How did Planned Parenthood Federation of America blow it on the Stupak Amendment? Maybe Jane’s explanation about the Veal Pen is a starting point. That possibility gets support from G. William Domhoff’s article, an article for the American Behavioral Scientist titled The Power Elite and Their Challengers: The Role of Nonprofits in American Social Conflict (only the abstract is available free on-line). Domhoff has been writing about class in America since the mid-60s. His book, Who rules America, is described in detail here.
Domhoff points to the interlocking relations among the social upper class, giant corporations, and policy planning networks. The last category includes large non-profit entities, like Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
The upper class and the closely related corporate community do not stand alone at the top of the power structure. They are supplemented by a wide range of nonprofit organizations that play an important role in framing debates over public policy and in shaping public opinion. These organizations are often called “nonpartisan” or “bipartisan” because they are not identified with politics or with either of the two major political parties. But they are the real “political party” of the upper class in terms of insuring the stability of the society and the compliance of government.
…
Tax-free foundations receive their money from wealthy families and corporations. Their primary purpose is to provide money for education, research, and policy discussion. They thus have the power to encourage those ideas and researchers they find compatible with their values and goals, and to withhold funds from others.
Domhoff’s article provides case studies of foundation activity that brought about changes acceptable to the large donors. His conclusion is exactly like Jane’s:
However, there are limits to what challengers can achieve in terms of greater democratic participation and individual opportunity when they are beholden to a corporate- financed network of nonprofit organizations concerned with maintaining the current class structure and the huge privilege it delivers to the wealthy few. And even while the insurgent groups were making these limited gains, they were going backward in terms of economic equality, and they now face a relentless attempt by the ultraconservative wing of the nonprofit network to restore more hierarchy and deference in the name of traditional values.
It certainly is the case that a lot of us have supported Planned Parenthood Federation of America, thinking they were motivated solely by their interest in furthering women’s health and reproductive rights. In 2008 Planned Parenthood Federation of America received $22.9mn from the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, and $1.5mn each from The David and Lucile Packard Foundation and The Dyson Foundation. The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation was also the largest donor to NARAL with approximately $687K.
I don’t know the politics of these donors or the organizations or their motivations, but whatever they are, I assume the huge donor’s views have more weight than anyone else in the decisions of Planned Parenthood. There isn’t any reason to believe that their interests are aligned with those of smaller contributors. The people who run the day-to-day operations of these Foundations answer to the wealthy people who put up the money. These functionaries blew it on the Stupak Amendment. They failed to accomplish the one essential thing small donors thought they were supporting: protecting women’s access to a constitutionally protected medical procedure.
Small donors may think they are helping the cause of women’s rights, and enforcing the Constitution, but they were wrong. They were helping accomplish whatever the huge donors want done. Their voices didn’t count.
In fact, Planned Parenthood cannot safely ignore people making $50 dollar donations. If small donors quit giving, they lose their legitimacy.
Domhoff says the large single-issue groups are limited because they are dependent on money from the Power Elite, the upper class, and their hired hands from the professional class. Jane says they are limited because they really like their access to the White House, and won’t do anything that might threaten that access. It doesn’t really matter who is right, the plain fact is we can’t really expect the change we want and need from the veal pen.
(Photo courtesy of dogra)



42 Comments










Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
“But they are the real “political party” of the upper class in terms of insuring the stability of the society and the compliance of government.; couldn’t have said it better myself.
Now if we could only get the majority of U.S. voting citizen’s to realize how they’ve been manipulated.
Thanks for this masaccio. One side benefit of not having any money is I’m not in the slightest tempted to respond to the fundraising appeals from the Veal Pen folks.
Other than to ask them rhetorically if they realize that fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing when they do ask for money.
*sigh*
They don’t seem to want to know.
Both sides love the abortion issue and the gay issue. Neither care much about the outcome of either issue. But both sides want these 2 issues to raise funds. Pro Lifers love to rant and rave and seek donations. Planned Parenthood, NARAL, the Dems and others love the Stupak Amendment. Think how many women and feminists will donate to “save ” abortion. Well, they can count me out. NOT one PENNEY. They all voted for 0bama, they get what they deserve…the third term of Bush. But the right have to pretend he is a Socialist…HAHAHAHHAH to still get donations and contributions. Remember the statement of not a dimes worth of difference between D’s and R’s. Well, we know that to be true. How is that 0bama thing working out? When I see the Obama logo on the DNC website, I know the bamboozeling is complete. Organizing America….TOO efen funny. At least I won’t have to spend what little money I have left to donate to any political party. Unlike 2008 when I sent a good bit to Hillary. I still feel like the DNC stole my money by cheating in the primaries. Never again.
I think people do know they have been played. My neighbors certainly do and they are solid, average Americans. When faced with the realities of a bad economy, global warming, etc. I think many just want to stay home and huddle with their families. Who can blame them? Look at the thousands that turned out for Obama’s inauguration. How many have been effected by the lack of response by the government, no jobs, death by health insurance companies, etc..
etc..
etc..
Will this eventually lead to real, appropriate change or will the fascists regain control of the country and hold it’s head underwater until dead? It is a quicker death than the passive aggressive bullshit that the dems are using to destroy us.
Follow the money, always helps to understand motivation.
I am in danger of losing my TU status at dkos, is my comment HR worthy? Check it out. If is HR worthy, so be it, if not could you uprate. Thanks
http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2009/11/29/13169/973/5#c5
As a someone who has dabbled in the ad world, I see the problem with a lot of these groups as simple laziness. It is much easier to get a few cash cows and live off of their milk, if you don’t mind behaving like a sock puppet from time to time.
However, hustle and market and build a grassroots financed effort is fucking hard work. But the payout is better, and with a tremendous following and email lists of devoted voters, I think the access thing will take care of itself.
Just plain lazy.
In these organizations there are layers of importance.
The prez is the queen bee; then all the little buzzies who are “wanna bees”, and then the people who do the actual work. They are either paid very little or they are volunteers. The queen doesn’t know the ones at the bottom and doesn’t want to. But the queen gets to meet the guy in the Oval so all is well.
wow, wow, and more wow masaccio – thank you
.
I don’t see a conflict btw Jane and the Professor’s take – man oh man is this good.
Another voice from the veal pen: CAP
Think Progress points to “the report” throughout the entire post without taking a position, but clearly indicates this is the Majik Pony.
wrong location for that kind of appeal.
f*cking triggers again.
Very interesting info to see who really controls these organizations!
Yea, probabaly right, whatever.
Here is my response:
Just for shits and giggles, everyone should go over there and vote up my comment.
This analysis is 100% correct.
I posted a discussion here on the notion of the Veal Pen. It’s good to know that there’s some empirical basis for it.
Is it time to look for a candiate to run in the primaries against Bush’s 3rd term president (BO) yet?
This easy to understand 47 min video says bankers are the ones in charge of everything.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2550156453790090544#
The role of the big “progressive” organizations is to
1) Define the outer limits of permissible debate and action
2) Pretend to represent the mainstream of progressive opinion while working with the Democratic party to make sure that opinion (e.g., immediate withdrawal from Iraq, single payer, marriage equality)is off the table
3) Ensure that any organization actually working for change — e.g. Code Pink, Act Up — is defined as crazy hippies.
Not surprising. For a good and thorough analysis of the phenomena of American avoidance of unpleasant realities, see Barbara Ehrenreich’s new book, “Bright-sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America.”
(review now up at DKos)
Sometimes political/social systems are beyond reform. In that case the entire system is in need of a complete realignment of power.
Great post, Ed. He’s actually saying something quite the same — the powerful have the ability to cut donations to groups that buck their agenda, and they very much do that.
Successful progressive advocacy depends on having a financial structure that can’t be ripped apart if a handful of big donors get disgruntled. That is a really difficult thing to do.
Right now these groups are “selling the brand” in the wake of Stupak — using it to build their lists and drive donations. But their “ownership” of the choice space should be in jeopardy if their track record is considered at all.
She was here for Book Salon, too
Yup. I used to sell ads in a newspaper. Me and another guy got hired at the same time. He worked like hell to land major rainmakers and I worked like hell on ma and pa shops to run simple institutional yellow page ads.
In about six months I had about 200 accounts and he had about a dozen–but we were both banking similar amounts. He worked incredibly hard on each ad every week, while I got involved in political and community organizing.
When he would lose a client, it was a major disaster for him and it would take several weeks for him to recover and not so much with me.
Jane did you catch my diary here? It appears that some of the respondents thought it was a referendum upon you…
When you pay people to do advocacy or think tank stuff you get the answers you want to hear left or right. Since the rich pay any advice they give automatically protects and advances that class at the expense of the other classes. The MSM works the same way.
I have also wondered if older women are more fervently pro-choice than younger women. Today a story in the Times seems to support this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/29/weekinreview/29stolberg.html?ref=weekinreview
It makes one fearful what will become of the pro-choice movement when the money from people like Susan Buffett and Lucille Packard finally runs out.
For what it is worth, I quit the board of the local Planned Parenthood affiliate because my concerns that the Right was organizing an effective antiabortion campaign were summarily dismissed both by the director and other board members. I still support financially, but it is difficult to do so for the national organization as I see the continued smugness and envelopment with victim-role politics.
Up until last year, I taught a section of human sexuality at a local community college; in seventeen years, only once did have have a younger female student successfully quote the Equal Rights Amendment; and only once did one of the older female students. Forget about the guys.
Aiyup. I have been talking about this for years. Dismissed as just another conspiracy nut. But finally other people with much better communication skills than I are starting to spread the word. The tea baggers are actually just begining to understand what the real power structure is, they will be turning on the rethugs pretty soon.
But to the main points. 100% correct. We the people lost control of the country to the upper classes and the corporations. Military Industrial complex anyone? Or how about this;” The New American Century is a loosely organized group that currently encompasses Big Energy, Big Arms, Big Media, Big Jesus and the Neocons and seeks to maintain a constant state of low level war in order to preserve the social order of which they constitute the oligarchy”. The various “news” organs are totally involved. We are fed the news that the oligarchs want us to hear. Any attempt to place a real news story that does not follow the current story line is buried, due to the 24 hr news cycle it is dismissed and will never be seen on any MSM. The sheeple believe it all and any attempt to bring in the reality that the rest of the world sees is dismissed as not true. They(da oligarchs) really do not care about the internet or about individuals getting news from outside the US bubble, the vast majority of sheeple are kept happy with what they see on TV-all the millionaire “reporters” peddle the same crap, left or right, in the end its all just crap, we the people mean nothing-I read a lot of history and what this time reminds me of is Japan in the 20s and 30s where the Emperor and the War lords got the people to believe that they really had voted on a PM when in fact the men at the top had the Prime Ministers and govts figured out 3 and 4 govts ahead, they “allowed” young militant groups the “honor” of ridding the people of a corrupt govt, only to replace it with another one just as corrupt. From the old book “Japans Imperial Conspiracy”.(I have read it 3 times now, every time I see more resemblance to our current govt-example, go back and really look at 2000 and 2004, aside from how bad the dem candidates were, do you remember just how much our “Big media” figures made fun of and denigrated both Al Gore and Kerry? Remember how all the news was slanted(by the “liberal” columnists and the entire MSM)towards Bush? How he never really got any bad press?(stories that carried over from 1 news cycle to the next) And after he was crowned, how many times was it pretty obivious that he was drunk,(I can remember the pictures of him at the Olympics, My wife-who owned a small town taveran for 20 years said, he is drunk- yet that was ignored by everybody, it never became a story, I wonder why. His being briefed just before Katrina, a non story, I am quite sure you can come up with dozens more. Yet the MSM gave us stories all the time about trivial junk. All of the really big stories, that should have been screaming headlines, resulted in nothing. Over and Over again.And we the sheeple never noticed, did we? And how about now, since Obama was elected, notice how the MSM treats the prez? Compare to the Bush years. Now the rethugs are making a “comeback”. Question; Have those who wield the real power decided on the rethugs regaining control of the congress in 2010? Am I a conspiracy nut? Aside( The Emp. and his war cabinet realized that they had lost the war after the battle of Midway, yet they continued to fight) A very fascinating book that is begining, at least to me, to resemble the political makeup of the US in the late 20th and early 21st century.
Nothing scares the power elite more than the notion that the majority of suckers stop voting for Ds or Rs. Then their fixed shell game is over, and they have to worry about another Ross Perot.
BTW, notice what happened after RP got 19% of the popular vote in 1992: no more League of Woman voters running the debates, states across the nation made it harder for third party candidates to get on the ballot, and every time a proportional representation initiative came up for a vote, gazillions of dollars raised to make sure it loses or doesn’t even get enough signatures. And even if someone by some miracle does start to garner support, they just get their media buddies to portray him/her as a “nut”. (Remember that cartoon cover of Perot on the Weekly Standard blowing out his springs like a psycho cuckoo clock?)
The left and right wings keep the corporate bird of prey sailing on and sucker sites like dkos and the institutional nonprofits are the bird feeders. The traditional media’s trumpeting of a right wing “comeback” was so predictable we might as just throw up our hands and admit we are all unwilling participants in a bad reality D.C. TV show.
Well, I think the most critical mistake in the Abortion/Reproductive Rights cause was made way back in the 1970′s, just as we had been successful in getting a few states to legalize and protect these rights, and as the Supreme Court eventually ruled.
The womens’ movements needed to take ownership of those successes, and then move on by taking ownership of the facilities that provide the services. Just imagine how much better off we would be today if instead of investing money in a now 40 year political battle (court appointments, all the campaigns, all the levels of lobbying at the State and Federal Level), and had just turned Planned Parenthood into a national franchise that provides these services at the lowest possible cost. What if we had set up scholarships to Med School, Advanced Nursing programs — with the understanding that those so educated would work at a reasonable wage in the field for say eight to ten years? Sometimes I think we should have built reproductive services clinics next door to police stations, the better to force security.
The problem is we didn’t act like we had won the argument in the 1970′s and we invested in just more persuasion, and not the execution of those new rights, which itself would have established their legitimacy.
In contrast, just imagine how little progress would have been made if yet today African Americans were still acting like they had to convince you that it was OK if they sat at a lunch counter near you to drink a cup of coffee!
I see what you are saying, access demonstrates to the big donors that they get their money’s worth when they give to the single issue/progressives organizations. Big donors also know that those groups are unlikely to upset things that they don’t want upset.
That’s a great point. When you win a battle, you have to enforce your victory, and keep pushing for more. I love the idea about putting women’s health clinics near police stations.
It gets more than 500,000 visits/day, and there’s nobody prohibiting you from posting there if you want…
Way back when I wanted NOW to figure out how to buy the patent on RU486. And then work on selling it and insuring it be legal. It is sort of the same idea. I like the idea of clinics built near police station. Women need to grab the reins and drive that right…right down their throats. No more MS nice gal.
It gets more than 500,000 visits/day…
Kinda makes my point, and the point of this diary, doesn’t it?
The point being that only suckers would want that big of an audience?
Planned Parenthood thought they’d won, but the other side never quit fighting. PP was not caught in a Veal Pen, they were caught flat footed with a false sense of security.
The Dems, on the other hand, are doing what they do best, ritualistically kicking one of their constituencies in the gut so as to prove their bona fides to the corporate elites.
No, you’re not a conspiracy nut, now stop asking the question or people will think you are.
The question is, What Do We Do Now?
And btw, no, I don’t think the ‘tea baggers’ are going to ‘get’ the power structure ‘pretty soon’. Some will, but the tea partiers institutionally are basically a wholly-owned subsidiary of Big Jesus.
Many have been banned from dailykos, me included, it’s an actively censored site.
(And not for anything nutty, I just called out ‘management’ when they were lying about Hillary being more pro-war than Obama. Remember when ‘the big issue’ was that Hillary hadn’t ‘apologized’ for her earlier position on the war, like John Edwards did? That silly and ad infinitum belabored anti-Hillary talking point, and my response to it, got me banned, as far as I can tell.)
I went down to UCSF to read this piece and I don’t think that it is applicable because it discusses corporate funded nonprofits. Our main source of Veal Pennage are the nominally membership based nonprofits that are in the Democrat Party beltway orbit, more so that the corporate outfits.