Jane’s in Sweden and I’m in Indonesia but we left Blue America in the best of hands. Digby, John, Jacqui and D-Day have been working non-stop on our campaign of cable TV ads to get one of the few senatorial culprits in the war against health care reform who actually has to confront voters next year–Blanche Lincoln–to reconsider her position. Lincoln, always an opponent of giving working families an equal break, is a member of the Health Care Subcommittee of the Senate Finance Committee. We want her to forget her avaricious campaign donors for once in her miserable political life and think about the average citizens of Arkansas and America for a change. Last week, HHS Secretary Sebelius’s report on the state of the nation’s health care situation is especially bleak for people living in Arkansas–not for Blanche Lincoln, Mark Pryor or the 4 congressmen, all of whom get free platinum health care coverage for themselves and their loved ones paid for by the taxpayers, but for regular working families.
We’re hoping our TV ads will help persuade Lincoln, worrying about her re-election prospects, that with 80% of Americans favoring at least a public option, her career i n politics depends on her championing her constituents, rather than Health Insurance CEOs. Digby wrote three TV ads, produced by Brave New Films and directed by D-Day. Here’s one, but you can view all three here: Campaign For Health Care Choice
We need you to vote on which of the three ads we should use first and we need you to donate what you can to getting the ads on TV in every nook and cranny in Arkansas so that there isn’t one single solitary person in the state who doesn’t know that their senator is playing a crucial role in health care reform. The raw facts about health care in Arkansas speak for themselves. Blanche Lincoln should speak for her constituents, not for Insurance Industry CEOs:
ARKANSANS CAN’T AFFORD THE STATUS QUO
Roughly 1.5 million people in Arkansas get health insurance on the job, where family premiums average $11,486, about the annual earning of a full-time minimum wage job.
Since 2000 alone, average family premiums have increased by 81 percent in Arkansas.
Household budgets are strained by high costs: 27 percent of middle-income Arkansas families spend more than 10 percent of their income on health care.
High costs block access to care: 17 percent of people in Arkansas report not visiting a doctor due to high costs.
Arkansas businesses and families shoulder a hidden health tax of roughly $1500 per year on premiums as a direct result of subsidizing the costs of the uninsured.
AFFORDABLE HEALTH COVERAGE IS INCREASINGLY OUT OF REACH IN ARKANSAS
18 percent of people in Arkansas are uninsured, and 69.5 percent of them are in families with at least one full-time worker.
The percent of Arkansans with employer coverage is declining: from 57 to 53 percent between 2000 and 2007.
Much of the decline is among workers in small businesses. While small businesses make up 75 percent of Arkansas businesses, only 29 percent of them offered health coverage benefits in 2006–down 3 percent since 2000.
Choice of health insurance is limited in Arkansas. Blue Cross Blue Shield AR alone constitutes 75 percent of the health insurance market share in Arkansas, with the top two insurance providers accounting for 81 percent.
Choice is even more limited for people with pre-existing conditions. In Arkansas, premiums can vary based on demographic factors and health status, and coverage can exclude pre-existing conditions or even be denied completely.
ARKANSANS NEED HIGHER QUALITY, GREATER VALUE, AND MORE PREVENTIVE CARE
The overall quality of care in Arkansas is rated as “Weak.”
Preventive measures that could keep Arkansans healthier and out of the hospital are deficient, leading to problems across the age spectrum:
20 percent of children in Arkansas are obese.
26 percent of women over the age of 50 in Arkansas have not received a mammogram in the past two years.
45 percent of men over the age of 50 in Arkansas have never had a colorectal cancer screening.
70 percent of adults over the age of 65 in Arkansas have received a flu vaccine in the past year.
You can see the three ads here; you can vote for which one we should start with here and you can donate here–and they’re all the same here.
John Amato explains what we’re trying to do really well at C&L and Digby did the same, with less words, at her blog. I don’t know if this is going to work or not but is it worth $5 or $10 to give it a try? Sooner or later we absolutely have to make these elected officials understand that, even if they have delusions of serving in an American House of Lords, they work for us. And if Blanche Lincoln loses, what do progressives lose? She’s already declared that she’s not just opposed to Employee Free Choice, but that she’ll support the threatened Republican filibuster. According to Progressive Punch only two Democrats–Ben Nelson and Evan Bayh–have voted more frequently with the GOP on substantive matters since Obama was elected than Lincoln. Would the Democratic caucus be better off without her? You bet; she consistently pulls it to the right and is worthless more often than not. And last year a Green Party candidate racked up 20% of the vote against Mark Pryor without anyone noticing. This year, the Greens hope to build on that and teach the Democrats–at the very least–to stop taking progressive values and working families for granted.
Related posts:
- Blanche Lincoln Should Wish She Were as Popular as the Public Option in Arkansas
- Sen. Blanche Lincoln is Moving… Toward a Public Plan Near You
- President Clinton to Skip Arkansas Free Clinic, Blames Olbermann for Politicizing Event
- Blanche Lincoln Holds Health Care Bill Hostage While Bill Halter Brings Olbermann Clinics to Arkansas
- Blue Dogs Win Big for Health Insurance Industry; Public Option Now Less Robust





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

i voted with my $$ but I wasn’t able to leave msg so thanks for this- I like #1 but change the I thought we had insurance to we have insurance but our portion is outragoues (os something) I thought we had insurance implies that they dont -not strong enough!!
I liked all three. I voted for number three, “Bailout,” because it skillfully wove in the GOP’s old favorite, “options,” and “bailouts.” I think number three has more “reach,” because it hits a key long-term liberal/progressive theme: the banks and Wall Street are the ones driving the deficits, not Social Security and Medicare. Thanks for all your work.
Given the new unemployment numbers released today the GOP and Blue Dogs would be smart to make a deal fast because unless Obama gets more job stimulus cash quick I only see the pressure building.
i vote for one,but they are kinda whiny not emphatic.they are ok
i prefer something along these lines
http://oxdown.firedoglake.com/diary/6081
The GOP has a 4 of july Tea Bag protest planned right?
I Googled 4 of July and Tea Baggers and I got some weak hits is the GOP backing off blame Obama, Brown People ACORN etc?
http://www.google.com/search?h…..&aqi=
Is the Michele Bachmann anti Census campaign gaining ground? The less very conservative GOPers counted in the Census the better Healthcare and everything else we want will be.
I’m just looking ahead
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…..24175.html
If we want stuff to pass we must study the future terrain and so far its looking good:)
I was torn between #1 and #3
Agree.
And the banks are going to come back asking for more cash as their commercial real estate bets head south.
has anyone done an analysis of how much per dollar (based on total dollars spent for insurance AND healthcare) goes to the health insurance industry and related admin as opposed to actual healthcare services (and related admin)?
Yep so that means we got Leverage to End the War now and get more Stimulus jobs. We can ask the banks what they want more to get for more wars?
Or get a another Bailout?
But of course the Left must get some Green Stimulus jobs if you banks get more money otherwise another bailout is dead in the water.
We have options! I like it:)
Thirty cents of every dollar does not make it to healthcare. This does not include the expenses by the health care industry in dealing with the insurance vultures.
Or the higher prices we pay for drugs I take it than other countries?
Higher drug prices here in America where we invented the drugs! We need to get that talking point out more the logic behind it makes no sense.
Except that we are being PLAYED as Suckers in a Con the rest of the world is to smart to fall for.
yeah.. I just looked it up too. It looks like, of a total $7,900 per capita in healthcare costs (2008), $3,175 go straight to the insurers. If one cuts the insurers out of the picture, that’s $4,725 per capita (not including those costs you mentioned from the industry side, in dealing with the insurers.. but presumably there will be forms/admin requirements for any system)… if basically 100% of actuarial risk goes to the government/public purse. Which means the entire system (cutting the insurers out of the picture) runs on $1.45 trillion a year. So… balancing things out, if we simply killed off the insurance industry outright.. that’s a tax increase (or a war spending cut) of a measly $1,550 per person per year or $477 billion per year in total.
And that’s NOT for a public option, kids – that’s for the complete obliteration of the private health insurers and the institution of national healthcare. I know this analysis is simplistic, but, heck, on the surface for it we could pay for the whole shebang just rolling back half of shrub’s tax cuts. No wonder the insurers are engaged in every form of sleazy behavior imaginable to fight us on this. They’ve done the math and realized how easy it should be for us just to get rid of them altogether (if it wasn’t for the fact that they own most of our politicos). We won’t even have to bother to nationalize them.
Blub
We won’t even have to bother to nationalize them.
Why would anyone want to nationalize them – there is no value there
sorry for the v quick drive by, but saw your comments and thought you would like to see an nejm paper that does that cost analysis. check the link at the bottom of this comment:
http://firedoglake.com/2009/07…..nt-1927334
there’s more, i’ll get the links later today or tomorrow.
by the way, all of that is simplistic for a number of reasons but mostly because it doesn’t take into account those who already have their insurance paid for by the government and those 46 million people who are foregoing medical care by virtue of being uninsured or getting it inefficiently and expensively by going to emergency rooms. Which means the real number is likely far less than $1,550 per person. We could probably do this for $3,000-$4,000 per household per year… or $250 to $300 billion per year in additional spending – more than the $400 per year bribe the insurers are effectively demanding for support of healthcare reform. When you have the chutzpah to solicit a bribe that’s more than underlying issue is worth…. Criminals.
Thanks. I just scanned it quickly.. will do a detailed read later tonight, but it looks intriguing.
I love picking apart commercials and have made many radio and television ads for my own business in Arkansas over the years. With that in mind, here’s my first reaction after watching them all just once.
These people don’t speak like southerners. And I am not looking for a twang overload, but they are from somewhere else. The set was fine, but the actors need to do spots for Omaha, not Little Rock or Fayetteville, certainly not Jonesboro, Pine Bluff, El Dorado or Texarkana.
I pick, number three… and hope number two doesn’t make it to the airwaves at all. Saying Harry the way she did sounded almost condescending… especially when she said it the second time.
I like number one because it speaks to people who have insurance at work; most of us have been in that situation, gotten a huge hospital bill despite having insurance.
ES, can you please explain what you mean by “the actors need to do spots for Omaha, not Little Rock or Fayetteville, certainly not Jonesboro, Pine Bluff, El Dorado or Texarkana.”
I don’t understand the nuance.
Hi jacqrat, Omaha Nebraska… the actors tone, lack of accent etc.
FWIW the word is “preventive” not “preventative.”
Mod note: Thank you.
So Yew Mean we shoulda tawlked a bit differnt-like in them ads?
Well, SHoooooot. Whyfore dint you a’tell us’n beforehand, like?
“Preventative measures that could keep Arkansans healthier and out of the hospital are deficient, leading to problems across the age spectrum:”
MOD: Here too. And if it’s wrong in the ad, that will be unfortunate.
Just met with Senator Lincoln at the Fayetteville, AR airport this morning. She would not commit to a robust public option, and she spoke at length to local media about the need to protect “private industry” in healthcare.
These people don’t speak like southerners
Bullseye!
Thank you.
Can’t believe I missed that.