![]() |
|
Young people only work because they need some cash for a new iPod. So forget about raising the minimum wage. It’s not like 20-somethings are raising a family. And forget about health care reform, too. People who want health coverage have it. Young workers don’t have health coverage because they don’t want it. You know, they think they’re invincible.
If you’re a young worker, you’ve probably heard those lines more than once. And especially if you’re a young worker, you know how false they are.
We had a few young workers here at the AFL-CIO this week to talk about what it’s really like to be age 35 and younger and trying to get by. They joined us for the release of our new report: "Young Workers: A Lost Decade."
Like one-third of the workers surveyed, Nate Scherer, 31, lives at home with his parents because he and his wife can’t afford to be on their own. His brother and his brother’s partner live there, too. He spoke at a press conference here.
After getting married my wife and I decided to move in with my parents to pay off our bills. We could afford to live on our own but we’d never be able to get out of debt. We have school loans to pay off, too. We’d like to have children, but we just can’t manage the expense of it right now…so we’re putting it off till we’re in a better place. My [work] position is on the edge, and I feel like if my company were to cut back, my position would be one of the first to go.
This bears repeating: One-third of workers younger than age 35 live at home with their parents.
Peter D. Hart Research Associates conducted the polling for this report in July 2009 for the AFL-CIO and our community affiliate Working America. We did a similar report 10 years ago, which enables us to see how bad the deterioration has been in the economic situation of this group. Here are some of the findings:
- 31 percent of young workers report being uninsured, up from 24 percent 10 years ago, and 79 percent of the uninsured say they don’t have coverage because they can’t afford it or their employer does not offer it.
- Only 31 percent say they make enough money to cover their bills and put some money aside—22 percentage points fewer than in 1999—while 24 percent cannot even pay their monthly bills.
- A third cannot pay their bills and seven in 10 do not have enough saved to cover two months of living expenses.
- 37 percent have put off education or professional development because they can’t afford it.
- When asked who is most responsible for the country’s economic woes, close to 50 percent of young workers place the blame on Wall Street and banks or corporate CEOs. And young workers say greed by corporations and CEOs is the factor most to blame for the current financial downturn.
- By a 22-point margin, young workers favor expanding public investment over reducing the budget deficit. Young workers rank conservative economic approaches such as reducing taxes, government spending and regulation on business among the five lowest of 16 long-term priorities for Congress and the president.
- Thirty-five percent say they voted for the first time in 2008, and nearly three-quarters now keep tabs on government and public affairs, even when there’s not an election going on.
- The majority of young workers and nearly 70 percent of first-time voters are confident that Obama will take the country in the right direction.
Over at Jobs with Justice, Maria Escobar writes that young people and the labor movement need each other. Escobar is a recent graduate of Florida State University and current National Coordinator for the Student Labor Action Project (SLAP), which every year holds a student week of action on behalf of workers. This spring, hundreds of students in 28 states and the District of Columbia took part in rallies, community service days, petition drives, educational forums and other public events to promote workers’ freedom to form unions and bargain and to mobilize for a fair economy. The students are members of SLAP, United Students Against Sweatshops and the United States Student Association.
The work that unions have done with SLAP has only had a positive impact on union campaigns. Over the last 10 years that Jobs with Justice has been tracking their work with students, JwJ has found that union organizing and bargaining campaigns which involve students are 10 percent more likely to end in victories than campaigns which do not.
AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka, who is running for AFL-CIO president without announced opposition at our Convention this month, is making union outreach to young people a top priority. He said one of the report’s conclusions is especially striking:
Young people want to be involved but they’re rarely asked. Their priorities are even more progressive than the priorities of the older generation of working people, yet they aren’t engaged by co-workers or friends to get involved in the economic debate.
Currently, 18-to-35-year-olds make up a quarter of union membership. And at the AFL-CIO Convention, we will ask Convention delegates to approve plans for broad recruitment of young workers, as well as plans for training and leadership of young workers who are currently union members. And that’s just the beginning of a broad push towards talking and mobilizing young workers in the coming months and years.
According to the report, more than half of young workers say employees are more successful getting problems resolved as a group rather than as individuals, and employees who have a union are better off than employees in similar jobs who do not.
Here’s hope for the future.
Our full report is here.
Related posts:
- Without Jobs, the Nation’s Future Circles the Drain
- Who are Union Members? New Study Shows “The Changing Face of Labor”
- Findlay, Ohio, Chamber of Commerce Kills Parade Because Unions Backed It
- Jobs Don’t Live Here Anymore
- AFL-CIO President Trumka: Union-Blue Dog Relationship Changing, Filibustering Health Care Un-American






Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Any data about what the situation is in other industrialized nations?
Personally, I can tell you it’s a drag getting old also.
Ever hear this? Other nations are still trying to figure out how to deal with a nation that is on medication.
When I was twenty BCBS weaseled out of paying for my first child’s birth. He was 14 days early, they wouldn’t pay for premees. Needless to say I was loaded with money at 20..heh.
As a country and as individuals we are living on the last of the accumulated wealth of the last century . The good ol days when we had sane tax policies, a manufacturing base, realatively affordable housing and wages more in line with the cost of living. people were in unions back then and lobbyists didnt write all the laws for us. America was still seen as a”growing market” by capitalists and not a merely a place to keep their boats and solid gold furniture.
Unions got tarred with the same brush that Reagan used to tar government. Republicans attacked Unions using the same rhetoric: Big, inept, corrupt and self-dealing. It continues to be effective with their base, viz the attacks on the UAW during the GM and Chrysler restructuring negotiations.
Young people aren’t as bought into that rhetoric. I hope that your efforts to increase membership pay out and Unions help lead more Americans into middle class prosperity.
Those that remain in the Republic base will never notice that government is biggest, most inept, most corrupt and most self-dealing when Republics control the goverment.
Wow. What a stat.
The abuse of workers breaks my heart. They are treated hardly better than the slaves from the past. Really no rights. And when they are denied a union they are in even worse shape.
France and the FRENCHIES much smarter
butter better than bullets…mais oui
well… let’s see.. for young Americans, we have do it yourself healthcare:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02…..nsure.html
http://www.boundlessline.org/2…..elves.html
The internet works in lieu of medical care if you can’t get the real stuff.
There used to be a well-known website called fuckedcompany.com that tracked corporate failures, after the dot bomb.. allowing laid off young workers to vent. We need a new one, called fuckedcountry.com. This is the future, until we choose to fix it: a generation with representation, without access to basic services including healthcare, without housung, working multiple jobs to repay the debt foisted on them to attain education and training.. education and training without any prospect of yielding commensurate employment opportunities. By the way, historically speaking, there’s no quicker way to destabilize a country.
I’m with you Tex – that is astounding !
left you a note in last night’s thread where you left the Eshoo Townhall info.
What do you mean Young People haven’t bought into it? I guess you haven’t heard about all the “Young Republicans” on College Campuses….
There “morons” in every age bracket, the guy (sitting down with the army type hat) that shouted down the woman in the wheel chair at a town hall looked no older than 30, there idiots born every stinkin day.
Unions after being ignored for years will be a key part of bringing this country back to the progress we got side-tracked from.
The AIF-CIO said my company was too large to organize and couldn’t help me and I know at least the people I work with would join a union in a heart beat.
I live at home, many College Grads live at home, yet I’m the looser.
Its not that I can’t afford it, I can’t afford for SHIT TO HAPPEN. Just to give you an example -
I recently had to drop my auto insurance and bought into California’s Public Auto Insurance because I qualify (many people do actually) but I forgot to pay attention to the BOLD lettering that said “No Comp or Collision” coverage.
I didn’t get into accidents anyway and said I would deal with it later.
About a month after I got that plan, I had an accident. I likely wouldn’t have had an accident if I hadn’t been out driving around for my second job because my primary job cut my hours and I haven’t had wage increase (nor my co-workers) in two years.
Since my car was damaged to a point that I couldn’t drive it, I couldn’t work my 2nd job. I bought another car while that one sat at a dealership lot so I could figured out how I would pay the $5K damage bill.
Long story short, I got into my 2nd accident in less than 45 days after my first one. That car got totaled and the policy I bought when I got the car covered it, plus GAP.
When I thought I might loose my primary car to storage fees, I found my Auto Loan Company failing I didn’t contact them about coverage when my tags were due put coverage on my car a MONTH before the accident, so I was covered after-all.
In the mean time that delay and now the work on the car means I haven’t worked my 2nd job since June 25th and my hours were cut even further. I finally applied for EDD and got it.
There is NO way I could pay my car payment and rent in any decent area around Los Angeles.
According to various studies on poverty in America, you need to make $30K a year in Los Angeles just to cover your basic needs (rent, transportation, entertainment, communications, food, clothes) I pulled in 17K last year…
I don’t qualify for many poverty related programs because I make too much money!
Can you believe it? Poverty Data from the Government is, to put it mildly out of date and a half-truth, just like the REAL unemployment numbers Nationwide are around 12-13% not 9%.
I think the Unions are the catalysis for a 3rd political party if we can’t get the main parties to do what’s RIGHT!
I think most college rethug chapters are pretty small relative to college dems.. (although I don’t know in Dixie and the Dead Zone). I think somebody told me recently (even though it was many years ago for me), that my undergraduate alma mater’s College Republican chapter claims 20 members (which means that probably 5 bother to show up to their meetings), versus over a thousand for the College Dems.
I admit that once upon a time I was a College Republican. My parents were Republicans, and so were the parents of all the other members. It was kind of a default thing. I quit by the end of my first year and registered as a Dem two years later.
Unions are one of the original whipping boys of the right. They are absolutely terrified of the poor, working class and middle classes coming together to see to thier own interests. Look at how absurdly they have tried to smear ACORN as some sinister alien conspiracy.There arent enough billionaires to for a majority so shove democracy. They se it as thier right and duty to subvert democracy at every opportunity. Many of them have the repulsively offensive paternalistic view that its “for our own good”. That protecting corporate profits is not only main goal of american government but the ONLY legitimate goal of american government.
40 years ago today I came home from Vietnam. I was 19, turned 20 in November. I got $130 a month on the GI Bill, almost the exact amount my dad got 20 years earlier. It took me 9 years to get my undergrad, 7 more for my masters and my doctorate at 50. I worked at the post office, landscaped, drove a school bus, umpired built grain elevators. . .now I’m almost 60 and if I work 7 more years I’ll have 20 in at my current gig. Know what, I wouldn’t trade what I’ve lived for nuttin!
The rich right don’t want to share anything and the poor right don’t understand that they are being played.
I think the right is growing weaker with young people. You can only scare someone with lies if the truth isnt threatening catastrophe and ruin. This is the beggining of the end game for American Monopoly capitalsim. if they cant find some kind of majority coalition, we will see more and more blatant, daring attempts to undermine the democratic process. If that means buying off congress thats what it means. If they cant buy off enough Reps and Senators they can create crisis, if the people see thru that they can get really pushy. The focus is on Global because they’ve used up the American markets. When they cant “grow” markets and profits by expansion, they will take more out of their workers flesh. When that gets to a breaking point, either we become slaves or we evolve beyond capitalism.In the end I dont see Americans agreeing to be chained up in the salt mines, so I believe its the end game for capitalism.
no, the rhetoric is about cutting it down to size, but the reality never matches. I had someone going on about how great Reagan was last night. I told him Reagan’s tax policy took from the middle class and gave to the wealthy – especially the FICA tax increases. He kind of shrugged and said government always gives to the wealthy, then went back to screaming about socialism and redistributing wealth that Obama wants to do.
Reality and expected policy outcomes just don’t register for some people because their ideological lens is so distorting.
this isn’t market capitalism. If it ever was, it stopped being so sometime in the last couple of generations. Now it’s predatory crony capitalism at best… a corrupt syndicracy (rule by corporations) at worst. The invisible hand of free enterprise has materialized into a very visible fist wielding a whip. Adam Smith wouldn’t recognize what we have now.. or maybe he would, since it’s closer to the monarchical autocracy that he inveighed against than to the state he envisioned.
This article sums up the present state of affairs very nicely (the Economist, Big is Back):
http://www.economist.com/opini…..d=14303582
Small firm enterpreneurial opportunity as wealth-creator (Smith’s ideal of small companies and level playing fields and the foundational unit of American capitalism, going back to the early republic) is as dead as the banking system.
This? I’ll check out the references.
I live in Ben Lomond, will be arriving late to my motorcycle club’s monthly meeting because of Anna’s town hall.
She scheduled it the same night the local schools are having their first parent’s night…. a lot of people that should be at her meeting will be at the school.
@19
Speaking of predatory,crony capitalism at it’s best,here’s a story worth considering from ProPublica…tell me again how much KBR and AIG care about the military:
Injured War Zone Contractors Fight to Get Care From AIG and Other …Apr 16, 2009 … A military audit deemed AIG’s premiums “unreasonably high.” Insurance companies initially rejected 44 percent of claims from contractors …
http://www.propublica.org/…/inj…..om-aig-416 – Cached – Similar
Ha haaaa! And the Rich Left tell everybody to go green while they build huge mansions, fly all over the place, and let their limos idle for an hour.
I was so moved during the Ted Kennedy send-off. His eulogizers connected so well with the common folk with all those stories about sailing their yachts. I wept.
Some people call, it “Monopoly Capitalism” and your absolutely correct, it has nothing to do with the “main st. capitalism” or “mercantilism” or any of things things that many Americans beleive. In fact, it never was. For the first 100 years of our nation we practiced slavery, 1/2 of our economy was a slave economy. Its hard to believe but many of these “lets get back to 1776″ folks seem to ignore that. After that, the industrial revolution and unimaginably hideous working conditions supported the massive expansion of Monopoly capitalsim. Then it died, in 1928. It was ressurected as some kind of “mixed” economy, made to protect capitalism from itself. That worked fairly well but the instabillity inherent in capitalism (the class warfare) was still there. Now,for the last 30 years the right has been taking apart the safegaurds that were built into it so it could survive-its life support system- this year it almost died again. our govt did a commendable job saving its life with a transfusion of trillions of dollars in public money. so where do we go now???I say, let it die and let history move on. Let eveolution happen. its gonna happen anyway, eventually. We can make nice or we can fight it every step of the way but it ends at socialism of some kind. There are many great models for what American socilism could look like and some of it will probably work. Authentic Democracy is key, and some private ownership,familly farms, small businesses (like 600 -700 employees) but major industry willbe nationalized. and yes I hope I live to see all of this but i accept i probably wont.
very eloquently written. Virtually the only big block of young people buying homes seem to be those using (at least in part) their parents’ accumulated equity.
The following column from NY Times is simply frightening:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08…..t.html?hpw
The article suggests that real unemployment rates (current claimants + frustrated) may be as high as 35% for young men in their 20s… and that there may be 30 million unemployed young adults. Total national fail.
And the generation after these young people are faring even worse:
http://www.google.com/hostedne…..wD9AEMF2O4
It is truly frightening. If ever there were a time for a genuine “progressive” movement its now. we cant see the corporate dems as all enemies but we cant expect they are going to do the right thing if we dont push them
Nice recitation of Republic talking points.
Hell, the real umemployment rate for young African Americans in Pinellas County is over 40%. Another half million people, nationwide, filed for unemployment last week. Corporate America sees the current economic situation as a great excuse to lay off more workers and improve their bottom line. What are they gonna do when not enough people can afford to buy the shit they import from China?
and meanwhile, young Americans who haven’t yet left school to not find jobs, are accumulating record levels of debt:
http://online.wsj.com/article/…..st_Popular
“What are they gonna do when not enough people can afford to buy the shit they import from China?”
Well.. according to NYT a few weeks ago, many desperate young college grads are moving there to look for work. Hey.. why not? Let’s compare the two country’s stimulus budgets:
China: http://shanghaiist.com/attachm…..echart.jpg
…which they’re really spending on infrastructure and job creation.
US:
http://economyleague.org/files/stimpiechart.jpg
What’s that really really big piece in ours? Oh, tax cuts. $47 billion for infrastructure. Wowee.
Honestly, Mr. Cleavland i just dont see what that has to do with 30 million unemployed, miilions over that living below the poverty threshold, 50 millions uninsured, 100 million inadequately insured, the FACT that home ownership is going down down down. why do you think that bush allowed all those bad loans? charity? now THATS funny. they did because they know just like anyone paying attention how big a part of our economy the home industry is. if people dont have the money to buy, then the investment group dosent have the profit. simple as that.
Hopefully some of them will come back with some ideas on how to fix the health care problem. LOL! bet the “free traders” didnt see that one coming
’cause in a system based on cronyism only one thing matters: young Jenna has a spectacular vanity job.. and cheap servants.
But, but, see if we spend taxpayer money on infrastructure and real job creation it’s socialism, communism, fascism, or some such shit.
“socialism” “communism” “fascism” might as well be vampires werewolves and devils. Probably 80% of americans dont have a working idea of what socialism , communism or fascism is, and that includes the idiot politicians that throw those words around. They are buzz words and usually they mean something else. For instance in gopland “socialist” actually means “black person” now.
the scary thing is that if you dissect the numbers behind the two stimulus packages, you realize that much of their spending is inward-turned and thus at their internal purchasing-power parity rate instead of the international exchange rate. Thus, what appears to be $220 billion on infrastructure spending is really $510 billion.. or 11x what we’re spending. Sure, their population is just under 4x ours, but their budget is 11x. Even their domestic welfare and entitlement+rural development (mostly rural health) stimulus spending is a bigger slice than our corresponding stimulus elements. Also, much of that 1 trillion in disaster-recovery spending is actually going into entitlements and infrastructure, in roughly equal measure. Meanwhile, by the time our lobbyists got done with our package, we wound up with $300 billion in tax cuts. The contrast is just un-fracking believable. A fracking second world communist country is going to get a fully functional national high speed rail network a full generation or two ahead of the richest fracking country on earth.
I heard a writer on the radio a couple weeks ago who was talking about the use of the term anti-Semitic. He said that it used to be that people who were called anti-Semitic didn’t like Jews. Now the term is used by Jews to describe people they don’t like. Alan Dershowitz immediately came to mind.
“Any data about what the situation is in other industrialized nations?”
Well.. given the number of disenfranchised and unemployed young American men, I would imagine those other industrialized nations are busy tightening their immigration controls.
Or the AIPAC crowd. Its not good to throw words like that around because they lose their meaning. For Klansmen to go to town halls and accuse the president and other black leaders of being “fayshists” is stomach turning.
Ah, once again, we have someone who can’t refute the point, so he complains that the point was raised.
I expect that sort of thing from most folks, but not here.
Come on, prog up!
K
E
E
P
S
C
R
O
L
L
I
N
G
Nothing to see here but teh stoopid.
Don’t feed teh stoopid.