The celebration has begun – quite real in Iraq where Maliki has declared Sovereignty Day to mark the withdrawal of US forces from the cities – to bases which are often not very far from the bases they occupied just days ago – and Iraqi forces take responsibility for their country’s security.
"All of us are happy – Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds on this day," Waleed al-Bahadili said as he celebrated at the park. "The Americans harmed and insulted us too much."
For the US press and politicians, the celebration is something else indeed. In reports like that of Michael Ware for CNN in which he declares that “this will no longer be America’s war,” we hear about all the American blood spilled to bring about this day with not a single mention of the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who have died, killed by our unnecessary and criminal invasion. A step back by US forces is not an achievement hard won by our efforts – something we’ll hear over and over in the statements from American spokesmen.
As Andrew Bacevich notes today in the Washington Post:
… by pretending that Iraqis should find tolerable levels of violence that would be deemed intolerable anywhere else, the Obama administration may yet be able to extricate the United States from a war that has failed utterly…
Sadly, President Obama’s apparent inclination to go to the mat in Afghanistan suggests that his administration has little appetite to confront and to take on board the real lessons of Iraq. It is easier or at least more expeditious to confine the search for lessons to matters of tactics and technique, as if the U.S. Army’s rediscovery of counterinsurgency doctrine has redeemed "the global war on terror," an enterprise that was unnecessary and misbegotten from the outset.
And for all the talk of this “US withdrawal,” let’s not forget that we have 130,000 troops plus who knows how many contractors in Iraq, and even if the planned withdrawal out of Iraq by August 2010 goes forward, we will keep 50,000 troops there. Sovereignty after all is an iffy thing when 130,000 foreign troops are not so far up the road.
Still, today it is good to see the Iraqi celebrations – for as one Iraqi woman told CNN:
"I feel the same way as any Iraqi feels — I will feel my freedom and liberation when I don’t see an American stopping an Iraqi on the street," said Baghdad resident Awatef Jwad.



17 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Outstanding post, Siun. Thanks.
The disgrace of American corporate media.
From the disgusting MSM AP
At least the Irakis got a mention.
Those poor, poor, people.
Words fail
Pat Lang has a great post on this.
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the neocon scum will be held accountable somewhere, someday for their crimes against the American soldier.
Here is a partial list of my accusations. It will be argued that some of these things are not technically “crimes.” I think that irrelevant. These specifically apply to Iraq. You may add your own and I may comment further
4 More American Families Shattered
“How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?”
Wonder whut our lil war criminal chimpy chimp is a-doin’ today…?
I saw Janet Napolitano on TeeVee who was asked about our invasion/occupation of Iraq, “Was it a mistake to go there?” She said we were acting on information at the time that “proved inaccurate.”
Wow. Just WOW.
(Besides drinkin’ that is…)
“Ooops. Our bad. But not really.”
I guess what she said is technically true, the lies were “proved inaccurate.”
And we are not “looking backwards.”
That works.
Thanks for the linky, Raven.
Indeed, Bush and Cheney will be held accountable. The question is, who will get to them first? Our own system of justice, or foreign powers in a Nuremberg II?
I guess we should be pissed off that he didn’t specifically count the number of Iraki dead.
Several years ago, independent groups were already estimating the count was over a million. The numbers for the injured and the displaced are far greater.
I vote for Nuremberg II.
The invasion and occupation of Iraq will inevitably be judged by historians as one of the greatest foreign policy mistakes ever. To knowingly engage in a war of choice based on lies and distortions is unconscionable. Millions died and thousands were injured so Bush-Cheney’s war profiteering enablers could make millions and his neo-con buddies could further their “do as we say or else” agenda.
Now, as Obama keeps his word and starts the long, slow and painful withdrawal process . . . one can only hope that Iraq doesn’t disintegrate totally into an endless cycle of sectarian violence. If so, our original Iraq policy will be responsible, not Obama’s/Iraq’s decision to withdraw US troops. The blood will be on Bush-Cheney’s hands.
The three things to keep in mind is that the withdrawal isn’t even slated to begin until 2010, and, as Siun notes, the plan is to leave 50,000 troops in Iraq. These will not be called combat troops although that will be their function. This retention of troops in Iraq past a supposed withdrawal is actually what the neocon plan was to have permanent bases in Iraq.
Obama is handling this the right way. It’s Bush’s war and Obama is being a responsible leader dealing with the hand he was dealt and not giving conservatives any ammo.