![]() |
|
Today, it’s my honor to turn this space to Sheet Metal Workers (SMWIA) General President Mike Sullivan, leader of one of the first unions to publicly state the union is pulling all support from the Blue Dogs because of their efforts to kill real health care reform.
Remember last November? I still do.
I remember the pride I felt watching President-elect Obama and his family standing on that stage in Chicago, bolstered by the hopes and dreams of millions of Americans and the promise of change finally coming to our nation.
Months later, the promise of that new day is in jeopardy. Not only because of the do-nothing Republican opposition, but because of some of our own.
Instead of real health care reform, a small group of conservative Democrats in the House and Senate are working with Republicans in a bid to tax the same health benefits union members made countless concessions for, while dropping the public option that would lower the skyrocketing health care costs that are keeping many working people up late at night.
Every major poll indicates overwhelming support for a public option and intense opposition to a health benefits tax that would force working Americans to subsidize irresponsible employers like Wal-Mart who underinsure their employees. I know that everywhere I travel, I am met with outrage and anger by union members and unrepresented workers who trusted the Democrats to stand beside the president and pass real reform.
Despite this anger, senators like Max Baucus and Kent Conrad continue to reject a public option and have consistently called for a health benefits tax on 160 million working Americans.
We in the labor movement have always stood with the Democratic Party through the highs and its lows. We have donated to the more conservative Democrats, promised that they would stand with us when the time came. We did more than uphold our part of the bargain. We worked day in and day out to help deliver the Democratic majorities in the House and in the Senate. In fact, the Center for Public Integrity reports that the majority of contributions made to the so-called "Blue Dog" Democrats come from the same working men and women of the labor movement they now try to ignore, not the health insurance industry or Big Business.
Those same working people have not just donated financially through their unions. For a long time, they have been called upon and delivered in performing the grunt work on many of these political campaigns. They have time and time again manned the phone banks, walked precincts, manned get-out-the-vote (GOTV) programs and distributed leaflets for all Democratic candidates across the country.
We have been promised that when push came to shove, the Blue Dogs would join their fellow Democrats and stand by working people.
Push has come to shove. And from the way things now stand, union members feel deceived.
Due to this, my union, the Sheet Metal Workers International Association (SMWIA), has decided to suspend all financial and intangible campaign activity in support of every political candidate until real health care reform is passed.
We are using those funds to instead launch a preliminary round of ads that are now playing in Iowa, Montana, North Dakota and Arkansas targeting Republican Chuck Grassley and the other senators holding up reform. We are also using those funds to inform and mobilize our union’s membership in our fight for real health care reform.
We are not the only ones in the labor movement who are feeling the disappointment. Other unions are assisting us in our efforts and even more are considering a similar moratorium on donations.
And in case these senators and their colleagues in the House are still not listening, AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka also is warning them about what is in store. He recently appeared at our General Convention in Las Vegas and further elaborated on his remarks at Netroots Nation, and amplified here in a Huffington Post article, where he stated that "We’ll look at everyone of their votes."
If they’re against the Employee Free Choice Act, if they’re against health care…I think it’ll be tough for them to get support from working people.
If we do not act today, America’s families will pay $24,291 in insurance costs by 2016. That is an additional $11,611 in payments that go to America’s health insurance companies rather than into people’s pockets.
I think the American people can find quite a few more useful things to do with that money besides padding the wallets of the American health insurance industry.
Perhaps cleaning up after the wreck of the past eight years might be a start.




80 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Solidarity Forever! The Blue Dogs are deserving of nothing except for a seat on a rocking chair on their porches.
Here’s an analysis of Wellpoint, with estimated savings for single payer:
http://www.synoia.com/Single_P…..h_care.htm
Mr Sullivan is on target.
And not even a sturdy, union-made, rocking chair, but some cheap crap from China.
great stuff tula, GREAT!
I hope all unions get on board this movement, very very nice
Keep the pressure on!
Thank you Mike (and Tula) for this.
I’m not going to hold my breath that the politicians will actually understand the message. At least not until a few of the incumbents lose due to the lack of Union support.
Maybe we should set up some sort of Act Blue account that just represents the money they could be getting if they weren’t such sell-outs. Sort of like those dumb Geico commercials.
synoia, your link is broken
I am personally wondering why we give any tax exemptions to products made over seas and a real progressive would pass the bill that tax exemptions are for union or living wage companies ONLY
Thanks. Fixed. The edit function is unfriendly for links.
Thank you, Tula. Thank you, Mr. Sullivan! Sadly, this is what it is going to take to get the attention of the attention of those feeding at the insurance/pharma trough!
Progressives are really finding themselves in this healthcare reform fiasco. Things are really starting to change.
Thank you, Tula. I enjoy your work!
Also, thank you Mr. Sullivan!
That’s my motto now…when we get single payer or untouchable public option then I will donate again, maybe. Hope I can get over what has happened in the KKK section of the Dem Party. These criminals need to be purged now!
I love the Unions. Bless them for being honest and standing for working people.
Thank you, Mr. Sullivan! Withholding financial support is one thing for sure, but the lack of man power will kill a campaign. Bravo to the SMWIA.
I am not a union member >>>> But i will support your Union in any way possible if you hold to your promise of not support ANYONE who votes no on a public option.
Good on you and your Union members
Right On Labor Brothers and Sisters !
Welcome Mike Sullivan !
surely, surely Labor by now has learned what happens when they don’t hold fast against this bs
oh and Richard Trumka is the shizz :D
SurveyUSA has a poll showing 77% for public option. Poll commissioned by MoveOn.
Just got from my serial emailer friend the AARP email debunking a lot of the health care reform rumors. She sent it to everyone on her list. Then my hairdresser talked about a friend of a customer that is probably going to lose everything because she had to drop health care insurance and had a fall that hospitalized here. The politicians that think selling out to the insurance industry is going to help them win an election are flat out wrong.
Here are the first three points on the AARP email, minus most of the explanations.
FACT #1: Medicare will not be ended, and no benefits or services will be cut.
FACT #2: No legislation currently in Congress would mandate the rationing of care. Period.
Our staff has read all of the legislation circulating in Congress and there are no provisions in these bills that would ration care for our members. None. If any ever did, we would vigorously fight to stop that legislation.
FACT #3: There is no provision of any piece of legislation that would promote euthanasia of any kind.
The rumors out there are flat out lies.
Glad the unions are using the stick
It’s probably not news here that Firedoglake is running fundraising for the 60 members of the House who made it clear they won’t vote for a bill without a public option.
In three days, FDL and partners raised nearly $250,000 for progressive members of Congress who agree to draw a line in the sand over a public plan:
http://campaignsilo.firedoglak…..nd-rising/
You, too, can offer carrots to these progressive politicians, donate at ACT Blue:
http://secure.actblue.com/cont…..hermometer
It’s time we beat the lobbyists at their own game.
YESSSSS!!!!!! YESSS!!!!!! YYYYYYEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!! As Bushie would say “Bring it on” Blue Dogs.
Here’s an idea — you union members can do actual work for a living the rest of us instead of running your mouths while hogging up money that far surpasses the value of what you do.
This is awesome. Unions have always lead the progressive movement, and this time is no different. Keep it up! We’re going to fight back and for Democrats who won’t stick with us on something as important as this, need to find another way to get elected – other than having us lick the envelopes and make the phone calls and knock on the doors.
Yes, union members are vastly overpaid and pampered. We should be taking the money from people like these and paying it to those who do the real work in this economy and get paid almost nothing, you know, like bankers.
If people in our nation could value quality over price this wouldn’t be a problem but it is our mindset on the whole to buy cheep for many reasons. 1. Can’t afford better 2. quality or not it could be wrecked. 3. we want new so often so who cares if something is quality or not. You can disagree but people like things that are cheap which is why China has so many exports to the US. Instead of our people trying to change others and give reasons why they should buy American, be smart about it and find a way to use our wealth of consumer data to produce the most popular products for cheap. If that means lowering wages I’m ok with a lower paying job as long as I have one. I am also not a big fan of unions. I am in one but I would really rather not be. They union charges me $50 a month to do something that I am competent enough to do myself but I have no choice but giving up my $50 a month. If I could put that in a Roth for the next 30 years instead I would be much better off I think.
We really must be close to winning if this is the best calibre of troll they can send over. Congrats all!
Also: We have captured mikewilder’s internet address and identity, and have already emptied his bank account into the Social Security General Fund. And he’s been scheduled for a visit with his local socialist muslim nazi death panel to discuss end-of-life preferences. Go team!
Welcome, Mr. Sullivan! (and don’t mind the troll)
United we stand!
Awesome!
I would much rather see many lower paying jobs that fewer higher paying jobs. That reminds me of supply and demand. If our plant didn’t have a union our employees and community would have an extra $85,000 minimum throughout each and every year. But yes people do need protection and to be informed and some cannot or will not fight for their legal rights so these legal rights need to be easily availiable and easily understood. Have you ever seen a boss, HR manager, landlord even squirm because YOU knew more than they did and you knew and could fully explain how they were breaking the law. It is quite empowering and I’m paying $50 a month to not have a chance for that feeling at work.
I love that picture of the union members and their families marching. I grew up in a blue collar neighborhood in baltimore. More than half of us were “union” families.It was a part of life. After 30 years of republican/right wing/ pro corporate policy (starting with reagan who had so much blue collar support…some of you older union guys have yourselves to blame too) after 30 years, that neighborhood is a wasteland. the jobs are gone, the families are gone, half the houses are boarded up. i dont go there anymore. good jobs have been replaced with welfare and really really bad service jobs.
Thanks to the Sheet Metal Workers Union for taking a stand on honest principle instead of the cop out of political expediency. Mike is exactly right. They trusted the Democrats to deliver and the Blue Dogs sold them out, and they should be held accountable. Enough is enough.
Well done!
not like all those unemlployed white trash slugs all over the “right to work” states “hogging up” government payouts to their girlfreinds, selling pot and working with thier uncle and his crew of illegal immigrants a couple times a month, and complaining about government 24/7
Today the unions arriving on the national scene in the health reform debate looks an awful lot like the cavalry riding over the hill. America’s workers (the root of the success of every businessman large or small, don’t forget) saved by the unions — yet again. Thank you. Thank you.
Uh yeah, only union folks complain about the government 24/7. Right. Yeh.
I checked out your link.
This line:
Is this SG&A + profit? That seems to fit the posted numbers. It’s probably worth spelling out your methodology.
What happens to investment income and interest expense under single payer?
i wansnt speaking about union folks,, lol i thought the “right to work” thing gave that away..i broke my rule of not responding to trolls and look where it got me
I’m with you, well done SMWIA!
LOL That’s damn funny!
Your thought process utterly eludes me on so many levels that I have no idea where to start. So I won’t.
he probably logged off to check his accnt
how so?
i forgot to link my response to the comment bout “lazy” union workers”.. i thought my sketch of the typical, southern, birther/ internet troll is fairly accurate, for a stereotype.I have know too many of those people over the years.
I hope so! ;)
Obama, I believe spoke of our 2.2 trillion dollar health care system and how about $1 billion went to things other than actual health care. I believe that this area has many ways where savings can be brought out outside of a public option or single payer system. Tort reform being a large one which would help out in other areas such as waste from practicing defensive medicine. I also think the government could make an “investment” in computerizing the medical records, which would make things easier and more efficient and Obama is all for making “investments” in the US and for Our future. Simplifying or standerizing insurance forms and other paperwork would also go a long way in cutting down on administrative costs. I don’t see a reason why these can’t be brought about as a true reform of the Health insurance and payment system, it doesn’t require a public option.
Given that for-profit insurance companies run overhead in the 30%-40% range, the amounts going to things other than health care are a lot larger than $1B in a $2.2T industry.
And the easiest way to standardize paperwork is to get the for-profit insurance companies out of the picture.
Otherwise, they (insurance companies) will manage to create and maintain the complexity as that is how they justify all the denials of service.
And even if you maximize ALL of those savings that you just described, there is still the profits of insurance companies and for profit care givers. Any dollar spent on profit is a dollar that could’ve been spent on care, and thus to maximize care for dollars does require a public option, in fact THE public option of single payer.
And further, any dollar of profit earned by human beings off the suffering of other human beings is morally reprehensible, and unjustifiable.
Single payer is the only solution, as most other modern, civilized societies learned long ago. Some day we may, and I repeat MAY, wake up to the 20th century. Probably no hope of the 21st.
It’s a sad, sad way we have of doing things.
In 2006, the federal government was responsible for roughly one-third of U.S. healthcare spending, primarily through Medicaid and Medicare. Private insurance company payments accounted for another 34 percent, while out-of-pocket payments by patients accounted for 14 percent. The remainder came from state and local funds and other private funds.
Technological advances ranging from new equiptment, vaccines and treatments are responsible for over half of the yearly increases in costs. Obama saind in Colorado I believe that insurance companies should have no problem competing with a public option, hell UPS and Fed EX do it and make a nice profit…. Yes they do because those companies innovate and meet the needs of their customer. They provide a much better service than the US postal service and yes make a profit. THe post office lost $2 billion some last year and the Post master general got a fat bonus still and they are on the way to nearing a $10 billion Dollar loss this year. I don’t want that for health care too because it will eventually come out of my pocket in taxes and lack of advances because of less innovation.
Ah. If your @33 was snark, then I apologize for missing that. Been a lot of actual trolls around today — deeply stooopid ones, I might add — and I may have momentarily mistaken you for one… sorry!
Ahh, yes, and once again the last sentence reveals the true motives, as I’ve said hundreds of times prior.
And BTW, since you’re so worried about health care innovation, can you name the last big (or little) health care innovation brought about by insurance companies, since those are the profits I discussed?
I also saw in the paper today that US life spans increased again. A 3 month increase from two years ago. Of course this was a small and hidden article but I found it nonetheless. Yes our lifespan is shorter than other countries and our care is deemed less quality than other countries. We are making progress though and are having great advances all the time funded by all this money that it costs to have these developments. Our American lifestyle leads us to have higher rates of obesity, heart attacks, hypertension and a lot of other bad stuff. Is this gonna change with reform of a system that pays for healthcare?
Put it in context: $10BB is what, half an hour of military expenditures? The issue isn’t the total amount of money now, it’s future cost growth and relative priorities as a country. Does the country as a whole value lower marginal tax rates and massive tax avoidance by the richest 1% of Americans? Obviously not. So the money can be found, especially if health insurance and health technology/supplier profits are capped in some way. The public option is the only way I’ve heard to introduce subscriber cost competition into the health insurance market.
Will it be a panacea/miracle/magic wand? No, of course not. But it will allow folks that are not currently insured to actually see a doctor and maybe, maybe, get treatment for problems prior to the point when the problem is no longer treatable. Or at least treatable earlier in the times when it costs less to fix.
But you must also realize, the Government is NOT a business and should not be expected to operate as one. Yes, you can use some business concepts in the government service. But government is by definition something that costs, not something that can be used to justify screwing people in order to squeeze out a higher rate of profit.
Besides, for-profit health insurance is a deeply immoral thing in the first place. Profit comes from denial of service, not provision of service, creating a perverse motive directly in opposition to the original goal of making health care available and affordable to all the participants in the pool.
Well what I am worried about is the amount of money that the “public option” or “single payer” system would pay to doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies. Several “save medicare” bills have cuts in payments that get deeper as time goes on which is opposite of inflation and the cost direction of health care. The money has to come from some where. I am an adult and would like to see reforms to bring about cost savings but I don’t want to pay money to “mommy and daddy” and have them take care of me. I have seen the government not handle my money and investments well in the past and truthfully I don’t trust them with this either. Hell they spend my retirement money for this years budget and have been for a while.
Also little tidbit, I think in this last July the US had a budget deficit of $182 billion for just the month of July. If you tax the top 5 US earners for all of last year at 100% you would have around $85 billion, for a whole year. This would still have the Feds short nearly $100 billion for one single month. They don’t think ahead so well and I truthfully think I can do beter on my own
You really think you can beat the social contract?
the “mommy and daddy” trope is one of the favorites of the right wing.i never hear it when people are talking about defense, or the fire dept, or police. those things have to be paid for also. there is waste in government administered programs but the idea that there is LESS waste in the private sector is a myth. WE pay for the greed and inefficiencies in the private sector, as conumers and employees. its built into pricing and wages.also why do the self described spending conservative, “budget hawks” think that we can get big savings out social welfare programs which, all combimned, are less than 30% of the budget?
Insurance of many kinds is a rip-off but it is also paying for peice of mind that you have coverage on the rainy day when you need it. Car insurance is not neccessary if you have the money to pay for a new one and any damage incurred. (this is the worst example). Extended warrenties on products and many other items are a huge ripoff. They use tables to figure out how many out of a thousand let’s say break and how much their cost to replace or repair will be. This is what we are really buying and it is about 14%-15% of the total cost for these products. Life insurance is great but only if used properly and if the buying takes the time to understand why it is needed. I think we need to look at the cost of the actual health care services that we are paying for and then see if the price is too high. Again the main driver in cost increase is technological and medical advancement. So if we get rid of that prices will stabilize nicely but I for one have no desire to and will pay more for these advances.
Like I said, I knew your true motives, and they are the same as all of those on the right that opposes health care for all.
Some helpful advice.
You could save yourself the possible healtch care expense of carpul tunnell syndrome by limiting your typing. You could simply post
“I’m against the public option and single payer because I don’t want to pay for other people’s health care.”
See, short, true, and to the point. And lowers the risk of injury versus the longer posts that use excuses and sometimes lies and distortions to hide the true reason for being against it.
Have yourself a nice day, and I hope you’re never faced with health care bills exceeding your ability to pay. Good luck with that.
yes my thought process confuses everyone, especially me. I shouldnt respond to trolls but like a rash, they appear wherever union members are trying to doing something for everybody.i get really hot. i also shouldnt stereotype but, i get tired of hearing the same old misearable, right wing, corporate talking points over and over and usually from people who not only benefit from govt, but actually need govt to live week to week month to month. I KNOW every one of those town hall freaks are either getting S.S., and OR medicare, food assistance, ADFC, VA benefits, rent assistance, free legal protection ( the mandate for public defenders) emergency room treatment which they havent paid for, pell grants, or they have at some point, and or their children or granchildren do. who do they think they are fighting against?
21% to defense, 21% to Social security, 20% to Medicare, medicade, and CHIP in 2008. 8% was debt payments and that is huge and rising fast. I see right now the federal government paying for about a third of US health care costs now through these existing programs. So if we double that I see a lot more debt and that is truely the killer. If we were having surpluses year after year or even just having a surplus in a ressession like Texas I would not be so fearful but hell I can’t afford paying 8% to debt service and I make sure I never pay any. If I can afford it I wait and in the meantime I save. If we can do that it would make this single payer/public option viable in my eyes because the government would prove competent in handling of our nations resorces and money
Any insurance that is a net rip-off is a bad buy, but self-insurance only works for those years while you’re in the money. A country that has no accommodation for those who are out of the money — and it could happen to anyone, you or I, in very short order, all you need is a spot of bad luck — is not a humane country. As other industrialized democracies have demonstrated at length, those in the money only need to contribute a reasonable amount for the whole to work out just fine. Grownups share with those less fortunate.
good point.NOT MANY int america go from cradle to grave without ever spending a long stretch or two, or three, when their broke. these peopl have to realize it should be us against them, not us angainst us. i would bet anything, that there are people who started this argument on the other side, fell into trouble, and now they are demanding someone do something, and vise versa. think people. dont pay lip service to the 1% that would sell us as slaves if they able.
I would actually love to pay for others health care some day. I would want nothing more than to start a business and build it to a level that would sustain such a great and noble venture. Right now I can’t so I will work hard to make sure none of my costs and actions are a burden on those around me.
Also I do pay for many people’s health care right now. I actually got may paycheck saying so today. I paid 3.1ish percent of my income and my company matched me. I’m sure this doesn’t affect employers ability to give raises though. This does cost money and yes it might just sound selfish but you know what if everyone was so selfish that they never needed help from anyone and could completely take care of themselves think of all of OUR money that we could keep instead of giving it to the government to do it for us.
Exactly but giving should not be mandated. The uber rich were forcefully nudged by TED Turners pledge to the UN and it has lead into a great thing. The wealthy and better off give much and want to see their gifts be used most efficiently as well. Giving for the right reasons can be a great lesson for all involved but being forced to do so builds resentment and shame for all involved.
I live near Berkeley, and the wheelchair community there likes to call the rest of us “temporarily abled”. I think of financial self-sufficiency in pretty much the same way: those that have it are lucky. Now, they may also be hardworking, or any other virtuous trait you could name, but sheer luck is a big part of it. A society can be defined as that which sticks together and helps each other when luck fails and the chips are down. Because the one who helps out today might need help himself next year. The average tends to work out OK.
The troll’s argument goes to the heart of how the right was able to pull off its war against unions beginning in earnest in 1973. If all the people who complained about how much union members got paid had to do the tedious, strenuous, difficult, thankless jobs that most union members do they’d be screaming for someone to represent them so that the work didn’t become any harder.
Unions got this country out of the Dickensian hell that capital always degenerates into while allowing their members to make enough money so that the goddamn corporations that eventually took their operations and their jobs overseas could make the profits that allowed them to buy the politicians who helped kill the great unions or at least weaken them.
My 13 year old son and I were watching an episode of Entourage and there was a scene where Piven gets fired from his job, locked out of his office, has his car and phone taken away and is basically left out on his own. I looked at my son and told him that if that guy had a union behind him they couldn’t do that to him. Granted it’s a poor example but it was something he could relate to…someone losing his job and having a family to take care of.
Giving should not be mandated? Why? What is the basis of your ’should’? I can live with the resentment of some of the very rich if that’s what it takes, I’ll just consider it a side trait that comes from their selfishness. They get one vote each just like anybody else, and they’re outvoted. It’s a democracy, right? Also I don’t agree shame is necessarily involved. I currently collect unemployment insurance after being continuously employed for the past 27 years, and am proud to participate in a net-positive system. I’ll receive back far less than I’ve paid in, and couldn’t be happier with the arrangement. The social stability of the country that that system fosters is more than worth the extra I’ve paid in.
Like weekends? Thank the labor movement.
Like the eight-hour day? Thank the labor movement.
Like a safe workplace? Thank the labor movement.
Without pressure from labor, capital will never do anything to reduce its profitability by ensuring safety or rest. Labor, in capital’s view, can always be replaced by other, cheaper, less broken labor.
Thank you Mike Sullivan, and Tula for hosting him today!
Just like “change we can believe in” – “the public option” has no meaning. No one knows what it is….who it covers….how it will be financed….what its benefits will be, etc. Notice that no one, Nancy, Terry, Obama, the Progressive Caucus, et al, haven’t told us what a public option actually IS, only that they won’t pass a bill without one.
If Obama and the Congress actually get to the finish line with their healthcare reform bill, they can make “the public option” meaningless in competing against Big Insurance – and still claim a victory. And at best – it’s what they’ll probably do. We have no details – if we did, we might actually have something to fight for. Other than words.
here’s something very few people have recognized;
the government gets a positive monetary return bringing someone unproductive back into productivity
this is realized obviously through tax revenue but also throuh the productivity of the family and those associated with the person who’s
sick
the insurance companies don’t get any return bringing someone into productivity, as you’ve pointed out, they get a return from denying service, the government gets a return from providing that same service which costs the insurance company profit
interesting point that
That’s an excellent point, perris, and one that should IMHO be a part of the high-level debate over PO, but even more properly of the debate over single-payer… you know, the debate that we’re pointedly not having.
Also: Socialist. Oy gefilte, what fools these mortals be.
Mike… this post is a breath of fresh air.
FINALLY, someone/group with CLOUT is standing up to these bastards.
I saw Trumka on TV recently and he was great…
THank you thank you thank you… for doing this. Our bought and paid for by the insurance industry Dems (in name only) have finally got to have some accountability to the working peole of America.
That’s BS we don’t value cheap over quality. You don’t hear companies making quality, well made product complaining about the lack of sales…
What Conservative policies have done since I was born (1970) have push down wages while everything else has gone up. Making you work for less and being able to afford less.
Productivity has constantly gone up, let me repeat that. We have the highest rate of productivity in the world. France has about 70% of our productivity and look at their social safety net.
I have no problems with American Unions, they make product quality products. Only the bean counters prevent them from producing that are high in quality that so-called consumers demand.
Now that’s not to say the SEIU is doing things in the background I agree with it, especially with PR School Teachers and Nurses in California. But the principles of the Union are still pure and something we should all support.
When I drove trucks, many drivers complained this and that place was union and if they had to unload at certain times they blamed the fact the warehouse is Union and just couldn’t unload when they felt like it. Hey when they say they take loads from say 1-5 pm, your ass better be there by then.
I’m not mad, they have lunch to take or they need to go home on time, nothing wrong with that. Its these NON-Union jobs that has your ass working weekends, holidays and forcing you to work overtime or else.
Too many NON-Union companies are all too happy to tell you -
“Be happy you got a job”
That’s ridiculous
Most people’s anti-Union stances are unfounded and based on Right Wing Propaganda or haven’t you noticed most of the companies in trouble with the IRS or EPA do not have Union Employees.
Thank you Steel Workers of America and thank you ALF-CIO and SEIU
Oh yeah what I originally wanted to say was, if the Re-nuts are not going to support health care reform, let’s make sure they pass Single Payer in the House and Force the Senate to vote it down….
Great comment, thank you.
Good for you and your union, Mike. We need more people like you.
Cudos Mike Sullivan ! You have just raised the bar on this “dog fight”…Pres O seems to have forgotten who put the “President” in front of his name….its time to remind him and the other dems who “brung ‘um to this party”. Thank you and the Sheet Metal Workers Union for your courage and your smarts on this!
You better talk to your wife about always selling yourself to the lowest bidder… I’ll keep selling my skills to the highest bidder. Which one will provide for your family better?
Do you think whoring yourself will protect you from layoffs? You should go talk to the loyalists now in the unemployment lines and trying to save their homes.
Brother Sullivan,
You keep holding them to their word. Thank you for the leadership!