I’ve been speaking with people in Rep. Jan Schakowsky’s office about the new War Supplemental, and I have to say I am sorely disappointed. Disappointed because a congresswoman I had hoped to support for Senate some day as an Illinois voter has not yet agreed to stand firm on her earlier pledge of no more blank checks for the long war.

We are at a critical moment – a progressive block of votes has the ability to stop the new War Supplemental. For those of us who work to bring more progressive voices into power, this should be a time when our allies in Congress flex those muscles they hardly ever get a chance to use.

Instead, Rep Schakowsky – and many others – are wobbling, suggesting that their vote is for sale if the bribes are big enough ($3 billion for an ineffectual Cash for Clunkers is the latest offer as Jane has reported.)

This wavering comes at a time when all that is wrong with our expanding war in Afghanistan has never been clearer:

And you have to wonder how anyone could support spending $90 Billion – including "$700 million above the request" when the DOD has just ordered the fifth review of strategy for Afghanistan in just five months.

Progressive leaders in Congress — as well as in the netroots and blogosphere — have the ability over the next few days to say NO to a continuation of this madness.

Those of us who have supported candidates and organizations who claimed to want an end to the Bush style wars are watching carefully – our support was given in answer to those pledges and we expect them to be honored.

As Jane says – to the phones!

Her office numbers are (773) 506-7100, (847) 328-3409, and (202) 225-2111.


Related posts:

  1. Rahm’s Whipping on the Afghanistan War Supplemental — Will You?
  2. Obama Now Whipping Supplemental: Rahm FAIL
  3. Supplemental Vote Could Come Later Today
  4. Kucinich to Vote Against Supplemental — 11 Down, 28 to Go
  5. Speak Out: Write Letters To Your Local Papers and Urge Members of Congress to Vote “No” On Supplemental