My parents used to tell me that I could sing “Davy Crockett, King of the Wild Frontier” before I could talk. I don’t doubt it; I loved that show. Fess Parker, a Texan, played Crocket in television’s first three-episode mini-series, produced by Walt Disney in 1955. The theme song, sung by Parker, was the nation’s number 1 hit for 13 weeks. I sang it constantly, setting a coonskin cap on top of my three-foot self and banging on a plastic ukulele I couldn’t play.
“Be sure you’re right, then go ahead,” was Crockett’s motto. Out of the mouth of a legendary American frontier hero, it’s often misunderstood as a kind of dangerous, simple-minded willfulness. One can almost hear George W. Bush saying it, though he’d put a period in place of the comma: Be sure you’re right (full stop). Then go ahead (smirk, chin bob and shoulder dip).
However, as the saying appears in John W. Barber’s 1857 Hand Book of Illustrated Proverbs, it reads more like Emerson, Thoreau, William James and John Dewey than George Armstrong Custer:
Be cautious all, abroad, mind where you tread
Be not deceived, be sure you’re right, then go ahead.
It speaks to setting incautious certainty aside in favor of open-minded experimental action, and that is the core of America’s most original philosophy, pragmatism. Some even say its roots lie in practices of the first Americans, the indigenous people the real Crockett championed. Crockett, by the way, destroyed his brief career in Congress when he opposed President Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Act. Disney dramatized Crockett’s fundamental humanism. In one episode, Crockett faced down three racists who were trying to take away Indian land. “Indians have rights,” Crockett said. “They’re just folks like anybody else.”
All human actions are experimental. We have to “go ahead,” but we’d best leave the cock-sure behind us when we go.
Of course, it’s sadly true that the ears of arrogant, cock-sure and ugly Americans haven’t exactly been open to the nation’s philosophers. Too many actually oppose action to philosophy, as if thinking before acting is a weakness.
It may seem nutty to turn to Walt Disney for progressive insight, but it’s often forgotten that in Disney’s world, the Indians were heroes and Custer was a villain. Heroes like Crockett weren’t lonely, anti-social individualists. They acted on behalf of community. J.G. O’Boyle wrote in the Journal of Popular Film and Television:
A close examination of Disney’s historical film output shows a consistent pattern of antiracist, anti-war, anti-authoritarian messages – messages often at odds with the prevailing popular mood of the time.
So, can Disney’s Davy Crockett save America?
The other day I wrote a piece about a new study that shows broad-mindedness leads to happiness, and happiness leads to broader, associative thinking that is more creative. The author, Harvard’s Moshe Bar, speculates that the happiness reward gives us a survival advantage.
Certainty and dogmatism lead to unhappiness – and quite often to peril. Science is confirming Crockett’s advice. Move ahead, but do so with an open mind and an understanding that absolutist illusions of certainty are dangerous.
There is a human tendency to avoid uncertainty, a tendency often exploited by the authoritarian right. They aren’t the only ones, of course. Ideologues of all stripes quit thinking creatively and insist that truth belongs exclusively to their ideology.
Ronald Reagan was a master at using melodramatic American myths of the cock-sure frontier hero. In the end, though, Reagan was open-minded enough to trust Mikhail Gorbachev. It’s just another dumb ideological fiction that Reagan “won” the Cold War. But he had sense enough to open his mind a bit, get out of the way and let the historic changes happen – a move Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and other hidebound exploiters of the mythic, unbending cowboy hero are still angry about.
We can never be sure we’re right, of course. Crockett’s motto would be more accurate, if more cumbersome, if it read, “Be sure you’re right as you can be, then go ahead. Adjust your future actions to the consequences.” Absolutists on the right will call this moral relativism. Absolutists on the left will say it lacks revolutionary zeal. They’re both wrong. It’s just smart.
Crockett gave us sound advice, and there’s another benefit. The authoritarian right has created a false image of frontier-style individualism. And that gives progressives and opportunity to win favor from voters who understand that thought is action’s hero, and that real heroes are socially minded champions of community, not Ayn Rand pathological loners. Generations were taught that by Walt Disney, for crying out loud. We ought to remember the lessons.
Related posts:
- Late Late Night FDL: The Flying Squirrel
- America Regrets We’re Unable to Lunch Today
- Upcoming Recess Events: Tell Your Rep Where You, Your District, and America Stand
- Late Night: The Great Muppet Menace, Or, Ten Tiny Trotskys on the Telephone Talking about DESTROYING AMERICA
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Michael Huttner and Jason Salzman, 50 Ways You Can Help Obama Change America





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

More Sunday food for thought.
Just for you, Glenn
Davy Crockett – King of the Wild Frontier
Ah, the memories!!
Gee Glen you had a coonskin hat too.
I’m thinking of donning it again!
Mine is long gone.
Often times the proponents of whatever action are going to sell it with certainty. Those that are victorious own it just like GWB and Cheney own Iraq and Obama owns the stimulus.
Uncertainty is the terror of the far right. That’s why they like virtual dictators who tell them what to do and think. Taking time to consider a problem is so “liberal” and it’s so much easier to just invade or bomb something.
Thanks, Glenn, for the thoughtful post. I liked Crockett, too.
I think what feeds into this is people generally don’t like to have to admit when they’re wrong about something. But it’s a sign of character and maturity to be able to admit it. It’s funny you mention Ayn Rand because I just wrote up a comment about her on Steven Weber’s blog, where incidentally, I mention how Alan Greenspan has had some trouble with this.
I don’t think Ayn Rand merely has a particular brand of philosophy. I think there’s something psychologically wrong with it.
- Tom
The far right conjures up disasterous consequences to those actions to which they disapprove then present them as certaintees.
A good read is the history of the various social safety nets developed in the :wild west” and the moral values and ideals which informed them. Like Ronald Reagan W. got his notion of the Lord of the Flies culture from the movies. Their heroes were the criminals.
My observations are that most of the people such as Crockett and Boone and those who followed to settle the West thought they were creating a civil nation. In fact it was their abhorrence of the notion of extending slavery into the western territories that had much to do the the Civil War. The slave states insurgency lives in the conservative clinging to states rights to determine who is deserving of basic civil rights.
Hey man, don’t be hatin’ on Uncle Walt. Here in the City Beautiful Disney IS the economy man. Well, a big chunk of it anyway. (And it’s doin’ pretty shitty. Wanna keep a school open? Come on down! Wanna keep cops on the street in The City Beautiful? Come on down! ’cause we ain’t got the money for… like… basic services) We LOVE Disney!
Pragmatism is the major contribution of America to philosophy. It begins with William James and Charles Peirce, and on to John Dewey, and Dewey’s disciple Richard Rorty. The central issue is a discussion of the nature of truth.
Actually you weren’t hatin’ on Uncle Walt. To the contrary Just wanted to get a plug in. Come on down and pay tribute to that great progressive — walt disney. What better way to do it than spendin’ tons of money?
I have a question. What constitute pragmatism? Obama might say he’s being pragmatic signing a lousy HC bill. But couldn’t it be said that pushing the Blue/Bayh Dogs and having them vote for a strong PO(Medicare +5) is pragmatic too?
I agree. It has no basis in observed fact nor reason. Can we call it Sociopathy? I think so.
They bait the fearful by making thoughtfulness equivalent to hesitancy or cowardice. But just the opposite is true, of course.
Political pragmatism is taking the best deal available. The philosophy of pragmatism is sort of like what Glenn ascribes to Davy Crockett, the King of the Wild Frontier.
I agree with you about that these are equal political pragmatic choices.
Rand’s thought is really not philosophy at all. I agree with you. To begin with, as almost all branches of the human sciences are showing, her Hobbesian outlook is wrong. Humans are social. We are cooperative by nature. Our selves are interdependent, not isolated. Of course, we are also competitive. And we are wired to watch for danger. Rand then takes danger to be the only certainty, and the isolated self the only defense. It’s sad, really.
Thanks for bringing back that memory. I suppose I got more of my moral instruction from ‘Davy Crockett’ and ‘The Andy Griffith Show’ than I did from church…at least the part that I still adhere to. When we talk about the 1950s we mostly remember it through a haze of the events and ideas that have shaped us since then. While it was certainly a time of racist violence and right-wing intolerance, especially on the national stage, this was also the time when the seeds of the modern progressive movement were beginning to sprout. Disney, Boy Scouts, small-town America — all things that have been co-opted by the right — the reality was lost somewhere. The time when Ronald Reagan was promoting 20 Mule Team Borax on “Death Valley Days” also had Edward R. Murrow, Andy and Opie, and Davy Crockett. They all had a profound influence on me.
See massaccio at #12.
I might add that pragmatism — kinda an unfortunate name, really — applies to more than just a philosophical search for truth. Think of it as both a style and a philosophy of the good life. It is anti-foundational, that is, it takes no truth or certainty for granted, but basis decisions on experience. It is open, not a closed system of thought.
No one probably recalls Arthur Hunnicutt as Crockett in “The Last Command” with Sterling Hayden as Bowie. He was a man of few words who jumped in the ammo wagon with a torch and took a bunch of Mexicans with him.
Funny, I always felt that those of us who served in Vietnam and then came home and tried to stop it were following in the footsteps of “make sure you are right and then go ahead”. But I’ve always been a romantic.
Glen – this is a super essay – thank you!
I had a raccoon hat as well and sang with gusto. I often think that many of our generation were led to our politics by the tv we watched which said equality and fairness matter and the good guys never stop fighting for their brothers and sisters.
Unlike those who try to forget that John Wayne played Crocket in The Alamo
We bought the myths we were taught and then p*ss’d people off when we tried to force the country to live up to them.
No question about it, really. The humanist side of the era is often lost in memories of cold war bluster and the right’s subsequent reliance on folk tales of the lone, anti-social hero who escapes the community.
You know, I could have gone into that more. The transition from Fess Parker’s humanist, compassionate-eyed Crockett into Wayne’s lone hero says much about the conservative effort to repudiate narratives that tell our responsibility for one another.
Did you have to bring that up – Pilgrim? :)
It is anti-foundational, that is, it takes no truth or certainty for granted, but bas[e]s decisions on experience.
The way you (quite accurately) describe pragmatism echoes some of the less-quoted verbiage of the Declaration of Independence: “…experience hath shewn…”
Which is (at least a big part of) what makes it so American; the approach is ingrained in us, or anyhow is so widespread as to constitute a national stereotype. The founders, after all, were thorough pragmatists in practice, as were Lincoln, FDR, so many other greats.
Raven, I’m not sure what I said that you’re objecting to. I have nothing but admiration for those who served in Vietnam and then came home and tried to stop it.
And today’s trivia question. What film did Wayne use that term in first and most frequently (no google allowed)? :})
Have to admit I can’t remember which movie, but I can see and hear him saying it. Way too long ago.
The Man Who Shot LIberty Valance (one of my personal all time fave Wayne movies and Westerns)
Now I remember and I loved that movie although I never cared for him. He always just played John Wayne. I did like The Quiet Man, though.
Yes, that is my favorite of all as well. But as I think about it sometimes, these two and a few others, Wayne did do some good work even though he was usually just playing some variant of John Wayne. McClintock is also on my list as is In Harm’s Way. And Donovan’s Reef.
That is an excellent point about the Declaration. Thanks.
There are so many things we have not experienced in this country. That’s why we handled the aftermath of 9/11 so poorly. It was totally outside the range of anything we knew.
Nothing at all. . .honest. Your comment just rang true with me. Poor wording on my part.
Much of what was presented was black and white. The Lone Ranger and Superman fought evil. Germans and Indians were bad. Was there any gray?
Did this lay some of the seeds for todays problems?
I propose a choral rendition of Davy Crockett by all of us who remember the words at NN10 in Vegas next summer. What key should it be in?
Another thoughtful essay, Glenn, thanks. I’m reading Frank Schaeffer’s Crazy for God and he mentions that that attitude, of certainty, dogmatism and the conviction that you are superior to everyone else, is the #1 thing he took away from the religious teachings, both by word and deed, he got from The Work (as his parents called it). It’s also one of the things he has the most trouble letting go.
Forty years ago The Population Bomb was a best seller Ehrlichman posited that there would be mass starvations from overpopulation in the 70’s and 80’s, everywhere including the US.
I remember long discussions in college about whether he was right and what we could possibly do about it. Our conclusion was that it was immoral to bring more than one child into the world. I know there were many others who came to the same conclusion and so my cohort of progressive-valued men and woman had far fewer children than other cohorts of my generation. The Christianists today are having kids by the tubful so that one day there will be more of them than of us and they can take over the country.
So that’s one of my theories about how we ended up where we are today. The cohort of morons is just bigger than the cohort of progressives.
Namaste, Glenn.
Glenn, I’m with Siun, this is a very thoughtful piece
and I was recalling Disney’s Tonka at your mention of Disney’s treatment of Native Americans. it depicts Custer as a blustery, hard ass ‘decider’.
youtube is down or I’d find a clip
Barbara Ehrenreich has recently weighed in with her own idea about how we got here, dovetails quite nicely with what Glenn is saying about real pragmatism
If I had a dollar for every poorly worded comment I’ve made, I could rival a Wall Street investment banker ;-)
Is the cohort of morons connected to the confederacy of dunces? :)
And, I’m all for singing the Davy Crockett anthem, in the key of C, “the people’s key.”
We bought the myths we were taught and then p*ss’d people off when we tried to force the country to live up to them.
I’ve never heard it put more succinctly, but that’s exactly what the experience of the ’50s and ’60s was for me (early boomer, b. 1947).
A fundamental flaw in Rands thinking is shown in her fictional protagonists: conservatives that were both productive and honest.
Instead of designing and building bridges, contemporary conservatives are busy tearing down the figurative ones and letting the literal ones rot.
That quote, and it’s full-length version, remind me of another truncated ‘conservative’ idiocy: My country, right or wrong.
Not many know the full version of that, which is, “My country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right. When wrong, to be set right.”
George Bush was clearly wrong, and Obama, along with the Democratic ‘Leadership’ are not about to ’set right’ the wrongs of 8 years of Conservatism.