Health insurance companies are raising rates to small businesses at a staggering rate: one consultant tells the New York Times he expects small business rates to rise an average of 15-23%, which is well ahead of the rate of increase of medical costs.
Why? The Times quotes several people saying that insurers are worried about the wizards of Wall Street:
“There’s no one out there who hasn’t had to do a mea culpa to Wall Street,” said Sheryl Skolnick, an analyst for Pali Capital who follows the companies. While the industry is particularly vulnerable now in Washington, she said, “it seems like they’re more afraid of Wall Street.”
That is a real problem. On the one hand, health insurance companies need to raise rates drive up stock prices and protect their stock options. On the other hand, these price increases come at exactly the wrong time, right in the middle of the legislative fight over reform. How ever will they defend themselves? How about this:
Insurers’ “profits are not responsible for increased health care costs,” said Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for the industry’s trade group, America’s Health Insurance Plans.
Oh. Then these enormous rate hikes aren’t going to help your bottom line. Wall Street won’t like that, folks. And if it does help your bottom line, and I think it will, members of Congress will hear from their constituents, those small businesses which are so important to their electoral futures, and might think twice about voting to help the people screwing their bread and butter contributors and voters.
What a dilemma. And it’s a problem for the Republicans, too. They want to take the side of small businesses, so they argue that reform will increase prices as more sick people buy into the system.
The Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said in a response to the president’s radio address, “We can’t support a bill that will raise premiums.”
Senator McConnell is in full “pull up the ladder” mode with this weird statement. He says it would be bad to insure more sick people, because it would raise prices for the people who already have insurance. Anyway, we don’t need a bill to raise premiums, the insurance companies can handle that without legislation.
Insurance companies also say there are more non-paying patients because of the economy, and Medicare doesn’t pay enough to providers, so providers charge more to employer insurance plans. In other words, insurers and providers want more money poured into this bloated system, and guess who they want to pay. Taxes? Premiums? It’s all good, as long as they don’t have to take a haircut.
Related posts:
- Only the Insurance Companies Want a Level Playing Field
- Blue Dog Health Plan to Increase Insurance Premiums, Bureaucratic Costs
- CBO: Public Option Would Do Too Good A Job Of Providing High Quality, Low Hassle Health Insurance
- Medicaid for All: An Alternative To Subsidizing Insurance Companies
- Former Insurance Industry Exec: Baucus Plan a “Gift” to Insurance Companies






Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Is McConnell just stupid or lying sack of sh*t?
Both.
Do we really have to choose between those?
Health insurance IS Wall Street.
Can I choose both?
I will make it easier for you – Is McConell just stupid and a lying sack of sh*t?
Yes you can!
Actually, Republics only want to pretend to take the side of small businesses. This just shines a light on them and sends them scurrying for cover.
Any mention of corporate management stock dumping? It never ceases to amaze me that fund managers are oblivious to that.
The biggest private health insurers will RUN ANY PUBLIC OPTION…
part of the secret deal between nancy pelosi, white house, and insurers…
see page 117 of HR3200– outsources running public option but prevents insurers from having any risk… it will be Halliburton on STEROIDS!
Progressives should call NANCY PELOSI AND HARRY REID AND DEMAND THAT THE PUBLIC OPTION BE FREE OF PAYOFFS TO BIG BUSINESS!!
Business Coalition for Single Payer
Not even short back and sides. Damn!
I keep hearing this from commenters, but none of the headliners here have ever said it. I’m Missouri. Show me!
I’m with you. I’ve got both bills on my desktop. With reference to Page 117 of HR 3200 I began with line 10 “(c) Administrative Contracting”. Within that section there are references to the Social Security Act which appear to me to be all about Administrative Functions of a Medicare Contractor to supply services.
When I looked at the language of HR3200 and went back to the SSA, my reading is that the contractor supplying Medicare (Public Option) Administrative Services will not be responsible for the costs.
Well of course not. A public option means that the government will be responsible for the costs. This doesn’t look like a bailout to me, including the lines here (from page 117 HR 3200).
20 Con
21 tracts under this subsection shall not involve the transfer
22 of insurance risk to such entity.
I’m not that great when it comes to understanding the convoluted language of a bill, but I don’t see anything here that amounts to an insurance company bailout.
what it is, in fact, is a COST-PLUS CONTRACT…
that should remind us progressives of something….. and not make us happy
from page 117:
(c) ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING.—The Secretary
11 may enter into contracts for the purpose of performing
12 administrative functions
add to that the language from Primrose…
and you have private insurers with guaranteed profits running the public plan.
disgusting and Jane should bring the full power of FDL to bear on the issue
thanks for the link, dcblogger. we don’t need private insurance companies – this isn’t a time where a haircut will do. let’s end the financial parasitism of healthcare in the usa by taking private insurance corps out of the picture.
the I in FIRE stands for Insurance.
Almost as though for-profit health insurance were not only the clearly immoral thing that it is, but also not a viable business. I’m with Selise, let’s outlaw this form of business. Other countries have done it and it works very well.
I’ve pointed out before that several of the big the health insurance companies have weak balance sheets. I wonder how viable they are.