by twolf

by twolf

The last time I paid attention to professional anti-gay lunkhead bigot Matt Barber was when World O’Crap was marveling at him for (1) being (at the time) the “Policy Director for Cultural Issues” for the Concerned Woman for America (him being a concerned woman and all), and (2) spitting (metaphorically, though I wouldn’t want to be his computer screen) on Mary Cheney’s lesbian (ahem, shriek) baby.

And also last October I applauded him for coining the term "homofascist" and having "a head that closely resembles a cauliflower." Oh, and he is also the world’s most famous homophobe to ever be martyred by the Allstate Insurance Company (no, seriously — or, more accurately, comically).

Now he’s Back in the News with the startling revelation that not only does Barack Obama want your grandma dead (he wants her family dead, he wants her house burned to the ground, etc.), he wants her to grow a dick.

The linked post is to do with a "press release" (read: hysterical blast e-mail) he forwarded a few days ago entitled: "ObamaCare Likely to Mandate Free ‘Sex-Change’ Surgeries." You can read all about it, and it itself, at Pam’s place. Apparently after he sent it, Rachel Maddow, and the Daily Show, among others, got a hold of it and laughed at it, because, well, it’s hateful… and funny! So now Barber is frantically clutching his pearl necklace in outrage at the fact he got made fun of. Note where he hangs his hat, and the fascinating idiom he uses to illustrate his point about "Ms. Maddow, a hard-left lesbian activist":

In what was apparently an awkward attempt at ridicule, Maddow then focused like a laser on the title of my release. True to form, she twisted and spun like the Michelle Kwan of yellow journalism.

That is quite the simile. Though he’s probably just trying to be an "anti-PC" asshole on purpose, in which case he’s succeeded — he’s surely an asshole!

Did Maddow mock me for suggesting that ObamaCare might provide taxpayer funded "sex-change" operations? No. Did she deride me for mean-spiritedness, insensitivity and "transphobia"? No. Instead, she just lied. She dishonestly suggested that I claimed the government was going to "mandate sex-change operations." Get it? That, if ObamaCare becomes reality, healthcare officials will knock down your door, drag you away and force you to undergo a "gender reassignment" surgery. I know — Silly.

Still, what Maddow didn’t say speaks volumes. She didn’t refute any of the substance of my release. She didn’t deny the real likelihood that such cosmetic procedures will be covered at taxpayer expense. And she certainly didn’t give me the opportunity to respond to her propagandist obfuscation.

The charge of dishonesty is pretty good. I’ll admit I haven’t seen the Maddow segment, because I rarely watch the teevee for anything but pro wrestling and Skinemax softcore. Or else PBS NewsHour. But the defense itself is hilarious bullshit. First, the title of the press release is deliberately misleading. Second, the git is desperate to go on Maddow’s show, which seems to be the point of his current ravings. Third, he’s lying:

Page 972 of the House version of the bill (H.R. 3200) provides for "standards, as appropriate, for the collection of accurate data on health and health care" based on "sex, sexual orientation [and] gender identity." The Senate draft indicates that the government will "detect and monitor trends in health disparities," requiring the Department of Health and Human Services to "develop standards for the measurement of gender." (i.e., officially recognize subjectively self-determined "transgender" or "transsexual" gender identities). It further mandates "participation in the institutions’ programs of individuals and groups from…different genders and sexual orientations."


Which is absurd hyperbolic bigot-mongering crap
.

If conservatives were serious people when it comes to healthcare, they would not be gay-baiting or trying to scare old people. This is obvious. So obvious, that in a few months, even CBS might be able to figure it out.