Tweet
This morning on CNN, the RNC’s head liebaby tried to explain, inter alia, how the whole RNC/Cigna/elective abortion coverage fiasco NEVER REALLY HAPPENED.
That’s right. According to Michael Steele, the country had a collective brain fart and totally misinterpreted the RNC’s hypocritical position on insurance coverage for abortions. In fact, the RNC’s position is not even hypocritical, it’s “completely consistent.” (With what, I’m not entirely sure, but that’s not important right now.) And another thing – even if the RNC’s insurance plan had covered abortions, WHICH IT DIDN’T . . . um . . . quick, look over there! It’s Sarah Palin’s tour bus!
If you want to see how much Steele really dislikes discussing this little Republican bugbear, note the Rodney Dangerfield-esque finger in the collar when the CNN anchorperson first poses the question. Don’t ever play poker for money, Mr. Steele. You’ll get taken every single time.
This is really the modus operandi of the Republican party (and more than a few Democrats) when it comes to the health care debate: All the things that I argue against in public for me in private until the opposition notices, but never for thee.
156 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
They are really scraping the bottom of the barrel on every level, aren’t they?
one would think Republicans would be too embarrassed not to do something about Steele, but apparently Republicans are embarrassed by absolutely nothing.
Reality: “The sky is blue.”
RNC: “No it’s not.”
Reality: “It is – look! It’s blue!”
RNC: “Even if it WERE blue, it isn’t our fault.”
Steele is a masterful communicator. Otherwise, how could he remain at the helm?
Actually I don’t think they are even close to the bottom yet. They will, however, get there when the 2010 election season gets in full swing.
This is almost embarrassing to watch. We are seeing a once powerful political party self-destruct before our eyes as all the shit floats to the top of the bowl.
Steele: RNC affirmative reaction hire.
Great post, but this is really going too, too far:
Totally uncalled for. Have you no compassion?
the peter principle!
He talks more than 5 barbers. So much double talk he needs three sets of teeth. Also, too.
RNC: Well, if it’s blue, it’s BILL CLINTON’s fault.
Good one!
Wasn’t Steele pro-choice when he ran as a moderate GOP for US Senate in Maryland, anyway?
When Michelle Bachmann is a prominent figure in the party and they publicly laud the intelligence and qualifications of Sarah Palin, you are pretty damned close to the bottom. Any lower and you are delving into the primordial muck.
Steele’s job is secure throughout the Obama presidency, no matter how many terms. “See, we’ve got one, too!”
I would imagine there will be a wonderful PhRMA or AHIP job waiting for Rahm shortly after passage of the health care bill.
We need to be less concerned about the RNC’s abortion policies than our own. We need to abort Rahm Emanuel and get Howard Dean in that job. We need to support Alan Grayson 24/7. We need to get the banksters out of the Obama cabinet and the Fed. These moves would take the bag out of the teabaggers within three weeks.
Time for an Obama administration shakeup.
I am afraid that we would have to start at the top. As the expression goes, a fish rots from the head.
This is response to EdwardTeller at 13 & 17.
Ah, but all the BigMedia talks about is the resurgent Repub Party, or GOP (Got Ours, Piss-off), and how 2010 is gonna be their big comeback. That damn Librul media…
Steele is just confused. RNC chair is not the same thing as telethon posterchild for multiple idiotosis.
They are actually quite consistent;
RNC: facts are irrelevant, it’s what we SAY that matters!
Please, Mr. Steele. Keep talking.
Wishful thinking by grossly overpaid, pampered media elites.
They are creating their own reality, doncha know?
707
Stupid is not generally considered a psychiatric disorder. Unless you’re Michael Steele, that is.
Ahem.
Yeah, because they’ve obviously got all of these great new ideas that will appeal to independent voters…
It his special genius. One, I might add, that he shares with much of his party.
Yes – but I think it’s crazy that they picked some wierd combo of “Mad Max” & “The Passion of the Christ” to loop in their VCR-of-the-mind. (You know they still don’t use new tech, right?)
Actually, I believe that it is in 16mm. They are conservatives, you know.
You means Rahm isn’t the head?
I kind of think he is the ass.
heh.
you’re the Principal Peterr.
Ahhh, you’re prolly right. The porn would be more familiar too.
Beta? To loop it they would need the Master–and it would be called…nevermind.
“master” communicator…you are kidding, right? he’s black. that’s the whole story.
Good post..the question you gotta ask yourself as well, is Steele angling for LouLou Dobbs old spot on CNN OR is he really trying for his own show on Cluster-Fox..??..??
Either would be a HUGE step down for the networks (if you can call them that)..this man is SUCH a loser it’s scary sometimes…
BTW: The ‘Dana Milbank-forced-to-write-a-750-word-column bad ” reference is a very funny image….
WWII, Korean War, and Vietnam War footage, endlessly recycled. Nothing but endless war porn.
My motto: if you need a snark tag, you misjudged your audience. Which I may well have done.
big words..little man
please be careful how you use words like “abort”. it is so loaded with implication and as a woman it really skeves me when it’s used to be glib and clever. glen beck and rush limbaugh do that alot, they think it punctuates their points but it really just shows how they really view women’s concerns.
Welcome to the Lake!
What a coinky-dinky. An hour and a half ago I posted a comment to Oilfieldguy’s diary with a Gilligan’s Island reference and then watertiger opens with “Just sit right back and you’ll hear a tale . . .”
It takes a very special skill. The General is the very best in dealing with “not man parts.” His lobbying efforts to pro-lifers to go even further and end the “Great Tubesock Holocaust” and save our tiniest pre-born spermatazoan Americans is absolutely priceless.
OK. I’ll be more careful. Thanks for the advice. How about “chop off their heads”?
no, all you were was too opaque for clarity. you are not anymore. clearly you are too clever for you audience.
I saw that too.
I love raucous and bawdy threads.
Particularly when language is challenging to purity types. Often times as a result, beauty, hilarity, and clarity of meaning is borne.
*Booger*
Michael “cow on the tracks” Steele meets his destiny:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/10/14/124547/04
I’m confused.
your point is well taken, but word police are not needed.
remember when gay used to mean “gay” (happy?)
now it means something different to those who choose to read it differently.
abort is a word with many implications, all of which should be allowed here.
seriously, dude, with those guys you can chop off anything you want, but by all means start with their rhetoric. both those guys called sen landrieu a “prostitute” today. i am pretty tired of her too for totally different reasons, especially as a woman in a pivotal position, but referring to her that way is such an adolescent way to say she is not worthy of their consideration.
Correct. Late Night is known for the absence of the Verbiage Coppers.
Carry on.
Jane observed on countdown that firepups are capable of multi-tasking. I’m glad to see foxman understands double entendres.
brutal…
The problems in the Obama administration start with Obama. He is an appeaser, not a fighter and has clearly aligned himself with the interests of the powerful.
Frankly, it is a perfectly good description and one which is also routinely used around here for Ben Nelson and my own worthless Senator, Max Baucus, among others. They sell themselves to the highest bidder and do whatever they are paid to do.
true— but he that lives by the sword—is a dumb f—ker.
Once again, OK.
I got jumped at some blog last week for noting that Sarah Palin, who I’ve known for 19 years, often takes advantage of her physicality in unseemly ways to get attention. Even though I carefully stayed away from terming her cynical use of her body by using words others often do, I got jumped as a sexist anyway.
Mr. Teller (and The LurkingMod:)
a simultaneous handshake and bow.
Wait, is that inappropriate?
Prostituties! – the fabulous new DC cereal!
Flakes (Now in Gender- Neutral!) that moan when you don’t pour money on them!
I’ve thought that since watching him on a C-SPAN Iowa farm fair appearance in mid-2007, but thought it was a minor part of his makeup, and that something else might predominate should he be called to higher office. I’m still confused.
Bingo. Bad career choice if he just wants to be loved…
it’s not about word police, it’s about using a degree of sensitivity that does not diminish your point. i happen to think the guy had a point and i was merely stating that when the language is articulated in a way that distracts readers it loses it’s impact.
don’t go in search of word police or thought police, just pay attention: if it seems harsh when knuckleheads like limbaugh and beck uses it, it will probably be harsh and distracting from the point when someone else uses it. Especially when it is in bold print.
namaste
Why not? She’s selling her services (as a senator) for money. That’s close enough for jazz. (It doesn’t have to be sexual services being sold.)
Once again, OK. Bowing back, though not as deeply as Obama or Nixon or Eisenhower or…….
Or we could refer to the Beltway as a Prosted Toot-Loop.
Ahh, much more concise!
gayle,
when you say “just pay attention,”
that seems harsh and knuckleheaded to me.
I am paying attention, which is why I commented.
Twain already labeled Congress our only native criminal class.
i never said that. i don’t what you said about palin and most women i know would agree that she is using her “assets” to manipulate her audiences, but that doesn’t mean anything other than that she is playing to the lowest common denominator.
so, if what you just told me is what you said about palin, this woman would say the gals over reacted.
Perhaps it should be noted that “prostitute” is not a gender specific term. Plenty of rent-boys out there, or so I have been told.
Twain takes the prize!
Tons of them out and about in the vicinity of my old neighborhood in Chicago.
ET, skip it, scroll, it’s not worth your time.
You of all people, she should not choose to mince nicey over words.
You’ve earned a GREAT amount of loosage and crazy in here for your efforts to bring the truth.
You’ve nothing to defend, and no reason to do so.
no. when they say it you know exactly what it means. and that’s the problem: once they reduced it to that in the media-sphere it is reduced. don’t pretend you don’t know that.
It was Rahm, after all, gayle.
This place has a history of some rather florid descriptions of prostitutes in action, and by comparison, this is milquetoast.
Twas a colorful neighborhood. The sort that would scare people from small towns half to death but really not too bad. In the fifteen years my friend lived there he only got burgled once.
Time for me to toddle off. Lots of young minds to corrupt on the morrow (provided the unlikely event that any actually show up for class and haven’t already left for Thanksgiving). Take care all.
N a big PROST to YOUR Tooty, Too, Toots!
I think we’ve said all we have to at this point.
“No we haven’t!”
“Yes we have!”
“No we haven’t!”
“Yes we have!”
“No we haven’t!”
“Yes we have!”
“No we haven’t!”
“Yes we have!”
Wait, this isn’t abuse!
*pause*
Yes it is.
*G*
nite doctor
Jane was on TRMS, hosted by Lawrence “I staffed the SenFinComm last time Health Care went down in flames!” O’Donnell, thus the confusion.
Former rent boy. Year on the streets back in my teens a jillion years ago, and I’ve come to find it true what Nicholson said in Chinatown.
Paraphrase: “Whores, Buildings and Politicians all become respectable if they get old enough.”
I’ve tried to be funny, at a distance, and polite, but that ain’t working, so I’m reverting to type – direct.
Get a sense of humor, gayle. People here have one, and your wet blanket is a bit off-putting, mkay?
g’nite, k’rupt ‘em REAL good…
A friend used to drive out of town guests by the corner of Belmont and Broadway and give them a gander at the working “girls”. They generally lost it when he then informed them that those were really boys.
You know, when I mentioned earlier that “gay” used to mean “happy,”
I had no idea that we would soon be talking about “rent-boys.”
I am shocked, shocked at the turn this thread has taken.
and BTW, Michael Steele is NOT a prostitute!
okay, as you wish. i can live with being called harsh and knuckleheaded. beats the hell out of having my positions diminished because i’m a “prostitute.”
see, dude, i do make a distinction between being disputed and being dismissed as not worth hearing.
namaste
And what shall they tell the children?
“Ma, what’s that noise?”
“Don’t look hun and cover your ears. It’s a cow that got runned over by a train and it’s still alive. Well at least it thinks it is.”
true. i am laughing.
Hey guys, we all have triggers.
So we can afford to climb down off of each other now.
I remember the first time up there while waiting for a gyro at 2 a.m. I spotted a well-dressed lady about 6’9″ (in heels) walk by.
{{{{Larue}}}}
back to making dinner.
is a discourse more relevent or powerful because participates use abusive or denigrating language? seriously, does calling people really vile things to diminish their point of view make anyone more “right”? just a question.
gayle,
I hear you and respect your POV.
I have an issue when people try to tell other people how to express themselves.
best regards.
That’s been the whole mindfuck of the past 8 or so years. “Obviously we needed to go to war in Iraq, otherwise, we wouldn’t have sent troops in there.”
So, at least the Republicans are sticking to what kind of worked, for them.
Geez, I wasted a perfectly good Python parody.
That WaterTiger sure likes to stir shit up, don’t she . .
*G*
Great read WT. And with Steele and Palin the RePugs . . . . uh.
I got nuttin.
Oh, they don’t either!
*lol* *crackesselfup* *sigh*
It depends, IMHO, on the listener.
And I agree with Lurk – there’s a soft spot in all of us adults, and when plucked, we can shake it off. If you choose to be offended, I guess that is, well, whatever… but if you think that the commenter was looking for your pressure point, in this arena, you have lost me.
What does it depend on in your dishonest opinion? “g”
no judgement. i get you totally. i am speaking for myself. if we don’t clarify people jump to assumptions over sound bites. i’m just saying that we need to listen more carefully sometimes. namaste
humble… humble…
But I like it in here when it gets prickish.
Kelly – say some bad shit about yourself.
Well, I’m late to this party, so I’ll offer up my comment totally outside the current context.
Speaking of minds like claptrap, I’ve got Chris Matthews & Hardball on my teevee in the background. Holy mother of GOd, Bob Corker is a complete idjit!!!!!!!!
Thinking maybe this is something we can all agree on? That, and WT is high-larious!
OOOOhhhh, does this mean we can say the “C” word now? I like that word when referring to certain types of women. *g*
[using utmost restraint]
I respect everyones whiny assed opinions, no matter how stupid they are.
Even more hilarious is Tweety adorning the Republican party with ‘fiscal practicality’ in that exchange.
Christ.
This kind of amusing albeit not surprising.
Palin Supporters Struggle To Explain Why They Support Palin
So that’s who he was talking to that seemed to take up 65 minutes of a 60-minute show! Gosh he was tiresome.
I just KNEW you would be visiting! LOL!
Just one restraint? Seems kinda half-assed. Do you have a problem with commitment?
It’s because she is no longer a GILF.
not at all. frankly, it’s not even a “soft” spot. really, i’m not that easily rattled. but i am a writer and i believe it matters the words we choose: we can either illicit another’s real thoughts on an issue or we can make them shut down and go into a defense mode with our language.
i was simply asking what exactly it is one means. not their command of extreme language.
don’t concern yourselves with my soft spots, dude, this is a blog, not a love fest. namaste
Well, now you’re just being patronizing,
and I will will not tolerate that!
Fair enough.
Fuck you, Lurk!
Heh. I think I was indulging in wishful thinking when I caught a whiff of irony? Guess not. ;)
As far as I’m concerned in the GILF War she was a noncombatant.
Much obliged.
hahahahahah
Later on in the show, he really gives the Catholic Bishop who did or didn’t scold Pat Kennedy a piece of his mind.
It was a pretty good Tweety moment.
I have a soft spot for Lurk…sigh, bats eyes…
That may actually be worth staying up for!
I’m just glad all the big problems in the world have been solved so the bishop can focus on something really inane.
Writers who fail to capitalize personal pronouns just drive me insane. i think we need a blogger ethics panel-complete with punctuations basics. Oh, and large blond ladies with small hands drive me batty. Also, too.
Plays a pretty mean harpsichord as I recall.
He really gives him what-for for dabbling in public policy while trying to remain at a safe distance. He really drives him into the boards, and Tweety proclaims to be a devout Catholic.
I’m not large, blond, or a lady… oh wait, you probably weren’t talking about me.
But is the Crystal Methodist Ted Haggard still not gay.
Might explain his shivering timbers.
I’ll just put it out there.
I will be 50 in 2012, and I plan to run for Denver City Council at that time. I will put all my skeletons out (and have started doing so) so that I may not be oppo researched into oblivion, and in fact I think it will work in my favor for the specific seat as it’s the most urban, most blue and most in need of a reality check.
I will run Independent, and as a conscience candidate.
I am a familiar face at the food bank, the Rainbow House, and the Colorado Aids Project.
I am just over the alleged professionals running and “wooing” these constituencies, as that’s what they do; woo, beg for money/votes, and then do what the hell they want too, because they are not an actual CONSTITUENT!
And what must be banished is “polite” language. Not entirely, as people must remain civil, but it’s frikking Klingon Cloaking Device Language that must be abandoned to effect real change.
The Hell With Correct Speech – It’s Correct Deeds, dammit!
All I know about him is that he likes chocolate pecan candy. What else matters? ;)
Only his body-builder masseuse/dealer knows for sure.
Does he share or horde them all for himself?
When he has Leftys on the show and Stupak and the like come up, he goes to the “Money is fungible” card. When the overly-pious visit, he whacks them for trying to make church doctrine into law.
So maybe the shivers are all about the straddle.
You should start an “American As Apple-Pie, Dammit!” party.
It’s a wonder folks don’t get straddle sore.
There will definitely be “food” in the mix.
But I’m not kidding. At all.
I don’t know.
Hey Lurk! Do you horde the candy?
(I bet he does.)
Meh. Dems are the only ones required to use civil discourse. During the deterioration of the Iraq war, everyone who was right was called defeatocrats, surrender monkeys, cut-n-runners. Reference was given to “aide and comfort” and treason. We get called baby killers and DFH’s. But let a Democrat slightly raise his or her voice above a whisper, the entire Republican delegation, backed by the jillion watt right-wing wurlitzer kicks into instant mock shock and relentlessly demand apologies.
Good luck with your run.
In a chocolate-sized safe.
I believe you. I’d vote for ya.
Think I’ll call it a night. Bob an’ I say “Bye.”
Hah! As I thought.
Night night rat. Give Bob some sunflower seeds or other treat for me.
Bribes, you know. Gotta get in the habit. :)
Free political consulting advice for a guaranteed win.
Get out in front. Keep improving your position.
Wow. Thanks for the heads-up about Tweety and the RI bishop. Whipping out the old Jesus card: “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.” Jesus’ teachings often trip up the politically-meddling pious. But what do I know about catholicism? I’m just an Episcopalian. /s
That was worth staying up for!
I avoid church religiously.
And pardon me for whatever anyone might take from this, but Bishop Tobin is a liar and an asshole.
Bob says “Thank ya, thank ya verra much!”
Looks like you have his vote.
nite ratfood
W00T! One down, only a couple hundred thousand to go!
[now, seriously shutting down campaign mode till appropriate time arrives.]
“Bishop Tobin is a liar and an asshole.”
How else would he get the job? We’re talking Catholic Church here. Tax them!!!
Just saw that at HuffPo, it was really, really hard to watch.
I don’t think Steele is even really running the party. Mainly because of stuff like this, he just makes a fool of himself.
I was one of these people caught up in the grrrrrr of the health care debate and I would like to interject something, if I may.
A lot of this internet-fighting could qualify as prank-phone calls or other forms of nonsense. It comes from this electric-wall of non-accountability called “the internet” more than anything else.
What is significant is the real levels of rage and anti-government sentiment in the public at-large since President Barack Obama took office, these web-fights (I think) are just the bottom of the barrel of the real issue of our times.
You raise the right questions.
Does defamation make up your entire political stance on the president, and can that truly be called “patriotic?”
I am interested in people’s opinions, even if they are not at all like my own.
But much of what I hear touted today is not even opinions, it is wild theories and broad accusations.
I call it “The Politics of Personal Destruction.”
My favorite phrase: “We did a forensic overview of our policies, and…”
Thuis is just anotgher example that the Repub party really has no interest in the abortion issue except as a fund raising mechanisim. Did you ever see a constitutional amendment against abortion during the Repub years under Bush. No you did not. They would hate to have it completely restricted because they could not get their troops up in arms without it. That is why no one ever cared about whether iot was in their opolicy or not.
alia jacta est