dncbidengayevent-1.jpg

I’ve been consumed with writing about the supplemental over at the Silo for the past few days, but I wanted to take a moment to address something that I’d be writing about a lot if I wasn’t — namely the brief filed by the Department of Justice over DOMA.

John Aravosis and Joe Sudbay managed to obtain a copy of the brief, and AmericaBlog has covered this superbly.  But Joe writes something that I hope everyone considers when writing about this:

For some, the decision whether to defend or oppose DOMA is purely a legal exercise. For many of us, it’s our lives. I’m sure, along the way, Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP were told to back off on their challenge to Topeka’s segregation law. After all, that law had been unsuccessfully challenged already, and there was that very clear Supreme Court precedent on "separate, but equal." The law is the law. Who was this political activist Thurgood Marshall to suggest it should be overturned?

It’s shocking how many people viewed yesterday’s DOMA discussion through their own purely intellectual, legal lens. The condescending tone from some of the legal types, both straight and gay – all Democrat – was insulting, demeaning, and horribly out of touch (with their own humanity). Gay Americans lost rights last November in California. We had fundamental rights taken away by an election. Think about that. When was the last time that happened in this country?

And I agree with John that this is the wrong time for Barney Frank, Tammy Baldwin and Jared Polis to be honoring Joe Biden with a DNC fundraiser.  It sends all the wrong messages.

Related posts:

  1. Administration Still Defending the Indefensible DOMA
  2. Liz Cheney Rejects DOMA, Applauds Hillary Clinton
  3. Will Hillary Clinton’s “Partner Plan” Run Afoul of DOMA?
  4. Red State Targets Vulnerable Democrats in Conservative Districts over IMF
  5. For Democrats, NY-23 is Heads We Win, Tails They Lose