Scarecrow explains the importance of the public option for the financial future of this Nation here. He points out that employer-based insurance is shrinking, and we need a transition to some other system. The public option is just such a transition. Scarecrow points to this report from the Economic Policy Institute, based on Census Bureau data up to 2008, which tells us that the number of people covered by employer-sponsored insurance dropped from 64.2% in 2000 to 59.5% in 2008.
The facts support this survey. Three of the five largest health care companies have seen enormous drops in their employer based coverage in the last year:
Cigna: 800 thousand
Wellpoint: 1.5 million
UnitedHealth: 1.71 million
The insurers blame the drops on unemployment, and they expect that trend to continue.
Decreased membership is not a financial problem for the insurance companies, which are raising prices faster than the drops in enrollment. Cigna reported earnings of $1.19 per share in the third quarter compared with $.62 for the same period last year. This is much higher than expected.
UNH reports revenues of $.89 per share, also much higher than the expected. Revenues for the insurance subs were only down 3.4%, less than the drop in enrollment, so policy rates increased substantially.
Humana reported $1.77, in line with expectations. That includes unrealized investment losses of $69mn. About 30% of its health insurance is Medicare and other senior markets, making it different from the other companies. It just shows the value of depending on government subsidies through Medicare Advantage.
Aetna (AET) reported $.75 in earnings, substantially higher than expected. Its enrollment was up 7.7% over 3Q 2008, but down over 2Q 2009, and AET expects the downward trend to continue. Revenues were up 14.4%, almost double the increase in enrollment. I reported on Wellpoint earlier.
Employers will pass some or all of the rising costs on to their employees. As the number of people covered by employer insurance drops, prices will rise. Administrative costs are significantly higher for individuals than for employer based insurance. A study by the Congressional Research Service says that administrative expenses for large groups, over 1,000, are in the range of 5 -11% of claims, and in small groups, the range is 33-37% of claims. The range is at least that high for individual policies. As people shift from employer based insurance to individual policies, prices will rise dramatically, based strictly on increased administrative costs.
Administrative expenses in the public option are expected to be in the range of Medicare administrative costs, which Ezra Klein estimates at 5-6% of claims. This figure is higher than the usual figure of 2% because it includes outsourcing of certain costs. Lower administrative costs are an enormous improvement. It may be that access to the public exchange will result in somewhat lower administrative costs, even without a public option. But it is perfectly clear that the public option is the one thing that will make a real difference.




20 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Any chance that these wondrous profit levels will cause UnitedHealth, WellPoint et al to stop pretending that “goodwill” is something one can give to one’s shareholders instead of actual money?
I would be curious to see the stats on the number of dead janitor policies that have been issued in this same time frame.
Not the first time they’ve sold out to the big money boys. Won’t be the last, either. Why does anyone join this contrary organization?
AARP: Public option ‘not a priority’
BTW, massaccio, I JUST posted a link to your September piece on viaticals,over at the Seminal,on a thread by libby liberal about Sanders and health reform.
so… the great capitalistic carrot of ‘get a good job that has great benefits’ is shown as the great fiction its always been… for those of us who worked for companies that provided retiree benefits… and then, in the great era of ‘restructuring’ to ‘maintain competitiveness’ (i.e., increase the bottom line so that the top 1% can continue to enjoy ever greater salaries and bonuses) the CEOs and boards decided to screw their retirees (who helped build the companies) and told them ‘we can’t afford YOUR retiree health and pension benefits (all the while these self-same directors and corporate officers / CEOs ALL keep and continue to get LIFE-LONG FULLY PAID health care and retirement packages…)
the repugs and corporatists have spent that past 70 years dismantling bit by bit, ever so slowly, the New Deal reforms and regulations and benefits (like a slowly cooking frog) in order to return to The Gilded Age – when the top 1% owned 90% of the wealth and property, the the other 99% were poor, unhealthy, and divided amongst themselves, fighting for the remaining 10%…
“keep the people poor, sick, and stupid, and they can never rise up against you.”
Obama’s predictable (and predicted) betrayals of his more leftish campaign rhetoric and imagery have met only minimal and half-hearted opposition from what’s left of a U.S. left. Unjust wars and occupations, mega-bankers’ bailouts and other regressive policies that were seen as intolerable under the nominal rule of a boorish moron from Texas (George W. Bush) have become acceptable for many “progressives” when carried out by an eloquent and urbane black Democrat from Chicago (Barack Obama). A recent pathetic example – one of many – comes from the so-called liberal-left journal The Nation, whose bourgeois editor Katrina Vanden Huevel proclaims the following in an editorial titled “Obama, One Year On:” “Whatever one thinks of Obama’s policy on any specific issue, he is clearly a reform president committed to improvement of peoples’ lives and the renewal and reconstruction of America… Progressives should focus less on the limits of the Obama agenda and more on the possibilities that his presidency opens up” [34].
http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/23196
Important to make distinction between current heading towards drain PO the Senate and House are touting and/or a viable,national Medicare styled One Card 50 State Plan with no triggers,no state opt outs,no limited eligibility hoops or for profit insurer contamination of intents and goals.
Current PO as presented in Congress yet to be settled out proposals seem more intended to provide the for profit insurers with an easy to hunt and kill target. Barack Obama seems quite willing to see any PO healthcare idea suffocated.
This current so called reform seems much more about shoveling lots more money into for profit insurers bottom lines and not so much about putting in place a viable PO.
Just because the Ds are trying to sell themselves as being all in for PO is not very good reason to kowtow to this POS reform they are trying to foist off on Americans. It smells a lot more like cheap politics being done to posture for 2010 elections. I know the Rs are Party of No but that does not explain why the Ds are Party of Ruse.
Barack Obama has not shown much integrity on a wide range of issues since Jan.2009. Just because he is a D does not clear him on doing Junior Bush Lite. Pelosi and Reid are not innocent of venal pandering to be sure but the Oval Office is Obamas which he ran on lots of happy talk in 2008 to get. Political amnesia now seems to have set in on Obama WH repeatedly from torture to Bush/Cheney war crimes to Gitmo dealing. Just because Obama says he is a D is not reason to overlook his Bush/Cheney Lite act.That dog dont hunt.
No kidding!
You’re preaching to the choir here, Shoot. It’s your next-door neighbors you have to talk to about this!
My husband and I do. Interesting conversation when you get the incredibly stupid comment “The uninsured can just go to the emergency room”. I just reminded the speaker that you can’t get ongoing cancer care at the emergency room. Both, she and her husband, have had ongoing cancer care a couple of times. That pretty much ended the conversation.
Single Payer Advocates To Help With Sanders’ S703 Amendment and HCR Updates
By: libbyliberal 49 comments
Actually take time to comment here at FDL and some other websites in hopes this stuff is read by Obama WH staffer(s) or perhaps someone on KO or RM staffs.
The Ds in WashingtonDC are not showing much appreciation for the shitstorm coming their way with this near constant D drumbeat that mediocre is the deal that gets done.
Mediocre is killing America and Americans.
The Rs have an excuse being they are ignorant and still in 19th century.
The Ds not so much. Produce or perish.
Jane has a fresh cross-post up and ready: “Why is HCAN Defending Blanche Lincoln From A Primary Challenge?”
Do you disagree with the content s of the article, or do you find objections to ZNET as a source, or are you merely superficial?
Yes indeed employer based coverage is shrinking. It’s important to remember most companies are small business, not Microsoft or Ford. For these modest size companies health care coverage has gotten too expensive and just like company pension plans they are going the way of the dodo bird.
Blue Texan’s regularly scheduled post is ready: “Lou Dobbs Now Favors Amnesty for Immigrants, Effectively Destroys Political Future”
Trust me, I’m no prude by a long shot – But your handle has got to go dude (or dudette if that’s the case).
Your handle just makes ya wanna keep on truckin’ and not read your stuff ’cause it’s probably as lame as the handle. Get it? If not just say fuck no and keep usin’ it.
I assume you favor an expanded public option to make it possible for small businesses, or at least their employees, to get insurance at a reasonable price.
Thanks, masaccio.
FWIW, Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-
EnronTexas) was on MSNBC this week yakking about a GOP ‘plan’ for ‘small biz insurance plans’, as if she actually believed this could be some kind of solution. She exhibited no clue that large employers = clout; small employers = no numbers, therefore screwed on premiums.Her comments struck me as 90% ideology, 8% cluelessness, and 2% partisanship.
BTW: I hope you’re aware of the Financial Times news reporting about Dubai and CDOs. Unbelievable; looks like quite the shocker today, with ramifications around the planet.
I am a psychologist in private practice, a single parent with children 11,13, and 16. In 2008 our monthly insurance premium was $930; thus, 18% of my gross was paid in health insurance as opposed to 14% of my gross paid in federal income taxes. That is with a $2,500 per person deductible and a %5,000 family deductible. Yeah, I’d like to see a public option.