
Words have weight and this assassination word defines were we’re at on the downward spiral to hell.
Take care of your head down this rat hole.