Comments on: Where Do They Find These Charlatans?

By: gregm

gregm — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 08:35:21 +0000

Damn, an attack by name. You must’ve *really* gotten under their skin, Mike–I’ll bet they even brought you up at Grover Norquist’s special breakfast. And I know which rag Fredosso writes for, too.

Keep up the good work, man!

By: AngelsAwake

AngelsAwake — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:44:04 +0000

You are one of the only sources of real journalism. Keep on keeping on- you’ve got decades of journalism behind you, of the real journalistic school, a history of luminaries as bright as the stars. Keep on going, man!

By: lakezoarian

lakezoarian — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:44:42 +0000

Oh c’mon! Equating “birthers” with folks (and hardly just Americans in the democratic party) who’ve been paying enough attention to all the things about 9/11 that just don’t add up is so beneath this blog. I’m shocked.

Here are some of those questions (the top 40):

http://911truth.org/article.ph.....1155307646

By: sporkovat

sporkovat — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:43:22 +0000

for those who wish to peer over the threshold, some of the best sourced, credible research on ‘the new Pearl Harbor’ is over at:

http://www.washingtonsblog.com.....orked.html

remember Sibel Edwards? new stuff from her.

By: perris

perris — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:35:36 +0000

that was after the president was pretty much chased down, having refused to meet with those that wanted him briefed on this grave and iminent danger

in any event, of course he was forewarned and using a poll demonstrating most democrats know this fact is a little counter productive to their point me thinks

By: perris

perris — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:33:25 +0000

I edited this in to my post;

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.

this is pretty clear and precise and it definately calls to action

By: rwcole

rwcole — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:31:04 +0000

Yes, I’ve read the briefing- but it doesn’t specify when, where, or how Al Queda planned to attack.

By: nahant

nahant — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:31:03 +0000

That is my take also… Dodge that bullet Sarah dodge!!

By: RevBev

RevBev — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:30:08 +0000

And isn’t it the one that provoked W’s famous reply: Now you’ve covered your ass….? Such a serious, dedicated man, just as Laura says.

By: perris

perris — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:27:02 +0000

as revbev says at 23, it’s the famous pdb, “bin laden determined to atack america”

from wiki;

Former Central Intelligence Director George Tenet considered the PDB so sensitive that in July 2000 he took the position with the National Archives and Records Administration that none of them could be released for publication “no matter how old or historically significant it may be.”[4]

During a briefing on May 21, 2002, Ari Fleischer, former White House Press Secretary, characterized the PDB as “the most highly sensitized classified document in the government.”[5]

that’s the one, and we have the testimony’s in the 9/11 report as to what the briefing entailed

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.

from the report;

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.