And thus, it was easy for me, and I suspect most of you, to cheer when the White House went on the offensive against Fox News, calling it (as Communications Director Anita Dunn did) “A wing of the Republican Party”:
“The reality of it is that Fox News often operates almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party,” Dunn said.
This follows up on Dunn’s comment to Time earlier this week that Fox News is “opinion journalism masquerading as news.” . . . .
“Let’s not pretend they’re a news network the way CNN is,” Dunn said.
Even Jane was root root rooting for the home team earlier today. So, hooray, huzzah, and here here—Fox News is an “opposition political outlet” (to quote Rachel Maddow), and it is high time a leading Democratic official said so.
But while I cheer, I am also nervous. Whenever I hear or read a story, there is always a little voice in my head that asks “Why am I hearing this now?”—and the little guy has been speaking up lately. Why now? As the clips from Media Matters (above) show us, Fox has been shoveling shit on the White House since day one of the Obama Presidency, so why has this administration waited till October to call a spade a spade?
Forgive me, but as great as it feels to whack at Fox, I think I am being given a reach around. Is it possible that, as effective as this offensive strategy might be in-and-of itself, it is designed to make me feel good, to cement the administration’s liberal bona fides, in advance of the White House doing something that is going to really, really piss me off?
I’m thinking the answer to that is “Yes.” The timing of this tilt at Fox is just too close to day we are supposed to see the likes of Harry Reid, Max Baucus, and Olympia Snowe dance around the locker room with Rahm Emanuel and President Obama, spraying each other with cheap Champagne while celebrating a “bipartisan” health package that forces Americans into shitty private insurance while promising a public option sometime way off in the future if and when some complicated algorithm determines that the for-profit sector egregiously misbehaved.
You don’t get a public option, but hey, look over here, Fox News sucks! Feel better?
Think I’m a cynical sonofabitch? What about the “off the record” White House gathering of so-called liberal media heavyweights—Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann, Maureen Dowd, Frank Rich, and Bob Herbert, to name the names the New York Times names—that went down on Monday? Yes, Bush did it with right-wingers, and only with right-wingers. . . and on multiple occasions. . . and Obama has done this with both leftish and rightish groups. . . but why now? And why “off the record,” but oh, so public?
And damn if this isn’t working, too. I don’t know about you, but I actually don’t feel at all good to hear Rachel and Keith giggling about how effin’ great the peach cobbler was at the White House. Not that peach cobbler with Barack Obama doesn’t sound like a great thing (I love me some peach cobbler), but to what extent does hobnobbing with the administration’s message machine affect the reporting on this White House? It is a question we always asked of the Bush Administration and its lapdogs; we should be asking the very same question now.
Outside of some of our very favorite blogs, how many stories have you read about the Obama Administration’s secret deals with the corporate players in the health care debate? Just askin’. We like taking our shots at Harry Reid—and he deserves those shots—but weigh the balance of reports that say that Obama supports a public option against those that demonstrate how little he has done to make that option a reality. (Again, present company excepted.)
So, yes, offense is hot. I like it. . . it gets me off. Please. Don’t. Stop. But after that, I want more. I want a real relationship. I want sustained attention to my needs. I want my championship ring.
And, as good as this finger Foxing feels, I am not looking at Fox. I am looking at you, Mr. President, and I’m not playing around, I’m playing to win.



90 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
THe proof will be in the pudding when it comes to the Public Option. I like peach cobbler too.
I don’t think it’s a particularly effective or aggressive strategy – I haven’t seen one elbow yet from these guys, except those directed at… Democrats. ObamaCo is seeding the clouds as a diversion for the ungodly failure to assert their majority.
I want to see Chicklets™ on the ice. What the administration’s stooges are doling out now is wet kisses disguised as semi-stern parenting.
Draw some blood, in political terms, and they are still years from getting me to open my checkbook.
In politics, the only defense is a strong offense (even better if Faux Spews takes offense!).
Louisville Sluggers and a bit of artistic kneecapping seem in order (especially with the Blue and other Running Dogs).
If this is “The Chicago Way,” I want a refund.
I was still not sure if the Dems are terrible at offense, or the Republicans are just so much better at it.
Then I watch Harry Reid. Done deal.
This most certainly is not the Chicago Way and I definitely want a refund.
Spot on Greg! As a Spurs and Yankee fan who lives in New Jersey. “Don’t ask” I get it and you’re right. While I’m thrilled to see Obama call out faux news, I’m not going to lose sight of what I really want. I want to be brought to a climax with a strong, pounding, public option. Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes! I have to go now. I need a cig now!
Before we (The Left) go running for our Kleenex™ Boxes, wait until Monday to see what the administration has up next.
Breaking: Barack leaves Michelle for Senator Snowe – quoted as saying “This girl has game!”
Jane’s description of the health reform battle as being like a yo yo sure seems apt now
The saddest part is that she really doesn’t. Snowe has not done anything to merit the attention she is getting.
A Conservative is a Conservative is a Conservative, and that is just fine with me.
Her power does not come from her actions, intentions, or from any special gifts – it comes from the fact that President Obama will do almost anything to court his blood-soaked opposition, even hobble or destroy a worthwhile agenda. Her power comes from the head of The Democratic Party.
I totally agree with this article, but would like to point out that they’ve been using this stupid strategy for a while now. Every time Obama gets in trouble because we start seeing how weak he’s behaving, we have another Rush Limbaugh episode or another teachable moment with Barack calling someone a jackass. That’s supposed to get us Lefties riled up. You know, we don’t get affordable health care, but we sure get to stick to some Repug for 30 seconds. YES!!! That more than makes up for incompetence and betrayal
So refreshing when you realize others think along the same lines you do. THANK YOU.
Carry on.
Just Cuz We Can
True. She is marginally less insane than most, but all her power has been given her by Democrats fetishizing a useless, unnecessary, and ultimately destructive “bipartisanship” (as if such a thing was even possible at this point).
Offensive strategy? ok, I’m offended. What now?
Gilly!
Thanks for the reminder!
A-Rahd sux.
It is a fetish, isn’t it.
Yep, REALLY! The D’s have been negotiating with themselves for weeks now. Sad part is, they’re LOSING!
If it is true that Obama admires older ‘gentlemen’ for lack of a consistent father-figure in his youth, how the Hell did he take up with Harry “Folding an ace-high flush until the day he dies” Reid?
I sent this to my senators and the president today.
Yeah, but that was just a quick link for which I hope I’m forgiven.
There must be some much better links out there…aren’t there?
Yep. And we are getting to the point when people come in here and don’t know who Steve Gillard was, and what he meant.
a ferocious editorial force…
That’s god-damned right.
Alan Grayson, while greatly enhancing his reelect with his recent splosions, must be the loneliest man in DC.
Hmmmm…I don’t think it’s all about health care, although I agree with the premise that the offensive against Fox is intended to offset something progressives don’t support.
I think the real problem is Afghanistan; we’re going to be stuck there for a long time for a number of reasons. Sen. Kerry has already given his imprimatur for staying, and the military thinks they have Obama boxed into staying.
The timing comes when they believe they have some political capital, which means they are going to have something in the way of health care reform a critical mass of citizen will support.
But there had to be some other reason why Obama took it directly to Ailes, and why Ailes has now invested so much of the Fox brand in retaliation.
lol, that was a great, succinct, way of summing it up.
or maybe a distraction so you don’t know to be pissed off? like i was when i started reading the cms report on hr 3200. the one that says that reform will increase costs, will not do anything to control cost rate of growth, and will make it harder for people on medicaid to get care.
http://tinyurl.com/yfbj2v9
~~~ModNote: Replaced with TinyURL to preserve margins.~~~
it’s like the fucking bankster bailout all over again. only this time it’s the insurance companies.
Time for me to toddle off. Take care all.
God bless El Gato Negro!
While I begrudge no one the opportunity to pound the crap out of FOX NEWS, the reality is that any move they make to strike back helps them, and any move Obama makes to step into them belittles himself and enhances them.
RBG !!!
Evenin’ all !
Gregg, this is spot on … no one in Congress should try to pull the wool over our eyes, we’re not going to fall for it.
Petro!
Excuse me, don’t you socialist Canucks already have it made in the shade? If there’s wool in your eyes you need to back away from that sheep, man… “g”
Hey Petro…
So, what is this? Another attempt to confine the Republican party into the racist, homophobic anti-American box it came in? Like enhancing Limbaugh?
Remember the first Limbaugh thingy … the whackos continue to destroy their party from within.
What puzzles me is, why hasn’t PBO and the Dems been more aggressive on offense ? You’d think Reid was the minority leader, by his demeanor.
There’s a better way, IMHO – deride them as ‘second-stringers’ and ‘half-wits’ who can’t find their asses with both hands and a flashlight, but do it softly, more with body language and facial expressions than words.
The minute they launch a direct attack, they draw themselves into the same cesspool. And in there, we already know who the winners are.
EDIT: when you shovel shit for a living, you are acclimated to the conditions.
I am disgusted by the other networks defense of of Fox News more than anything else. Deep down I think they realize that their own credibility is only an infinitesimal degree greater than that of Rupert’s network.
It is so cold already, we prolly will grow Wool on our bodies by Christmas …
Yo Petro.
FWIW, I’m kinda been doing the Lamont Cranston lately but glad to be back.
Well, it got Chuck Wad to shave his Goatie … *g*
That would be because Reid believes it too, because he believes it takes 61 votes to make a majority, and he ain’t got 61. (Mind you, if he actually HAD 61, then he’d probably think it took 67 to make a majority. And then if he had 67, he’d probably think it took 75,…… etc. etc. etc.) Don’t you just LOVE true leadership?
Been unseasonably chilly here as well. Hope we get a few moderate days at some point before we’re up to our necks in winter.
I’m not sure I agree – by that standard, news organizations have to take an administrations word for what IS news and what ISN’T.
And the White House affirmatively shut them out of a press event.
Hey RF. Wanted you to know Ralphbon fixed my problem with accessing The Seminal!!!! It’s a dirty fix, but a fix nonetheless!!!
And could I ask who Bob is??? Do you have a pet named Bob?
Fox taught the other Networks that News and truth don’t need to be roomies … just get some hotties to smile on Camera and maybe one day, the Preznit will look like this !
You’re in the Band ? I love Blues !
Actually, wasn’t it a Suprem Court ruling that taught that??? Sorry, no link, I’m going by memory, and that is VERY faulty, so could be wrong.
There was a time when Vince McMahon’s ‘wrestling’ franchise maintained the fiction that it was real, you know, wrestling. I wonder what pushed them to fess up? Congressional hearings, perhaps?
WAIT….I need retards like Beck and Limbaugh and Ingraham to keep talking stupid. That way I can watch Olberman and Maddow make fun of them.
I have not seen any indication the Obama Administration would deny access to any news org that engages in reasonably objective reporting, even it the coverage was unfavorable to them. Fox News doesn’t even feign a reasonable semblance of objectivity and for the other networks to pretend they are valid news organization is absurd.
I believe that, in HCR / Energy Overhaul / Wall Street reign-in zeal, perhaps one other possibility may have slipped off the radar.
Why now? Well, there is one other recent “event” very close to “now” (just last week I believe).
There was an analysis released that showed that the Secret Service is being overwhelmed trying to track the 400% increase in threats against the president and other government officials. They are having to pull agents off non-threat details in an attempt to keep up, and may even have to pass some of their investigations off to Treasury.
And that would be 400% rise over, say, this time last year.
Further, aside from groups like FreedomWorks and other anti-democratic (intentional small “d”) organizations, one of the main ringleaders in fomenting this violence-tinged dog whistle anti-government rhetoric is…(insert drum roll)… Fox!
Not being a psychic, I have no way to know whether the idea presented here is on- or off-target. Still, not being psychic and faced with a new circumstance brings out the Junior Scientist in me: I try to apply Occam’s Razor to the situation (a principle that says that the most simple answer is usually the most correct).
Softening the ground for progressives by offering a doggie snack before squirting bad medicine down our throats is a bit, er, complicated strategerie — especially since nobody has a clue as to what form of public option will come out of congress. (I mean think about that one for a sec: Just a couple months ago we were all like “Oh! PO is dead, it’s dead” and right now they’re talking about whether a reverse trigger will pull disloyal DINOs into line — a reverse trigger on Medicare for the uninsured (plus 5%). But, still, this is softening the ground for a disappointment that might or might not happen and nobody seems able to say for sure which way it will tilt today.
On the other hand: Death threats and other threats of violence and Fox is openly preaching that Obama and the duly elected government want to pull the plug on grandma. They’ve been using their megaphone 24/7/365 since maybe Jan. 19, 2009, shouting “off with his head!”, we get proof positive there are doggies hearing the dog whistle rhetoric last week, and the WH thinks maybe it’s a good idea to stuff a rag in that megaphone this week.
Which of those pairing of points has the straighter line drawn between them?
Just another thought.
They’re not my band and sadly, I have not even set foot in that town since the last century. But ask PW about them in her morning thread.
A little less with that particular euphemism, if you please…
lol.
I was thinking (misremembering perhaps???) that there was a suit involving a Fox station in (FLA????? damned memory is bad) where the Supremes came down on the side that said a news organization DID NOT have a duty to tell the truth.
Mind you, that last paragrah may be a TOTAL fabrication based on bad memory, but dadgummit, that sticks in my head for some reason.
Hey, Welcome to Late Night!
The latest and greatest chapter in the Democratic Party’s ongoing incredibly inept theater of the absurd, How To Snatch Defeat From The Jaws Of Victory, going on in the Senate has Harry telling Obama he’s got 58 votes for a public option with an opt-out. This was news Obama didn’t want to hear because he’s still trying to snow Snowe into agreeing to be his date at the Bipartisanship Fetish Ball that nobody plans to attend. She ain’t sayin’ she will and she ain’t sayin’ she won’t. She is sayin’ she’s got google eyes for some dude named Trigger that anybody with a brain knows is too stupid to pour piss out of a boot.
Obama tells Harry, “Go fetch me 60 and Trigger.”
Harry says “No can do, boss.”
Tune in again tomorrow for the exciting conclusion that will be brought to you by The Pocket Fisherman, another amazingly useless product from Popeil.
Okay, kiddies. Don’t forget.
Same bat time.
Same bat channel.
Bob is a Nanday Conure I adopted from an avian rescue a couple years back. Don’t know what kind of traumas he was subjected to early in life but he’s a pretty happy guy now. I don’t have pictures but he looks a lot like this.
Believe I’ll head out, splendid evening to all.
I will … terrific music !
Here’s the problem, as I see it – if the White House is going to credential FOX for the briefings, and they aren’t news, then they need to credential me, too.
Now, if ObamaCo yanked their White House credentials, that would be another matter. And that would be a real elbow. And I would stand on street corners and make an ass of myself, cheering and laughing.
But, no.
G’nite Dood !
I recall it the way you do – hazily.
Sorry about the WALL OF TEXT above. I hit “save” on an edit without first selecting preview and it removed all the p-breaks and I can’t edit it anymore.
My entire bad.
Going by my assertion that PBO is a great Poker player, I think the railings against Fox is an attempt to capitalize on the growing resentment agin Beck & Co.
If Chuck, Chip & Ed see Major Garrett get a backhand from the White House, while Fox Execs see their sponsors’ response to Beck, it might be enough to get them to rein in the hate- filled cacophony.
Offer a Box of your finest Chocolates to TLM and you may be forgiven …
Ahh, gotcha.
Thanks. Knew it was none of my business, but that never stopped me from asking before. *g*
Nite RF. Thanks again for lots of laughter.
I’ll second that, yank their credentials. Be worth it just to hear them howl.
OTOH, I predicted that Anita Dunn, who started this offensive, would be on HotJobs by the end of that week.
But to get PBO in on this – for only the second time that I can remember I agree with Pat Buchanan – it looks petty.
Thinking the admin might have been wiser to strategically expand their “approved” news media.
Force Fox, et al to argue their superiority, then shiv them in defense.
No problem. If the Dems don’t pass a health care reform package that includes a robust public option we’re going to mount a primary challenge to Obama.
Rat-Bob in ’12
nite ratfood
Can’t you see through the haze?
LOL, you must’ve seen PB on Hardball tonight.
Yeah, I was feeling the exact same way, I was agreeing with PB for one of the very rare times.
Believe it or not, that guy (while I disagree with him almost 100% of the time) actualy does do a better job of at least being honest than 99.9999% of the other right wingers. I’ll give him that.
Except for one thing … BO made Fox and hacks like PatBuch talk about this type of ‘reporting’.
Without the help of MediaMatters and a whole lot of his Left flank, it goes nowhere. And he never has to utter a single word to get this going, unlike the Limbaugh mess.
Secondarily, how does he NOT go after PoolBoy, and Blitzed, and Hacktacular Howie, and the rest of the liars and complete fools now?
lol, you might just get my vote!!!!
I have to be fair. One year ago, I absolutely couldn’t wait for election day to go vote FOR Obama. Today, I’d absolutely vote against him and for almost any primary challenger (especially you & Bob!!!). But I will be fair in that one year from now it could change back. But damn I’m disappointed so far. And it’s hard to put into words HOW disappointed, because of the hope I was feeling a year ago.
So many hacks, so little time.
My last words on this will be that BO’s comment[s] pushed the Reich Wing further to the fringe, which weakens their base and gives the Dems even more seats in ’10 & ’12.
Was this a way of currying favor with Reid & Pelosi ? I think so … find a way to get them more votes and they take a bigger risk with good legislation – Health Care, Green Energy & the Mid East peace deal.
See, I told you I’m a hopeless optimist … *g*
If it gives him a bigger bat when it comes to
stranglingnegotiating with the Senate, I don’t care if he does stand-up in the East room.Rat & Bob ’12!
(let’s get on that live birth issue)
h/t Suzanne.
One of her best.
They can pose all they like, no one likes getting smacked down by the POTUS.
Grabbing some Grand Marnier … I can listen to Clapton all night.
I was reading something about his Strat(s) the other day. Real hybrid stuff.
I wonder how he affords it?
A lot of you are missing the point. This is all distraction. Who cares about the White House having a tiff with Fox? Keep your eyes on the Senate and the Public Option. That’s where Obama and Company are really trying to screw us. All for some ridiculous notion of bipartisanship. The bipartisanship of one Repug. Does Olympia Snowe have Obama’s balls in her purse? Is that why he’s being so nice? He just wants to get them back?
this is exactly right. obama and his organization are no progressive administration and they have no interest in progressive leadership; plenty of interest in manipulation of progressives and progressive policies, but no interest in enacting progressive legislation. obamadmin is the not-republican admin doing the same old corportist bidding against the interest of the American people:
* they killed “cram-down”
* they’re killing the public option
* they’ll be no meaningful financial regulation.
legislation to combat global warming will be a joke.
* they’ve not repealed any of the bush anti-civil rights initiatives and presidential power grabs.
obamadmin is NOT lookong out for the average American – better watch your coop little peeps.
…and don’t forgot, Obama has Social Security evisceration on his agenda – just as soon as he gets finished screwing up health care reform.
The fact that the rest of the “Mainstream” has been rushing to FOX’s defense, declaring the administration’s truth-telling “a mistake,” proves how right it was.
Moreover it’s perfectly porrible to agree about FOX and critize the Obama administration. For real criticism should be based on fact — not hysteria.
Perhaps a better question to ask is, Why haven’t the MSM news outlets called out Fauxnewz for its behavior — EVER — ?????
Rather than tsk-tsking the WH for not being more prompt in its correctly calling Fauxnewz out, why isn’t FDL going after the MSM????
Eggszacktly.
FDL’s entire existence is based on calling out the TradMed (or the GOP/Media Complex, as I call it).