<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early Morning Swim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:21:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosanostradamus</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931877</link>
		<dc:creator>cosanostradamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931877</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations! You are now IMPERVIOUS to irony. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may have to take a supplement, to avoid anemia.&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.<br />
Congratulations! You are now IMPERVIOUS to irony. </p>
<p>You may have to take a supplement, to avoid anemia.<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann in AZ</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931869</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann in AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931869</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;kib·butz  (k-bts, -bts)&lt;br /&gt;
n. pl. kib·but·zim (kbt-sm, -t-)&lt;br /&gt;
A collective farm or settlement in modern Israel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So wouldn’t that make the term “Islamofascist kibbutzniks” an antagonism of terms.  (I think it’s way beyond contradiction!)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>kib·butz  (k-bts, -bts)<br />
n. pl. kib·but·zim (kbt-sm, -t-)<br />
A collective farm or settlement in modern Israel.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So wouldn’t that make the term “Islamofascist kibbutzniks” an antagonism of terms.  (I think it’s way beyond contradiction!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosanostradamus</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931868</link>
		<dc:creator>cosanostradamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931868</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
OK, we’ll all just be poor and collectivistical, like. Like them Islamofascist kibbutzniks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, you want the bad news first, or the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog-me-no-blogs.blogspot.com/2009/07/news-to-make-you-crazy.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;worse news?&lt;/a&gt; Up to you…&lt;br /&gt;
.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.<br />
OK, we’ll all just be poor and collectivistical, like. Like them Islamofascist kibbutzniks.</p>
<p>So, you want the bad news first, or the <a href="http://blog-me-no-blogs.blogspot.com/2009/07/news-to-make-you-crazy.html" rel="nofollow">worse news?</a> Up to you…<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wigwam</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931860</link>
		<dc:creator>wigwam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931860</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/07/AR2009070702746.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Per Dan Balz at WaPo:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nothing may be more important to public assessments of President Obama’s leadership than the state of the economy, and at this point there are political warning lights flashing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In light of the latest unemployment figures, there are more persistent questions coming at the administration. Did Obama and his team get it right last winter when they put together their $787 billion stimulus package, or did they undershoot? If they made a mistake, what should they do now?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The administration is trying to tamp down talk that it didn’t get it quite right — talk created by Vice President Biden. On Sunday, he told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, “We and everyone else misread the economy.” But he insisted that the stimulus “is the right package given the circumstances we’re in.” &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But it’s not just Joe ‘the Mouth” Biden.  Per Obama’s economic advisor Laura Tyson, who was chair of Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisors: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;July 7 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. should consider drafting a second stimulus package focusing on infrastructure projects because the $787 billion approved in February was “a bit too small,” said Laura Tyson, an outside adviser to President Barack Obama. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And Krugman has been saying that a second stimulus would be needed (and hard to get) since February.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/07/AR2009070702746.html" rel="nofollow">Per Dan Balz at WaPo:<br /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Nothing may be more important to public assessments of President Obama’s leadership than the state of the economy, and at this point there are political warning lights flashing.</p>
<p>In light of the latest unemployment figures, there are more persistent questions coming at the administration. Did Obama and his team get it right last winter when they put together their $787 billion stimulus package, or did they undershoot? If they made a mistake, what should they do now?</p>
<p>The administration is trying to tamp down talk that it didn’t get it quite right — talk created by Vice President Biden. On Sunday, he told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, “We and everyone else misread the economy.” But he insisted that the stimulus “is the right package given the circumstances we’re in.” </p>
</blockquote>
<p>But it’s not just Joe ‘the Mouth” Biden.  Per Obama’s economic advisor Laura Tyson, who was chair of Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisors: </p>
<blockquote><p>July 7 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. should consider drafting a second stimulus package focusing on infrastructure projects because the $787 billion approved in February was “a bit too small,” said Laura Tyson, an outside adviser to President Barack Obama. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>And Krugman has been saying that a second stimulus would be needed (and hard to get) since February.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wigwam</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931852</link>
		<dc:creator>wigwam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931852</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;They should’ve listened to Krugman the first time. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DING !&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>They should’ve listened to Krugman the first time. </p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>DING !</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendanscalling</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931843</link>
		<dc:creator>brendanscalling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931843</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;on that first article, the washington post has its facts wrong. they write:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;In light of the latest unemployment figures, there are more persistent questions coming at the administration. Did Obama and his team get it right last winter when they put together their $787 billion stimulus package, or did they undershoot? If they made a mistake, what should they do now? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Uh, no. that was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/11/stimulus-deal-obama-team_n_165912.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the senate&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Moving with lightning speed, &lt;b&gt;the Democratic-controlled Congress and White House agreed Wednesday on a compromise $790 billion economic stimulus bill&lt;/b&gt; designed to create millions of jobs in a nation reeling from recession….&lt;br /&gt;
The president’s signature tax cut was preserved _ a break for millions of lower- and middle-income taxpayers of $400 per individual and $800 per couple. &lt;b&gt;That’s less than the $500 and $1,000 the White House originally sought&lt;/b&gt;, although officials said it would mean an estimated $13 per week extra per paycheck…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scaling back the bill to levels lower than either the $838 billion Senate measure or the original $820 billion House-passed measure caused grumbles among liberal Democrats, who described the cutbacks as a concession to the moderates, particularly Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., who are under pressure from conservative Republicans to hold down spending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Working to accommodate the new, lower overall limit of the bill, negotiators effectively wiped out a Senate-passed provision for a new $15,000 tax credit to defray the cost of buying a home, these officials said. The agreement would allow taxpayers to deduct the sales tax paid on new car purchases, but not the interest on loans for the same vehicles.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obama’s proposed stimuluis was nearly $900 billion. And guess who was instrumental in cutting it down? Everyone’s favorite brand new DemmycRAT, Arlen Specter:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scaling back the bill to levels lower than either the $838 billion Senate measure or the original $820 billion House-passed measure caused grumbles among liberal Democrats, who described the cutbacks as a concession to the moderates, particularly Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., who are under pressure from conservative Republicans to hold down spending.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks Arlen. Douche.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on that first article, the washington post has its facts wrong. they write:</p>
<blockquote><p>In light of the latest unemployment figures, there are more persistent questions coming at the administration. Did Obama and his team get it right last winter when they put together their $787 billion stimulus package, or did they undershoot? If they made a mistake, what should they do now? </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Uh, no. that was <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/11/stimulus-deal-obama-team_n_165912.html" rel="nofollow">the senate</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Moving with lightning speed, <b>the Democratic-controlled Congress and White House agreed Wednesday on a compromise $790 billion economic stimulus bill</b> designed to create millions of jobs in a nation reeling from recession….<br />
The president’s signature tax cut was preserved _ a break for millions of lower- and middle-income taxpayers of $400 per individual and $800 per couple. <b>That’s less than the $500 and $1,000 the White House originally sought</b>, although officials said it would mean an estimated $13 per week extra per paycheck…</p>
<p>Scaling back the bill to levels lower than either the $838 billion Senate measure or the original $820 billion House-passed measure caused grumbles among liberal Democrats, who described the cutbacks as a concession to the moderates, particularly Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., who are under pressure from conservative Republicans to hold down spending.</p>
<p>Working to accommodate the new, lower overall limit of the bill, negotiators effectively wiped out a Senate-passed provision for a new $15,000 tax credit to defray the cost of buying a home, these officials said. The agreement would allow taxpayers to deduct the sales tax paid on new car purchases, but not the interest on loans for the same vehicles.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Obama’s proposed stimuluis was nearly $900 billion. And guess who was instrumental in cutting it down? Everyone’s favorite brand new DemmycRAT, Arlen Specter:</p>
<blockquote><p>Scaling back the bill to levels lower than either the $838 billion Senate measure or the original $820 billion House-passed measure caused grumbles among liberal Democrats, who described the cutbacks as a concession to the moderates, particularly Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., who are under pressure from conservative Republicans to hold down spending.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>.</p>
<p>Thanks Arlen. Douche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthernDragon</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931828</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthernDragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931828</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s something short that should also be read by all:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From the 1929 Encyclopedia Britannica&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~eshaw/lawrence.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;T E Lawrence on Guerrilla Warfare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s something short that should also be read by all:</p>
<p>From the 1929 Encyclopedia Britannica</p>
<p><a href="http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~eshaw/lawrence.htm" rel="nofollow">T E Lawrence on Guerrilla Warfare</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sadlyyes</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931825</link>
		<dc:creator>sadlyyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931825</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;sadlyyes,cant get my flkr accout to work will post pics later&lt;br /&gt;
take good care&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sadlyyes,cant get my flkr accout to work will post pics later<br />
take good care</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sufilizard</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931821</link>
		<dc:creator>Sufilizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931821</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope Obama learned his lesson about bipartisanship from the stimulus thing. He made so many compromises to Republicans that it ended up not doing the job and now the public has no stomach for another one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And to be honest, it’s all the tax cuts and stupid Republican crap that I think people most resent. But the public blames Obama for it. It’s a classic lose-lose-win situation. The public loses, Obama loses, but Republicans get to blame Democrats.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Obama learned his lesson about bipartisanship from the stimulus thing. He made so many compromises to Republicans that it ended up not doing the job and now the public has no stomach for another one.</p>
<p>And to be honest, it’s all the tax cuts and stupid Republican crap that I think people most resent. But the public blames Obama for it. It’s a classic lose-lose-win situation. The public loses, Obama loses, but Republicans get to blame Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eCAHNomics</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931820</link>
		<dc:creator>eCAHNomics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/07/08/early-morning-swim-167/#comment-1931820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the recommendation. I’ve read some of that history, and have many other books on my list to read for now, but put it in my shopping cart.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the recommendation. I’ve read some of that history, and have many other books on my list to read for now, but put it in my shopping cart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.269 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-16 23:23:26 -->

