| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Exclusive - Anna Baltzer & Mustafa Barghouti Extended Interview Pt. 2 | ||||
| ||||
Look for instance at Secretary of State Clinton’s recent travels. While in Pakistan, where we have increased drone attacks which have killed an estimated 13 Al Qaeda leaders and hundreds of civilians, Sec. Clinton spoke forcefully of Pakistan’s need to fight terrorism but apparently had no real response to the question raised by one Pakistani student:
At the Islamabad town hall meeting, a student from a university in Peshawar, a city shaken by a car bomb blast Wednesday that killed 118 people, summed up the anger over the drone attacks.
“What is actually terrorism in U.S. eyes?” the woman asked. “Is it the killing of innocent people in, let’s say, drone attacks? Or is it the killing of innocent people in different parts of Pakistan, like the bomb blast in Peshawar two days ago? Which one is terrorism, do you think?”
Clinton was tentatively scheduled to head to Afghanistan but given the election mess there, changed her plans and headed to Abu Dhabi. There she met with Fatah’s Abbas, pressuring him to reopen talks with Israel – and to approve Israeli construction of 3,000 new settlement housing units.
Ignoring Israel’s continued evictions of Palestinian homeowners in it’s continued land grab, she completed her reversal of the Obama administration’s demands of just months ago that “the US wants to see a stop to settlements. Not some settlements, not outposts, not natural growth exceptions” by calling Netanyahu’s refusal to end the settlement expansion an “unprecidented concession” and criticized instead the Palestinian’s unwillingness to restart talks.
Of course, Clinton not only did not visit Gaza but also ignored the horrific repercussions of Israeli actions there. While she was praising Netanyahu, nothing was said about the conditions his government has imposed on the people of Gaza where “10,000 Gaza residents have no access to a water network – while about 60% — about 1 million people – don’t have access to water daily and receive water only intermittently.”
Even today, the most basic commodities for life still continue to be barred by the Israeli government. Materials like wood for doors or cement for rebuilding in the aftermath of the destruction left by the last attack remained barred.
No electrical appliances, like refrigerators or washing machines, and no parts for cars are allowed. Also restricted are “fabrics, threads, needles, candles, matches, mattresses, sheets, blankets, cutlery, crockery, cups, glasses, musical instruments, books, tea, coffee, sausages, semolina, chocolate, sesame seeds, nuts, milk products in large packages, most baking products, light bulbs, crayons, clothing and shoes.” [11]
School supplies too, are blocked from entering. More than 100 trucks full of stationary are still awaiting clearance to enter Gaza. All of the 387 government-run and 33 private schools, which serve more than 250,000 students, lack essential supplies.
All of which is not surprising given our government’s refusal to press Israel on even it’s worst actions against the Palestinian people including the decision to oppose adoption of the Goldstone report on Operation Cast Lead.
One of the best ways to understand the Goldstone report is to view Bill Moyers interview with this respected jurist.
BILL MOYERS: I mean, there are allegations in here, some very tough allegations of Israeli soldiers shooting unarmed civilians who pose no threat, of shooting people whose hands were shackled behind them, of shooting two teenagers who’d been ordered off a tractor that they were driving, apparently carrying wounded civilians to a hospital, of homes, hundreds, maybe thousands of homes destroyed, left in rubble, of hospitals bombed. I mean there are some questions about one or two of your examples here, but it’s a damning indictment of Israel’s conduct in Gaza, right?
RICHARD GOLDSTONE: Well, it is outrageous, and there should have been an outrage. You know, the response has not been to deal with the substance of those allegations. I’ve really seen or read no detailed response in respect of the incidents on which we report.
BILL MOYERS: Why is that?
RICHARD GOLDSTONE: Well, you know, I don’t know. I suppose people hate being attacked. There’s a knee-jerk reaction to attack the messenger rather than the message. And I think this is typical of that. And of course, a lot of the allegations, I certainly don’t claim anything like infallibility. But I would like to see a response to the substance, particularly the attack on the infrastructure of Gaza, which seems to me to be absolutely unjustifiable.
BILL MOYERS: What did you see with your own eyes when you went there?
RICHARD GOLDSTONE: Well, I saw the destruction of the only flour-producing factory in Gaza. I saw fields plowed up by Israeli tank bulldozers. I saw chicken farms, for egg production, completely destroyed. Tens of thousands of chickens killed. I met with families who lost their loved ones in homes in which they were seeking shelter from the Israeli ground forces. I had to have the very emotional and difficult interviews with fathers whose little daughters were killed, whose family were killed. One family, over 21 members, killed by Israeli mortars. So, it was a very difficult investigation, which will give me nightmares for the rest of my life.
And such opposition to an evenhanded examination of what happened less than a year ago is also strong amongst Democratics in Congress. When Goldstone’s report was issued, Kirsten Gillibrand wrote to Sec. of State Clinton calling on the administration to reject Goldstone’s report saying:
Furthermore, the report does not adequately recognize the extraordinary measures taken by the Israel Defense Forces to minimize civilian casualties, which frequently put Israeli soldiers at risk.
and the following Senators signed on:
The letter was co-signed by Senators Johnny Isakson (R-GA), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Carl Levin (D-MI), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Joe Lieberman (I-CT), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), James Risch (R-ID), Pat Roberts (R-KS), Evan Bayh (D-IN), Mark Begich (D-AK), Benjamin Cardin (D-MD), Susan Collins (R-ME), Jim DeMint (R-SC), Byron Dorgan (D-ND), John Ensign (R-NV), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Mike Johanns (R-NE), Tim Johnson (D-SD), David Vitter (D-ND), Roger Wicker (R-MS), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Russ Feingold (D-WI), Dan Inouye(D-HI), John McCain (R-AZ), Arlen Specter (D-PA), Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), John Thune (R-SD), and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK).
On this coming Tuesday, the House will vote – and likely pass a nonbinding resolution that
charges that the report is “irredeemably biased and unworthy of further consideration or legitimacy,”
Sadly, even the innovative J Street which had seemed a source of hope in the american discussion of Israel is mostly going along – urging congress to rewrite the resolution but with assurances that Israel will never be called to the dock for war crimes.
For those of us who wish to see a more just approach to the issue, Gideon Levy perhaps says it best in today’s Haaretz:
Before no other country on the planet does the United States kneel and plead like this. In other trouble spots, America takes a different tone. It bombs in Afghanistan, invades Iraq and threatens sanctions against Iran and North Korea. Did anyone in Washington consider begging Saddam Hussein to withdraw from occupied territory in Kuwait?
But Israel the occupier, the stubborn contrarian that continues to mock America and the world by building settlements and abusing the Palestinians, receives different treatment. Another massage to the national ego in one video, more embarrassing praise in another.
Now is the time to say to the United States: Enough flattery. If you don’t change the tone, nothing will change. As long as Israel feels the United States is in its pocket, and that America’s automatic veto will save it from condemnations and sanctions, that it will receive massive aid unconditionally, and that it can continue waging punitive, lethal campaigns without a word from Washington, killing, destroying and imprisoning without the world’s policeman making a sound, it will continue in its ways.
Of course, Levy’s advice depends on the US elite actually wanting to end these crimes. Makes you wonder.



72 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Good evening, Siun. As always you find and connect dots so many others miss.
The O administration is sending a clear message to the Muslim world: go F yourselves. And for a stupid hypocritical speech in Cairo he gets a Nobel. How debased that award is.
Thanks Eureka … not so happy dots eh?
It’s just terrible. Wasn’t Hillary close to one of the bombings this week?
He promised in that speech to keep killing. I just couldn’t understand how so many were so easily fooled again.
I heard only clips on the news. I long ago got tired of O’s blah blah blah.
Netanyahu looked into Obama’s soul and saw a doormat.
I heard yesterday about the drone attacks = terrorism question but never heard Hillary’s response. My expectations are low but I’d like to know what she said.
I watched the first rate interview with Goldstone on Moyers’ program last week. Worth noting that Goldstone gives military forces a fair amount of leeway saying civilian casualties are inevitable but you should not purposely target civilians. That is not enough leeway to satisfy the folks doing the killing, however.
edit:
Okay, I just got Hillary’s reaction in the linked article.
Thanks, Madame Secretary. It’s not terrorism because you say it isn’t. That certainly settles the matter.
Background they have no army to speak of that I know about and a huge immigrant population kept in almost slave like conditions a drop in oil prices could lead to a revolt cause they won’t pay their workers unless we are committed to defend these scum why do they matter unless they are writing checks?
Siun, what do you think of Susie Madrak’s take on this?
Clinton in Israel to Relaunch Peace Talks
I can’t wait to hear what a J-Post-reading dual-citizenship Likudnik of my acquaintance has to say. Betcha he rips into Clinton for picking on Israel!
Particularly disappointing to see that Boxer, Feingold, Dorgan, and Wyden signed onto that letter.
Goldstone makes a great argument. Been listening to my better half read me parts of the report. Posted on the UN website. Summary, pieces or the whole thing.
See how much fun we have at our house?
I almost mentioned Goldstone earlier when some other commenter (sorry for forgetting who it was) mentioned that the I next to Joe’s name stands for Insurance and Israel. But, thought again and didn’t want to open that can of worms.
Thank you, Siun, for bringing the can opener.
Well said.
Price paid for Holy Joe’s support on healthcare or did we get nothing in return? Chicago Politician my ass “Where is mine ” is the creed of Chicago Pol’s! Obama Rahm insult Chicago’s proud traditions!
Good Job at the book club Demi you an eCHAN!
Why would you think that group would call for supporting the report?
Goldstone talked about how Israel intentionally destroyed Palestinian food supplies. Bad enough they don’t allow enough humanitarian aid to enter but they would also deprive them of farm land and processing facilities they possessed.
I thought that the J-Street group would take the “support the report” line, but I guess that was hoping for too much.
:) Just questions. And a couple of thoughts.
Nope – he will probably do what a lot of the Israeli press is doing and celebrating their “victory” over Obama. Bibi used Clinton’s words as an example of why he is so right to stand firm.
As to the other – this argument that a non-gesture from Bibi is a step forward – given everything we’ve seen for years, given Cast Lead, given the ousting of the family in Jerusalem who were removed from their home by settlers, and this week in an dreadful prelude to Hillary’s visit, were removed from the tent they had to move to … such attempts to make excuses for Clinton or Bibi are … nonsense (to be polite).
I’d answer that Gideon Levy gets it just right … the rest is simply an attempt to fool ourselves (or a way to once again find excuses for Israeli crimes)
Logically this is a clear contradiction get a few Jesuits from Americas top colleges to write their opinion the Jesuits even the right wingers who love Israel hate logical *cough* mistakes.
How about the distribution of leaflets telling the folks at Gaza to move to the center of the city. The leaflets didn’t say And, Then Duck!
Really dispicable, immoral and a bunch of other bad stuff.
You both had good questions and thoughts I’m sayin you both should take a bow!
This reminds me — Anna Balzer says that the Daily Show folk were shaken up by the concerted neocon swarm done against their particular episode:
I wouldn’t. I remember well.. things like sending cluster bombs to Isreal (for use on civilians) will get over 90 percent of a senate vote every time. However, it’s a bit more disappointing when somewhat sensible senators join in on the insanity.
Oh, you’re just trying to make up for all the insults I endured from the trolls.
It worked. Thanks, Things. And, now, I’m embarrassed. A little.
Baby steps, baby steps. AIPAC and JDL have had decades to shove the debate rightward, and they have Congress (particularly the House) scared to death. They’re already attacking J Street for selling Israel out to the Palestinians.
What trolls did I miss it!
Siun, he’s the sort of Likudnik who thinks that Egypt’s feeding the Gazans via underground tunnels. If it’s not in the J-Post or the NY Times (and lately he’s been having his doubts about the Times), he doesn’t trust it. Needless to say, he hates the British press (especially the Guardian and Independent) with a passion.
I can’t find it now – and if anyone does I’d love the link – but a member of Goldstone’s team has given a statement recently noting that Gaza may become uninhabitable by general standards due to the toxic waste from the weapons used there.
There’s been a lot of troll traffic of late, you should set up a troll-booth.
Was the interview good or bad?
Better that you did. Let’s turn the page. :)
That deserves a front page post in Prime time!
The second half of the interview is the video above.
no surprise there.
the last thing they care about is evenhanded examination of anything, because reality often displays a bias against the abuses of the powerful.
I’ll dig it back out and write something up … it was stunning.
This is what we need on the news in order for the blogs to run with this we need personal stories/updates on the victims condition! Weekly updates
Net probably will make video iffy Boeing field fraks up my connection.
Prime Time Siun! Use some favors heck use any favors I’ve got being a loyal laker should count as something.
One thing I find frustrating is that we all knew this was happening as it happened. When I was covering Gaza for FDL I was shocked at how much was actually shown and reported … and people around the world including in the US responded. In Europe, there are growing boycotts of Israel for example. But … even with the clarity of seeing the white phosphorous bombing of UN schools for example on CNN, there is no official American even minor gesture to say “too far” – nor is there even any outrage that, as Levy says, Israel keeps making the US beg. It’s a stunning situation.
What toxins? give me something to research!
I think we are all extremely fortunate to have the willingness of FDL to cover these issues – most blogs shy away. I have never been asked to back away from the story or censored while writing about it.
I just found this in the Goldstone report, which I recalled him discussing in the Moyers interview. Any reasonable person should be able to agree that these were not legitimate military targets.
This was not reported in American news if so I missed it or the blogs I admit I don’t catch you all the time my bad but sorry this IS FRACKIN NEWS! It should be front paged forget the Lake I’m talkin MSM 24/7! It would get much better ratings than another missing White Woman!
Here’s something:
UN Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict Goldstone
http://whatreallyhappened.com/content/un-fact-finding-mission-gaza-conflict-goldstone-0
Obama’s early Israel/Palestine policy was one area where I thought he really was making a change from Bush and earlier administrations. His change of tone towards Israel was refreshing, even though limited. Very sorry to see that even these modest changes are failing.
Reads like the Russian practice of dumping a dead Pole in a well to poison the drinking water under Peter the Great.
Maybe every post Siun you could include places where we could send cash or volunteer to help.
Ok bye
Have a good nights rest, Things. See you another day.
Here’s the link, Siun:
Thank you, as always.
Bother. The link didn’t stick and I couldn’t edit it in. Here’s the link.
Thanks Laura!
And to think, the Romans only (purportedly) salted Carthage.
Bibi’s arrogance makes more sense every day. What COULDN’T he get away with?
Dennis Ross got promoted to the NSC, in charge of M.E. policy, with an office down the hall from Rahm. Rahm said he would carry Ross’ luggage anywhere he wanted to go.
Dennis Ross was described as “Israel’s lawyer” for his role in tilting the Camp David negotiations in Israel’s favor.
Looks like he’s at it again, with a big high five from Rahm “Emmanuel” Auerbach, IDF volunteer and second most powerful man in the U.S.
I wonder what the whole script for failed peace looks like for the Obama era. You know it’s already written or outlined.
You said:
Netanyahu looked into Obama’s soul and saw a doormat.
This is so true but Netanyahu isn’t the only one. You could add the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Insurance Companies, Big Pharma and a host of others -
I dont understand the isreal – US relationship as it is. Yes i know the i lobby is powerful and yes i know they were a realiable cold war rap buddy (so was saddam hussein), i know they are the only “western republic” in the ME. On the other hand we (the U.S.) pay a LOT of money for all those supposed benefits. isreal gives us nothing in return but a strategic client state in the region. They take trillions from the U.S and demand that we have palestinian blood on us along with them…the return dosent seem worth the cost.
Oil
Thank you, Siun. It is clear to me that Israel’s goal is to eliminate the Palestinians either by directly bombarding them with genocidal weapons, depriving them of water, food, shelter, medicines, medical facilities, means of educating their young people and in the process contaminating the air and soil with depleted uranium and other toxic elements.
In the period between the election and Obama’s inaugural Israel strongly reminded Bush to make sure that the “special understanding” between the U.S. and Israel was impressed upon Obama.
Since Obama has gone wimp on his obligation to be an honest broker between Israel and the Palestinians in Gaza, I have determined to learn what is that special understanding.
On Jan 16, 2009 George W Bush signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Israel.. I have read it and it definitely condemns Hamas and is complicit in sanctions and the bockade, etc.. [I think the charges against Hamas are greatly exaggerated in the MOU.]
I note that this MOU was signed just as Israel was ending Operation Cast Lead. It appears to me to be a statement of support for that unjustified, disproportionate assault using banned weapons. To me this MOU shows plainly who Bush and Cheney are, but not who we Americans are.
IMO: (1) GWB had no right to sign such an agreement just 3 1/2 days before he left office and expect the incoming administration to abide by it; (2) Obama should repeal that MOU and either come to a more humane stand as to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians or make no new MOU but make Israel understand that the US does not support their current treatment of the Palestinians and will not automatically back them up if they become beligerant toward Iran or other Middle East nations.
It is very possible that I do not understand the contents of this MOU. How do you folks see it?
Remember Hilary’s comments in public to Pakistan last week, expressing her skepticism about their inability to locate Bin Laden?
I think there is an effort by Israel and those in America who serve them (Hilary included, obviously) to destabilize Pakistan with the ultimate goal of getting a U.S./Israel puppet in charge of Pakistan and their nuclear weapons.
Israel has the power to defang any regional threat or possible future threat, and they want to be the only guy on the block with nukes.
It’s just a theory for right now, but it dovetails with current Afghan/Pakistan policy, including the indirect support of the Taliban (through druglords like the CIA Karzai brothers) and the bombing of civilian populations and wedding parties in both countries.
Remember Richard Perle’s “Securing the Realm” paper he wrote for Bibi in the mid-nineties, PNAC’s “Rebuilding America’s defenses, and Brzezinski’s “The Grand Chessboard.”
If you think I’m full of shit, I hope so too. But “Regional transformation” has been the buzzword since before 9/11, and Obama is certainly showing us that things don’t change for the better no matter whose campaign speeches we vote for.
Would any of you be shocked if the U.S. or Israel tried to destabilize Pakistan like they are proven to be doing in Iran?
Despite the high levels of misdirection WashingtonDC has orchestrated reaching back to 1980 and immediate post Shah removal in Iran what you touch on here is much closer to the deeper thrust WashingtonDC seeks to bring about. WashingtonDC and Israel have cemented a relationship that has become increasingly monstrous,demonic and venal since 1980.
WashingtonDC promoted overtly and covertly the Iraq-Iran War and only turned on Saddam when he broke Washingtons leash (or was tha leash let go on purpose by Washington?)and attacked Kuwait.
Washington soon was in Kuwait,that beacon of democracy on the Persian Gulf and Iraq soon was routed and placed under Washingtons no fly zones and defacto siege. It always seemed more like Saddam had failed to topple Tehran so Washington demoted him by ruse of letting him attack Kuwait then turning on him and taking over Iraqi airspace.
Israel meanwhile has mauled Lebanon,the West Bank and Gaza repeatedly and clearly would prefer to make refugees of the Arab Palestinians and be rid of them. Anyone who still believes Israel has any true interest in peace at this point with the Palestinians,Lebanese or Iranians suffers from delusion. Israeli warmongers,land and water grabbers and Temple Mount zealots are anything but peace seeking.
President Obama failed early on to denounce IDF/IAF Iron Fist conduct and it should be clear now will not be moving WashingtonDC off/away of where it has been since 1980 regarding Israeli intents and desires towards Jerusalem,West Bank,Gaza or strips of land and river water resources it covets along Israeli borders. Anyone who cannot see what fate is nearing for the Gazans after the past five years of Israeli duplicity is thick in thinking to be sure. Israeli duplicity which condones genocide and war crimes tainted politics and militarism. WashingtonDC has also condoned this,continues to do so and is as guilty as TelAviv for it being so and becoming more so.
It is not out of bounds to suggest Washington or those who cast deep policy in Washington in the political parties,the Pentagon or whatever lairs they lurk in set Iraq up for attack/occupation. Intend to fully install,keep and maintain American military presence in Iraq,Afghanistan and Pakistan. To keep Iran under ongoing threat which similar to the Iraq saga may at anytime be transformed by misdirection or duplicity into a attack on Iran with intent to subjugate Iran with the lash of Shock and Awe ruination.
President Obama has fallen short of what he claimed to be or would be. It is now easy to see he seeks to protect the Bush WH legacy. To keep with the longer,deeper Washington decades old pro Israel,American hegemon across Asia with all his ability. Israel knows it. Congress knows it. SoS Clinton knows it.
Americans may not know it but we are inflicting a great deal of suffering across Asia on lots of poor,innocent people and clearly our SoS Clinton is of the opinion that we will keep doing so.
WashingtonDC has sown and is still sowing some very bad seeds for conflicts already here or to come. Stoking a religion based conflict with Islam and using it to justify American/Israeli hegemon across large swaths of Asia seems demonic. Judging from how Washington is letting Israel get away with what IDF/IAF did to Gaza with Iron Fist the word demonic is apt.
In response to BillWalker @ 61 last sentence and inquiry? No. Expect it.
Peace to you Christina – sadly I come too late to this posting.
I suspect that many Americans mistakenly think that Obama’s speech in Cairo and his alleged desire to deal fairly and honestly with the Dar al-Islam was taken seriously by Muslims.
It was not.
Furthermore Americans in my experience overstate the Cairo Speech’s importance to the Dar al-Islam as a whole.
I suggest that people read his speech again you will see there is very little substance there although the tone is polite. In the light of American actions subsequent to his speech there is no reason to believe that President Obama has ever had even the slightest intention of dealing either honestly or fairly with the “Muslim world”. His administration’s deeds show that he is the latest imperialist in chief and that that is all he is.
Those of us who said at the time that pretty words and an emollient tone were merely the latest American ploy have been proved correct and our political stock has risen throughout the Dar al-Islam accordingly.
You might be interested in this Pew Survey.
Confidence in Obama Lifts U.S. Image Around the World: Overview – Pew Global Attitudes Project:
Emphasis added. Islam as I believe Abu Dubhaltach has told you is a very practical religion. We look at a person’s deeds not words when we want to know how whether they are truly interested in peace or not.
I see no evidence whatsoever that Obama is anything other than a somewhat more competent and somewhat more polite version of his predecessor.
Thanks for the excellent reply, shootthatarrow.
“It always seemed more like Saddam had failed to topple Tehran so Washington demoted him by ruse of letting him attack Kuwait then turning on him and taking over Iraqi airspace.”
Have you seen “Hidden Wars of Desert Storm”? I think that’s basically what happened. Lots of evidence:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eG5D8JyTUw
As far as Pakistan, when I see a “suicide” bomb, like the one last week which occured hours after the NYT published details of Brother Karzai’s CIA and Opium connections, my first thought is “Israel did it,” and my second thought is “CIA did it.”
Have you seen “Missing Links”?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YResfXTXd1c
“Through deception thou shalt make war”
Have not seen Hidden Wars of Desert Storm. Likely very worthy.
The history of American State Department signals to Saddam in year prior to Iraq going into Kuwait which was based on some historical prelude reaching back to Ottoman rule and then British Empire border drawups after WW1 in this part of the planet.
One could factor into this turn of events also the decline and fall of the Soviet Union. Post Soviet Union demise Washington was talking the peace dividend but that soon was eclipsed by American Kuwait War which led to Iraq being subdued,sanctioned and by March 2003 very ripe for Shock and Awe.
Washington soon proceeded with plans to install some American military superbases across Iraq and that fortress mega U.S.Embassy building which are now in place and showing little sign of being dismantled for one or two decades to come. Iraqi airspace is and remains under defacto USAF direct control.
Israel plays Washington like a fiddle year after year,no matter who Americans put in Congress or the WH. This is a simple fact. Both American political parties have been co-opted by Israel. Washingtons dereliction of any American foreign policy about or towards Israel apart or separate from what Israel seeks or desires is wanton. As Siun has presented here at FDL so well so often.
President Obama has disappointed often since moving into the WH Oval Office. More and more there is little reason to think or believe Barack Obama is going to be a profile in presidential courage on Israel or Arab Palestine. It is certain Barack Obama has left the plight of the Gazans to TelAviv merciless and war crimes premised occupation conduct in Gaza.
SoS Clinton with her actions,answers,statements and posturing is making it plain to see Barack Obama is not going to make Israel change its abuse of what is legal,moral or truthful. Barack Obama is not going to change what WashingtonDC has been doing across the Middle East or South Central Asia since 1980.
We are the ‘leaders’ in the world of terrorism.
Is this it?
Goldstone member: Israel’s toxic munitions could leave Gaza uninhabitable
by SCOTT MCCONNELL on NOVEMBER 1, 2009 · 55 COMMENTS
http://mondoweiss.net/2009/11/goldstone-member-israels-toxic-munitions-could-leave-gaza-uninhabitable.html
You left out the part about their super effective spy ring.
Since they designed lots of our communications equipment to have built in spyware, we really should assume ALL of our lawmakers are being blackmailed. Anyone can be blackmailed easily if ALL of their communications are bugged and monitored.
Plus Cheney’s hit squads, don’t forget about that. If they will mail you US military grade anthrax, they will also kidnap and torture your children or arrange a little airplane crash. Everyone is afraid of them.
I thought they were already working on it.
Then you won’t think I am crazy for thinking ‘Cast Lead’ was launched in response to something I said. I can’t even remember what it was, just that sinking feeling they used my words as an excuse.
They do have very sophisticated spyware built into all of our communications equipment. I would say they do blackmail that works.
We could go after it as a conspiracy to commit treason and expose them. We could if we wanted to.
Did Richard Goldstone Hide More Sinister Crimes in Gaza? Part 2 – DIME and Uranium Weapons
http://www.paltelegraph.com/opinions/editorials/2757-did-richard-goldstone-hide-more-sinister-crimes-in-gaza-part-2–dime-and-uranium-weapons