Cowards. Cowards. And again, cowards.

I can’t say that word enough because no one else seems to say it at all.

Contrast what a sampling of Republicans (and Republican wannabe) have to say about today’s decision, announced by Attorney General Eric Holder, to bring some of the alleged terrorists, currently held at Guantanamo, to the United States, to be tried in federal court. . . .

John Cornyn—The attacks of September 11th were an act of war. Reverting to a pre-9/11 approach to fighting terrorism and bringing these dangerous individuals onto U.S. soil needlessly compromises the safety of all Americans.

Jon Kyl—It’s an unnecessary risk to bring the self-proclaimed mastermind of the 9/11 attacks to downtown Manhattan.

John McCain—Today’s decision sends a mixed message about America’s resolve in the fight against terrorism. We are at war, and we must bring terrorists to justice in a manner consistent with the horrific acts of war they have committed.

Joe Lieberman—It is inconceivable that we would bring these alleged terrorists back to New York for trial, to the scene of the carnage they created eight years ago, and give them a platform to mock the suffering of their victims and the victims’ families, and rally their followers to continue waging jihad against America.

. . . with what some Democrats are saying:

Patrick Leahy—I have always believed that the nation’s federal courts are capable of trying high-profile terrorism and national security cases. They have proven time and time again to be up to the job… I hope these cases will move forward promptly. By trying them in our federal courts, we demonstrate to the world that the most powerful nation on earth also trusts its judicial system – a system respected around the world.

Russ Feingold—Our system of justice is more than capable of securely, fairly, and effectively prosecuting alleged terrorists.

Jerrold Nadler—New York is not afraid of terrorists, we want to confront them, we want to bring them to justice, and we want to hold them accountable for their despicable actions.

It is fitting that they be tried in New York, where the attack took place. On that day almost 3,000 innocent men, women, and children were murdered, and New York has waited far too long for the opportunity to hold these terrorists responsible. We have handled terrorist trials before, and we welcome this opportunity to do so again. Any suggestion that our prosecutors and our law enforcement personnel are not up to the task of safely holding and successfully prosecuting terrorists on American soil is insulting and untrue.

On one side, a group visibly quivering at the prospect of having a handful of prisoners brought under heavy guard to lower Manhattan to face charges in the same court that was able to convict those held responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombings. A group terrified by what–the prospect that they might escape? Not gonna happen. That New York will suddenly become even more of a target than it already is? Puh-leez! That somehow the ideas that these long isolated and oft-roughed-up men will get expressed in court and somehow poison the tree of liberty, causing America to shrivel and die? Hmmm. . . .

On the other side, the Chair and a veteran member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, a US Representative from the district that includes both the World Trade Center site and the courthouse where the men will appear, and I’ll throw in (in the spirit of bipartisanship) the mayor of New York City, and the city’s police chief—all folks with a lot more on the line in this instance, all of whom say, essentially, bring ‘em on, it’s about time.

I said this much closer to 9/11/01, and I’ll say it again now: America is a big, strong, wealthy country with a rich history and a time-tested tradition of civil adjudication. What happened eight years ago was deplorable, sad, and horrible to witness, but it wasn’t anything close to an attack that could threaten America and American identity. . . unless we let it.

Unfortunately, under the cowardly leadership of Bush, Cheney, and their lily-livered amen chorus, we (at least in part) let it.

Now, under a new administration, we have a chance to look strong again. We’d look stronger if we brought all of those held extra-legally back to US soil to face justice, so I am not feeling singularly celebratory today, but I would be remiss not to contrast this small but strong step with the empty posturing and utter cowardice of the likes of Cornyn, Kyl, Lieberman, and McCain.


Related posts:

  1. Late Night: No Elephants, No Parade
  2. Late Night: Elephants on Parade
  3. Late Night: Elephants on Parade
  4. Late Night: Elephants on Parade
  5. Late Night: Elephants on Parade