Some encouraging news via the Washington Post today:
President Obama is likely to endorse using a portion of the government’s $700 billion financial bailout for a new jobs creation program during a speech about the economy next week, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters Friday morning.
“The president thinks we should and must do everything in our power to create an environment for job growth and job creation,” Gibbs said. When asked whether Obama will talk about the use of TARP funds on Tuesday, Gibbs said, “I think that’s likely.”
About $139 billion of the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP, remains unallocated and available to the administration. Banks have paid another $10 billion in interest and dividends to the Treasury and returned about $71 billion in aid, the Treasury reported in November. This week, Bank of America announced it would repay its $45 billion package.
As recently as this week, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner has said he wants to dedicate much of the unspent TARP money to reduce the national debt. But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Cal.) and other top Democrats have been crafting a jobs bill that would tap the bailout program. The size of the repayments from once shaky banks may make it possible to accomplish both goals.
. . . Gibbs said the president is likely to talk about multiple ideas for job creation, some of which would require congressional approval. The Tuesday speech at the Brookings Institution follows a day-long jobs summit Thursday and a trip to Allentown, Pennsylvania on Friday to highlight the plight of workers.
This weeklong focus on creating jobs is a refreshing sign that Obama and his top advisers did not, in fact, forget all of their political skills shortly after taking office.
Matt Yglesias adds that the President may be remembering a thing or two about basic messaging as well:
… once Obama’s Allentown event got into the Q&A section it got really good. What was interesting about it was that everything Obama said was so banal. It was elementary, back-to-basics, “I’m a Democrat” kind of stuff… He wasn’t even really all that feisty. But he got out and talked basic politics—who’s on your side, who’s fighting for change, and who’s responsible for protecting the status quo.
In other words, Obama is rediscovering the importance of the fundamental things that got him elected.
There’s a massive element of political calculation involved here, obviously — not just a president taking action to stop the downward drift of his poll numbers, but the Democrats in general needing to provide a positive political message going into 2010.
Even if the stimulative impact of whatever “jobs bill” gets passed is relatively small, much of the money from last spring’s economic-recovery package is still due to be spent this coming year. Giving voters a fresh reminder that Democrats took action will be important for them in taking credit for whatever improvement occurs in the job market, regardless of the cause.
But at least this is the good kind of political calculation… the kind that comes from elected officials realizing they’re accountable for producing positive results for the people who put them in power. Frankly, we could do with a bit more of it.




36 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Swopa !
Do we have consensus on how much of the Stimulus has been utilized to date ?
It’s about freakin’ time someone other than those crooked bastards on Wall street got a little boost.
Oh, and SWOPA!
Quite heartening + the better job news today. We can hope, if we still use that word.
The charts on the official Recovery.gov page suggest that only one-third has been paid out so far.
I am getting somewhat jaded by pretty talk and no action. But as I said in another thread Obama is a pragmatic politician and politicians who want to stay in power can be swayed by sufficient well placed pressure to do the will of those who actually cast the votes that elect them.
Certainly a hopeful sign. Maybe now is an opening to apply some of that pressure.
Here’s my prediction: Pawlenty will say using the TARP funds won’t work.
And then the next day will take credit for all the new jobs created in his state.
Also. SWOPA!
People keep yelling at me. What’d I do? :-)
Swopa!
To God’s ear, Swopa. Thanks for news of this potentially hopeful turn.
I just read an article on how Larry Summers was adamant against any kind of serious stimulus for Main Street which really got me grinding my teeth. With the frustration over the Afghan escalation, I hope Obama will DO SOMETHING for the American people.
Recent article? Link?
People’s hair should be on fire: we’re at over 17% real joblessness in America! When did that become acceptable? This is an EMERGENCY. We need DIRECT hiring by the federal government, and state governments NOW.
Yes, I am SHOUTING. And: SWOPA!
Larry Summers needs to build his direct personal experience with joblessness, starting NOW.
Maybe Obama’s getting a wiff of “one-termer.” And, yeah, SWOPA!
Scarecrow ! Teddy !
See Swopa, we’re shouting at other folks too … *g*
Same hear.
Why is Obama hosting a job Summit cuz he knows what coming.This way when it all goes down.he will have the excuse that he has been trying to do something.
Why is it that he is only speaking about jobs now when all he has been saying is that we are faced with the worst recession since the “great depression”.Since he came into office he has been lamenting this, why only now he is focusing on jobs.
He invited all sectors to the jobs Summit,why,because the larger the pool of people he has attending his fake jobs summit,the pool of critism is going to be smaller.
Just like the make up of his cabinet.He took all the major Dem leadership into his cabinet so the challenges he will face from fellow Dems will come from a small pool.
The major Dem leaders not involved in Obama’s cabinet are Howard Dean & Al Gore,almost everyone else is connected to Obama’s cabinet.
… Geithner and Bernanke, also !
And Rahm! Don’t forget Mr. Emanuel!
I don’t mind Rahm being where he is … provides an easy target for Jane to show just how messed up Washington is !
“In other words, Obama is rediscovering the importance of the fundamental things that got him elected.” i disagree, one has to listen very carefully to barack to understand the breadth of what he says. he has talked continually about the inter-connected challenges facing our country, its future and our economy.
everything he has been attempting to do (unfortunately not only with the obstructionist gop but the obstructionist senate as well) has been based on his four pillars of a new economy – health care reform – companies can spend on expansion and jobs, not skyrocketing health care for their employees; energy independence – green jobs and the ripple effect; education – better educated workforce; and bank regulation – easier credit for companies again to expand and create new jobs.
watching barack is like watching a chess match or a golf tournament – quiet, disciplined, concentrating – not the super bowl.
That would be wonderful if it were, you know, REAL health care reform, and, you know, REAL financial regulation. The problem is, the health insurance reform and “financial regulation” that the administration is supporting would result in, well, at best a double bogey, using your golf analogy. Not fun watching that shit.
Jesus – if I didn’t hate lil Timmeh enough already. Now that he has lavished our tax dollars on the banksters with ZERO accountability he wants to bring down the deficit? Can we please cram this asshat into DickCheney’s man-size safe? Please? Even Dick believes that deficits don’t matter.
Since you appear to be an expert on Obama, please tell us where will we be, if the Jobs stimulus is as counter- productive as the Wall Street bailout ?
ABOUT TIME!!! I am still furious and disgusted with everyone in D.C. who supported bailing out CEO’s and Banks last year. All of that money should have been used for jobs, healthcare, etc. What did that stupid bank bailout do for the economy or for us??
Perhaps we the common people really do have some power after all: the power to terminate employment :D.
Really getting to the point of almost being too little, too late.
We peons get a few crumbs tossed in our general directions, and then we should STFU and be ever so grateful.
Still steaming about our corporate overlords continuing to award themselves giant salaries, bonuses, etc. No doubt laughing maniacally at all of us stooges, while they pick up bargains in this down economy. As well I’m ticked at TARP & stim money mostly going to the same bastards who broke the system – so that they can purportedly fix whot they broke – with their giant Ponzi schemes and casino gambling on Wall Street.
i think it’s more like
“In other words, Obama is rediscovering the importance of talking about the fundamental things that got him elected.”
which is better than not talking about them, probably, but, well, we’ve been here.
Good point. Yep he is a pragmatic poltician.
Perfect!
Swopa: great diary title! It says it all.
To LiB, I been trying to warn people about Larry Summers since Obama picked Him but nobody listens.
I even tried to tell Obama to fire Him, didn’t work.
Doesn’t matter much because the others on the team aren’t much better.
They all believe You fix the middle class by fixing the big money interests first, so that they can fix the middle class.
The only trouble with that is they don’t give a shit about the middle class, as long as their doing well.
I wouldn’t get My hopes up over what Obama is doing and talking about. He finally realized He better speak up about the problem.
What did He do today? Tell us how much is getting better, and how well everything they have done has worked.
That doesn’t sound like a man who is going actaully get after the problem, only is out to cover His ass.
P.S. Obama gave miss piggy, “Kristy Roemers,” four hugs today when she gave Him those new emloyment numbers.
If they all think this is great news, when will they declare the recession over, and everybody has jobs again when unemloyment drops below ten percent.
Swopa are you really this easy? Obama is talking about jobs to save his party’s ss. Are we supposed to cheer bcz he talks to a few common folks once in a while. Your acting like someone who has been dumped who gets excited bcz the dumper treated him nicely. GEEZ.
That’s the sound of folks recognizing you, seeing you a ways away, opening their arms and racing to give you a big hug — all the while yelling “Swopa!!!”
Calculated Risk is skeptical:
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/12/if-economy-lost-jobs-why-did.html
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/12/unemployment-record-number-unemployed.html
And Robert Reich makes a good point about the goal should not simply be lowering unemployment, but bringing back good jobs and higher wages.
http://robertreich.blogspot.com/
As it stands now, the good jobs are being cut or sent overseas and what we’re getting now is low paying jobs. If the unemployment rate is 5% again, but the wage gap is higher than ever and the average annual salary (not counting the top 10, 5 1%) has fallen or greatly fallen, we should be very angry. What that will mean is the US is transforming into a second world state. The quality of life most Americans will enjoy will be more comparable to that of Mexicans than that of Canadians or Europeans.
Teddy,
Gov’t hiring won’t work. Let’s say a private company hires an employee for 50k annual salary and 15k worth of benefits totaling a 65k annual expenditure for the company. The company can reasonably expect to be more productive now and increase it’s annual revenue by at a minimum of 65k breaking even.
The gov’t on the other hand could hire the same person for the same wage and benefits but because it does not produce any annual revenue other than taxes collected will realize a loss of around 80% based solely on portion of the person’s pay that is not recouped in taxes. Depending on the person’s job this loss could exceed 100% if you include materials and training needed to perform the job.
If you extend the scenario a little further and analyze where the gov’t got the revenue to hire their new employee you will see that they had to take at a minimum 80% or 52k possibly more from the private sector.
But but he’s going to return that 52k back to the economy through purchases right? Not if he saves any of it. If he only saved 2k a year only 50k makes it back to the economy resulting in a 2k loss for the economy.
It’s actually worse than 2k but I didn’t want to get in to gov’t inefficiency and all that.
You “government can’t do anything” folks misrepresent the facts. Government employees, just as private sector employees do more than spend salaries. They produce things and provide services. The whole people, benefit from the goods and services provided by government employees as much, sometimes more, as private sector employees. The inefficiency canard is just that. Bunk!
there is a lot of valuable services most of which could be provided by the private sector cheaper but when it comes to efficiency either your a lifetime bureaucrat defending your job or you don’t quit grasp the meaning of the word.
it would be more efficient for the gov’t to require all companies to use their tax burden to hire people to do nothing than it would be to tax them and pay unemployment.