• About us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Send Comments/Tips

  • Home
  • My FDL
  • News
  • TBogg
  • La Figa
  • Book Salon
  • FDL Action
  • The Dissenter
  • Pam's House Blend
  • Elections
  • FDL TV
  • Just Say Now

« I should have known better
Tortured Logic: Government’s Own Words Fail Our National Ideals »
user

Early Morning Swim

By: Blue Texan Monday August 10, 2009 4:48 am

TweetTweet6
digg stumbleupon 
  • Bring them home.
  • No one could’ve predicted… 
  • Crazy, insane — pretty much.
  • Has unemployment peaked?
  • You win, Teabaggers: no euthanasia.
  • I am an American conservative shithead.
  • What Tbogg said.
comment on this57 Comments

57 Responses to “Early Morning Swim”

ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 4:52 am
1

BT says

Bring them home…

NOW!!! IF NOT SOONER!!!

replyLogin to Reply
ThingsComeUndone August 10th, 2009 at 4:57 am
2

Seconded.

replyLogin to Reply
ThingsComeUndone August 10th, 2009 at 5:01 am
3

The U.S. war effort in Afghanistan is costing American taxpayers about $4 billion a month.

Several officials who have taken part in Gen. McChrystal’s 60-day review of the war effort said they expect him to ultimately request as many as 10,000 more troops — a request many observers say will be a tough sell at the White House, where several senior administration officials have said publicly that they want to hold off on sending more troops until the impact of the initial influx of 21,000 reinforcements can be gauged.

Expect that number to go up. 4 billion a month money we could spend on healthcare.
We need a poll asking Americans what do they want more wars or healthcare? If they say war we ask a follow up question how many more years of war do you think it will take to get Ossama who is in Pakistan if we are fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq?

replyLogin to Reply
twolf1 August 10th, 2009 at 5:03 am
4

Mika says it’s fair to call health care reform “death care” if that is how you feel.

45 seconds in to my Morning Joe experience, I have switched to CNN.

replyLogin to Reply
TarheelDem August 10th, 2009 at 5:03 am
5

Questions:

Does the US military brass now have a vested interest in prolonging the war in Afghanistan? After all, if they leave Iraq and Afghanistan, peace might break out, and then the paths to higher rank will shrink once again.

Does McChrystal have a vested interest in screwing things up so he can appear to be a bigger hero? And be on the JCS track.

Not alleging; just asking if the incentives work that way.

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 5:04 am
6
In response to ThingsComeUndone @ 3

Supporters of the war don’t really care about Osama any more. The goal is to rid the country of Taliban and the John Wayne Americans will be for that as long as it takes. If the PTB feel interest in the wars ebbing then they can whip out Osama’s name to get ‘em all fired up again.

replyLogin to Reply
ThingsComeUndone August 10th, 2009 at 5:06 am
7

The coming redeployments are the clearest manifestation to date of Gen. McChrystal’s strategy for Afghanistan, which puts a premium on safeguarding the Afghan population rather than hunting down militants.

Gen. McChrystal said the Taliban are moving beyond their traditional strongholds in southern Afghanistan to threaten formerly stable areas in the north and west
.

http://online.wsj.com/article/…..18153.html

My bold
Translation We are retreating from chasing the Taliban to hiding in population centers. The Surge Strategy of Gen Petraeus has failed the Taliban are advancing to formerly stable areas after we increased the number of troops.
The General got pulled into a sucker play he fell for the bait.

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 5:06 am
8

Granny McConnell is gonna have a cow when he reads Krugman’s piece this morning.

Ronald Reagan was wrong: sometimes the private sector is the problem, and government is the solution.

replyLogin to Reply
eCAHNomics August 10th, 2009 at 5:08 am
9

So what state or nonstate actors are supporting the Taliban. The Soviets completely defeated the Afghan insurgency until the U.S.-Pak-Saudis supported it, and even then the Soviets nearly won until the U.S. supplied Stingers. How come the U.S. can’t match the Soviet record?

replyLogin to Reply
ThingsComeUndone August 10th, 2009 at 5:09 am
10
In response to twolf1 @ 4

F$#% Mika Everyone else who has healthcare lives longer than us and pays less money. I like the idea of living longer. I like the idea of paying less money.
Mika I assume you are talking about euthanasia? Fine Mika if you are ever brain dead on life support we will keep you alive…and play a clip of your words today in and endless loop.

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 5:10 am
11

According to a U.N. report, opium production in Afghanistan soared twentyfold in 2003, the year that the U.S. military removed the Tabiban from control of the capital.

Way to go, guys.

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 5:12 am
12
In response to TarheelDem @ 5

peace might break out

Can’t possibly have that! How are the bomb-builders going to eat?

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 5:15 am
13
In response to ThingsComeUndone @ 7

Sounds like a revised version of the Strategic Hamlet program in Nam. Instead of moving people into them the military is moving into the populated areas. I would imagine McChrystal would like to avoid what happened when the military moved the Montagnards into them. My old friend William Colby was in charge of that too.

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 5:15 am
14
In response to eCAHNomics @ 9

You completely misunderstand the situation. Victory would screw up everything. Perpetual warfare (and perpetual profits for the bomb-builders) is the sole objective in Afghanistan.

replyLogin to Reply
eCAHNomics August 10th, 2009 at 5:18 am
15
In response to ghostof911 @ 14

I know that. Just a futile effort on my part to reframe the situation in the reality based world.

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 5:20 am
16
In response to eCAHNomics @ 15

The irony was understood.

replyLogin to Reply
ThingsComeUndone August 10th, 2009 at 5:23 am
17
In response to eCAHNomics @ 9

Well Pakistan created the Taliban. Bush gave Pakistan billions, the Saudi’s run religious schools in Pakistan that I’m sure help recruit for the Taliban.
The opium growers give protection money to the Taliban I’m sure but they do remember the Taliban banned opium when they were in power so I don’t think they support them willingly.
As far as who is supplying them the former Soviet republics have weapons. I’m sure the Afghan army and police have lots of defectors who leave with the weapons we gave them plus whatever they can steal.
Prince of Blackwater fame is accused of gun running nobody says to who though the Taliban maybe?
As to why we are loosing the vets here I’m sure have a better idea than I do. As to why Russia did better well Bush was our President his choices of how many troops on the ground approval of strategy can’t be undone over night if at all.
I expect the Bush legacy project to run from planning the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan but considering how Rummy, Darth and the Neocons micromanage things that interest them I’m sure their fingerprints are all over it.
And the ultimate way to get your idea put into practice in the Bush White House sell Bush on it.

replyLogin to Reply
ThingsComeUndone August 10th, 2009 at 5:25 am
18
In response to SouthernDragon @ 13

Crap I was really hoping the Vets here were not going to bring up Viet Nam because then this is worse news than I thought.
And I am a Pessimist!

replyLogin to Reply
eCAHNomics August 10th, 2009 at 5:28 am
19
In response to ThingsComeUndone @ 17

I’m sure everything you mention is a factor. Also, Soviets had more troops, apparently, but if you count U.S. mercenaries, I’m not sure the difference is that great. Still kind of amazing the U.S. isn’t doing bette.

Off to prepare for a 9am meeting.

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 5:30 am
20
In response to ThingsComeUndone @ 17

Can’t have perpetual war unless the opposition has a means to defend itself. Eric Prince of Blackwater was simply doing his part to keep the ball in play.

And every bomb dropped and every drone launched rings up $$$ in the eyes of the politicans, in terms of campaign contributions from the bomb buliders.

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 5:30 am
21
In response to ThingsComeUndone @ 18

It’s the latest insurgency we’ve fought. Hard not to compare strategies and tactics. The terrain may be different but a guerrilla is a guerrilla. The insurgency in Irak will be decided by the Irakis. Afghanistan is a big question mark. The US military is bound and determined to be able one day to say that conventional forces defeated an insurgency supported by the local population.

replyLogin to Reply
ThingsComeUndone August 10th, 2009 at 5:32 am
22
In response to SouthernDragon @ 13

Ok the plan is reversed we are in the cities the Taliban control the countryside and the food for the cities. The Taliban could provoke riots by cutting off the cities from food.

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 5:33 am
23
In response to ThingsComeUndone @ 22

Ain’t nobody said they were stupid.

replyLogin to Reply
ThingsComeUndone August 10th, 2009 at 5:33 am
24
In response to eCAHNomics @ 19

Ok then I’m going with Bush’s leadership as the cause bye eCHAN

replyLogin to Reply
KayInMaine August 10th, 2009 at 5:35 am
25

We need to show up to the RNC with a Death Panel just to see their reaction. I think they’d run away like a bunch of babies!

replyLogin to Reply
ThingsComeUndone August 10th, 2009 at 5:36 am
26
In response to SouthernDragon @ 21

The US military is bound and determined to be able one day to say that conventional forces defeated an insurgency supported by the local population.

That is really how they think they want a redo on Viet Nam? After years of trying under Bush they still think they can win when by this account they are retreating?

replyLogin to Reply
ThingsComeUndone August 10th, 2009 at 5:38 am
27
In response to KayInMaine @ 25

We could scare them with a mass mailing saying you have been selected to participate in a health care death panel. Naw that would be cruel.

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 5:39 am
28
In response to SouthernDragon @ 23

Then why can’t the U.S. simply pull out and leave them alone?

replyLogin to Reply
mocha August 10th, 2009 at 5:41 am
29

Interesting discovery reading over at plainsradio ( scary place.) A call to cancel your AARP membership. From reading the discussion from people who are on Medicare, I think they think Medicare coverage comes from AARP or wherever they buy their supplemental. They don’t understand that Medicare is government administered health insurance, they think they are buying it from insurance companies. This would be an opportunity to educate people that VA and Medicare ARE government administered health insurance, many people have it already. I know, most of us say “well, duh”, but I think there is a group out there that doesn’t understand the basics of Medicare. And of course it overlaps with that group that doesn’t think Pres Obama was born here. Go figure.

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 5:48 am
30
In response to ghostof911 @ 28

I really do wish it were that simple. Look at the geopolitical realities of the region. World governments look at things differently than I do.

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 5:51 am
31
In response to SouthernDragon @ 30

It is that simple: War is not the answer.

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 5:54 am
32
In response to mocha @ 29

Mornin’, Mocha. It’s hard to believe that people on Medicare think it comes from AARP. To apply for Medicare one has to call the Social Security Administration, fer cryin’ out loud, and they don’t send a form to fill out. I never joined the AARP. Seems they’re more about making money from their various insurance plans than helping seniors.

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 5:55 am
33
In response to ghostof911 @ 31

Sorry, I threw my rose-tinted glasses away a long time ago.

replyLogin to Reply
Raven August 10th, 2009 at 5:58 am
34
In response to SouthernDragon @ 30

You see this whiny shit ?

While Woodstock Rocked, GIs Died

With the 40th anniversary of the ‘60s cherished rock concert, the so-called “Sixties Generation” remembers fondly those four days in August 1969. Instead, VFW magazine commemorates the 109 Americans killed in Vietnam then.

I wrote and asked if they were going to have similar articles about what people were doing during the World Series and Superbowl but the email bounced!

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 5:59 am
35
In response to SouthernDragon @ 33

Well then in personal terms, please list all the ways that war now benefits you.

replyLogin to Reply
mocha August 10th, 2009 at 6:00 am
36
In response to SouthernDragon @ 32

Perhaps it’s just an extension of the “Obama’s ruining everything” attitude. But if the whole have-to-have-supplemental-to-medicare, plus Part D drug coverage, has people that confused, maybe some more education would be the key to understanding. And then there’s the realization that a lot of people in this country are not very well educated, not very well informed and they read stuff on the internets and don’t have the savvy to check if it’s true before they spread it to their friends.

Speaking of health care, I’m off to the eye doctor, no vision coverage of course! ;) Namaste Dragon.

replyLogin to Reply
Raven August 10th, 2009 at 6:00 am
37
In response to ghostof911 @ 35

It depends on what the question is.

replyLogin to Reply
RevBev August 10th, 2009 at 6:02 am
38
In response to ThingsComeUndone @ 27

I can’t link to the Euthanasia topic in the above list. Did someone find and mind and change ?

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 6:04 am
39
In response to Raven @ 34

Country Joe and the Fish was there singing about getting out of ‘Nam, wishing the G.I.s could come home like right now.

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 6:05 am
40
In response to Raven @ 37

Very simple question. How does any war benefit anyone (excluding the bomb builders)?

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 6:06 am
41
In response to ghostof911 @ 35

It’s not about me. I wish I had an answer to Afghanistan. I don’t. Now I have a question for you, what happens if we just pulled out of Afghanistan? And I’m not talking about what happens here but in Afghanistan. You’ve got Specter/CIA killing Kennedy, Bush/Cheney knowing about the WTC, so what’s your answer to Afghanistan?

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 6:08 am
42
In response to Raven @ 34

After seeing some of the VFW mucky mucks visit Bay Pines once I wanted nothing more to do with them. Dudes got fat and lazy hangin’ around all the coctail weenie parties in DC. Hell, I was off in the bush during Woodstock and I got no bitch.

replyLogin to Reply
Raven August 10th, 2009 at 6:10 am
43
In response to ghostof911 @ 39

i had 15 days to go 40 years ago

replyLogin to Reply
Raven August 10th, 2009 at 6:12 am
44
In response to SouthernDragon @ 42

roger

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 6:12 am
45

Inform all the concerned parties that the U.S. is unilateraly ending hostilities, but will participate in negotiations between the opposing parties, if invitied.

Correction in your note. The insinuation was never made here that Bush/Cheney were simply knowledgeable about the WTC.

Re: CIA/JFK, have you read Plausible Denial by Mark Lane?

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 6:13 am
46
In response to Raven @ 43

Very happy that you made it back.

replyLogin to Reply
Raven August 10th, 2009 at 6:14 am
47
In response to ghostof911 @ 40

forget it

replyLogin to Reply
Raven August 10th, 2009 at 6:14 am
48
In response to ghostof911 @ 46

me three

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 6:16 am
49
In response to ghostof911 @ 45

You are very naive. I read Lane’s first book on the assassination. It, like all the others since, has more speculation than fact.

FACTS, HARD EVIDENCE, ghostof911. That’s what I want. Not shit that just causes brain farts.

replyLogin to Reply
foothillsmike August 10th, 2009 at 6:16 am
50
In response to ghostof911 @ 40

It seems like it benefits rabid fundies like Eric Prince who want to see as many muslims as possible killed.

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 6:19 am
51
In response to foothillsmike @ 50

Yes, that is also part of the equation.

replyLogin to Reply
SouthernDragon August 10th, 2009 at 6:20 am
52

Off to swim in the great capitalist cesspool.

US KIA Irak: 4330

US KIA Afghanistan: 773

Be good to yourselves, and all other living things.

Namaste

replyLogin to Reply
ghostof911 August 10th, 2009 at 6:20 am
53
In response to SouthernDragon @ 49

Read his second book, about the E. Howard Hunt defamation trial held in South Florida. Evidence was presented at trial. As expected, it was never picked up by the media.

replyLogin to Reply
ThingsComeUndone August 10th, 2009 at 6:47 am
54
In response to RevBev @ 38

Ask a Mod or BT I can’t help you on that RevBev.

replyLogin to Reply
twolf1 August 10th, 2009 at 6:57 am
55
In response to RevBev @ 38

Are you saying the link doesn’t work for you?
http://www.washingtonmonthly.c…..019421.php

replyLogin to Reply
Prairie Sunshine August 10th, 2009 at 7:03 am
56

Acronym of the Week:

R A Ts

Republican Anarchist Thugs

replyLogin to Reply
RevBev August 10th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
57
In response to twolf1 @ 55

Thanks to you both. It did start working later in the morning…who knows what gives? All would go blank. Thanks

replyLogin to Reply
Sorry but the comments are closed on this post
« I should have known better
Tortured Logic: Government’s Own Words Fail Our National Ideals »
#OCCUPYSUPPLY

Help the Occupy Supply Fund continue to support more than 60 occupations across the country!

$202,345.00 RAISED
$191,293.71 SPENT

Last updated 2/15

100% of donations committed to the occupations served by Occupy Supply

MYFDL RECOMMENDED DIARIES
  • Want Guns With Your Grande at Starbucks?
    By: spocko 12 Comments
  • The New Poverty
    By: Daveparts 1 Comments
  • Newark, NJ Police Evicts Occupy Newark
    By: tobiasfox 0 Comments
  • Why Obama Should Be Impeached. Video of Nader and Fein at Harvard Law School.
    By: Robert Alexander Dumas 24 Comments
  • Amazing Diary at Kos by Donovan and Holder re Settlement
    By: janeeyresick 5 Comments
  • 2012 is Make or Break (the Planet) for Dirty Duke Energy
    By: Philip Radford 6 Comments
  • Hey, Did You Happen to See the Most Beautiful Girl in the World?
    By: Jane Hamsher 96 Comments
  • The Million Dollar Question: What Happened to the $10K OWS Donation
    By: tobiasfox 0 Comments
  • Atrazine: A "Molecular Bull in a China Shop"
    By: Rebekah Wilce 1 Comments
  • Birth Control Blasphemy: Contraceptive Hysteria Grips Congress and the Religio-Patriarchy
    By: RHRealityCheck 0 Comments
CSM Ads advertisement
FOLLOW FIREDOGLAKE
Follow @Firedoglake

Subscribe to Firedoglake's RSS Feed

» More Firedoglake feeds
Advertisement
FIREDOGLAKE’S #OCCUPY COVERAGE

Become a member of Firedoglake

News. Community. Activism.

Firedoglake is a member-supported organization.
Help us continue our work for as little as $45/year.

LATEST FROM AROUND FIREDOGLAKE
Upcoming FDL Book Salons

Saturday, February 18, 2012
2:00 pm Pacific
None of Us Were Like This Before: American Soldiers and Torture Chat with Joshua E. S. Phillips about his new book. Hosted by Jason Leopold.

Sunday, February 19, 2012
2:00 pm Pacific
Pity the Billionaire: The Hard-Times Swindle and the Unlikely Comeback of the Right Chat with Thomas Frank about his new book.
Hosted by Charles P. Pierce.

TOOLBOX
switch view
  • RegisterRegister
  • Support UsSupport this site!
  • NewsSubscribe to the newsletter
  • Advertise HereAdvertise on Firedoglake
  • TipsSend us your tips
  • Make us your homepageMake us your homepage
  • About usAbout Firedoglake


BLOG ROLL
  • congress matters
  • calculated risk
  • arkansas blog
  • tom maguire
  • they gave us a republic
  • stark reports
  • glenn smith
  • progressive alaska
  • scotus blog
  • kung fu monkey
  • sadly, no!
  • david sirota
  • gregg sargent
  • group news blog
  • my left wing
  • bilerico
  • vinyl mine
  • pam’s house blend
  • the heretik
  • the political carnival
  • world ‘o crap
  • eschaton
  • chase me ladies, i’m in the cavalry
  • attytood
  • needlenose
  • jesus’ general
  • huffington post
  • sideshow
  • tom tomorrow
  • talk left
  • dohiyi mir
  • skippy
  • james wolcott
  • instaputz
  • daily kos
  • dean baker
  • left coaster


Home  |  Become a member Donate  |  Advertise  |  RSS Feed  |  Register  |  Login  |  Subscribe to updates  |  WordPress  |  About  |  Contact  |  Privacy
MyFDL
  • Log In
  • Create a Firedoglake Account
  • ?
Close
  • Social Web
  • E-mail
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! My Web
  • Windows Live
E-mail It