The Washington Post has a great article about the Pecora Commission today. In it there is speculation about where this generation’s answer to Ferdinand Pecora will come from.
One possibility is that such a character could come out of the 10-member Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, which was set up by Congress in July to investigate various aspects of the current crisis. The panel’s chairman, Phil Angelides, a former California state treasurer and longtime Democratic donor, explicitly said in a recent Bloomberg interview that he planned to use Pecora as a model and pursue "non-political hard look" at the causes of the crisis.
I applaud Mr. Angelides decision to rely upon the prior work of the Pecora Commission and use it as model. I have made somewhat of a study of the work of the Commission (housekeeping note: the transcripts basically live on the coffee table in my living room) and believe they provide more than just a model or inspiration, but almost a literal roadmap for questioning on matters like insider trading, excessive executive compensation and conflict of interest in the comingling of commercial bank, investment bank and brokerage functions.
The key for the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission will be staff hires. Remember, Ferdinand Pecora was not a commissioner, he was staff—specifically, chief counsel. Although the Commissioners obviously play a crucial role, it is staff who spent the hours pouring over documents, parsing the transcripts and doing all the nitty gritty work that makes or breaks the success of such a commission. Hiring staff, like Pecora, with a specific background in fraud and white collar crime will be essential. Hiring staff that are as driven by curiosity to find out what really happened and who do not believe any malarkey about derivatives being “too complex” to understand will determine the success of this endeavor.
A former New York prosecutor, Pecora was the last in a series of investigators hired to examine the causes that led to the stock market crash of 1929 for the Senate Committee on Banking and Currency. In early 1933, the newly-elected Democratic president, Franklin D. Roosevelt, gave the bulldog lawyer his blessing to dig deep into the excesses that had plunged the nation into the Great Depression.
The result was a relentless investigation, 12,000 pages of transcripts that laid bare abuses on Wall Street and failures of Washington to adequately regulate the nation’s financial system. Pecora’s efforts provided a basis for reforms that would alter Wall Street and maintain relative stability in the banking industry until the recent crisis. These included legislation that for the first time regulated the sale of securities and helped establish the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For all the differences between then and now, there also are whispers of familiarity: Abuses on Wall Street. The blind eye of Washington. An economy in crisis. A new and eager administration calling for reform, and efforts by those with vested interests to shape those reforms to their will.
On Monday, President Obama tried to wake the national debate over financial reform from its August slumber, urging Wall Street to embrace the changes rather than seek to impede them. But Wall Street has rarely embraced broad change without some prodding.
Pecora and his small team of dogged investigators recognized as much in the 1930s. They issued subpoenas and summoned the titans of finance to Washington, where Pecora savaged them during a series of probing and withering cross-examinations. Charles E. Mitchell of National City Bank, the precursor to Citibank, was forced to resign after Pecora revealed his many transgressions. Likewise, financier J.P. Morgan, namesake of J.P. Morgan Chase and Morgan Stanley, left with a battered reputation.
Day after day, Pecora turned the proceedings into riveting political theater. He made villains of some of Wall Street’s most revered bankers, earning them the nickname "banksters," generating a steady stream of headlines and captivating the nation.
At the same time that Obama was addressing the Masters of the Universe at Federal Hall, Judge Jed Rakoff issued a decision refusing to condone a collusive settlement agreement between SEC and Bank of America over $5.8 Billion in bonuses paid to Merrill Lynch executives after BofA bought Merrill.
The MOTU are not going to suddenly get religion and give up their bonuses, nor beat their breasts crying mea cupla, mea culpa, mea maxima cupla, nor even admit that they must not be geniuses if they ran their companies into the ground and needed to be bailed out by the federal government. Nor have they learned their lesson about derivatives, collateralized consumer debt or gambling masquerading as insurance know as the credit default swap. Did you know you can get get this phony “insurance” on your fantasy football pool? Tell me again that this is insurance, not plain old fashioned gambling? I dare you.
My point is, unless or until the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission gets some boots on the ground eager to get their hands on all that grunt work, WaPo and others will continue to wonder where the next Pecora will come from. We need people who are willing to do that detail work, so that public hearing can be held which demonstrate to the American people the path to improved financial regulation. We are lucky this time; we don’t have to re-invent the wheel. There are hundreds of pages of transcripts sitting on my coffee table, thumbed through daily, that give a usable blueprint. Mr. Angelides is correct to rely upon that model, it will enable the new Commission to hit the ground running.
(This is the eighth part of a continuing series on the original Pecora Commission and its relevance today. Previous posts can be found here: part one, part two, part three, part four, part five, part six, part seven)
Related posts:
- Pecora in Perspective: A New Commission is Born!
- Pecora in Perspective: Examining the Current Commission, Still Without a Commissioner
- Pecora in Perspective: Everything Old is New Again — the Pecora Commission Redux
- New “Pecora Commission” to be Named This Week? Who Would You Appoint?
- Pecora in Perspective: Why Do We Need a New Commission?





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

One thing they could look at besides the ’sources’ of the ‘Financial Crisis’ is the after ‘efforts’ in dealing with it.
Note this; “FDIC names first winner in toxic asset program”
“Fort Worth, Texas-based Residential Credit Solutions Inc. is paying $64.2 million for a 50 percent stake in a new company that will have about $1.3 billion in home mortgages from the failed Franklin Bank.
The FDIC took over Houston-based Franklin Bank in November. Under the test sale to RCS, the new company will issue a note for $727.8 million to the FDIC. Twelve groups of companies had bid on the assets, the agency said.”
$62.4M for a 50 per cent stake in $1.3B of mortgages? “the new company will issue a note for $727.8 million to the FDIC” ; so who has the other 50%? And who is backing the issuance of such a note?
And how did Franklin have $1.3B of mortgages without ’securitization’ of such mortgages as indicated by “The FDIC pilot sale involved actual mortgage loans rather than the related securities.”
Ok, the pea is under which shell?
This needs to happen ASAP. It will help change the face of health care policy at the same time.
such an investigation will never occur under the auspices of this blackbush regime. the banksters are in control.
obombya is just another marionette.
Mz. Kouril, have enjoyed your series and this post tremendously!
Thank you for your time in doing so, and for your work.
We can hope, we can still hope.
But I fear this commission as is, with Angelides, is already neutered and has predictable outcomes in favor of the big guys.
Time will tell and what the phook, if we lose ALL hope we’ll either degenerate into wingnuts ourselves or roll over and die.
I’ll continue to hope a bit. There’s wiggle room for hope, still.
And again, thanks for all your efforts in this series.
Slainte Mhath!
I really don’t see why we need a commission before we can reform.
Glass-Stegal was repealed and the banking regulators allowed the leverage to go to the sratisphere with a vote among five people. Repeal the repeal of Glass-Stegall and pass a law limiting leverage with no discretion for the regulators. If companies are found to be over levered they are shut, period. This is a good start. Then you can take your time investigating and setting up new regulations for CDS or plain outlawing them in the future. Once the regulations are in place the investigation is just to see if there was criminal wrong doing not a fight about what kind of regs to have.
The Glass-Stegall and low leverage worked since the great depression, it is just that they were dismantled in the last ten years. Why re-invent the wheel and argue when we know what worked in the past?
Let’s hope Lee Hamilton and Richard Ben-Veniste and James Baker III will be completely unavailable for this.
Aside from the fraser website, are these hearings available anywhere else you know of?
I remember looking at the make up of this committee in the past. The Republican choices are nuts and the Democratic choices looked only so so. Perhaps there will be a surprise but I didn’t see any indication of one. To say the committee will have a target rich environment is an understatement.
The Post is laying it on thick. The Obama speech was weak. The embracing change nonsense was Obama asking Wall Street to do good, pretty please, to help him out. Like that is ever going to happen. Every so often someone makes a mistake and a person like Elizabeth Warren gets named to something but that is definitely a bug not a feature.
C-u-l-p-a
I agree. I wrote up a fairly long and solid list of reforms in a diary last December. Most of what needs to be done, like re-imposition of Glass-Steagall, is known. The elites simply refuse to do it.
james, LOL.
OT- Mary of Peter, Paul, and Mary has died. :(
Great post, thanks.
Who is Residential?
http://74.125.95.132/search?q=…..#038;gl=us
Good point.
Glass Stegall was fine, till it was repealed.
I’d think, though, we might need IT, and more.
But yeah, bring back GS AND do the commission.
We KNOW they are guilty!
*G*
Damn, and I was feelin SO hopeful.
Musta been the cheap merlot.
Thanks Hugh . . . you DO provide details for your posits, ‘preciate it.
Just read this, and got leaky eyes.
I’m a BIG fan of Mary Travers, have been for decades.
A big voice, one that could hang with Cass Elliott, Janis, or anyone, in any genre.
A folkie, who shared her gift with us for what, 6 decades?
A big, big voice, from the 50’s to just last year.
A big heart, too. Damn.
Bless her for sharing her gift with us all for so long.
‘Cross The River Jordan, Mary. Up Jacob’s Ladder. And yer home, gal.
Sigh. Sniff.
ubetchaiam – the Franklin Bank deal-the reason the FDIC sold a 50% stake was so that the FDIC could retain part and thus have some “up side.” Also, by selling a smaller stake there were more organizations that could afford to bid, which means more competition and thus a better price.
I’m guessing that the note was payable to the FDIC as receiver for Franklin Bank, while the guaranty of it was made by the FDIC Corporate. I don’t understand the amount of the note itself.
As for these being whole loans and not securities, evidently Franklin originated the loans and either chose to not sell them off for securitization, or wasn’t ABLE to sell them off for securitization.
Well, given that the financial crisis is going to deepen before it gets better, I’d say it’s likely that there will be a commission investigation with some teeth in it. As noted, the Pecora cross-examinations did not take place until four years after the crisis of the 1930s had begun in 1928-29. Right now, we’re waiting for the other shoes to drop…like the world’s entire cargo shipping industry going bust…which is probably going to happen in the next year or so. There are probably a few other sectors slated to take some serious hits too. So, when that happens, there is going to be some more economic turmoil to remind us all that the “presents” of the last two decades of unbridled greed and speculation will have to investigated as to precisely who provided us with these gifts.
If you go read the enitre article I link to, it points out that the drama of the commission hearings fueled the public outrage that made a climate where such reform bills could actually pass Congress.
We need that kind of political theatre so that the public will demand these reforms and so banksters (what a great term for the 30’s) will be sufficiently reticent that there will be less pushback from them on reform.
Hugh whether you like the make up of the committee or not, it is the SATFF that does the work in hte trenches. A strong staff witha clear vision and good fraud investigations skills can get a lot done
Yesterday I saw a photo of hundreds of empty cargo ships sitting at anchor in the pacific with nowhere to go. There was an article (might have been in the Guardian?) about the “ghost fleet”.
The shipping industry collapse has already begun
Here’s an article about it on the daily mail.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/hom…..apore.html