
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island)
I recently attended the Second Annual “Living Constitution” Lecture at the Brennan Center for Justice. The keynote speaker this year was Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and his topic was “Living Up to Our Constitution.”
Sen. Whitehouse identified four ways in which we live up to the Constitution. I’ve excerpted some of the best bits, breaking them into four separate posts for your contemplation; this is the final entry in this series.
Part 4
The Constution and Economic Well-being for All
…[T]hat progress toward economic opportunity for all makes good on our social contract and is another important way to live up to the ideals embedded in our Constitution.
When I heard this, it did not seem directly intuitive like the other parts of the speech. There is no “economic opportunity” clause in the Constitution. However, it does remind me of Franklin Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” speech delivered as a State of the Union Address in 1941. Roosevelt said:
In the future days, which we seek to make secure, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms.
The first is freedom of speech and expression–everywhere in the world.
The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way–everywhere in the world.
The third is freedom from want–which, translated into universal terms, means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants–everywhere in the world.
The fourth is freedom from fear–which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor–anywhere in the world.
That is no vision of a distant millennium. It is a definite basis for a kind of world attainable in our own time and generation. That kind of world is the very antithesis of the so-called new order of tyranny which the dictators seek to create with the crash of a bomb.
[emphasis added]
And, of course the iconic image of the Freedom From Want, created by Norman Rockwell in his Four Freedoms poster series, is of a family gathered around a Thanksgiving table.

Freedom from Want by Norman Rockwell
Sen. Whitehouse points out that although there in nothing in the Constitution that allows us to go into court to sue for economic justice, the goals of the Constitution cannot be met unless there is economic opportunity for all.
What does this mean in practice? We secure the “Blessings of Liberty to . . . our Posterity” when every child finds a foundation for success in our education system. We aid “domestic Tranquility” by lifting off our families the burden of worry that the next illness will push them into penury. We “promote the general Welfare” by protecting Americans from usurious 30% interest rates. We “establish Justice” when our bankruptcy system can fairly and effectively relieve Americans from crushing burdens of debt, particularly those caused by the costs of sudden illness, military service overseas, or the collapse of the housing market. Our “common defence” is aided when no veteran again slips through the cracks in society’s safety net. And our “Union” is “more perfect” when the hedge fund manager sipping champagne in his Gulfstream is not paying a lower tax rate than the man outside in the rain loading his leather luggage into the hold. I could go on. The list of examples is long. But my point is that progress toward economic opportunity for all makes good on our social contract and is another important way to live up to the ideals embedded in our Constitution.
On every issue — from health care reform, to abolishing predatory lending, to BRINGING BACK GLASS- STEAGALL, to undoing the Big Corpa giveaways in the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention Act of 2005, to fair taxes — Freedom from Want can only occur if we undo the skewed economic policies of the BushCo era, rejecting policies responsible for the biggest income disparity between rich and poor since the Gilded Age.
We defend the purpose of our Constitution when we create economic opportunity for all.



25 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Thank you for this important series. Agree we need to bring back Glass-Steagall soonest.
I’ll double down on the restoration of Glass Steagall, just for starters!
A BIG YUP to that!!
Updated for today’s communication revolution that has happened since it was enacted!!
Call it Lalique Steagall… whatever it takes!
[laughing at ES:)]
This is another bullshit piece, from a ridiculous idiot who no one cares about, why don’t you JUST ADMIT THE TRUTH, IF THAT IS AT ALL POSSIBLE.
You and your cronies stole American jobs with NAFTA, CAFTA, WTO and all your “plans” for unrestrained, “no borders” corporatism, THAT IS FUELED BY AMERICAN TAXPAYER DOLLARS.
You stole American jobs when you decided it was YOUR RIGHT to increase VISAs to the point of becoming ridiculous. No other country does this.
You stole American jobs when you accepted illegal immigration as normal, resulting in 9 million undocumented workers and their families, who live in fear, pain and sickness so that our now-multinational corporations can soar on the stock exchange.
You stole American jobs when you bailed out every corporation under the sun, and then looked the other way as they immediately offshored and outsourced most of the jobs that were left. Yeah, we all saw that. You must have been in a drug stupor.
You stole American jobs when you decided to let airlines and other vital entities to go bankrupt in order to rid themselves of labor unions and fair, professional pay.
You stole American jobs when you let American corporations shed their “American” status, becoming offshored entities responsible to no one, yet still receiving subsidies from the American taxpayer and most likely abusing people in their newfound environment.
Bill Clinton is responsible for much of this.
You continue to steal American jobs when your so-called “new energy reform projects” include manufacturing to be done in China, such as solar panels. Nice job.
Now go get drug tested and stop fabricating crap. I don’t ever ever ever want to hear from you again until you decide to tell the truth. You are not someone I would EVER vote for, and I don’t understand why anyone would listen to you.
“Bill Clinton is responsible for much of this.”
There, fixed your rant for you.
Would someone please find a white cane and a guide dog, we are in need.
I don’t who you are blaming for this but there were lots of conspirators who got into the act. Their conspiracy destroyed this nation and the constitution is nothing but a document under glass in the capital.
I have a chihuahua and a stick – will that do?
I actually think it’s far worse than you state.
As money concentrates, ‘big investors’ have more money chasing too much of the ‘same stuff’. It’s bubblaliciousness on steriods.
And as it cycles, it becomes more and more unstable.
I don’t think there’s anything in the Constitution about handing our collective money over so that anyone on Wall Street can make $200,000,000, which they then have to ‘invest’.
If they ‘invest’ in derivatives, they can actually ‘buy debt’ at 1:30 ratios. Meaning that if our government agrees to cover that debt, we’ve all just gone bankrupt with no way to pay it back.
Even if they only ‘invest’ $100,000,000 in CDOs that are ‘guaranteed’ by the US government, that obligates taxpayers to cover 30 x $100,000,000.
Or $30,000,000,000 of ‘Bad Money’ (i.e., unpayable, crushing debt from non-productive financial activity that seeks to inflate its own importance by calling itself ‘capital creation’).
That’s not government.
That’s insanity.
(I don’t mind paying to cover ‘Main Street’, because I can’t figure any way that we’d ever end up with anyone on Main Street sucking $20,000,000 or $5,000,000 or even $2,000,000 out of that scenario. So it’s not as bubbalicious as the Bad Money we’re currently covering.)
Ahem. Another excellent piece Cynthia. Explains it well. Should be required reading for Scalia, et als. Not that it would make a difference with them. But still……
Thanks for this, Cynthia. I learn a lot from your articles.
Thank you, Cynthia.
Great series.
I got modulated for that? OK.
I think it’s covered by ‘promote the general welfare’ and ‘secure the blessings of liberty’. Possibly also ‘insure domestic tranquility’ – if we have jobs and can afford food, clothing, shelter, and health care, we won’t be out in the streets with pitchforks and torches, looking for bankers, insurance execs, and gutless congresscritters.
(You’ll notice it doesn’t say anything about making people rich!)
thank you cynthia for this series. and your other posts and series. i always learn something from your writings.
i would love to hear president say fdr’s 4 freedoms speech with senator whitehouse’s quote from above explaining it in tomorrow night’s speech. i would love to have a president who believed in defending the constitution passionately and took immediate steps to actively do so.
i also would love a pony.
watertiger is upstairs!
Late Night: Not Even If You Had 100 Monkeys in a Room, Typing…
GO GIRL!!!!!!!
YA WANT ATOY PONY? OR A REAL ONE?
Boy, tempted to take a poll, show of hands as to who votes regularly, who participates in local democratic (little d) process, who recruits, trains, grooms solid progressive candidates, who donates to their campaigns…
Takes more than yelling to keep a republic.
Who ever said I suppored NAFTA or CAFTA? Where in hell did you get an idea like that? Anybody who reads me knows that I am opposed to to corporatists oplicies that outsource Amercan jobs.
I think you are confusing me , and FDL, with some other bloggers. WTO I can dealwith only to the extent of it being an information sharing mechanaism, beyond that, it does not have my support.
Our Visa program is not nearly as liberal as many Euorpean countries. I do not support illegal immigration, I don’t think starting the path to citzenship should begin with a crime, it’s just not a good omen.
That being said, because the US has had porous borders for most of my lifetime, under presidents of both parties, the simple truth is that there are now second and third generation americans born, real live human beings, here and seprating families is not going to solve our problems. So, a solution has to be found for the people who are here, and our border control really needs to be fixed, not only for immmigration reasons, but for Homeland Security reasons.
I have never personally bailed out one single corporation in my life, nor have I ever advocated in favor of bailing out a single corporation in my life.
Including the airlines. I was opposed to airline deregulation, just as I oppose utitly deregulation, BTW.
Bill Clinton had some policies that I really admired, and if you have ever spoken with him, or even been at a speech followed by Q & A with him, it is apparent that he has one of the sharpest ninblest minds on the planet.
That being said, he came out of the Democartic Leadership Council, the corporatist wing of the Democratic party. A wing that I do not belog to. In fact, although I do not speak for my fellow contributors, I cannot think of any memeber of the Contributor’s list that I would consider to belong inthe corporatis wing of the Democratic party.
The biggest bailouts of corproations inthe history of the United States was Begun and Done while G W Bush was still on office–Remember TARP.
Like 9-11, TARP happened on Shrub’s watch–please send a memo to Dana Perino.
Chia is the primary purchaser of the debt that is funding those projects, it is not uncommon to have that sort of reciprocal arrangemetn. More importantly, China has the manufacturing capacity to build this particualr project in place and ready to go. The US DOESN”T HAVE A FACTORY TO BUILD THIS PRODUCT YET. So , instead of waitng years while such a factory is built, the first contract went to China.
So long as the first wave of these projects is a success, and the US builds up it’s own manufacturing capacity to do future projects “in house”, I’m not seeing what your gripe is.
Is it me you want ot get drug tested? Or the Senator? You do know that Sheldon WHitehouse was NOT in the Senate when most of the stuff you are complaining about happened, you do know that? Don’t you? He’s a freshman Senator.
In fact the ONLY thing on you list that even happened while he was in office was TARP.
If you don’r want to vote for him, don’t. Do you even live in Rhode Island?
If that whole get drug tested and you don’t want to vote for me thingy was directed at me, well, darlin’ I’m not running for office, so I wouldn’t know what to do with your vote.
So, you just keep it. OK?
Our Constitution is a lot like the Bible, many read it but fail to understand it’s true meanings.
Most of the people in the Senate and Congress talk of the Constitution all the time. but break it’s most important fact that their job is to represent the people everyday.
You can’t belive strongly in one part while rejecting most of the rest of it.
You see, the protection of all our rights given in the Constitution is not ours to protect; as much as it is for our elected leaders to protect them for us.
When they have no respect for our rights, those rights have little meaning.
As we see they can take away those rights with a simple vote, and have done it many times.
Dear Mister Whitehouse You are more of the problem, than the solution.
You got any specifics to back that up? Is there some vote(s) you take issue with?
What does that comment even mean? It is vague to the point that I have no clue what you are referring to.
I think your piece while elevating if read with a detached frame of mind seems out of kilter with the times. The quote from FDR especially inspires a longing for someone of that caliber among this current crop of mediocre incompetents, your seeming hero Clinton high among them. A more amoral compromising abject figure would be hard to match.
Responsible for the decimation of welfare because it was convenient, the abandonment of Haitian democracy for no reason with untold ensuing misery, the support for Suharto in the decimation of East Timore, the adoption of derugaltion of banking and derivatives trading, the deaths of thousands of innocents from starvation and disease from Iraqi sanctions out of spite, the wanton killing in Kosovo by US bombardments and refusal to accept peace overtures, to name a few.
The American Constitution is not uniquely great or original, many countries have ruling documents currently in place that are much more democratic and enlightened, the ones from Venezuela and Ecuador are much more democratic and protective of human and ecologic rights.
Nor is Justice a uniquely American notion, it’s been around for a while. The reason that there is a hollowness to the ideals expressed in the US Constitution is that it means little in practice now and in the US past, it guarantess you nothing in the real world. Just look around.