<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Public Option Means Hundreds of Billions in New Assets for Giant Health Companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:28:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenharper</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974140</link>
		<dc:creator>greenharper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974140</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ha!  We know about Shays’ Rebellion here in Western Mass.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  We know about Shays’ Rebellion here in Western Mass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPDCUS</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974125</link>
		<dc:creator>PPDCUS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974125</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lee Atwater/Joseph Goebbels Republicans&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s clear now Obama doesn’t understand that you can’t negotiate with people who are committed to your destruction regardless of what it costs the nation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Atwater/Joseph Goebbels Republicans</p>
<p>It’s clear now Obama doesn’t understand that you can’t negotiate with people who are committed to your destruction regardless of what it costs the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenwarrior</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974121</link>
		<dc:creator>greenwarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i say he’ll fluff.  more fog, no substance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i say he’ll fluff.  more fog, no substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TarheelDem</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974120</link>
		<dc:creator>TarheelDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974120</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Olympia Snowe just came out against the public option; I guess triggers are now off the table.  It’s just Democrats now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will poker-player Obama call, continue to bluff, or fold?  Watch at 8 ET&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olympia Snowe just came out against the public option; I guess triggers are now off the table.  It’s just Democrats now.</p>
<p>Will poker-player Obama call, continue to bluff, or fold?  Watch at 8 ET</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masaccio</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974119</link>
		<dc:creator>masaccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974119</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I believe a public option can produce excellent results. I will be writing to explain that in due course, if it still matters. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I won’t debate Kip Sullivan, but by way of explanation, I will say that the “level playing field” is not in my calculations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe a public option can produce excellent results. I will be writing to explain that in due course, if it still matters. </p>
<p>I won’t debate Kip Sullivan, but by way of explanation, I will say that the “level playing field” is not in my calculations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubetchaiam</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974118</link>
		<dc:creator>ubetchaiam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974118</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Because I’m still fighting for the dream of “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness”.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I’m 62 and have been doing such for many years and am pretty tired of getting nowhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because I’m still fighting for the dream of “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness”.</p>
<p>But I’m 62 and have been doing such for many years and am pretty tired of getting nowhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masaccio</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974117</link>
		<dc:creator>masaccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974117</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That is also an excellent point. The public option should have higher rates for older people, but at least they can buy coverage.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is also an excellent point. The public option should have higher rates for older people, but at least they can buy coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masaccio</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974116</link>
		<dc:creator>masaccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974116</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your observation that we can start a virtuous cycle is excellent, and quite true. We need to reduce the concentration of wealth in the hands of few people, and this is a great place to start.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your observation that we can start a virtuous cycle is excellent, and quite true. We need to reduce the concentration of wealth in the hands of few people, and this is a great place to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldgold</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974115</link>
		<dc:creator>oldgold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974115</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;masaccio, I am sorry to be so late to this thread, but since Monday I have had a question for you. That is, what is your take on the criticisms of the PO that Kip Sullivan had? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was unclear to me as to whether they were fully legitimate or if he was so deeply committed to single payer that he was unable to see the benefits that the PO offers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>masaccio, I am sorry to be so late to this thread, but since Monday I have had a question for you. That is, what is your take on the criticisms of the PO that Kip Sullivan had? </p>
<p>It was unclear to me as to whether they were fully legitimate or if he was so deeply committed to single payer that he was unable to see the benefits that the PO offers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ART45</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974113</link>
		<dc:creator>ART45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/09/09/no-public-option-means-hundreds-of-billions-in-new-assets-for-giant-health-companies/#comment-1974113</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good to know there are some other realistic pessimists around here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know there are some other realistic pessimists around here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.270 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 20:45:26 -->

