
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island)
I recently attended the Second Annual “Living Constitution” Lecture at the Brennan Center for Justice. The keynote speaker this year was Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and his topic was “Living Up to Our Constitution.”
Sen. Whitehouse identified four ways in which we live up to the Constitution. I am excerpting some of the best bits and breaking them into four separate posts for your contemplation this holiday weekend.
Part Two
Protecting Our Democratic Process
The second way in which we live up to our Constitution is by protecting the right to vote. Obviously if you take away the right to vote, our Constitutional process cannot function. I don’t mean an outright ban on the right to vote, I mean stealing away your right to vote by sly trickery. Sen. Whitehouse explains:
We must be vigilant to ensure that every American with the right to vote be given every opportunity to exercise that right. Electioneering games that trick voters into not participating; voter caging; burdensome documentation requirements that disproportionately affect the poor and the elderly; strategically planned election venues that cause discouragingly long lines for certain voters; politically motivated investigations of voter fraud that in practice cause voter disenfranchisement—these are the modern tools to deny access to the ballot.
As many of you know, I believe passionately about protecting the right to vote. Let me put a plug in right now for the Democratic Lawyers Councils active in the various states. Some day we will have active chapters in every state. You don’t have to be a lawyer to join, just willing to learn how to protect the vote. The motto of the New York Democratic Lawyers Council www.nydlc.com — for which I am the National Committeewoman, Member of the Steering Committee, and a Regional Coordinator — is that “Every person who has the right to vote, and wishes to vote, should be able to vote and have that vote counted accurately.”
But the work of even the most devoted election protection team is not enough to fully protect our voice as citizens. Sen. Whitehouse explains:
But even unfettered ballot access is not enough if the free speech of “We, the People” is drowned out by corporations flooding the airwaves with propaganda pushing their own economic interests. Congress and the Supreme Court have recognized for at least a century that corporate involvement in elections, with its corrupting self-interest, must be controlled.
However, the conservative bloc of the Supreme Court seems in a pending case, Citizens United v. FEC, poised to undo that plain and well-settled principle. The Court would have to upend opinions like Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of Commerce (1990), when Justice Thurgood Marshall warned of “the corrosive and distorting effects of immense aggregations of wealth that are accumulated with the help of the corporate form and that have little or no correlation to the public’s support for the corporation’s political ideas.” The Court would have to overlook the legal fact that corporations are legal fictions: government-established tools for organizing human behavior. Neither logic nor history justifies unleashing corporations from the bonds of government, freeing them to master and control the very government that created them, so that government in this country is of the CEOs, by the CEOs, and for the CEOs.
Sen. Whitehouse contemplates that it may even be necessary to amend the Constitution to limit political activity to human persons; under precedent and current law, corporations are legally “incorporeal persons.”
I make no comment about the fictional non human political activity on “V.”



40 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
corporations are not living breathing persons and should not have any ‘person’ rights.
Great read and thanks.
I have a few concerns about this right to vote thang, for sure.
1) We have to loosen up the registration process.
2) We have to loosen up the voting process.
What do I mean?
We have to make it EASIER for ALL people, eligible to vote, to actually get registered and vote!
I’m not sure how to do this . . . but to register should be easy and fast, especially for disabled, elderly, minorities who lack internet access or transportation. Perhaps access to registration at work. More access at senior citizen centers, care homes.
A public affairs campaign of greater magnitude than ever before to ENCOURAGE registration to vote.
But as to VOTING?
Stretch it out to more than one day! Make it on a weekend! More polling places!
I’d love to see a sitch where any one any where can vote for THEIR ballot based on residency, but that would require a computer system which so far has proven to be highly corruptable and corrupted!!!!
I fear ‘The Vote’ is being driven and beaten back down and manipulated as much as in the days of Jim Crow legislation.
And I fear this attack on ACORN will (and has) result in reduced minority registration and turnout at the polls.
And as we all know, minorities don’t often support GOP (not that it matters much as to party affiliation, huh?).
So, it’s complicated, but I feel our whole system is bought and sold for, and that includes the right to vote. It’s becoming more and more a restricted right and subject to class . . . and the forces to beat back civil rights are riding high and hard for electronically rigged voting and suppressing registration and voting at the polls.
The fight, and it’s a fight make no mistake about it, to KEEP our rights never seems to stop.
Like taxes and death, a fight to keep our rights and the constitution and amended parts is inevitable, huh.
Thanks again for the first, and now, second read, Cynthia.
I don’t see why everyone is so anti-Semetic.
Yeah, we really need to fix THAT shit.
AND reintroduce controls over corporate monopoly and more for banking, finance, healthcare, transportation, and all corporate activity.
Glad to see ya quick on the Z draw, Suz!!! *G*
Ohhhh heysusssss marimba’s, Suz, set glare to *vaporize* n get ready.
On a holiday weekend too, such a shame and waste of your time.
not the spelling police (gosh no) but i think the word you were looking for is semantic
Corporate persons cannot die and therefore are not entitled to the rights of mortals. Corporations were devised for specific purposes (building a canal, paving a tollroad) in the early years of our Republic. Our founders would be appalled at the corporate personhood we put up with today.
It must end.
There’s one state — perhaps a Dakota? — with no voter registration. Everyone simply shows up and votes.
I’d feel more comfortable about corporate personhood if these also became features.
1. No corporation could live on past 77 years.
2. Every year a certain percent would have to die in random fashion.
3. No corporation could turn a profit or do any production for its first 16 years.
4.Two types,A and B, only B types could have subsidiary corporations but they would be limited to 75 % of the income of A type corporation.
5. Every year, every corp would have to shut down for 3-5 days randomly selected.
You get the idea. you want the good of personhood, take the bad also.
That’s a tender(ed) first reach.
;-)
Teddy P at #7, absolutely . . . power of corporate hood and control of not only our political system and military but all facets of our daily lives has resulted in an immutable force that’s not going to be unempowered with mere process within the system it’s bought and wrought.
Sigh.
I was just gonna sip quietly and pick to some bluegrass on the toobz today, but maybe I do need to engage with humans a bit . . . ;-)
I gotta ask, why not?
I’ve NO knowledge, but should it matter if we just eliminated registration requirements?
Voting requirements?
Why should anyone within our borders NOT be able to vote, legal or not?
Huge leaps here, I know . . . but I’m in favor of healthcare, education, work and voting rights for EVERYONE within our borders, regardless of status.
Now, somehow bringing the ‘illegals’ into our system to be legal? I’m in favor of that, should happen the minute they fill out a social security card request to work!! Automatic! Yer a citizen, so are your kids! Spouse, extended family! Just fill out Soc Sec cards for all, working or not!
Legal!
Tax paying!
Fully entitled to all citizen rights!
Must be the Single Barrell talking . . . I gotta turn up the newgrass louder so I don’t hear myself dream . .
How was yer Turkey Day?
Too complicated, but well thought out . . . just eliminate corporate hood bennies as individuals equal to human rights.
Turn back the clock, re impose regulations of the past.
Eliminate corporate campaign finance, eliminate lobbying.
Sigh, sorry, it’s the whiskey, and I’m dreaming.
Damn I get vivid dreams sometimes when I’m awake . .
*G*
Suzanne- Is that how George “Gulag Archipelago” Soros spells it?
Purple fingers are a lot cheaper than all our complicated voting registration systems (and lawyers to enforce them, even volunteers!) and would ensure no one voted twice. Which was really the whole point of voter registrations, to break the machine’s capability to move voters around the city casting ballot after ballot before they passed out drunk.
i’m sorry – i’m not familiar with the subject of your question. are you saying you were in fact accusing everyone here of being religiously bigoted and that my read of your statement as a typo was incorrect?
How do you track the thumbprints, Teddy, without worrying about a corrupted computer system?
I like the idea!
Suzanne- Thank you for pointing out my typo.
no problem
teddy’s upstairs
*g*
Must be fishing season . . . bait was cast, a bite was had, and suddenly, the waters are calm again.
Amazing.
I love this town.
*G*
YOU havin fun today, too?
*G*
So much work, so fast, movin on up . . . . .
Yer the best sheep dog I ever met . .
Hi Ralph, Hi Sam.
*G*
Had to pick up Kismet’s refill. Ever get stuck on the approach to a drawbridge that has decided to be contrary? On Black Friday? Lemme tell ya.
Long’s as I’m still here catching up the the sheep herding, the only draw bridge I’ve ever dealt with was when I commuted into SF from The Peninsula.
3rd Street, if I wanted to cross it, for any reason, had a up and down bridge.
For ships.
I was young, and always just thought it was the universe tellin me to slow down. So I’d roll one, lite one.
Turn up the music . . .
I miss that bridge, come to think of it.
But I was young and crazy, go figger.
*G*
and they required thumbprints…
They couldn’t get this one to close right. Only a few years old. Ending up drivin’ across the median to go back after I got unpinned by a couple guys who had the same idea.
How does “living up to the Constitution” have much to do with voting?
It is in many respects an anti-democratic document.
Yes, I am aware that several of the Amendments, Baker v Carr and its progeny improved this in some respects. But, still………………..
I missed part one! :(
The Senate is about as undemocratic a cohort of pompous (greatest deliberative body in the world) self aggrandizing prima donnas as it comes. Totally-fucking useless.
Electoral College -useless.
Constitution written by landed gentry for landed gentry, re-public my ass.
Cynthia – I am very concerned that the Democratic Lawyers Council in New York is ignoring the impending disaster which will befall secure and transparent voting in the state with the imposition of software-based voting systems next year. Software-based voting violates all the safeguards which have been instituted in New York election law as well as the constitutional guarantees of transparent vote counting. Especially given the numerous reports of op-scan failures in the recent election, does the NYDLC plan to support the movement led by the Election Transparency Coalition to ban software-based voting in New York?
Link failure above. Try http://electiontransparencycoalition.org/
If people voting was the problem we would be in great shakes.
It’s what and who we have to vote for that is the problem.
Our two party system has highjacked our democracy, but only offering politians in either party. We have a one or the other system. When we get pissed at one we vote for the other, and it has become switch from one bad deal to the other bad deal.
There is little hope for the Country unless we solve the root of the problem, and throw out both parties, and the members of both parties.
“Let me put a plug in right now for the Democratic Lawyers Councils active in the various states.”
If these organizations have ever tried to keep a third party off the ballot, then kindly spare us.
It is called Corporate Sodomy! Jefferson and Madison wanted incorporated into the Bill of Rights, restrictions restricting the rights of corporations, to obliterate rights of others, Leverage economic servitude?
Corporate America has extracted enough Life and Liberty from the American people. Jefferson is correct about the inability of corporate aristocrats to control passion or lust for profit. “Constitutional usurpation under the color of law in the lust for endless profit!”
Let’s continue to eat our own “”corporate slime”" in legalized crime!!!
The NYS Board of Elections has taken the position that it cannot avoid HAVA and the Americans with Disabilities ACt and that paper ballot Optical scan equipment is the least dangerous way to go about that.
At least with the Op WScan method, you still have apaper pallot that you can recount if there is any reason to think the election has been tampered with.
NYDLC helped to draft the implimenting regulations and they require random auditing of every election with automotic hand recounts triggered if the random audits turn up problems ( there are intermediate audit steps).
It’s kinda like wanting single payer but being willing to compromise on a public option?
The die was cast when the feds sued NYS and the AG Office made an admission agaisnt interest by saying that they agred with HAVA, just thought it’s implimentation timetable was unrealistic.
Members of NYDLC, acting as individuals, have worked on and submitted briefs amicus curiae arguing that computerized election equipment is inherently unsafe and un transparent.
The other part of the problem is that NYS chose to take the HAVA grant money and that money was required to be spent on buying this new equipment.
I know that Suffolk County Executive Steve Levy has said that Suffolk will not be scrapping the lever machines ( I LOVE LOVE LOVE the lever machines, myself) and will mothball them against the day the NYS comes to it’s senses. I would like to see that happen across the state. But I am speaking for myself here, not NYDLC
It is not the function of the DLC’s to keep anybody off the ballot. It is the function to protect the vote.
Cynthia –
Your premise is that HAVA requires the replacement of the lever voting machines which it does not. Even one of our State Election Commissioners admitted as much more than a year ago. HAVA does require accommodation of special needs voters and, as of November 2008 New York had fulfilled that requirement by using HAVA funds to provide a Ballot Marking Device (BMD) at every polling place in the state. So complying with disabilities requirements and retaining our lever voting machines are not mutually exclusive.(There is an irony here in that local communities out of economic desperation might be transferring some of their funds for polling place access for the disabled to the purchase of the mandated op-scans.)
It is the state Election Reform and Modernization Act (ERMA) which now dictates the replacement of the machines and it is ERMA which the state AG office told the federal judge would be enforced. But if ERMA is unconstitutional because it mandates secret vote counting, how can we be required to enforce it?
The constitutionality issue, which I argue from, aside, many computer experts, statisticians and good government groups including NYPIRG, NYVV and the League of Women Voters have told the SBOE that the auditing standards are totally insufficient to catch errors or fraud but the SBOE has ignored these concerns.
For recent examples of the failures of the so-called pilot use of Op-Scans in the New York elections this month I recommend the following:
http://electiontransparencycoalition.org/2009/11/26/the-plunging-pilot-project-impossible-vote-totals-in-ny-23/
http://www.gouverneurtimes.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8461:first-the-impossible-now-the-improbable-in-ny-23&catid=60:st-lawrence-news&Itemid=175
And please take a look at the video on the home page here:
http://electiontransparencycoalition.org/
As well as the testimony of a county election commissioner who has declared she will not cerify elections using software-based vote counting on the homepage at http://etcnys.org
Thanks!
I can be contacted at joanne@etcnys.org
Corporations are nothing more than a group of individuals banding together to accomplish something (usually a profit). That means they should have every right an individual has.
Also, this guy seems all concerned about the poor not being able to vote. Has he ever heard of ACORN? With ACORN the poor (and anyone else) can vote countless numbers of time.
The whole speech is available at:
http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/living_up_to_our_constitution
Thanks to Cynthia for calling attention to it.