I’m fixin’ to tell you something about West Texas and how some conservative political habits are matched by strong, empathetic bonds among the people out here.
But, first, a word about the expression, “fixin to’,” a great American expression. “I’m fixin’ to go to town.” “I’m fixin’ to wring your neck.” I’ve always liked the phrase because it speaks to a kind of Zen, non-action action. I’m not fixing the fence, I’m fixin’ to fix the fence. The phrase captures something important about the character of the Southwest. My friend Derek Carroll, a cinematographer, reminds me that the phrase comes from the pioneer need to fix their plows before they plowed. Derek, by the way, is out here in the desert mountains with me. We’re fixin’ to make a little film, but that’s another story.
I’m in Marathon, north of the Mexican border in far West Texas. I’ve been coming out here since I was just fixin’ to grow up. It’s high desert, 5,000 feet above sea level. The air is clean and crisp, the mountains not purple really, but they turn blue when the sun sets behind them and the evening star floats above their peaks.
On the dusty streets of Marathon we greet one another like cousins. The people who live here and the people who visit embrace the kind of solitude the desert imposes. But there’s fellow-feeling, too. Go down to the community barbeques and dances at “the Post,” a county park south of town, and you’ll see it’s what the people hold in common that’s important. Differences disappear like the desert heat at night.
Marathon is in Brewster County, a county that actually went for Obama in 2008. But West Texas’ reputation for conservative politics is well-earned. These are western individualists, and somebody told them a few decades ago that the Republican Party was the party of individualists. Two things cut against that: they’re not much for corporate bossism out here. And, their squinted eyes have more to do with the burning sun than with the skeptical regard for others. Out here, people will do anything for you, if you need it.
They practice what might be called prairie humanism. Democrats used to be big on it. Teddy Roosevelt and his cousin, Franklin, New Yorkers, understood it and pursued it. Prairie humanists take care of one another, but they stay of out of another’s way, too. Government ought to follow the same path: solve our mutual problems, but leave us alone in our private lives.
But in recent years Democrats have too often fallen back on wonkish, rationalized justifications of policies. We forget to articulate the value beneath our initiatives: empathy. We sound kind of elitist. “We know better than you, so let us tell you what to do.” This will get westerners to say, “I’m fixin’ to wring your neck.”
“Empathy is the grand theme of our time,” writes biologist Frans de Waal in his new book, The Age of Empathy. De Waal recognizes that fear, cruelty and selfish ambition are also at work in humans. But we are not the brutes that Thomas Hobbes claimed. Simple human solidarity and social responsibility make civilization possible.
In politics we are too often divided into schoolyard teams of shirts and skins. We might even forget why we are one team rather than another. Labeling and stereotyping others, we overlook their human qualities. It’s a big mistake.
Because of our shared values of caring for others in the community, because of a kind of bedrock friendliness that underlies almost every encounter out here in West Texas, it is a very calming place to be.
I know if I were in an accident out here, my neighbors would take care of me and get me the care I needed. So it is surprising when that same neighborliness isn’t reflected in political decision-making. Snake bite? Folks here won’t let you die. Isn’t health care reform just a national way of taking care of the snake bite?
We have failed in our political messaging to connect these local practices of empathy to national policy goals. We talk about what “government” will do rather than what we are called to do for one another as free individuals. The desert’s a hard teacher. Everyone here knows they couldn’t survive alone. Isn’t that the progressive message writ simply?



46 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Thanks for this. I’m fixin’ to share this with some folks.
I’m fixin to respond to you.
Thanky, m’am.
I think that part of the solution is to deal with the alienation of people to the government. We are our government should be a part of the answer. Like if a disaster strikes our government should be there to help.
You have it right, that alienation is at the core of the problem. Government’s just the cooperative arrangement we’ve created to address mutual problems and concerns. We need to describe it that way and remind people that’s what it is.
Health care reform is exactly as you describe.
Can you please speak on this nationally? Maybe people would see the light.
Wonderful article, Glenn. Thanks.
Excellent!
I’ve spent lots of time in West Texas in the Permian Basin area. I never actually heard anyone say “I’m fixin,” but I think that’s because the people I went to see were not native West Texans. I’m sure it’s said quite a bit there.
Your point about what government will do as opposed to what we can and should do for one another is a great one. Individuals are far more efficient at doing things than the government though of course they are just individual acts. Too many people are ready to rely completely on big government. Even Obama has said government can’t do everything.
Good job!
Thanks, Margot. I’m doing my best. But all of us can carry this message in our small and large circles of friends, colleagues, families and other audiences.
Tinman, you’re right. The Republican attacks on government made progressives — myself included — want to defend government. But gov’ment speak won’t work. We need to make it personal, and we need to redescribe government functions as the things we do for one another. This also reinforces natural human affinities for one another.
Really on point post, Glenn. As usual you make us think about how it should be. Thanks.
When I left the south I had to break the habit of saying “I’m fixin’ to” because people looked at me rather strangely. Heard it all my life and people back there still say it 25 times a day.
Twain, thanks, and come back home. We’re fixin’ to fix it up down here. I am hoping we can begin to develop these frames — and style — in the south and southwest. And it does have a lot to do with style.
I wonder frequently how it is I can feel close to folks with whom I have profound political differences. But then I realize that often the political disagreements are based on thin symbols or other superficial, learned stuff. Connecting simply at a deeper level gets by all that, and there is every reason to take that approach in our larger political communications.
Glen, Not sure what your project is but if you want to see something repulsive drive west from Lubbock to Artesia, NM. Once in NM you can see how the oil industry can totally fuck up an environment. It is pathetic once in Artesia you will come to a refinery that has so fouled up the air that at times it will gag you. Driving around town you will find stations where you can plunk in quarters and buy purified water. Artesia was so named for its natural springs that provided great water. The water now is not even safe enough to rinse your dishes in.
Ah tell yew hwat!
(then you turn, walk away and don’t tell them hwat)
There’s an old joke about the happiness of Lubbock in the rearview — I guess not when you’re headed to Artesia. Of course I’m giving a bit of a simplified picture here, ’cause people are complicated creatures. But it’s a measure of our message failures that folks prefer foul water to government pollution controls. Two neighbors would let their property line get so fouled. They’d take care of it for one another, and that’s all that grander environmental efforts are aimed at doing. But industry, beginning early in the 20th century, resisted all controls and drove the negative message about government. Mining, forestry, oil and gas, the Ad Council and the chamber of commerce.
But, it’s one reason the west has begun to come around. People are waking up to what’s happened in their back yards. It’s our job to speak to them as neighbors, not as government agents.
I’ve been to Marathon! Fixin’ to go back next time we go west to El Paso.
I think we need a new word for “gubmint” that the right wing hasn’t demonized yet.
It isn’t big brother.
I remember I once asked my mama to do something I wanted and she told me she was fixin’ ta. So I asked her to please fix a little faster.
If we could sit down and talk to many of the people who were at the town halls shouting, I think we would find that we are more alike than we thought. There are exceptions to that, of course – people who have gained fame and fortune from being nuts. I have found that most Americans want pretty much the same things – the difference is how to get to that point.
HI Greg! MORE OF THIS in the otherwise increasingly irrelevant blogosphere, please! I know Marathon and West Texas very well. I know exactly what you’re talking about.
We could start by using the empowering possessives — “our government,” “your government.” Also, just personalizing it. For instance, “Health care reform is something you and I are doing for our families. Makes us all healthier and safer.”
“We oughta clean up some of the messes.” Generally, I find connecting on these simple, person-to-person value-based things makes conversations much easier. You are right about how some words and frames carry so much baggage that their symbolic weight is more than can be overcome.
But when you back into a conversation with someone you’re certain holds way different political views, you can reach common ground. Avoiding this mutuality is one reason the right drives wedge symbols as hard as they do. We gotta undermine those frames and symbols and speak to human hearts.
You can call me Greg. Just don’t call me late for dinner. :)
Sorry but some of these folks can’t even sit down and listen to themselves speak. Many can no longer hear what another person is saying and there beliefs are held dogmatically. Yesterday on C-Span this wingnut called to say we didn’t need more regulations and bureaucrats to monitor the financial industry we just needed to throw them in jail.
This sure is true in Texas. The common ground is wide and solid. That’s what I mean about shirts and skins. People joined one side or the other, but many can’t remember why. Oh, they learn the lingo of their particular side. But when you get into values — say on health care, jobs, education, even the environment — you find there’s not a catfish whisker’s difference.
This is even more obvious when we’re talking intra-Democratic party. There’s no liberal and conservative wing, really, not among the folks. Sure, there are Blue Dogs who like their special interest money. But, on issues, there’s no ’50s or ’60s style disagreement. When Democrats here get to fightin’ the old wars — say liberal Yarborough versus Bensen — it’s anachronistic. It really is just shirts and skins.
Texas would be a lot more liberal if the talk show hosts stopped telling everyone that the dems are against Jesus.
It’s the qualifier “some” in your comment that’s most important. But the truth is, if we’d been framing things right and steady for today’s teabaggers they may never have picked up the teabags in the first place. Okay, some will, because there are always crazies. But we can and must take a finer grained look.
I’ve been to Marathon and stayed at the Gage Hotel! And I remember people describing just as you do the mutual dependency when you live in so isolated a place. No anglo radio stations and it looks like you are on Mars.
I use the expression “fixin’ to” almost daily but that’s to be expected after this St. Louis native has been living in Texas for the last 28 years. “Y’all” is handy, as well.
As to your comments on prarie populism. I don’t know how one changes the dialog or what words/language we use to square “gummint” with shared responsibility in the public’s mind afer years of conservative bashing. To me gov’t is the populace writ large and practically, by definition, means “from all-to all”. If that makes sense.
People ought to have freedom-but not to harm one another: be it avoiding regulation, dismissing safety, essentially getting wealthy off the sweat of another man’s labor-while you pay him .30cents an hour in another country. Gov’t is the expression of a society that there are *rules*. That is populism (in a way) to me.
Thanks!
Can I say I love your name?
FOXnews was created to keep this people alienated, anxious, and behind their walls. We gotta tear down those walls.
Well said. A goodly number of the crew out here with me went to school in Denton, by the by. Including Derek, mentioned in the piece. So hello Denton!
Thanks! Most people call me Cassie but one of the late night firepups calls me Snarquita. I am a native Texan and never took a step outside of the state until I was 16 and went to New Mexico on a school trip when we were living in El Paso.
Glenn, “empowering possessives” works well in a circumstance where our opponents are feeling their opposition rather than thinking it. We can’t go professorial on them and persuade them. We need to build in an entitlement, and to exploit the subjective, their feelings of vulnerability and their needs for security that work so well to get them to support militarism by expressing health care in terms of offering better tools for people to protect themselves from insurance company malfeasance. I’d rather deal with the incompetent than the malfeasant.
Absolutely.
Plus having government funnel down resources gets expensive because bureaucrats are expensive. The more directly (person to person) we can help one another the better because as you point out its more personal.
One example of all of this is natural disasters. Let’s look at Katrina as well as the San Francisco earthquake of 1903 (I think that’s the year). With Katrina everyone was yelling about where is FEMA? How could the Army Corp of Engineers let this happen? Now compare that to the SF earthquake. At that time there was no FEMA. Everyone helped their fellow man as best he could. People picked themselves up and kept going.
The dilemma: How do you get many of your fellow progressives to give up their dream of big government?
My favorite name of a town in West Texas: No Trees.
The name fits perfectly.
I don’t think anyone necessarily wants big gov’t. We have so many people now that the gov’t has to do some things. It is not possible for individuals to do everything. We have a right to expect gov’t (at every level) to do what is needed with OUR MONEY. I can’t go out and hire my personal police officer or fireman.
I can’t pave the roads and build bridges. We don’t live in the 1700s any more.
So long as there is big business, we need big government.
During Katrina, big government was giving rebuilding contracts to corrupt companies and sending blackwater in to new orleans to confiscate guns.
The problem with Katrina wasn’t something inherently wrong with Big Government. After all, look at how well FEMA performed during the Florida hurricanes during Clinton’s term and how well it is doing now in Georgia with the “500 year flood.” The problem with Katrina was the people in charge of the government at the time and their philosophy that the purpose of government is to enrich the rich. Get rid of those people and that philosophy and Big Government works just fine.
Even the libertarians believe that the government has a role to play as policeman. Since Reagan, the government has abandoned that role by allowing the rich and powerful to control how the economy and the regulations are handled for their own benefit, hence the present situation. We need to return to the idea that the government has a role to play to protect citizens from the depredations of the powerful.
Make the Republican Party ‘face’ the face of the guy screaming at the ’socialistic’ fire-engines that, ‘..he ain’t paying to put out everybody else’s fires!’
‘There but for the grace of God go I’, used to be the American way but conservatives, now, condemn victims right up to the time they become the victim.
Big teeth, but not necessarily big government…
Glenn: “I wonder frequently how it is I can feel close to folks with whom I have profound political differences. But then I realize that often the political disagreements are based on thin symbols or other superficial, learned stuff. Connecting simply at a deeper level gets by all that, and there is every reason to take that approach in our larger political communications.”
This is what I’ve been trying to tell people for a long time. And really, this is EXACTLY the dynamic targeted by the fear-mongers of the right. They know that if people are freaked out, they won’t be able to even see the deeper connection, much less let it give them perspective to see the distractions as distractions.
Also, when your opponents are coming at you from that perspective, it’s very easy to fall into their false dichotomy. I think what you’re really saying is not so much that those evil right-wingers are all mixed up, but that anyone with a more progressive or wider view must be very careful not to play into the game of fear.
To which I reply: Thanks for the reminder. :-)
And don’t forget Woodstock-era Country Joe and the Fish. Their signature “Feel like I’m fixin’ to die rag” could be updated with “Viet Nam” replaced with, uh, just about anything.
Government needs to be as big as the problems it needs to solve are large. Infrastructure needs to be maintained and expanded and corporations need to be regulated to protect Americans from the off balance sheet consequences of industrialism.
The people who promised that the era of big government is over delivered precisely the opposite while running the economy off of the cliff, exporting our middle class jobs and importing cheap tech labor. That’s not going to fix itself, a pro-American worker industrial policy is not going to come about because of cooperation amongst titans of industry.
In all reality, it would take a staff as large as Goldman Sachs and paying similar remuneration for the government to be able to regulate Goldman Sachs in real time because they just keep inventing new contrivances which are not regulated by the letter of the law.
Similarly, so long as gargantuan corporations prowl the planet, it will take bulk as well as sharpened points to effectively check their power sometimes.
Great post.
I think that if there were more accountability in government and finance, some of the distrust would diminish and the empathy would increase. Not so much that we’d all be saints, but enough to have a healthier, more functional society.
Over here in Reeves County, on the other side of the mountains, we don’t even have a Republican Party. It’d be nice if they didn’t act like Republicans.
–cliff hammond
Balmorhea
I have to point out that there was a great deal of government assistance after the SF earthquake including the military that shot people on sight for looting. Not everybody was helping everybody else. Looting was rampant and there was a lot of every man for himself as there always is. Also, there were a lot of people helping their friends and neighbors and taking in refugees who made it across the bay. Just because there was no organization called FEMA doesn’t mean there isn’t a great need for organized govenment help in such emergencies as Katrina, earthquakes, wildfires, other natural disasters as well as man-made ones. Without such assistance, recovery would be very slow. People can help each other better if they have the means to help each other
Here’s a letter that shows what went into SF recovery after the 1906 earthquake and fire.
http://www.sfmuseum.org/1906/rebuild.html
Thanks for your post. It has helped me see in clearer words something I have wondered about in my own social milieu. I was raised Mormon, but the more I get into politics, the more it astonishes me that Mormons are so staunchly Republican as a group. They give 10% of their gross income to help other people and every month fast for two meals and donate what they would have paid for the food to the Church to be used to feed those who don’t have enough to eat. They have a welfare program and social services and I recall spending many a Saturday working for free in a fruit orchard owned the by the Church welfare system and canning for the Bishop’s warehouse, where those in need could go get food. My dad is so giving of anyone who asks, even those who have taken advantage, that my mom was ready to divorce him on a regular basis over the amounts of money he was passing around to other families that she thought should stay in ours. But he is a die-hard Republican. It isn’t just about the Church’s big issue, gay marriage, either, because I have a gay brother he treats the same since he came out of the closet as he did before.
His problem is that he truly believes that you should help your neighbor and be your brother’s keeper, but out of choice, not out of force. The fact that he is so giving of his private charity blinds him, I think, to the fact that private charity cannot be relied on to solve our collective problems or meet our collective needs. He is of pioneer stock and will help anyone in need, but is independent enough to want to be able to do it his way and fearful of a government that gets too involved in anything. He’s misguided, but he’s no selfish, uncaring “let them eat cake” guy. I sometimes despair of our finding common political ground because it bothers him no end that I am a bleeding heart liberal, but I have to believe there is hope somehow to bridge the gap. We need to have a coalition of the caring no matter what form their preferred means of caring takes.