<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harry Reid&#8217;s &#8220;Corporate&#8221; Public Option: Not Public, and Not an Option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:03:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: archiebird</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1975047</link>
		<dc:creator>archiebird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1975047</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for replying.  But I’m just curious.  How do they plan to pay for a public option anyway? A portion of it, of course, would be paid for by the recipient.  What about the other  portion?  When do the Bush taxcuts end, and what are the current Admin. thoughts about letting them lapse? My gut tells me that that Obama would probably let the rich keep their money.  He’s been such a disappointment at times.  I know they’re going after UBS, but Amy Goodman reported that there are over 50,000 Swiss Banks Accounts  that are avoiding US taxes,and Obama has only negotiated on less than 5000.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for replying.  But I’m just curious.  How do they plan to pay for a public option anyway? A portion of it, of course, would be paid for by the recipient.  What about the other  portion?  When do the Bush taxcuts end, and what are the current Admin. thoughts about letting them lapse? My gut tells me that that Obama would probably let the rich keep their money.  He’s been such a disappointment at times.  I know they’re going after UBS, but Amy Goodman reported that there are over 50,000 Swiss Banks Accounts  that are avoiding US taxes,and Obama has only negotiated on less than 5000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMcGarth</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1975035</link>
		<dc:creator>BMcGarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1975035</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Must have been a time in our history when the Majority Senate leader would say anything &amp; the larger majority of the populace his party represents would just go-along.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cuz it seems Harry Reid is still stuck in that point in time.&lt;br /&gt;
And for Dc blogger suggesting BBoxer as Senate leader.Is there something I am missing ? BBoxer ,the so called liberal senator who didn’t have the gumption to support the black caucus when they pleaded for the support of ONE US SENATOR to side with ‘em so that a congressional inquiry could be launched to query the 2000 election of GWBush.And the same BBOxer who went all the way to Connecticut to campaign &amp; lie about Lieberman’s stance on pregnant women wanting to visit hospitals when Lieberman was being challenged by Ned LaMont.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must have been a time in our history when the Majority Senate leader would say anything &amp; the larger majority of the populace his party represents would just go-along.</p>
<p>Cuz it seems Harry Reid is still stuck in that point in time.<br />
And for Dc blogger suggesting BBoxer as Senate leader.Is there something I am missing ? BBoxer ,the so called liberal senator who didn’t have the gumption to support the black caucus when they pleaded for the support of ONE US SENATOR to side with ‘em so that a congressional inquiry could be launched to query the 2000 election of GWBush.And the same BBOxer who went all the way to Connecticut to campaign &amp; lie about Lieberman’s stance on pregnant women wanting to visit hospitals when Lieberman was being challenged by Ned LaMont.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1975029</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1975029</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Single payer would be better than Switzerland’s style of insurance, but would the public option be better? Maybe if the public option was not watered down it would be as good or better than Switzerland’s style of insurance. I watched the President’s speech the other day and I really hope he wins the public option for America.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Single payer would be better than Switzerland’s style of insurance, but would the public option be better? Maybe if the public option was not watered down it would be as good or better than Switzerland’s style of insurance. I watched the President’s speech the other day and I really hope he wins the public option for America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masaccio</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1975013</link>
		<dc:creator>masaccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1975013</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;archiebird, the idea of medicare for all is plausible. The cost is a sticking point, and, of course, insurance companies would rather eat snakes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only reason the public option is limited to 5mn people is because the exchange is more like a gateway than a real exchange. It limits the people eligible to use it. That can be changed now or later, and we all hope it will. On the other hand, if the public option is limited in the ways the Blue Dogs want to, it won’t really be that much cheaper.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>archiebird, the idea of medicare for all is plausible. The cost is a sticking point, and, of course, insurance companies would rather eat snakes.</p>
<p>The only reason the public option is limited to 5mn people is because the exchange is more like a gateway than a real exchange. It limits the people eligible to use it. That can be changed now or later, and we all hope it will. On the other hand, if the public option is limited in the ways the Blue Dogs want to, it won’t really be that much cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulaT</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974999</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulaT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974999</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Does Reid have a primary challenger? He’s in trouble, which is a good thing, but would rather have him picked off by a better Dem than a worse Repub.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Reid have a primary challenger? He’s in trouble, which is a good thing, but would rather have him picked off by a better Dem than a worse Repub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archiebird</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974904</link>
		<dc:creator>archiebird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974904</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Something I thought of before I fell aspleep last night. According to the CBO they approximate only about 5 million purchasing a Public Option insurance plan through the government. Would it be possible to set up a ‘public option” through medicare? It would mean people are able to purchase medical insurance through medicare.  It could be set up that way? Right? Alot of the groundwork is already laid with medicare doctors and what not.  A person would pay a pre-determined premium (based on income) directly to the government through medicare.  Back to the topic:  Note to Harry Reid: Public Option MEANS PUBLIC! DUH! NOT PRIVATE. Can we get rid of him now?  Is there somewhere I can donate to his primary opponent?  Does he have a primary opponent?  If not can we get him one quick?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I thought of before I fell aspleep last night. According to the CBO they approximate only about 5 million purchasing a Public Option insurance plan through the government. Would it be possible to set up a ‘public option” through medicare? It would mean people are able to purchase medical insurance through medicare.  It could be set up that way? Right? Alot of the groundwork is already laid with medicare doctors and what not.  A person would pay a pre-determined premium (based on income) directly to the government through medicare.  Back to the topic:  Note to Harry Reid: Public Option MEANS PUBLIC! DUH! NOT PRIVATE. Can we get rid of him now?  Is there somewhere I can donate to his primary opponent?  Does he have a primary opponent?  If not can we get him one quick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masaccio</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974851</link>
		<dc:creator>masaccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974851</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m not sure how this advances the discussion. Perhaps you are self-gratifying like roxsteady @ 39?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not sure how this advances the discussion. Perhaps you are self-gratifying like roxsteady @ 39?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masaccio</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974850</link>
		<dc:creator>masaccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974850</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t disagree. I do think a public option can be done that will start driving down costs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t disagree. I do think a public option can be done that will start driving down costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlofhuntingdon</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974849</link>
		<dc:creator>earlofhuntingdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974849</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Harry Riedless, as ever, kowtowing to the private sector, which never does any harm and always does good.  He long ago followed Alice down that rabbit hole.  He is unable to think or act outside the little box Alice put him in after he drank the potion that said, “Drink This”.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Riedless, as ever, kowtowing to the private sector, which never does any harm and always does good.  He long ago followed Alice down that rabbit hole.  He is unable to think or act outside the little box Alice put him in after he drank the potion that said, “Drink This”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solerso</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974848</link>
		<dc:creator>solerso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/10/harry-reids-corporate-public-option-not-public-and-not-an-option/#comment-1974848</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;right. and  im glad that some are shocked out of thier “hope” that Obama is anything but a neo liberal “market” hack, but dont despair of it and give up! have you already forgotten the bush dictatorship..er decidership? have to have together for the long haul&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right. and  im glad that some are shocked out of thier “hope” that Obama is anything but a neo liberal “market” hack, but dont despair of it and give up! have you already forgotten the bush dictatorship..er decidership? have to have together for the long haul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.218 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 19:03:50 -->

