<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appeals Court Won&#8217;t Unseal Spitzer Wiretap Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:28:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953581</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953581</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Refusing to look it up before commenting…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bated = held&lt;br /&gt;
unabated = not released&lt;br /&gt;
abating = releasing&lt;br /&gt;
abated = after release&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unabated is a state of maintaining batement(?).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seems there must be another use of the word pointing to pre-held, chronologically before as unabated is during and abated is after.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refusing to look it up before commenting…</p>
<p>bated = held<br />
unabated = not released<br />
abating = releasing<br />
abated = after release</p>
<p>unabated is a state of maintaining batement(?).</p>
<p>Seems there must be another use of the word pointing to pre-held, chronologically before as unabated is during and abated is after.</p>
<p>Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synoia</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953301</link>
		<dc:creator>Synoia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953301</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;bated breath - breath held. (unabated - without restraint).&lt;br /&gt;
baited breath - breath used as bait, as in baited hook.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aside: Exon, pronounced identically as Exxon, has a precise meaning, and an appropriate one for an oil company.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bated breath &#8211; breath held. (unabated &#8211; without restraint).<br />
baited breath &#8211; breath used as bait, as in baited hook.</p>
<p>Aside: Exon, pronounced identically as Exxon, has a precise meaning, and an appropriate one for an oil company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnie2xs</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953276</link>
		<dc:creator>johnie2xs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953276</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Considering what task Spitzer had taken on, by becoming the Sheriff of Wall Street, I never had any doubt that the whole thing was a set-up from the beginning.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering what task Spitzer had taken on, by becoming the Sheriff of Wall Street, I never had any doubt that the whole thing was a set-up from the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953273</link>
		<dc:creator>allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953273</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Let’s see:&lt;br /&gt;
Using public funds to have sex with a younger woman not your wife: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en-us&amp;q=Mark+Sanford+mistress&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OK&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Using private funds to have sex with a younger woman not your wife: not OK&lt;br /&gt;
 (if a Repub is the local US Attorney).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let’s see:<br />
Using public funds to have sex with a younger woman not your wife: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en-us&amp;q=Mark+Sanford+mistress&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8" rel="nofollow">OK</a>.<br />
Using private funds to have sex with a younger woman not your wife: not OK<br />
 (if a Repub is the local US Attorney).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrCleaveland</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953272</link>
		<dc:creator>MrCleaveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953272</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you, Gregg. That’s a good sentiment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So can we delete my original message and your reply, as they are no longer necessary? I don’t want to unduly embarrass anyone.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Gregg. That’s a good sentiment.</p>
<p>So can we delete my original message and your reply, as they are no longer necessary? I don’t want to unduly embarrass anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Levine</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953271</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953271</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nitpicks in the service of the English language always appreciated. Fixed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitpicks in the service of the English language always appreciated. Fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrCleaveland</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953270</link>
		<dc:creator>MrCleaveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/08/10/appeals-court-wont-unseal-spitzer-wiretap-applications-appeal-to-scotus-should-follow/#comment-1953270</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Cynthia, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is meant to be helpful, not nitpicky. The phrase is “bated breath,” not “baited.” Bated is short for “abated,” as opposed to unabated. Don’t ask me why.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I absolutely loved your piece on civility yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Cynthia, </p>
<p>This is meant to be helpful, not nitpicky. The phrase is “bated breath,” not “baited.” Bated is short for “abated,” as opposed to unabated. Don’t ask me why.</p>
<p>I absolutely loved your piece on civility yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.219 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-18 00:48:47 -->

