![]() |
|
After he was elected AFL-CIO president in September, Richard Trumka traveled around the country on a listening tour. Here’s one story he heard, which he described this week as the AFL-CIO, along with several key allies, launched a jobs initiative to help get our nation back to work.
Last summer at an event in Ohio, I met a young woman who is facing this crisis head-on. Lacey, who is not yet 20 years old, wants to become a teacher. But after her dad’s factory closed and he was laid off, she had to put off her hopes of attending college to help her parents keep a roof over their heads. Lacey took a job in a school cafeteria—until the state budget got cut, and she got laid off, too.
After months in which she and her father were both searching for jobs, Lacey said she felt lucky to find a part-time fast food job that pays half of what the cafeteria paid. Lacey has more unemployed friends than friends with jobs, and, like a third of workers her age, she’s still living with her parents. Here’s what Lacey said to me that day:
I wanted to be a teacher to help children get the education they need to get ahead. But now I feel like I’m just going backward myself. I’m really scared for the kids my age. We want to work. We need jobs.
For many Washington insiders, Lacey’s life is hard to fathom. They’re obsessed with the GDP and fixated on the budget deficit (as opposed to the trade deficit, which, if it were addressed, would improve the U.S. jobs situation). The fact that more than 26 million Americans are unemployed or underemployed just isn’t registering. And who in D.C. can grasp that there are just no jobs in this country—that, in fact, there is more than six workers for every one job?
Yet as we found in our recent survey of young people, “Young Workers: A Lost Decade,” the recession is flushing their earning power and their futures down the drain:
- More than one in three young workers say they are currently living at home with their parents.
- 31 percent of young workers reports being uninsured, up from 24 percent without health insurance coverage 10 years ago.
- One-third of young workers cannot pay the bills and seven in 10 do not have enough saved to cover two months of living expenses.
Brad DeLong, an economist at the University of California-Berkeley, has described the debilitating effects of the oxymoronic “jobless recovery” on young people: Every 1 percent increase in unemployment results in the loss of 7 percent of income for young people entering the job market.
Overall, the long-term damage of an ongoing recession, says Economic Policy Institute (EPI) economist John Irons, seriously damages the chances unemployed workers will get jobs. Irons cites a study in which some 35 percent of jobless workers don’t have jobs two years later and 13 percent had only part-time jobs. Meanwhile, 13 percent of those who did find full-time work were paid less than at the job they lost.
David Dayen lists the five points in our jobs proposal here. We’re pushing it with our partners: the NAACP; National Council of La Raza (NCLR); Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR); and the Center for Community Change. Together, we’re trying to light a fire under lawmakers on Capitol Hill—who, if they don’t act fast, likely will get a close up and personal look at the unemployment line themselves. We plan to press the White House and Congress to act on these recommendations immediately, starting at President Barack Obama’s Dec. 3 Jobs Summit.
Speaking at yesterday’s event, LCCR President Wade Henderson said the nation’s jobs crisis requires urgent attention—because it’s not just an economic imperative to put people to work, it’s a moral responsibility:
Make no mistake, for us this is the civil rights issue of the moment. Unless we resolve the national job crisis, it will make it hard to address all of our other priorities.
The 2008 campaigns mobilized young people and turned them out to vote. Lawmakers have an obligation to ensure they—and our nation—have a future. As Trumka says:
We owe Lacey our support. We owe Lacey and millions like her a future to be hopeful about—not one to be feared. Lacey and her generation could find their future permanently stunted, their potential never fully met. That’s unacceptable. We can’t afford to let that happen.




28 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
To be fair they don’t even try
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Tula Connell and the Firepup Freedom Fighters:
I hope that the coalition of national labor leadership can hold together and forge a strong relationship first with the “populist” caucus and then with the larger “progressive” caucus for both the jobs bill and EFCA. If Democrats are to not only survive November of 2010 but expand their majorites, they need to pass a strong jobs bill, national healthcare without the Stupek Amendment and EFCA all by this Spring. In order to accomplish all of that they will need the Unions speaking with one voice on every talking heads program in every timeslot they can weasel into for the next 4 months.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION AND KEEP THE RED FLAGS FLYIN’!!!
The entire agenda can come home very easily if the House “populists”
We need a real FDR sized Job Stimulus any chance of that happening or is Obama going to disappoint Unions?
Sadly true.
Way back in the olden days, when Congress and the Administration were haggling about the first stimulus package, many rational voices were stating (some of them screaming, actually) that the bill was poorly designed and would ultimately fail to achieve its vaunted objectives. These individuals further noted that when the failure became manifestly obvious, it would then be difficult by orders of magnitude to go back to the well asking for…another bowl of porridge (as it were).
Simply stated, we’re at that point, and anyone with an ounce of brains knows it.
I articulate (again) Four Words:
In Fra Struc Ture.
So does the Administration and Congress have the collective will to act boldly this time? Time will tell. I, for one, am not holding my breath.
Six workers for every job? If only. It’s way worse than that out there in Realityland…
If this administration doesn’t understand that JOBS need to be Job One, they are going to face a GOP congress in 2010. And if they don’t understand the difficulty a GOP Congress will pose for America, they are really clueless.
Get with the program, Obama. Stop talking about how you don’t want to create make-work jobs, and create some jobs, make-work or not.
What if we cut taxes, won’t that fix everything?
without jobs for all and a more balanced, progressive tax system we will begin to look more and more like mexico. know barack is going to talk to us about afghanistan; but really, with all being spent, how cost effective is it when so much needs to be done here at home?
Oh yeah. I almost forgot about that.
“Put more money in the pockets of hard-workin’ Amurrkins…”
Simple answers to simple questions: (1) No, and (2) Yes.
Sure looks that way from what I saw on a Facebook poll I took earlier this afternoon. Something over 65% of the voters seemed to think tax cuts could really solve the problem.
Of course, no explanations as to how tax cuts will perform this miracle.
Citizen Raven:
Ah another voice heard from down there in lunatic land…where the hell have ya been Brother Freebird? Been out in the woods killin’ small animals with sharp sticks?
For a voice from the other side of taxation question.
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_13816849?nclick_check=1
You and I are going to spend our sunset years telling our children, and our children’s children, what it once was like in America when men were free.
Where did our government (taxpayers) money go and what have those people done to help us with jobs?
So here some questions that it would be swell if they got asked.
First to Gates and his defense contractor buddies. Note how the question is pitting “the troops” against capital for useless weapons.
“What steps are you taking to reduce spending in weapons systems so that more money can be spent on salaries for the troops?”
“Including non-DOD expenditures, defense spending was approximately 31-37% of budgeted expenditures and 35-42% of estimated tax revenues in the US. This 925 billion to 1.14 Trillion spend on defense seems high during this time of 10.2 percent unemployment. Americans are being forced to get food stamps, what are you doing to hire more people with the money that you are allocated from American tax payers?”
The goal would be to get the EXACT number or percentage of the budget spent. It will be important to insert anchor numbers in your question so that they have to justify it in contrast to hungry unemployed people.
Military funding is “free” in America and we know that they will defend it as “protecting the homeland” or “GWOT!” but if we ask them to defend itin relationship to their own troops it is different. That sets them up against themselves. And then ask the same question of the Defense Industry people. What kind of jobs are you providing? They like to brag about the brains of the people building the stuff, but the billions spent on Star Wars? How many actual jobs is that? It’s easier to get sympathy for a bunch of troops than for a 200 billion dollar boondoggle that Ron Raygun wanted.
The key here is to look at what kind of money is allocated now to the people who got it. The other area would be to the shadow banking industry and people like AIG.
We gave you X million dollars. How many jobs did that equal?
“But that wasn’t about jobs it was about saving the economy!”
Your company was saved. Now we want you to turn that saved company into a jobs machine.
“But we can’t do that!”
Why not?
“We need to provide million per person or they will leave the company…”
Okay how about this, you show us how many jobs you have created with the money we gave you. And if it isn’t as good as the number of jobs that WE can create with your programs you give us the money back now. You see we can create a LOT of jobs if we pay 50,000 per job than you can create where you pay 1,230,000 per job with 3,000,000 bonuses.
“But our job isn’t about job creation!”
We heard that private industry is all about job creation, are you saying that you are lying?”
But, but, but… GUARDS!
I’d add the following planks to David’s list:
- Retraining initiatives – past recessions have resulted in massive shifts toward mcjobs (unskilled retail). This enabled rapid employment recovery once economic growth resumed. This isn’t happening this time, which could be a good thing, but only if we work to establish systematic and comprehensive programs to retrain workers re-entering the work force. Low skill jobs are unlikely to be where the recovery is, whereupon we will likely have a critical skills mismatch that will end up hurting the poor.
- Cleantech jobs, R&D, manufacturing programs – cities around the country have made commitments to facilitate cleaner and greener development – whether through renewable energy generation, redevelopment and retrofit requirements, better stormwater management and recycling, and other such good things, etc., etc. But states are broke, the technology isn’t ready for large-scale implementation, and there is insufficient LOCAL manufacturing capacity for everything from solar hot water heaters to high albedo roofing. Meanwhile there are a TON of idle construction workers who are going to stay idle because there won’t be a real estate boom to help end the recession this time around. Perfect match – retrain and redeploy these building industry workers into cleantech manufacturing and construction – making and installing solar panels, refitting roofing, replacing building siding, retrofitting drainage systems, replacing asphalt street medians with stormwater bioswales, replacing public lighting fixtures with low energy alternatives, and a ton of other things that need to be done. They probably already even have the basic skills, but the Federal governments need to provide municipalities (through community development block grant type vehicles) with the capital to undertake these greening programs. The private not-for-profit sector can only provide a billion or two toward these improvement schemes, by one count. Government currently provides about $25 billion a year in subsidies. This could easily be $250 billion. The for profit private sector won’t pay for the actual refitting and construction work needed to drive this process because there isn’t really a short-horizon economic return to the improvements (at least not without payments from the Federal government).
And please stop using taxpayer funds to buy windmills from China, even if they do know how to make ‘em pretty well. You can’t be green and ship the stuff 8,000 miles.
I LOVE telling that story (our taxpayer money going to Spain and China to build windmills that will be installed in the midwest) and I want to thank the people who posted the diary about it here.
Good paying jobs are overblown..by the wind..that blows on the Chinese wind generators.
Health care, a warm place to my business is all I need. The crows are plenty tasty here on my ranch.
Middle America continues getting hammered.
Ah yes, it has been said that sunshine is a great disinfectant, so here it is. Yesterday Republicans shamelessly thwarted efforts by Democrat Senator Chris Dodd to help Middle America by freezing credit card interest rates on existing balances. At a time when people in this country are literally going hungry and without work, Republicans had the chutzpah to throw Middle America under the bus and instead line the pockets of credit card companies. Oy gevalt . . .
I understand the great plight suffered by credit card companies. The gravy train with biscuit wheels that they’ve been riding for years will soon be coming to an end. However, if they are looking for sympathy from Middle America, they can find it in the dictionary, somewhere between “shit” and “syphilis.”
As you may recall, especially if you’re an insomniac and have needed something on the nightstand to help you sleep, the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure (CARD) Act enacted in May, prevents arbitrary interest rate, fee and finance charge increases on a consumer’s existing balance.
In response, credit card companies have been hiking credit card interest rates to 30% in a last ditch effort to take advantage of consumers before all of the CARD Act’s provisions take effect.
To stem the hiking of fees on Middle America, Dodd’s bill would have sped up some of the provisions in the CARD Act, which don’t take effect until February or August of 2010. But yesterday Senator Thad Cochran (R., Miss.) objected to the measure, and it only takes one senator to block a unanimous consent request in the Senate.
This missive has nothing to do with the fact that consumers have a responsibility to spend within their means and to pay what they owe, and everything to do with the fact that the credit card industry has a responsibility to deal with consumers honestly. There is nothing honest about what credit card companies are doing to consumers with these rate increases and fees, which are simply usury and legalized extortion.
Middle America is already frustrated with the political Left and Right for not providing relief on pocketbook issues, and this gets the peasants one step closer to grabbing their pitchforks. If you’re keeping score, let the record reflect that in keeping with its tradition of whoring for big business, Republicans have once again chosen big business over Middle America.
A. Muser
http://americanmuser.wordpress.com
I’ve been beating this drum for at least 6 years. Once they outsource all the good paying jobs who is going to be left to buy their stuff? Now we are feeling that uh-oh. Couldn’t they see this coming? We were the consumer society that kept the world economy humming. Put us all out of work, jack up the price of oil/gas/food, raise the percentage on credit cards to loan shark levels and how did they figure we were going to still be able to pay and buy crap too? Now that they have made us all serfs who are they going to rape?
I still have a job and I freelance for extra income but even with cutting expenses to the bone I cannot keep up. Last year in August I paid $4.14 a gallon for heating oil and between that and gas it just bled me dry. Then the credit cards starting going up and the minimums started going up and I kept all the balls in the air until 2 months ago when once again even though they all praise me for being a long time customer with an excellent pay history, none of the cards would lower my interest rate or minimum payments. So know my response to them is I will pay what I can. There are no programs for you at this time, there is nothing I can do for you at this time. I just parrot their customer service lines back to them. My priority is to keep a roof over my head, feed myself and kids and keep the cars running so we can all get to work. I won’t contribute another dime to a 17 million dollar bonus even if I have to declare bankruptcy.
But Obama will easily win over a Republican Congress with his spirit of “bipartisanship.” We need an FDR and we’re stuck with an insider with little more than lofty rhetoric.
Tell a lie enough times and it becomes “conventional wisdom.”
You sound like the abolitionists in 1861 dumping on Lincoln
and the abolitionists were right. Why is the notion of holding elected officials feet to the fire to act in the best interests of the working and middle class so frowned in the U.S.. Is it because Americans are myopic optimists?
No the point is that Lincoln had to delay issuing the emancipation proclamation for two years and modified at that BECAUSE his generals in the Army of the Potomac were pro slavery and wanted to let the South off. What did Obama inherit: pro Clinton democrat finance guys. Obama can only do so much at once and he cannot take on the Clinton finance democrats at least until he gets healthcare passed and something under reorg in Afganistan.
Any half-decent job, you’re looking at dozens to hundreds of applicants, it’s the absolute shit, part-time, minimum wage jobs that pull that number down. “Can’t find a job? Oh, a new McDonalds just opened up hiring part-time workers.”
The global barons saw it coming, the politicians just remained willfully short-sighted to keep raking in campaign cash, please the lobbyists, and avoid getting hammered. The global barons are transnational. If the US goes to waste, they have a new rising middle class in China, India, Brazil, Russia as well as smarter European countries. They could care less.