<
The three-part subtitle to Frank Schaeffer’s Crazy for God sums the book up very well.
How I Grew Up as One of the Elect . . .
One of the most engaging aspects of this book is the fact that Frank has lived and moved in several very different worlds. He grew up in what sounds for all the world like a 1960′s fundamentalist retreat center/commune in Switzerland. L’Abri was founded by his parents Francis and Edith Schaeffer in the mid-1950s, not so much to get away from the world as to figure out how to engage it. From the Alps to the seashore, from prayer sessions to discos, from the kitchen to the living room to traditional museums to contemporary artists’ studios, the story of Frank’s growing up bounces and moves from one world to another. The world also comes to L’Abri via a procession of artists, musicians, filmmakers, poets, writers, and others looking to sit at the feet of his father, the evangelical version of a guru. Says Frank (pp. 208-9):
The ethos of the sixties suited my parents perfectly. Dad had dropped out of the mainstream evangelical missionary environment in the late 1940s and then discovered the world of art. In the 1960, he was swept up in a subculture of rebellion when he began to listen to artists like Bob Dylan. The times mirrored Dad’s individualism. He was "into" big ideas; and, suddenly, so was everyone else. Dad knew how to "speak to young people so they understand," and suddenly other evangelicals wanted to know how to do that, too. Born-again Christians were confronted by a rebellious youth culture. Suddenly they needed Dad’s pop culture expertise.
They did indeed. And they also needed Frank’s.
. . . Helped Found the Religious Right . . .
In evangelical circles, Frank’s parents were a big deal. By the 1970s, Francis was a real draw on the evangelical speaker’s circuit, with Frank at his side and eventually stepping out as a leader on his own. As a 19 year old, Frank was the producer of a film series called "How Then Shall We Live?" built around his father’s lectures, and two years or so later he created his own production company called Schaeffer V Productions, which came to dominate the evangelical film landscape. By the 1980s, Frank had become a golden boy among evangelicals. He helped create a new way for evangelicals to be active in the world, working with and among folks like Bishop Fulton Sheen, Jerry Falwell, James Kennedy, Pat Robertson, and James Dobson from the religious world and folks like Jack Kemp, Henry Hyde, Bob Dole and others in the GOP political world.
After a while, though, it made him sick:
There were three kinds of evangelical leaders. The dumb or idealistic ones who really believed. The out-and-out charlatans. And the smart ones who still believed — sort of — but knew that the evangelical world was shit, but who couldn’t figure out any way to earn as good a living anywhere else. I was turning into one of those, having started out in the idealistic category.
(Have I mentioned that Frank is . . . ahem . . . plainspoken?)
. . . and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of it Back.
After a day of doing television and radio interviews, feeling more and more hypocritical about his role in all this, Frank came home to his wife Genie, raving about the Christian right and the political battles being fought: "If we win, the first person they’ll put up against the wall and shoot will be me!" After some back and forth, Genie pointed him toward what Frank called "my door back to sanity." Her advice was simple: "Why don’t you just quit and write a novel . . ."
It didn’t happen right away, it certainly wasn’t easy, but that’s just what Frank did. He left the evangelical world behind — the speaking, the religious film making, the political organizing, all of it — and into secular writing, publishing, and film making. Today, Frank has joined the Greek Orthodox church (which stresses the mystery of God as much as the fundies stress having all the right answers about God), and he writes regularly at the Huffington Post.
And the story is obviously not over.
After Dr. George Tiller’s murder, Frank spoke with Rachel Maddow about his role in helping to build up the religious right. As you can see from the interview below, Frank is not content with merely saying "I’m sorry," but is stepping up to help unmask and undo what he helped to build.
There’s no "if anyone was hurt . . ." nonsense to Frank’s apology, as we see all too often when public figures try to walk back their earlier actions.
Like many writers of moral/political/religious theories my father and I would have been shocked that someone took us at our word, walked into a Lutheran Church and pulled the trigger on an abortionist. But even if the murderer never read Dad’s or my words we helped create the climate that made this murder likely to happen.
Read the whole piece at the link, and you will find a refreshing candor about it — the same candor that comes through in the book — and a desire to reshape things for the better.
While I was reading Crazy for God, various words kept running through my head. Honesty. Hypocrisy. Integrity. We learn about a son growing up in the shadow of his famous father, and now see that son as a father himself who wonders what he’s putting his own kids through. We hear of the struggles of connecting personal belief with public action. The story swings wildly between episodes of poverty and scraping by as well as times of wealth and abundance. Along the way, we see the inside workings of the evangelical media world, the Hollywood studio world, the world of GOP politics and DC operatives, and more.
Crazy for God is a richly painted picture, laid out in vivid and engaging detail. From beginning to end, Frank does not appear to hold anything back, especially when talking about himself. There is deserved pride in his talents and accomplishments, as well as shame in his failures and shortcomings — and both get described in equal measure.
Please join me in giving a big FDL Book Salon welcome (and best wishes for Father’s Day!) to Frank Schaeffer.



77 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Frank, Welcome to the Lake.
Peterr, Thank you for Hosting today’s Book Salon.
Frank Schaeffer here and signed on. Hi!
Welcome, Frank! Glad to have you with us.
Welcome to Firedoglake – so glad you could join us!
Thanks!
Hi Frank, you and I conversed quite a bit a few years back so I have to ask how John is doing, is he out of the Corps? I admire what you are doing with this book.
Frank, did you have experience promoting the Ralph Reed/Jack Abramoff Judeo/Christian nexus of darkness?
Good afternoon Frank and welcome to FDL.
I have not had an opportunity to read your book but do have a couple of questions. Forgive me if they are answered in the book.
Was your father still around when you started experiencing your dis-enchantment with the religious right?
What was it like when you realized that you could no longer participate as part of the religious right?
Frank, you’ve obviously re-entered the political arena once again, this time against the conservatives and evangelicals on the right. What led you into deciding to do so, having turned your back on politics for more than a few years?
Hi Raven: My son John was in the USMC from 1999 to 2004. He then went to the University of Chicago, graduated and is married with a little girl. He is well. He was deployed 3 times to combat — I am VERY grateful he made it home well. As you know he and I wrote a book together called Keeping Faith–A Father-Son Story About Love and the United States Marine Corps, that seems to have helped a lot of military families come to terms with what has been a tough time for us all — 2 wars and all that!
Welcome, Mr.Schaeffer. Thank you Peterr and of course as always, Bev.
I have seen both of your appearances on The Rachel Maddow Show, and setting aside my immediate reaction to your story and my admiration for you for stepping up, I am curious about how those revelations and the narrative in your book (which I have not yet read) have affected your standing amongst your former peers.
Great to hear it. I hope this work has a great an impact as your contribution to the understanding of the disconnect between “the dominant culture” and the military.
I met Ralph Reed once, years ago and then in 2000 when I was working for McCain doing radio interviews and Reed was for Bush he refused to debate me on air. After that I got out of the Republican Party and worked to get Obama elected. I guess one reason I got out was the disgust with the way the Bush people treated McCain in 2000 not to mention that I did not agree with the war in Iraq. Since then the Republicans have moved more and more to the loony right and are now a joke but a bad and dangerous one.
A tech note: when you are responding to a specific comment, you can hit the little “reply” button just beneath that comment and the system will attach the “in response to . . .” note automatically.
Dad (Francis Schaeffer) died in 1984, so when I got out of the Religious Right 2005 — 1990 he was gone. But as you’ll see if you read the book Dad was also getting tired of the Religious Right. If he’d lived I’m betting he’d have been disgusted with the direction gay bashing etc.
One thing that leaped out at me in reading the book is that much of what you write about can easily be translated from the world of religion into the world of politics.
For instance, you spend a lot of time in the book wrestling with the “personality-driven” nature of a lot of the fundamentalist ministries — all too often more driven by a grasp of power than in serving a community. That same dynamic appears in politics as well. For instance, I was often amused at the way almost all the GOP presidential candidates tried to claim the mantle of Ronald Reagan — looking to touch the hem of his garment, so to speak — in order to try to tap into the power they think his mantle would provide.
Any other parallels you see between the religious and political leaders?
What is the earliest time in your life you were brought into the family business, actively?
What standing? Just kidding but the word hate comes to mind. The real problem is one I explore in my new book Patience With God — Faith For People Who Don’t Like Religion (Or Atheism) Oct pub date. I explain that it is a threat to the movement when someone leaves. If they (or I) can do it so can others. If Francis Schaeffer’s son, and the old “Franky” Schaeffer can and have doubts about faith then so can anyone. And my speaking out isn’t just on these issues, but on art too. Since I have written novels that have a pretty wide readership and that take a humorous look at growing up religious (Portofino, Zermatt and Saving Grandma) the religious folks on the right have not liked me since Portofino was published in 1992, and less each years since. Now with Maddow etc, I’m pretty much ignored or vilified.
I agree, and of course that goes back to the fact that we live in an entertainment and consumer orientated society. It’s all about celebrity, be that Rick Warren, Oprah, or Bono, same vibe. It just gets weirder when the family business is selling God
As I say in the book, in a way talking about Jesus was my first memory, in that if we weren’t talking about Jesus we felt guilty. No conversation was a real conversation, it all was a ploy to lure people onto our turf and pitch something spiritual to them. I learned to do this with my mother’s milk, as they say.
I’m glad you brought up art.
There’s a hilarious account in the book of Frank arguing with his boss at Gospel Films over some video footage that he had taken of Michelangelo’s David. It was a big dolly shot to set up some comments by Francis about the sculpture, which depicted David in all his naked glory:
Sounds like a close relative to the carney barker.
Your voice is an important one. Many associate religion with the Talibangelicals who divide instead of multiply. I have avoided church religiously for years for that very reason. It is hard for men of faith to call out the false prophets without falling into the same trap.
Sometimes I’m asked if when writing a memoir I just make up far distant dialogue. Of course I did my best to get tone and voice right. In this instance with the dialogue you quoted I actually remembered that exchange word for word and it was driven home when I repeated it to my dad when he asked why that shot was to be cut. He was furious. Looking back it just illustrated why my father (who loved art) was such a bad fit for the Religious Right!
Frank, in the book, you regret the fact that you and your dad didn’t publicly share your real opinions of the rightwing evangelical leaders, in part because you caught the “power-trip disease” and in part because of the “needs of the pro-life movement.” (Opinions like “plastic . . . power-hungry . . . way too right-wing, really nuts! . . .”)
This resonated with me, because it sounds like the debate in the progressive community about whether one should criticize Obama. Some who call for holding back strike me as being caught up in the power-trip disease (“if I criticize, then I won’t get the perks of having friends in high places”) while others call for holding back so as not to “set the movement back.”
This came back to me as I read your column at Huffington Post last week, where you came down hard on those who would criticize Obama, saying “stop acting like children.”
Where does one draw the line between honest (even necessary) criticism of one’s allies, and swallowing your critique for the “needs of the movement”?
Good point, sorry to make a pitch here but this really isn’t one but I got so much email from Crazy For God along the lines of “How does anyone who believes in God reclaim faith from the crazy people?” that it inspired me to try and figure it out and the result is Patience With God — Faith For People Who Don’t Like Religion (Or Atheism) Oct pub date. My sense is that to do anything useful these days re faith we need to figure out what we are not, just not what we are. Religion is a huge mess these days, check out Iran tonight! On the other hand the New Atheists are into a sort of pre-modern fundamentalism of their own.
It is a rather memorable bit of dialogue. Even years later, I would imagine that a conversation like that would tend to stand out in your mind.
And I know just the people that your boss at GF was talking about. Let’s just say that I think he knew the market to which he was pitching his product.
Which is sad. Very, very sad.
Well I’m an Obama fan on several levels, but one is just practical. We need to give him time to not just establish his presidency but to try and repair the havoc wrought by Bush. So my sense is give him time. Of course I’m all for also holding all political leaders feet to the fire. With Obama I guess it’s just a matter of timing. Of course I could be wrong about the timing question but I just want to give him — and therefore all of us – a break to work some things out. The other issue is that his opposition is now the far far right who have nothing good to offer, so he has his hands full.
That needs to go onto a poster somewhere.
Oh my — I clicked on FDL to see what was up this afternoon and found this post. I’m blown away — most probably about 20 plus years ago, I read How Should We Then Live?, watched the DVD series, etc. The work was incredibly informative to me then and helped to provide a framework for a lot of my beliefs and opinions.
Frank, much appreciate the early work of your parents. Now, I’ll go back and read the post — I saw brief mention of you on the Rachel Maddox show — thanks for being here — and thanks for Firedoglake, Peterr, etc.
… and after a while, it made me sick, very sick… thanks so much for speaking out Frankie —
The thing was Billi Zioli, like all the rest of us had a double standard: we said and did things in private we never said in public. Actually I have known so many evangelical leade4rs who start many a conversation with the words I believe thus and so but of course I can’t tell anyone or I’d be in trouble…” So the point was nudity was fine with Billy but not for his “people” who he regarded as rubes.
Frank, you speak in the book about the role of Bishop Fulton J. Sheen and yourself, in trying to bridge the chasm between Roman Catholics and evangelicals when it comes to abortion.
Where do you see the evangelical/Roman Catholic relationship today? Have the years of cooperation on the abortion issue led to a softening of the antipathy between the two camps, or is it seen as the exception to the rule?
Welcome.
I think that there is a huge difference in this country between the normal, bible-based, regular Christian churches and the ones that are too focused on abortion to care about people.
Hello, Frank! Thanks for coming.
Speaking of opposition to change, how does the established media fit into the equation? They still seem to be giving the Republicans every benefit of every doubt. Just this morning, for instance, the insane comments of Lindsey Graham attacking Obama for being “timid” and “passive” on Iran — in other words, for not making the mistakes Bush made that led directly to the triumph of the conservative factions — were reported approvingly by the press.
Hi thanks for reading my father’s books. His early work was non political and more of the left re culture and art than of the right. It was only later and as I explain in Crazy For God, that I and some others pushed hi to the right. So it is fitting that in my book i also talk about Dad’s humanity, kindness, interest in culture and when it came to the direction of society — for instance that the idealism of the hippies would soon be replaced by middle class values again — Dad got a lot right.
Why do a lot of these religious groups try to treat women as unimportant and unworthy?
I think so on the right, but on the left I’d say most Roman Cs voted for Obama but I’ll bet that if 20% did from the evangelical camp that would be about it. And the RCs didn’t get into the gay bashing or the neocon game the way the religious (protestant) right did.
Hi I could not agree more! In fact my latest post on Huffington is about this gross Republican hypocrisy. And I think the media is so used to the far right coments that they just think this is normal now. It is not. The media need to call out the Republicans for actually being profoundly anti-American now.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…..18359.html
Frank, I was wondering if the pluralism built right into the canonical gospels had any impact on your theological/religious trajectory. For example, I’m speaking about the different Christologies in the NT.
Thanks for coming, thanks for writing such an important book. Thanks to Peterr for hosting.
I don’t think it has anything to d with religion per se, I think it is something that goes back to tribal evolution that we are slowly growing past. I also believe in moral evolution and think that we need to be honest about the backward aspects of all religions. Then again secular culture hasn’t been so great on this either, notable the Germans who treated women like breeding machines under Hitler etc. Right now religion is (worldwide) often the enemy of women. It can also be enlightened.
No I did not ask you to write this but my new book Patience With God is partly about this in a bit of a different way. I talk about two threads running through Christian tradition, a human and open one and a closed and theological one. Of course it is never that simple, but the idea that somehow older is more fundamentalist is wrong. Some of the early Fathers were what we’d call either “liberals” or “mystics” today. In looking for a way to repair the damage done to faith by evangelical/fundamentalism, I’m trying to point to a better solution.
While I was either reading or re-reading your book in preparation for this Book Salon chat, Rush Limbaugh was proudly proclaiming his desire for Obama to fail. Your words about the leaders of the religious-right practically leaped off the page (#298-99):
BTW Peterr: Let me take take this moment to thank you for the terrific (and kind) job you did presenting my book and ideas in the review/essay above. I’m very grateful!
Good afternoon, Frank!
When you get a chance, take a look at the latest Christian hypocrisy by State Rep. Cynthia Davis (R-Mo.). She seems to think ‘hunger is a positive motivator” for the poor. And this is the woman who, according to her website:
“opened Back to Basics Christian Bookstore in 1989, and was a recipient of the O’Fallon Business Association’s “Business of the Year Award”.
I was just reading that. She is indeed a proud Bush Republican.
I’ll read Davis’ comments as soon as this session is over. It always is amazing to me that here we are still talking about the poor as if Dickens had never written a word! The Republican Party is even out of step with the Victorians these days!
Bless you, Peterr, for having Frank on with the review of Crazy for God and thanks to all who’ve responded in the thread.
Frank, last fall when you were on NPR, I was aghast listening with ecstasy as I heard your criticism of the right wing evangelical church. I couldn’t believe my ears that someone could say things I could so completely identify with, and say them so profoundly, articulating some of the principles I’d been struggling to define. You totally blew me away.
Later that week I met with the “Beloveds” a small faith-based women’s support group I’d been meeting with after my leading them in a study of Nouwen’s Life of the Beloved ; some of whom had also heard the interviews and we laughed and cried together with joy at your power and lucidity. I’d totally freaked out over your words and I can still remember the intensity of my feelings at the time. One of the group members subsequently bought the book and shared from its wondrous pages at a later meeting and I was all the more enthralled and grateful.
Glad to know about the upcoming novel. I’ll see if our area libraries have any of your earlier novels available in audio book form. My hand and eye problems have occasioned access to some really marvelous literary jewels in the last year; here’s hoping I can find you.
May the Lord sustain you and Peterr in your ongoing ministries!
Blessings to all,
PS I thank God everyday for the ministry of Firedoglake.
Thanks!
My nightmare scenario is that I’ve written a post that *doesn’t* capture the book well, and then the author and I get to spent two very awkward hours chatting about it.
Frank, tip of my hat for a very brave and comprehensive act on your part — bravo.
I was at Labri a few times in the early 70s, and grad of Covenant college (was at the “Schaeffer conference there way back then) — i missed the big formation of the political rightwing movement as i stayed on the left bohemian side of the Labri influence — just had to drop Christian fundamentalism and Christian misogyny — so I know where of you speak…
keep up the good work!
Re the Republicans being anti-American they got that from us on the Religious Right. Remember how Falwell and Robertson blamed gays for 9/11? The thinking is that the worse America gets, the more violent, or with more lost wars etc., etc., the more it “proves” that God has “removed his blessing.” In political terms that translates into Rush saying he wants the President to fail. These folks would rather watch us all go down and be proved “right” as in “we told you so,” than see America prosper. Of course the ultimate example of this is the fascination with the “End Times.”
Thank you, Mr. Schaeffer, for being here today.
It seems to me that the far right is driven by fear – fear of almost everything. Am I completely wrong?
I really look forward to reading your book. The hypocrisy is blood-boiling. Thanks for all that you’ve done.
Thank you so much for the great kindness of you note here. If I can ever be a help to your group feel free to contact me via my website frankschaeffer.com
I answer email, and also will call in to book groups if they want me to re my books, or anything else. Thanks again. For anyone who wants to hear that Terri Gross “Fresh Air” interview its on my website.
Thanks.
FWIW, I agree with Ron Paul on almost nothing, except auditing the Federal Reserve.
FWIW, there’s about eighteen centuries of Xtian teaching condemning usury. In light of the abuses by Wall Street, perhaps some of that can inform what I’m sure will be a terrific book.
One big topic we haven’t touched on here yet that obviously plays a big role in the book is “growing up as a child in a famous family.” You talked about “Schaeffer worship,” as people who idolized your parents would project their worship onto you.
We’re at a time when many of the leaders with whom you worked in the 70s and 80s are either retired, thinking of retirement, or dead. Sometimes the sons are trying to step into their father’s shoes (Franklin Graham, or Jerry Falwell, Jr.), while other ministries are trying to plan for the departure of the Beloved Founder (like Dobson and his Focus on the Family).
Who do you see right now as the big name players in the evangelical world? Are the sons going to be able to step in, or will it be newcomers like Rick Warren?
That’s terrific marketing. I hope your publisher contacts a lot of the surviving big city dailies. They are desperate for content and I bet would love to host a chat with you.
You are right. Fear is the word, fear of the other, fear of countries not like ours, fear of other races, fear of gays, fear of Obama “better stock up on guns he’ll take them away!” on and on. The problem is that with FOX News, talk radio and the rest there are people who are living in an alternative universe who get no other information fro “outside” sources. And when they snap and shoot a doctor or a guard at the Holocaust Museum, whatever, of course the “mainstream” right says they never meant for that to happen. But the atmosphere of lies-driven fear is a drumbeat inciting violence. There will be more.
Interesting you mention this. I got a letter from Billy Graham’s daughter Ruth the other day saying she really liked the book and describing the Graham children as “sacrificial lambs.” I’m lucky in that because I write novels I escaped in the sense that my father isn’t famous to the vast majority of Americans who weren’t in the evangelical movement in the 70s and 80s. So I’m a famous man’s son to some people but most of my readers have never heard of Dad. On the other hand Ruth, Franklin, Gigi and the other Graham family are stuck. As to who is next I’d say that Warren is the future in that he’s slick. It is no accident that Rupert Murdoch is his publisher.
Any clues about how to cut through all that fear?
I hadn’t made that connection before, but it certainly makes sense.
Speaking of marketing one thing that makes me a bit different is that I’m just as critical of the New Atheist movement as of the religious fundamentalists. So after my next book comes out I may be running out of friendy venues!
Well, I’m proof that it can be done. I began to see that there was something nuts about being against everything! From there it was a short jump to looking at the lies we were telling, sure we were right, because “they” were wrong. For instance I have heard from many former evangelicals who read Crazy For God and have had similar journeys. The good news is Limbaugh, Coulter, Fox all have the same 18 t0 20 million readers, viewers and listeners. There are 300 million Americans. There is a reason that the Republicans are disliked so much these days. What I fear is not what these people will do at the ballot box, but what the fringe of the fringe will try to do with a bullet.
Murdoch took a look at evangelical publishing, figured out where the big bucks were and got religion. I always have to laugh (somewhat bitterly!) when right wing bloggers say I sold out for the money by writing for Huffington etc. The big bucks is in the God business from the right. As any progressive Christian knows the money isn’t in being thoughtful or in nuance. It is in false certainty. Murdoch was just doing what he does best.
Are you familiar with Belief and Unbelief, by the old neo-con Michael Novak?
I used to talk to Novack after he wrote the Spirit of Democratic Capitalism (I think that was the title) He was always pleasant, and of course was one of the first real neocons from the Catholic right. I haven’t read the book you mention. I’m sure it is well written and I don’t know where Novack is coming from these days.
We’ve been talking a lot about the right, but what about the left?
One of the other things you mention in the book is that when Roe v. Wade was brand new, and you were doing your seminars around the country, a lot of your audience at the time were Democrats. You offered this observation of that time:
Do you seen any comparable blind spots among Democrats today, when it comes to dealing with religious issues/people?
Me neither.
His point was that all of us, atheists, theists, and agnostics all share doubt about our position.
People I respect, say it was the best thing he ever wrote.
I have tremendous respect for the many ardent atheists and agnostics here at FDL. I have learned tons from them and they never made me apologize for being a theist.
I am sorry that at times, my thoughtlessness in commenting here at FDL has caused them pain.
Yes, the uncritical embrace — by many on the left — of the New Atheists, say Harris saying some religious people might have to be killed for their religion because they can’t be changed, is mistake. Too many people on the left are unthinkingly anti-religious. And it also strikes me that the point I make about Roe in my book stands: Roe was too sweeping and got us into the culture wars (e are still in them) stands.
I think Roe will remain the law, and I think abortion should be legal, up to a point. But I also think there are better ways to bring change. For instance, if Roe hadn’t come along the Southern Baptists would have remained moderately pro-choice, CA and NY were already pro-choice etc.
So 2 points for the left to ponder: 1) is all religion bad? 2) what do we learn from going too far too fast?
Sure I know there are other points of view on this and I could be wrong, but for what it’s worth, that is something to think about.
As we come to the end of this Book Salon,
Frank, Thank you very much for stopping by the Lake and spending the afternoon with us discussing your book and your life.
Peterr, Thank you for Hosting this great Book Salon.
Everyone, if you haven’t bought this book yet, here is a link.
Thanks all.
The point I’m making in my new book Patience With God, is that certainty is a crock. That cuts right, left, atheist, religious. That doesn’t mean that there is no such thing as spirituality, or that atheists aren’t moral people, or that everything is absurd, but it does mean that I think the post-modern position re certainty, when it comes to grand theories, is a good one.
THANK YOU ALL! Very Best, Frank
Thank you. I hope the book has an audio version, too.
Frank, we’re coming to the end of this Book Salon chat, and I want to thank you for both writing the book and for spending a couple of hours here at FDL talking about it.
You dedicated the book to your daughter Jessica, and I daresay that the process of writing about growing up as your father’s child has made you look at your own parenting as well. (I loved the comments from your kids about being on the sets with you!) This kind of makes your book an appropriate one for a Father’s Day book salon.
You wrote “Honesty is the only thing that is satisfying about writing.” As a writer myself I agree — and the world would be much better off if more folks were writers.
Thanks again for your honesty, your openness, and your willingness to lay out the struggles of your life for the rest of us to ponder.
Regarding Roe, I’d encourage you to read Chapter 6 “Change of Heart” in Jan Crawford greenburg’s outstanding “SUPREME COURT: The Inside Story…”
Planned Parenthood v Casey has put reproductive rights on a much more solid legal footing.
It’s a critical lesson, you are trying to teach, thanks.
Bless you Frank for your kindness at 53. I’ll be sharing this post and thread with several in my faith communities and emphasizing your generous offer.
Grace and peace to all
Hi Marchan: I’ll be glad to help out. Best, Frank