While watching Ken Burns’ miniseries The National Parks: America’s Best Idea, I was struck by the parallels between the creation and maintenance of the National Park Service and the health care reform battles. Both have been long, long struggles, with progress coming intermittently and never easily.
Progress has required strong political leaders. I mean presidents willing to boldly act, cabinet secretaries willing to stand up for what they are called to do, and members of congress dedicated to serving not only their districts and states but the nation as a whole. Former cattle rancher, Wyoming governor, and US Senator Cliff Hanson, was one of the leading voices against the expansion of Grand Teton National Park in the 1940s. In the mid-1960s, at a luncheon in New York, he said:
I fought against the establishment of the Grand Teton National Park as hard as I could and I lost and I want you all to know that I’m glad I lost, because I now know I was wrong. Grand Teton National Park is one of the greatest natural heritages of Wyoming and the nation and one of our great assets.
I’d love to hear some of today’s opponents of health care reform say the same kind of thing in twenty years.
Progress has also required dedicated women and men in government. They are often young and always lower down in the power structure, and are people who see what needs to be done and can push their superiors to recognize it as well. People like George Melendez Wright, who died far too young.
Progress has also required people who can inspire the general public to get behind change, like the NPS rangers (the Cook family, Sheldon Johnson, and Gerard Baker, among others) as well as passionate outsiders like John Muir and Ansel Adams.
Progress has also been consistently opposed, and in retrospect, the opposition has been from those concerned with short-term profits, the lobbyists they employed, and those politicians who catered to them. When Burns highlights the secretaries of the interior who did the most to preserve, defend, and expand the parks, I couldn’t help noticing that these were generally Democrats (with Teddy Roosevelt and his administration being the notable exception).
Finally, progress has required political persistence. "It’s a marathon, not a sprint" kept going through my head watching The National Parks. For health care, the story is the same. You can go back to Teddy Roosevelt and early public health laws, to Harry Truman and his push for a more systemic approach to health care, to the Medicare and Medicaid battles of the 1960s, and to the battle being fought today.
At the end of the whole series, as I pondered these parallels to the health care battles, I am ever so grateful for those who have come before and for those taking a lead today. People like the House members who are standing up for the public option, like Jay Rockefeller in the Senate, like Jane and others pushing from outside the halls of Congress, and like the thousands who make the phone calls, send the faxes, and show up in the local offices of their Senators and Representatives.
Someday, there’s going to be a documentary about public health care in the US, and maybe Marcy’s YouTube will be featured. And we can each say "I knew her when . . ."




31 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
I visited 4 national parks this summer: Arches, Canyonlands, Petrified Forest, and Black Canyon of the Gunnison River.
I try to be mindful of the heavy work done by activists who lived before my time.
All National Parks show the best of us and should always be treasured. I think any park is special – even small areas in cities where kids can play and adults can enjoy the outdoors. We need to be mindful that buildings rarely if ever are actually beautiful. And how refreshing to have a politician say “I was wrong.”
You are right about leadership, I think that’s why Grayson made such a splash this week.
And on the talk shows this week, he did a good job of sticking to the point even when the likes of Tweety wanted to focus on the political back and forth, to and fro, ping and pong all the talking heads thrive on.
And admitting a mistake, one of the Virtues imo.
I have been watching the series. I was just telling a friend the same thing about the struggles for preservation of these lands. It is still a struggle to keep the developers out. Of course W was a proponent of maximizing the rape of our resources on these and all lands.
Fight fight fight for the robust public option. If the Finance Committee’s bill can finally get to the floor of the Senate, the real work can begin.
One of the things we have to learn to do as progressives is to make common cause on issues with people we don’t agree with on other issues. Senator Rockefeller is a good example, we don’t agree with him on many national security issues, but he is doing more for us on health care than Senator Feinman was able to accomplish for us on FISA.
The cooperation enables us to work on other issues with him from a position of mutual respect. That beats heck out of calling for primaries against either because they don’t agree with us 100% on some issues. Next time FISA comes up, maybe Marcy can talk to him about the positive things he accomplished on health care and see if he can be moved closer to our views on FISA.
I’d love to hear some of today’s opponents of health care reform say the same kind of thing in twenty years.
The only one(if at all) would be Olympia Snowe. The rest are hopeless(thought she might be as well .. we’ll see)
As for the National Parks, too bad there is so little giving back from today’s “robber barons” and other gillionaires as there was way back then. Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are committed to returning some of their riches, who else?
The story of Acadia National Park in Maine was particularly moving, down to the ashes in the teacups.
oh my! you said “progressives”
Tweety thinks that term is “pusillanimous.” He thinks it’s being used in place of “liberal.” He needs to get out more.
Can’t you just imagine bonehead Inhoff realizing he was wrong.
I’m sick of hearing from them now let alone twenty years from now.
END TIMES!
Last night’s show had an Alaskan giving the same lament after Alaska protested by burning Pres Carter in effigy over creation of national forest/parks.
Yes, and I would like to see Ken Starr apologize for Whitewater.
Not going to happen.
they have kids and family. the arc of time will show them that universal care with a public option will work best for them and theirs.
AND THE KILLIN’ GOES ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Peterr and the Firepup Freedom Fighters:
It is always good to remind ourselves that in the long (and even the short) arc of history, we progressives are always right. But on the issue of healthcare, it won’t mean a God damned thing when all the fuckin’ crypto-Nazi corporatists start appologizin to their children in 10 years when we’re all broke and no one gets to vote!
What is the reading on Obama’s remarks on healthcare reform today…I’m afraid he just sent a shot accross the progressives’ bow that they better not hold up a bill because it doesn’t have a public option…it could also be seen as a shot at the fascists but I don’t think so. This next week is gunna be a game of chicken between the Progressives in the House and the Senate and Obama-Rahm. Until this mornin’ I have been bankin’ on Obama seein’ the reality of losin’ his Congressional majorities and becomin a one-term President, now I ain’t sure.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, WE WILL STILL BE HERE LONG AFTER THE BASTARDS ARE GONE!!!
Ted Turner has done a pretty fair job of giving back as well.
This moment jumped out at me, too. Peterr. Thanks for highlighting it.
I watched that National Park TV series by Ken Burns every night this past week. What surprised me was the strong political message he delivers. I was expecting glorious mountain vistas and flowing rivers and lots of wildlife, and although those beautiful things are present, they aren’t the central message of his film. He really drives home the point that the National Park system was established over the objections of the usual mining, lumber, and industrial interests, and it took a lot of hard work and political courage to get it done. FDR and Harold Ickes come across as real heroes– they make our present day Democrats look like a bunch of wimps.
Peterr, thank you for the inspiration this morning. It’s good to be reminded of the long view and to keep things in perspective.
To be fair to the Republicans, Dwight Eisenhower did a lot to protect, and expand access to, the National Parks as well. Muir was a Republican, most of the early conservationists were Republicans. Stephen Mather was a Republican. Then again, were I living in that era, I’d be a Republican too. (It was before the Republican party made a faustian bargain between big business and the South, and when it stood for progressive change. That was still Lincoln’s Republican Party). Woodrow Wilson was not exactly a big supporter of the parks, and he was a Democrat. By the time he took action, he was ill from a stroke, and his wife was essentially acting President of the United States (she forged his signature on everything).
The difference between the national park fights and today’s fight is that there was moving pictures and art then. We have a little of that (the health fairs, etc), but it is very difficult to get those kind of messages out in the press. A spectacular picture of a Geyser on the other hand, would immediately run in those days.
Harold Ickes could make anyone look like a wimp. Wonder what he’d do if he had to deal with Harry Reid?
Interesting to watch Burns either ignore or show ignorance of Padre Island Nat’l Seashore’s being fought by the oil interests in TX with support from Sen. Ralph Yarborough what put it into the protection of our U.S. gov’t. JFK gave him that assist, since el Senador had given JFK early strong support, losing him most of the rest of the TX delegation – as running against Kennedy was LBJ.
What an amazing piece of work. Ken Burns never fails to deliver, but the national parks series is definitely one of his best.
I was brought to tears more than once by his masterful storytelling, and the political message was delivered subtly, but firmly throughout.
The thing I noticed was how familiar the arguments against the parks were, and how they came from the usual suspects.
Those who oppose conservation and other public good projects lack, as George H W Bush so delicately put it, “that vision thing”.
If there was ever an idea that needs revival, it’s that of the commonwealth.
I thought the most moving and bitter sweet part was the story of the old Indian woman, led from Yosemite Valley at bayonet point a generation before, who turned to El Capitan and reenacted her Chief’s cry for the tribe to assemble upon her return a lifetime later; so poignant.
To add one political item, I wouldn’t get too carried away with lauding the Republicans of the day – Teddy was the most hated Republican in New York State because of his progressive stances. He “inherited” the Presidency after New York Republicans schemed to get him out of their hair and run as Vice-President.
I merely add environmentalism to the list of things that make America great opposed every step of the way by rapacious, greedy Republicans.
It’s been almost painful for me to watch the series as I’ve made the same comparisons to the current health care battle. Moneyed interests vs. the common good. I come away with such a profound gratitude to the many people who fought so hard to establish and defend the natural wonders and historic sites. I despair at our lack of a Roosevelt — T or FD — to spearhead the battle. Or an Ickes or Mather, to name just two of so many, to soldier the plans to fruition.
The segment on the Civilian Conservation Corps touched me deeply as I’m certain it did the many whose fathers and grandfathers participated in that program and FDR’s other alphabet soup Depression public relief programs. Where is our CCC or WPA? The need is there both in terms of people and projects.
I was unfamiliar with several of the issues. Hetch Hetchy, for example. As Burns made clear in the very first example of Yosemite, these areas could be protected because they had no perceived monetary value. I found this essay which expands on that theme.
George Wuerthner’s On the Range
To return to the health care parallel, we will not win until we can demonstrate that WE have more economic value than corporate interests. Can that happen through the democratic process or will it require means more drastic?
I, too, was surprised at the Burns’ very clear political message. The party of NO has a long and ignoble history. Did any of them watch? Did any of them comprehend?
The phrase that struck me was “communal ownership of land”.
Can’t you just hear today’s conservatives yelling:
“Communal? Communism! Socialism! Socialism!”
“I’d love to hear some of today’s opponents of health care reform say the same kind of thing in twenty years.”
They won’t. The difference is, Hanson came to see that he was wrong, while the current crop of corporate cocksuckers already know they’re wrong but aren’t willing to give the money back and admit it.
They are a bunch of wimps. Mostly. Some are good occasionally, some are good most of the time, but too many of them have all the guts of a flatworm.
We were in Death Valley National Park on New Years day, got a year pass, and have been visiting parks all year. Bryce, Zion, Yellowstone and Yosemite next month.
The hard work, grassroots organizing of folks who came before us, gave us so much from the CCC projects to the expansion of the park system. We have grown complacent, decadent, as the empire has decayed.
Like the right wingers have bred themselves for stupidity, we’ve allowed ourselves to lose any connection with the skillset needed to bring a winning coalition to the table and hold elected officials accountable.
How sadly true.
Just like we can’t make stuff in our economy, we can’t do stuff politically anymore except pontificate like this on websites.
No Marxist me, but he was no slouch intellectually, and described it as “praxis,” putting theory into action.
We ain’t got no praxis, folks.