The last sentence of Adam Kirsch’s review of “Ayn Rand and the World She Made” is quite possibly the most succinct indictment of the GOP and the conservative movement I have ever read:
[I]f there is one thing Rand’s life shows, it is the power, and peril, of unjustified self-esteem.
The thing that always makes me go gyarrggghhh about Republicans’ worship of Ayn Rand (and, indeed, Ayn Rand herself) is their refusal to recognize that they are the pro-parasite party. They’re so outraged by the thought that somewhere in America a poor person might be getting a few government crumbs – for free OMG – that they don’t notice or care that the GOP has been giving corporations taxpayer-funded turkey dinners for decades, long before Obama decided to keep Dubya’s gravy train rolling.
Nor do they notice or care that the people who work their asses off to actually produce things of value must endure layoffs, inadequate healthcare, and stagnant or decreasing wages, while the executives who profit off of them, and the Wall Street whizzes who produce nothing but financial time bombs, make millions and billions of dollars.
If these supposed captains of industry walked off the job like in “Atlas Shrugged,” would the country really grind to a halt? Manufacturing, services, and technology CEOs, maybe. But I think the country would survive quite nicely if all the geniuses behind derivatives, credit default swaps, and Enron accounting went away, never to be seen again.
And how many of the heroes of the conservative movement are truly extraordinary achievers? George W. Bush is a mediocre failure who used his daddy’s coattails to coast through life like the angel of fuckups. Sarah Palin is a narcissistic freeloading clown who can’t complete a term or a sentence – her life is the world’s tackiest reality show. I can’t even figure out what Not-Joe the Not-Plumber is famous for, other than not wanting his future millionaire self to pay taxes. And what do Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, Coulter and O’Reilly create or produce other than lies and hate?
On the flip side, how many of the people who depend on unemployment insurance or food stamps are really lazy underachievers, and how many of them are potentially productive, even extraordinary people who never got the benefit of a good education or family connections to open the right doors? Rand and her disciples all assume that our society is a darwinian meritocracy that automatically slots everyone into the position they deserve, but it takes about five minutes of C-SPAN, talk radio, or Fox News to see how wrong they are.
Conservatives are absolutely right that creative, independent, extraordinary people are at war against a corrupt political and economic system – they’re just dead wrong about which side they’re on.



117 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
I propose that all plutocrats be required to relocate to Pluto.
Maybe we should offer them some demon dipped candy? Oh, man, Pat Robertson doesn’t miss a trick, or treat.
Wow I agree with everything!
a great description of the current r obsessions with all things galt, eli. they refuse to see what they have become
You got that right Eli.
Who sucks more at the government teat than conservatives?
Cheney’s Halliburton
and Blackwater/Xe — just for starters.
But none so blind as those who will not see, eh not?
I ran on too long with it – my original plan was to parallel it with their inability (the religious right in particular) to recognize themselves in the Biblical Pharisees.
(Not that that’s not necessarily a bad thing – I just didn’t expect to have so much…)
They would welcome the comparison since Republicans think the New Testament has a liberal bias.
GOP has been giving corporations taxpayer-funded turkey dinners for decades, long before Obama decided to keep Dubya’s gravy train rolling.
But of course the lie is that, “The Corporations MAKE money.” where as when you give money to those deadbeat poor people they don’t return money to the economy.
Corporations that don’t pay taxes are given an out, if the corporations had to pay taxes they would pass the cost onto the people who buy the products! Besides, they figure, ‘The employees have to pay taxes on the salary.” of course the clever CEO get it all in stocks and don’t have to pay capital gains.
Not to long I like the Biblical Pharisees idea maybe next post?
True, I’m sure the Conservapedia version will be much more sympathetic to the Pharisees. Or, alternatively, turn them into stereotypical bleeding-heart liberals.
“Unjustified self-esteem” – what a perfect description of Republicans. Scary.
One of the cleverest linguistic tricks the Republicans came up with was to translate “profits” into “jobs”.
After all, who doesn’t want jobs? Or massive, unchecked growth in jobs, even.
Rand would have hated the GOP. And she would have hated much of the corporate world as it now exists–or I’d like to think that.
I’m seriously considering it, actually. I may very well do that if nothing else grabs my attention.
The are remaking the movie Wall Street.
In this one Gordon Gecko is the head of Goldman Sachs and leads the country to the brink of financial collapse. After getting bailed out by cutting Union Pension funds from Martin Sheen’s old Airline company and convincing the Fed to give him free money backed by the voiceless American Tax payers he gets a 100 million dollar retention bonus. The villian, a female President named Mallory Vinton, demands that his salary is capped at $500,000. He out smarts her and successful changes his 100 million dollar bonus to 1 dollar (and asks for 100 million stock options equal to the share price on 11/30/2008 but with no total compensation limits).
His options becomes worth 3 billion 700 million dollars. He uses the money to fund the Heritage Foundation, NewsMax, WorldNetDaily, the AEI and the Club for Growth. He is able to donate money to three hundred politicians who will vote against any federal regulations on the finance industry. He buys the WSJ and Fox News off of News Corporation. He gets controling interest in Premiere Radio and the EIB Network so that Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity work for him. With the money Rush buys the entire NFL. Hannity buys Centre Island, where he currently lives in his 8.5 million dollar house.
The movie is a comedy.
I’m pretty sure she was very pro-GOP, actually. In her world it’s the big shots who are the ubermenschen who must not be held back, not the little people.
Excellent post, Eli. I read Rand in the 70s. Tried to read her again a few years ago. Couldn’t do it.
Never had occasion or desire to read her, but I *did* see the movie version of The Fountainhead. It was hilarious.
I once wrote a book that had a serious section on class analysis. In it I divided the world into Producers and Predators:
http://elegant-technology.com/ETthree.html
I can assure you that NOTHING in my analysis had useless protoplasm like Rand listed as a Producer. If you can imagine that fraud building a bridge, for example, your imagination is MUCH more colorful than mine.
Here is an interesting tidbit on Rand.
My then wife turned me on to her. She became quite the Randian. Still is.
And she chose Greenspan? Wow.
Linguistically they are very skilled. I recently suggested that people write the investors of News Corp before the Nov 4 stock holders meeting and ask them some questions about their losing money on the Glenn Beck show.
Today I heard that the radio station contest that killed a woman for drinking too much water cost them 16 million. I think we should ask News Corp if they are prepared for the lawsuits that may come from a Tea Party where someone takes a shot a politician. We currently have people attending with guns, we know that Fox is promoting them. We now have a wrongful death price. They should consider it the cost of doing business, but they should make sure that their insurance premiums are paid.
What I really want is for them to look at the cost of running a activist organization with no responsibility. They are not a press entity anymore and they should be subject to defamation and other cases where they don’t have the protections of the MSM.
Yeah, that’s pretty much where I’m at. I can’t think of very many conservatives whose accomplishments I have to grudgingly respect. Hey, Jim Bunning did throw a perfect game – that’s pretty awesome, right?
not a chance, not even technology ceos
gm would be fine without lutze, my company would be fine without it’s owner, my friends in banking and finance fields run the company not the ceo and there is not one chance ceo’s leaving of any major corporation would suffer that corp
except perhaps the value of stock but it’s the ceo’s that would lose from that loss of value
apple would be fine, microsoft would be fine as all they are now are representatives with almost nothing to do with the operation
stock prices would plummet for a very small window till everyone saw the companies did better with base management over ceo management and stock prices would soar since middle class would buy up the stock if they had a hand in how the operations ran
As far as I’m concerned Obama can pull a Palin any time. Quit, write a book and join W on the speaking tour. This present batch of hacks are destroying the Democratic brand of FDR. They’re all talk and no action.
I don’t think they care all that much about losing money on Glenn Beck. He could lose all his advertisers, and they’d just tout his show as being free of commercial interruption. As long as he keeps pissing off Democrats and collecting czar scalps, he’s earning his keep. I really do not believe that Fox News’ primary purpose is to make money.
I do wonder how much legal groundwork Fox has already done to try to protect themselves from being successfully sued (or put away) by the victim of some crazy teabagger. I can’t believe it hasn’t crossed their mind – indeed, that was probably the reason for Glenn Beck’s insincere little “Please don’t kill anybody” PSA.
You haven’t seen Alan in his toga and laurel leaves, dead ringer for Apollo.
I pretty much have to agree with that. When a corporation can hire a CEO from outside with no experience in the business that tells me he’s nothing more than a highly paid figurehead for the board and shareholders.
You’re thinking of the much lesser-known god Appallo. Very similar name, totally different appearance.
Ayn Rand is the Barbara Cartland of the New Republic. Mark Sanford thinks, ‘remember Ayn, Myrtle Beach, lost flights to Argentina, my dreams of Camelot? I must be FREE.
The GOP is all about sex, always has been. The problem with Ayn Rand was Howard Roark is still not worth waiting for. Ayn Rand was totally anti-Walmart. None of her characters could even lick a stamp. They were Pharoahs, more like the Soviets than the Communists. That’s what happens when you listen to Red Limbaugh.
Contemporary populism simply has a different target. The goal is to be popular with lobbyists.
The Inbred Elite Gaults are trying to create a permanent Upper Class since they never are allowed to fail they never weed out the Stupid.
Bush, Darth, Rummy on every issue from the economy ( less regulation, the housing bubble) the War (we won WW2 in less time) Katrina, Terry Schiavo 8 years of being wrong about everything and the best the GOP can come up with now is blame immigrants.
Hmmm? the Lou Dobbs shooting reminds me of Morton Downey Jr I think the guy painted a Nazi sign on his own face.
I think the Conservative Crazy movement when its fading gets desperate for attention and does things even more crazy to get attention.
I could have sworn there was a Tom Tomorrow(?) comic which showed what the world would be like if everyone followed Ayn Rand’s every-man-for-himself philosophy.
It turned out about as well as you’d expect…
Oh yeah, now I remember. Apallo, first name Shecky.
Eli. Here’s the deal. We need to FORCE the COO to explain that they don’t care about losing money on Glenn Beck. Why? Because then they have been forced to reveal they have lost money on Glenn Beck. I’ve worked with the financial investors before and their mindset is strange. They try and pretend they don’t care what is happening in the company but they really do. They also have schemes and plans that involve the company stock tanking that they will use any excuse to push some strange drop in revenue that is not really significant.
The goal here is to use their greed to hurt Fox and News Corp. Also anything that shows again that FOX is NOT a Press Entity (and I use that phrase on purpose because it is used by the FEC) is a good thing.
The Legal groundwork angle also needs to be brought up to the financial people, not because it hasn’t been thought of, but because we need to show them that it IS a potentential liability. Another potential liability is the loss of their FCC license which is a license to make money.
The station that lost the 16 million didn’t lose the license because they fired all 10 of the staff involved. That is something that they did to keep the license.
The whole point is to put these doubts in the minds of the investors. They are a public company and they investors are just LOOKING for reasons to be pissed and short the stock. If the reasons happen to be legit all the better.
Sorta like the inbred Pharaohs.
Oh sure. I’d love to debunk the excuse that they’re simply pursuing ratings and they’re *totally* not a Republican propaganda organ.
Who’d want to be head honcho if you couldn’t marry your sister?
Goopers Gone Galt…?
… may the list be long and growing…
I have two sisters, and I wouldn’t want to marry either of them. They’re nothing like me, in the ways that really count.
My google foo is weak in this area, any idea where to get a list of a few top institutional investors?
They lie to themselves they all tell themselves they are the Common Man. Why they need to do this when by their every action they screw the Common Man I don’t know.
They all think they are self made men Darth gets a CEO job with what experience? Then he bought an asbestos company moves like that should have made him the worse CEO ever but Bush’s numerous business failures top even that.
They hate the Elite Lefty Bloggers who use Facts and Science one minute we are Elite the next we are pajama wearing Cheetos eaters.
They make predictions about the future that are constantly wrong. We are like Cassandra of Troy right with the predictions but ignored.
Traders are to be herded, not listened to.
Try Page 9 of the summary PDF here:
http://www.execcomp.org/research/research_institutional.aspx
Seesters? You got seesters?
Thats easy ratings are how many people watch but the older white males Fox’s strongest audience unless your selling denture cream they are not to many advertisers wanting that market.
How many African Americans or Hispanics do you think watch Fox Growing populations with kids who buy stuff Fox doesn’t get to many of those viewers.
Young People came out for Obama huge Gays another group that doesn’t watch fox.
Same here. I’d sooner marry Bob.
Do they make Depends for droolers?
Dos. I could sell you uno for cheap.
Bob! Would he like some fried chicken?
How much?
Spock0 – there is also a list here: http://money.cnn.com/quote/major_holders/major_holders.html?symb=NWSA
He occasionally gets a few tiny bites of meat but won’t accept anything except steak. Spoiled kid.
Or lets put it another way as Rupert and big corporations bought the Media people have watched the news less the Comic book industry is doing fine so people are reading but the Newspaper industry? Nope Rupert bought the WallStreet Journal if he really cared about ratings he would give the people what they want and get more readers.
He bought the Journal I think by using his Newscorp stock as collateral that stock has gone down in value I wonder how much longer Rupert can afford to be conservative?
Ayn Rand and the murderer she worshiped:
http://michaelprescott.net/hickman.htm
http://www.executedtoday.com/2009/10/19/1928-william-edward-hickman-ayn-rand/
How would I know I don’t watch Fox’s ads:)
If you can make the younger one happy…a neekle. Hell, I’ll even pay for the airfare.
Oh, fine. Tell Bob we should have met before I started reducing our red meat intake.
There is some Devils’ Food cake left, though.
(Bob, Bob, Bob. Who has spoiled your feathery little butt?)
How’s this.. Anthony Levay, the founder of the Church of Satan said that Satanism is pretty much the same as objectivism.
http://www.churchofsatan.com/Pages/SatObj.html
There’s plenty on the internets about it. Of course, enlightening them does nothing to cure their ignorance or cognitive dissonance (stockholm syndrome).
From the ExecutedToday piece. Interesting. Thanks.
That’s sounds like getting more than I bargained for. *g*
As I pointed out at my place, even if you take away all the Hickman backstory, the fact remains that Rand has described her ideal man as… a sociopath.
Bob had a tough life before I came along. He deserves some spoiling.
So do I, cake please…
Mitt Romney sold 2 of his 4 mansions I guess Rush is eating him out of House and home conservative media thanks to corporate takeovers has to much debt, thanks to Conservative news fewer readers, viewers etc. I expect the big media companies to start collapsing soon.
Nice segue into All Hallow’s Eve.
Isn’t it amazing that two of the most important texts for conservatives – Atlas Shrugged and the Bible – should have such totally opposite messages?
If I had one that would suit you, I’d bring her by personally. I would. You’d have to talk to the tigers about it first, for permission, of course. It sounds to me like you have a good life, hon. Got your priorities straight.
Satanism John Gault I would love to see a reporter ask Megan McCain about that.
Two plates coming through. I’m out of ice cream, however. Milk works.
What kind of girls fall for sociopaths once they are out of their bad boy phase? And what kind of women marries these men? A study of the wives of Newt would be interesting sad but interesting.
I’ve yet to meet the woman who would play second fiddle to a house full of tigers. Don’t know that I’d want to.
Thanks. Bob doesn’t get chocolate but I’ll eat his piece too.
Hell, just go to one of our beach bars and hang out for a while. You can see ‘em in all stages of development.
Okay, I gotta ask cuz I musta missed something somewhere. Bob is a pupper, right?
But he has and he will.
Nanday conure I adopted from an avian rescue a couple years back. This isn’t him but looks just like him.
More document dumps.
Source: ACLU
ACLU Obtains More Documents Related to Bush Administration Torture Program (10/30/2009)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org
NEW YORK – The government today handed over to the American Civil Liberties Union numerous documents in response to two ACLU Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits for information related to the treatment of detainees in U.S. custody overseas. Thousands of pages of documents detailing the interrogation of prisoners by the FBI, Department of Defense (DOD) and CIA have previously been made public as a result of the lawsuits.
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/torture/41374prs20091030.html
Woooowwwwwww. He’s gorgeous!!! What a lucky pair you two are.
Golly Gee, you do have one fussy bird, don’t you? I mean, it’s fine with me, but goll. My dog will eat anything. And does.
I spent the afternoon napping and reading and my cat, Piccilo, was on my chest. Right in my face. Had to hold the book at a wierd angle to read. Does that make me wierd?
Talk about not having anything better to do. Good grief.
Not if ya wanna read.
Well, yep. And, one handed holding too. You know, the other hand was pet, pet, scratch, scratch. Just the way he likes it. But, the smile on his face was worth it.
Prolly going on in more households than you can imagine as we speak.
The race to the bottom has been won by the stupid. This has been going on for at least 50 years and smart people have watched and allowed Rush and Co. to prevail in our society. That sucks.
Universities are becoming repositories for military industrial complex whores who can get tens of millions in grants while students borrow tens of thousands to pay their tuition and top administrators and coaches get paid millions to rove from u to u to feed their egos.
Eisenhower was prescient. Who will stop this? Nobody in our government because they are all servants of their campaign donors. Guess what we need to do.
Another Randian Ubermensch…?
Madoff ‘amazed’ at escaping 2006 check
Let’s see now… well connected in Washington, eh? Can you say Blow Job?”
FACTBOX-Madoff, SEC employees quizzed about agency missteps
I’ll take door #69, Monty. S.E.C Exhibit69 Page 28
Ubermenschen??? … or Ubercronies!!!
I’ll take Red Zombies for 65 Billion, Alex.
Nah, not weird, just an indulgent cat owner.
Chocolate is bad news for birds. Not good for dogs either but of course they’ll eat it if offered.
Thanks, we’re buddies. He went from no time out of his cage before I got him to eight hours or more a day. He’s a happy guy.
Wow.. I followed your link.
That is one disgusting criminal she idolized. She wrote:
appealing
Then I read what he did.. horrible.
I can only surmise that she must have been abused badly or totally ignored during childhood by her father, to idolize emotionless psychopaths like she did, and find them so sexually appealing.
You know, the best graphic representation of the kind of businessman hero the Randians worship was in a recent Partially Clips cartoon. It sums up the morality of the market perfectly.
http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1626
And I’m gonna guess spoiled rotten. *g* Which is as it should be.
Lucky You!! Conures will suck your heart out! I can’t go into pet stores that have them.
Long day manana. Time to leap into my tree.
Be good to yourselves, and all other living things.
Namaste
I had to Wiki Rand’s entry to remind myself of her. (It has been a long time since college days when I knew some freaks who adored her.) And one part just had me shaking my head. Alan Greenspan went to her funeral. Doesn’t that make perfect sense?
Also, I was laughing out loud at the entry that, at her funeral, someone had “laid” a 6-foot high bouquet near her casket — in the shape of a dollar sign. Didn’t anyone tell them you can’t take it with you?
Isn’t the Old testament mostly written as a justification to take things away from other people?
http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_wilderness/index.html
Buenos noches amigo mio
Bob is a lucky lucky bird.
Gregg Levine is upstairs!
Late Night: Choosing Sides While Looking in the Mirror
Oh yeah, they *love* the Old Testament. But the New Testament is the one that puts the “Christ” in Christian, and they refuse to have anything to do with it, other than appropriating some of the language for lip service to show how holy they are.
Pharisees.
Oh, except Revelations. They loooove them some Revelations. It’s like a little pocket of Old Testament on LSD.
Rand reminds me of Leni Reifenstahl . After her career photographing the “heroic” Nazis she traveled the world photographing male aborigines wearing only their God endowed tools and jewels. That noted, Reifenastahl did have more talent than Rand. These are really the sickest of our species..
At least Riefenstahl had the good sense to claim that she had no idea what Hitler was up to. Rand would have gushed about how awesome the Nazis were.
Further, notice how GWB, a less successful son of a much more successful father was always being “informally” advised by other less successful sons of much more successful fathers? E.g., Kristol, Kagan, (the other names escape me at the moment).
What is it with these guys? Do they think they have some special entitlement within their own very special cohort?
Great post!
True. True. And thanks for correcting the spelling. I was too lazy to look it up.
Alice Rosenbaum (that’s her name — use it) has a lot in common with Leni Riefenstahl. The difference is HER Hitler was Alan Greenspan.
This is funny to me…
All these responses…
Rand is human of course, although this guy Kirsch seems surprised by the fact that someone could actually manifest an ideal higher than self. I looked on the NY Times site to comment on Kirsch’s review and eventually found this site, where some guy who calls himself ELI doesn’t have the ability to distinguish beyond cliched generalities… “George W. coasted on his daddies coat tails”…or something like that? And 106 plus me comments…Jeez…
The only thing I came to say was that there is no such thing as “Unjustified Self – Esteem”, it is an impossibility, making both Kirsch and Eli the fools of the day. I assume what these “well-read” youngsters meant is more like ignorant arrogance… which they both, obviously, have personal experience with.
Jeez…
Well if you’re really on the brink (or is it on the blink?).. Then cut loose!
Take some Damitol and chill… soon it will all be water under the bridge…
And don’t forget — “We’re all Bozo’s on this bus!”
How’s that for “socialist”…
…And don’t forget the Sarcasma chaser…
Comforting relief from the use of irony, mocking and conveying contempt.
And though we tread wearily aright we fall verily uptight…
You say…
Are you really an individual?
What do you really believe?
So now we know… happiness is:
Maybe you could give them a warm puppy too. And security is a thumb and a blanket, don’t you know…
As for hope…
Jeez…
And how many of the heroes of the conservative movement are truly extraordinary achievers? How can you say that? Bedtime for Bonzo is a work of staggering genius!!!
“the GOP has been giving corporations taxpayer-funded turkey dinners for decades, ..”
Medicare Part D and the subsidized private Medicare Advantage plans are outstanding, costly examples.
Since land tenure in the west is based on the legitimate freedom to enter into a contract whose provenance originates with white people stealing the entire territory from native Americans, the basis for Rand’s idealistic fantasy collapses in a stinking heap of illegitimacy upon scrutiny of the first link of the chain of custody post-conquest.
Libertarians are so infatuated with commerce and willing to ignore their dogma and trade in ill-gotten gains that they reduce the human being to chattel under the artifice that we own ourselves as we would own a hammer, and prioritize their fetishization into this notion that property rights are more important than the right to life, to access goods required to survive given that access to those goods requires that one work. Brains are like computers but nobody conceives of a person as a computer, to the contrary, the goal is to get computers to be more like people.
That kind of coercion, that you are first and foremost an economic instrument, that you must work to eat, when the “natural” law that these libertarians craft opportunistically out of whole cloth, derived from the pre-scarcity period prior to hunters and gatherers settled into sedentary agriculture, was that access to the necessities of living was available to all.
Now that land has been commodified, enclosed, privatized, it is no longer possible for most people to fend for themselves. In the early days of American urbanization, there were hobo jungles established along train lines in what is now the exurbs. The subdivision of these peripheral zones where those who did not fit into the contrivances of a work-wage-food economy eliminated the places where these folks survived and drove them into the cities, creating the homeless problem. Now that there is scarcity, these worshippers of property rights who see taxation as equivalent to slavery, are happy to ignore the slavery required to access food and shelter that their economic sharia imposes on billions.
The irony here, of course, is that amongst the best of times in the US, at least for white guys, was the 25 years after WWII, when the tax rate was northwards of 70%, infrastructure was a priority, education was honored and the workplace relationship was a two-way street. Never mind that most libertarians who fund today’s shriek box do not sell their labor for wages, rather clip coupons and fund think tanks to be sure that they keep as much of those coupons–crystallized labor of others–as possible. And they would not hesitate to use their economic might to coerce most people who don’t own significant property into paying taxes to police private property, as if that was exempt from the notion of taxation of slavery that they so abhor.
Libertarians historically are a reaction asserting individual autonomy in the fact of utilitarianism which claims that the rights of individuals should be subsumed to some greater good, that we can be used as pawns in greater projects. Of course libertarian capitalism has no such pretensions, ignoring that forcing labor on people subsumes their autonomy in favor of commodification and exchange. Thus, true libertarians abhor democracy because the have nots would simply use the artifice of state to redistribute wealth.
The best thing about libertarianism is that under such a regime, people would not consent to taxation to protect private property, this would result in a decay in the ability of capital to fund military forces to keep capitalism stable, and industrial society would collapse due to lack of energy and access to raw materials. Thus, the furthest idealistic right wing capitalist theory would double back upon itself and deliver the kind of “back to the Pleistocene” primativist anarchy, where corporations could not get that much bigger than the number of people with a direct interest in that corporation, that comes closer to my ideal of Green Anarchy (not to be confused with John Zerzan, please).
That said, we can agree with libertarians on social liberty while we disagree on economic liberty, the freedom to wage work or starve, and work with them as appropriate. And it is always fun to chat with them and make their brains turn to mush.
The transition from hunter gatherer to sedentary agriculture, the expulsion from eden myth, portends a significant break in the history of the human species as humans go from living in harmony with nature to the perspective that nature is something to be controlled, dominated and exploited. Such dominion was offered up in explicit terms in the Old Testament 3000 years later, and once the Church had finally let go of its death grip on Europe and the Mediterranean (thanks for burning the library at Alexandria, churchers) during the Enlightenment, philosophers such as Locke, well steeped in Judeochristian dogma and the rise of capitalist economics internally as the commons were enclosed and afar as the North American colonies were being set up to service the nascent British manufacturing sector, set out to create an intellectual framework that justified their position.
The rendering of the human being into commodity, of chattel, is an project to sever at the root any connection between human beings as animals and our environment, to snuff out a part of us by denying any wild origins. Thus, does libertarianism feel free to write any environmental consequences of “freely entered into contracts” off the books, relying on the threat of lawsuit after the fact to clean up any messes, floating us up the Love Canal.
Anybody catch Mark Sanford’s article about Ayn Rand in this week’s issue of Newsweek? Talk about elitism gone amock. Sanford displays his Doug Coe bible-induced “I’m one of the chosen” mindset right out there for everyone to gawk at. The only thing he forgot was his brown-shirted “Aryan supremacy” rant to go with it. No wonder so many people in SC go hungry with this Neanderthal’s take on the Golden Rule – makes me gag.
Sanford’s bull shit analysis about why his beloved St. Rand holds the future of the human race in her writings reminds me of the the old saying:
Democrats “work for you” – Republicans “just work you”…
You’re a week behind. Bmaz covered the Sanford piece at emptywheel last week.
the story that ayn rand likes to paint is totally fiction. if anything, the “captains of industry” that ayn-randers spend so much time worshipping are the very ones that ayn-randers demonize as “exploiting the talented.” anyone who has had a minimal education in the history of science and innovation knows that most of the time the people who bring about the really beneficial inventions, scientific breakthroughs and innovations in any field often don’t reap the benefits of their labor.
did albert einstein become a multibillionaire? after all, his work is the foundation of modern physics. did the inventor of the smallpox vaccine become a billionaire? after all, he destroyed the last great plague that bedeviled manking. anyone who takes a chemistry class learns the names of the great men of chemistry whose discoveries enabled our great medicines and modern chemicals. those guys were pretty much all academics who were content to do their research in their labs because they were truly interested in natural phenomena, not for material gain.
anyone who studies history and science will know that ayn rand’s ideas are just total fantasies. the government does the VAST BULK of scientific research, either directly in its own labs in public universities and places like NASA and the NSF, or indirectly by giving funding for places like stanford, harvard, MIT, etc.
a cursory study of history shows that generally the private sector is sucking the teat of the public sector. anyone who can’t even face these minimal, undisputed facts isn’t part of the world of reality.