Some stories are more revelatory than others. They expose the truth hidden behind hollow rhetoric and spin, and shine a light into some very dark places.
Such is the nature of a story I stumbled upon some weeks ago, and which I have written up in an investigatory piece at The Public Record. It concerns the arrest of Navy Petty Officer Daniel King by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS). King was held without charges for approximately 18 months, and forced, after four weeks of 12-19 hour-a-day interrogation, and sensory overload and sleep deprivation, to cough up a false confession. Subsequently, he spent months in isolation in a six by nine foot cell. . . and all this happened in the two years before 9/11.
The investigating judge ultimately halted the investigation, because King’s confession had been coerced.
The psychologist who interviewed King — all caught on a videotape that is supposedly unclassified, but I haven’t yet been able to obtain — was the former Chief Forensic Psychologist for the NCIS, Michael Gelles. For those who have followed the controversy over psychologists, the American Psychological Association (APA), and torture interrogations, Mike Gelles will be a familiar name.
Both NCIS and Gelles were portrayed in the Senate Armed Service Committee report on prisoner abuse, released a few months ago, as opponents of coercive interrogation, and advocates of establishing "long-term rapport" with prisoners under interrogation. Gelles is a well-known public advocate of psychologist participation in "ethical" interrogations. He publishes articles and gives talks about it around the country, promoting the idea that psychologists can ethically participate in national security interrogations.
Of course, Gelles never mentions that he had ethics charges filed against him in the King case by Jonathan Turley, Daniel King’s civilian attorney. Nor that the APA dismissed these charges out of hand, and without any investigation. Later, APA honchos put Gelles on their blue-ribbon PENS Task Force, drawing up policy for psychologists in national security settings. Of course, this august TF ended up endorsing the use of psychologists in interrogations, and had the gall to claim that "a central role for psychologists working in the area of national security-related investigations is to assist in ensuring that processes are safe, legal, and ethical for all participants.”
Here’s a sample of how one of APA’s star psychologists kept processes "safe, legal, and ethical," from my Public Record article:
On October 19, 1999, three weeks into the interrogation, King was taken by his own request to see psychologist Michael Gelles. While this indicates probable earlier contact with Dr. Gelles, nothing is currently known about any earlier contact. Gelles met with King for 45 minutes. The session was videotaped, although this was done without the legal requirement to read King his rights, or inform him the tape could be used against him in court. Two other NCIS agents were also present during the meeting, which took place after days of prolonged interrogation, sleep deprivation, and ever-present monitoring.
Lieutenant Freedus [a defense JAG] stated that King made “highly exculpatory statements” during this meeting, as indeed he did in all other taped sessions with him.
The actions of Dr. Gelles were documented by a videotape, which with other audio tapes, were discovered by accident by the defense, as they had illegally been withheld from discovery. The videotape reportedly shows Dr. Gelles referring to himself as “the doc” and “not an agent.” King told Gelles he had “no memory” of any of the espionage activities to which he’d confessed. He was concerned he had “repressed memories, or something like that,” because he was falsely told the polygraphs had come out positive, and he wondered if perhaps hypnotism or “truth serum” could jog his memory.
According to Turley’s statement to the Senate Intelligence subcommittee (emphasis added):
[King] told Gelles that he had no memory of the espionage facts but says that the polygraph examinations prove that he must have done something – a clear misconception that neither Gelles nor the agents correct. King asked for hypnosis and truth serum to determine if this is merely a dream. Gelles told him that he might give King hypnosis if King goes back and gives the agents “corroborating” evidence. Gelles told King that he could trust the agents and says that the agents are clearly his friends, he had a “special relationship” with the agents and the agents “will be with you forever.” Gelles virtually ignored the statement of King that he had suicidal thoughts when he left Guam – two days before the interview. Instead, Gelles told King to give corroborating evidence as a precondition for the hypnosis that King sought to clear his doubts as to any espionage.
After King was released, Turley made known his intent to file ethics charges against Michael Gelles with the American Psychological Association (APA). According to Mr. Turley, Dr. Gelles “refused to give licensing information to the defense or to respond to allegations of violation of basic canons of professional conduct as a licensed psychologist.” In a private communication, Mr. Turley subsequently indicated the ethics charges were filed, and dismissed without any investigation by APA.
As I researched, I found the NCIS also had a far more checkered history than I thought. This is from a statement to a Senate Intelligence subcommittee by JAG officer Lt. Robert Bailey, one of Petty Officer King’s military attorneys.
The conduct of NCIS agents in this case was nothing short of shocking. Independent reviewers have stated that their techniques were barbaric and hearken back to the unconstitutional abuses of the 1920s and 1930s. That such conduct occurred at the hands of NCIS is not surprising to one regularly involved in military justice practice within the Navy. Indeed, such conduct is predictable based on the training and guidance manual published by the NCIS. According to the NCIS Manual, Chapter 14 – Interrogations, any person who adamantly denies any wrongdoing and points to his clean record is "subconsciously confessing"….
This pattern of abusive interrogation techniques combined with a blatant disregard for national security regulations reveals a rogue agency that considers itself above the legal and constitutional standards it was created to enforce and protect.
Clearly, we have a scandal here that indicts what we used to quaintly call "The Establishment." Whether it’s military entities like NCIS, professional organizations like APA, or the press, who covered this story when it came out in early 2001, but then dropped it like a hot potato after 9/11, we have enough material stored up for a dozen investigations.
Yet here we are, nearly seven months into a Democratic presidential term, with a Democratic Congress, and more revelations than one can shake a stick at, and there are almost no investigations. There is, of course, the closed-door investigation of the Senate Intelligence Committee, whose every utterance and leak are gratefully read like mystic tea leaves for where the government might go when it comes to accountability. There is also the investigation by John Durham into the destruction of the CIA’s torture videotapes, but it’s not clear where this highly secret investigation is ultimately headed.
Speaking of accountability, the APA has got to clean up their house. A huge fraud was perpetuated upon their membership, and the public at large, when they created a bogus "task force" on interrogations, one which the military would utilize to justify use of psychologists to staff their torture interrogations (to keep things "safe"), and stacked it largely with ethical malefactors and CIA/Special Operations officers.
Nor can APA claim not to have known about Gelles’s role in the King interrogation abuse. In early 2001, the case was covered by the Washington Post, CNN, 60 Minutes, NPR, and host of other press. How can APA Ethics director Steven Behnke, or then president-elect Philip Zimbardo not have known what was going on? Why is Behnke still Ethics Director? What was the role of Gerry Koocher, APA president-elect at the time of the PENS meetings, and a major contributor to the PENS deliberations?
We have a very sad, yet critical, situation in this country. The Gelles/King/NCIS case goes back to the Clinton years. Things didn’t get better after 2001, they got worse. What can we point to as progress in basic human rights, or in the actions of the military? Very little, I’m afraid.
Correction, 7/26/09: The article incorrectly states that Petty Officer King’s false confession was rendered after approximately four weeks of interrogation. The "confession" occurred on October 6, seven days after interrogation began. King subsequently recanted this confession, while the interrogation continued, ending 29 days after it initially began.
Related posts:
- “Fair and Balanced” in Academia: Twisting Recent Torture History in the Journal “Nature”
- FDL Exclusive: SERE Psychologists Still Used in Special Ops Interrogations and Detention
- Who Will Investigate CIA/RAND/APA Torture “Workshop”?
- Expanding the Investigation into SERE Torture
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Dr. Steven Miles, Oath Betrayed: America’s Torture Doctors





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Those of us who came of age during Vietnam have never thought our military was on the up and up. 1968 I think is when the scales fell from my eyes and I was only 15 at the time.
Right off the bat, my first question is how much if any of these details did President Clinton know either contemporaneously or later?
Greetings,Jeff.
This might be a drive by comment,because today (and this evening-my time is not completely my own to indulge in extended posting.Some may be grateful for this,however.)
I’d like,if I may suggest that you reseach the archives at Democratic Underground.And although it is probably anathema to some, World Net Daily has tremendous archives on Clinton era stories. I used them extensively for research on Li-Ka Shing and Global Crossing.
If you think the Pentagon and their tentacles are the only ones doing this, what’s to keep the same boy scouts who cooked this up from playing all sorts of mind games with the American media? I think they call it information warfare.
Thanks for scooping this, Jeff. I’m looking forward to reading more of your work.
I assume that Clinton knew nada. Back in the good ol’ days the CIA and the military ran amuck pretty much by themselves. Not until Cheney came along did a direct link to the top executive get established.
Precisely why I ask.
Recent suggestions that Cheney affirmatively kept his pet chimp out of the loop wrt heinous behavior is what started me wondering.
I doubt Clinton was following the King case, but who knows? My comment in the article that this took place during the Clinton years was not meant to tag Clinton, but to note, as I have in plenty of other article, that the issue of interrogations and torture precedes the Bush-Cheney years. And that goes for cover-ups, too.
Perhaps my interest is a bit parochial, as my primary interest in the case concerns how a clear case of ethical violations, or the need to investigate it, was turned down pat by the professional organization (APA) to which the case was referred. Secondly, the PENS task force played a tremendous role in the Bush-Cheney years as a rubber-stamp for specious arguments for the “safety” of these interrogations, covering up the fact that psychologists were in fact instrumental in the abuse and torture that was being perpetrated.
The PENS report, referenced in the article, must be disavowed by the APA. This would leave the Pentagon without its fig leaf of legitimacy for the use of psychologists, as still occurs (see my last article regarding this).
And you, public.takeover, have hit upon my other reason for writing up this story. It’s clear we are not getting the truth, that cover-ups are in fact endemic.
We need a clear, open, transparent investigation of these abuses. The closed-door nature of those few investigations currently occurring are not enough, and due to their secrecy, provide little in the way of public trust for a government that has proven many too many times by now that it can not be trusted.
Jeff, I just read your bio. I admire what you do. Psychologists helping to
tortureinterrogate victims is akin to an ethical issue in my own field – how can architects ethically design prisons? Especially ones with death chambers? Our work is supposed to benefit and comfort human beings. But I know lots of architects who will do anything for money, to hell with any personal ethical dilemma (if one exists in those folks’ brains).Jeff,as H.L. Mencken said MANY years ago,”It’s hard to get a man to understand something when his paycheck depends upon NOT understanding it.”
@9
Oppenheimer and the Manhattan Project keeps echoing in my head when questions of personal and professional ethics intersect.
It is my belief that many, many more psychologists are involved with helping people than hurting them. Nor is it my intention to paint anyone as a monster. I think I made clear the positives and negatives, as I see them, in Dr. Gelles’s actions post-9/11.
This story is going to have its greatest impact upon the American Psychological Association, where the leadership, in thrall to military and intelligence agencies, and government research monies, has lost its ethical bearings. It will also have impact upon those readying to staff and study the proposed new interrogation project the Obama administration is looking at, especially since it appears (and see article for this) that it is proposing some kind of interrogation norms beyond even those in the Army Field Manual. As I’ve documented elsewhere, the AFM is already denounced by many for allowing cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment, if not torture, by the procedures delineated in its Appendix M, and elsewhere.
Ain’t that the truth.
And, btw, I do not eschew the sources you mention. I look for multiple documentation, however, of much of what I write. While no trained journalist, I do have some training as a historian and psychologist, and one looks for corroboration of facts, or a convergence of data, before one makes an opinion (or a diagnosis).
I have raised this issue many times when the issue of torture is raised-because RARELY are the TORTURE SHIPS factored into the dialog.
Forthwith a current,hot off the presses,story re CIA and torture ships.
(BTW,google Mena,Arkansas and CIA, Jeff.
You’re probably too young to remember.)————————–
Source: The Guardian
Guantánamo detainee’s lawyers hail UK air firm’s U-turn that allows rendition case to go to court
Confidential documents showing the flight plans of a CIA “ghost plane” allegedly used to transfer a British resident to secret interrogation sites around the world are to be made public. The move comes after a Sussex-based company accused of involvement in extraordinary rendition dropped its opposition to a case against it being heard in court.
Lawyers bringing the case against Jeppesen UK on behalf of the former Guantánamo Bay detainee, Binyam Mohamed, claimed last night the climbdown had wide-ranging legal implications that could help expose which countries and governments knew the CIA was using their air bases to spirit terrorist suspects around the world.
Jeppesen UK, a division of the Jeppesen Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Boeing, is alleged to have provided a range of services that allowed planes owned by shell companies operating on behalf of the CIA to fly suspected terrorists to “black sites” .
(snip)
Reprieve’s renditions investigator, Clara Gutteridge, said the CIA could not have acted alone and the case would raise questions over which governments were complicit in extraordinary rendition.
Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl…..iti…
I think it’s safe to say that black ops, including torture, has been part of American intelligence since at least the Vietnam War. It’s still useful to distinguish this covert, secretly evil stuff from the shrub dictatorship. The disclosures today about shrub wanting to test the constitution by sending the US army into Buffalo NY to hunt for AQ door to door should make the distinction perfectly clear. Spymasters and spies with delusions of fascism doing bad things in the shadows are one thing. Spymasters and spies genuinely in charge at the Oval – that’s something else entirely.
Lisa D is upstairs!
Values Voter Summit: Oh Please Someone, We Have To Attend!
Dear jeff kaye and all,
What a great, important article. Can we like nominate you for a Pulitzer or something?
It has been going on forever. I read a lot on the OSS and the formation of the CIA when I was a young historian some decades ago. At times the OSS was frankly divided between right-wing teams doing very sick things, and left-wing teams doing interesting work connecting with civilian populations in their target countries (all the countries of Europe and most anyplace else close to a war theater in the case of the OSS).
But by 1949, and the creation of the CIA, even under President Harry Truman and Secretary of State George C. Marshall, the great general of training, manpower, and preparation, there were no longer any left-wing intelligence teams. And as the 40’s turned into the 50’s, and the Cold War rang down across the globe, the intelligence apparatus of the national security state, and the interventionist black-ops brigades it sheltered in many nations across the globe including our own, delved and dabbled in every sick kind of political and psychological manipulation known to any Kings, empires or totalitarian dictatorships of the past or present. Men like Truman, Marshall and Eisenhower, who made at times great statements about the importance of democratic virtues and the rule of law, must have known and played a role in OK’ing the existence of, and using the intelligence & circumstantial benefits derived from, these black operations brigades.
The cancer runs deep. It is at the heart of the national security state. Yes, the one we have lived in since the end of World War II, here in America.
It’s easy for us radicals to talk big. I’ve given up reading Daily Kos, becuase of the huge number of people who say we must X or Y thing, we must achieve A or B result — and those A’s and B’s and X’s and Y’s are always positive, liberal-radical things we all should be thinking/doing/resulting in — yet with no glimmer of a plan to help us move from a fragmented radical minority with less-then-zero political power — to beginning to organize, first in the hundreds and thousands, then in the hundreds of thousands and millions, and finally to organize in the dozens and scores of millions that will result in OUR POSITIVE RADICAL ACHIEVEMENTS.
I’ve got tons of plans. No one wants to follow them, that’s fine, I’d rather tend my garden and smoke some big bongs too. We need a few thousand people competing to be OUR George C Marshall’s, to be seriously concerned about developing our radical political concerns into local, regional and national ORGANIZATION that can act with a minimum of discipline while having fun and staying true to our values. Let’s go, people, let’s go. No one is going to cure the cancer of the totalitarian-fascist-murderous-military/police terrors and secrets that live at the heart of our democracy and are very strong and well-organized in one certain town called Washington DC, except us.
Thank you again Jeff Kaye and all the positive commentors.
@14 – You are right about the prison ships, but wrong about my age (I just missed being drafted when Nixon stopped the draft in Aug. 1973.) The news on Jeppesen is major, and I’m sure we’ll be reading a lot more about that real soon. Thanks for reporting it here!
@15 – It’s difficult to compare different political periods. I think you could look at how the U.S. Army and CIA engaged in large scale domestic spying during the 1960s and early 1970s and say things were far worse back then. On the other hand, I don’t think in their wildest dreams the Johnson or Nixon administrations would have tried to legitimate torture the way Bush-Cheney did.
@17 – Very well said. I agree the problem is a right-wing national security state and apparatus (Pentagon, NSA, CIA, etc.). Not everyone in the military is bad (think of the JAGs quoted in the article), but the system is certainly subordinated to a very reactionary program, and the leadership has let power go to their heads. It’s a frightening time we live in, and I don’t know where the leadership we need is going to come from. — As for a Pulitzer, well, I’m sure there’s some others who could stand in line way before me ;-)
Jeff,have you ever read the ’70’s government commissioned Stanford Research Document entitled “The Changing Images of Man”?
PLEASE check this out.
Written during the Vietnam Era,it is a BLUEPRINT for what is occuring now.
Here is an excerpt from an excellent synopsis of the study,with a link to the PDF of the study itself.
Scary and true,I can’t recommend it highly enough to you for your research,
——————————————————————————–
The planned collapse of America
By Peter Chamberlin
Online Journal Contributing Writer
Dec 7, 2007
The government has known for decades that America is on a countdown to self-destruction. Among the elite it is common knowledge that our “global economy” must one day collapse from its own dead weight.
In 1974 an intensive research project was undertaken by the Stanford Research Institute and the Charles F. Kettering Foundation for the Dept. of Education. Their final report was released as the Changing Images of Man. It was compiled by the SRI Center for the Study of Social Policy, Director Willis Harmon. This is a far-reaching investigation into how the basic nature of man might be changed. .
The government was looking forward to a very troubling future, trying to figure out the best path through it. The plan was to find ways to shape and mold mankind into a new cultural image, complete with new ideas and ideologies, even religious ones. The root of the problem was human nature, and solution was to reshape the competing forces of daily life, in order to forge a new image of a new human nature.
The research revealed that there were a multitude of crises that were about to intersect in America’s near future. Not the least of these converging catastrophes was a rapidly approaching breakdown of both American capitalism and democracy. The collapse was a natural result of globalism and monopoly capitalism. The basic greed that powers the system eroded the American political and economic structures, exposing the foundation of immorality and unfairness that amplifies the social unrest.
The Stanford researchers clearly predicted that the American economy was destined to collapse from its own dead weight. The data also showed that that economic collapse was to be accompanied by disastrous social repercussions, such as rioting and upheaval, which would lead us into a “garrison state.”MODERATOR EDIT HERE(excerpt)
~~~ModNote: Copyrighted material is subject to Fair Use guidelines and needs to be limited to about 200 words. Providing a link is a good idea. Thanks.~~~
@19
The planned collapse of AmericaDec 7, 2007 … Their final report was released as the Changing Images of Man. … Changing Images of Man predicts an American economic collapse and a …
http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/p…..2715.shtml – Cached – Similar
I know you’ve mentioned it before. I promise I’ll take a look.
Jeff,
mahalos for the factual information about the sickness that is amerikkka.
it certainly explains why so much unconscionable conduct post-911 has been treated as just business-as-usual.
i feel sorry for all of those people who voted for obama and his pledge of change.
what will it take for people to start thinking about what it is that the U.S.A. actually stands for?
i’m curious if you know what’s happened with daniel king since he’s been released? i’m wondering how he’s faring.
I believe after his release, King returned to his home state of Ohio. I think a suit was attempted against the Navy for what it did to him. I don’t know what happened to that suit. Some people who were talking to me stopped in the process of writing the article, and I might have found out more from them. I didn’t make a concerted effort to track down Mr. King, partly because I didn’t have the time or resources. I certainly hope he was able to put his life back together. I didn’t want him to become the focus of the story, but the perfidy of those who hid or underplayed the abuse done to him, and the way that intersected APA/governmental mechanisms to legitimate the torture program over the last eight years. I also didn’t want to bring any more pain to Mr. King than covering the story at all might involve.
There are so many manifestations of this sickness and of a decaying empire in the throes of a death rebirth drama.
Jeff, I admire what you’re doing. Thank you.
Great news about Binyam Mohamed. I want him and others like him to succeed in obtaining justice.
I am 62.
I am now living under the sixth president of the united states that could be and should have been prosecuted for war crimes. 6 months equals Obama owns these war crimes.
Is there any other nation that can match that number?