<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dana Milbank&#8217;s 750 Word Quota and the Future of Progressive Activism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:17:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dameocrat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912433</link>
		<dc:creator>Dameocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912433</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;After John Kerry, I gave the dems to election cycles to turn themselves around. They haven’t I’m through!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After John Kerry, I gave the dems to election cycles to turn themselves around. They haven’t I’m through!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912212</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912212</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Howard Dean’s leadership at the DNC was evidence of progressives’ effort to hollow out the Dem Party and take it back to its progressive roots.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We haven’t given up on that, but like every movement — and you can even point to the Movement Conservatives as examples — has its ups and downs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We’re not done taking back the party, as the same reasons exist now that existed four to five years ago. Dean asked his supporters in late November 2004: do we start a third party, do we take back the party, or should he simply run again? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The numbers are still not there for a successful third party.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dean or a true progressive like him will not win without a sizable, solid progressive organization fully behind him and prepared to win.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the numbers this means we still have to consider taking back the party in order to win.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This will only happen if we continue our efforts to weed out the corporatist interests within the Dem Party, primary their incumbents and support our own candidates. This is not a job which can happen in two or four years, as we’ve just proven to ourselves; it’s a lifetime commitment. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ll point to the Movement Conservatives again as an example: it took the corporatists and the Bible-thumpers 30-plus years to get to the eight years they had with George W. Bush. It took them that long to move their party far enough to the right that Republicans like William Milliken (Michigan’s former governor) looks like a centrist Dem, and forced moderate Repubs like Mitt Romney to backpedal on everything they’ve ever believed. In doing so, the right-wing encouraged the development of radical far right groups to widen the Overton Window, making their new center look appealing in comparison (Dubya looked sane compared to Buchanan or Pat Robertson in 2000, yes?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This should tell us that we not only need to continue to hammer away on centrists; we also need to encourage those farther to the left than we are. This is our role, this is our groove for the next two presidential elections at a minimum. We take every opportunity like the backdoor organizing going on at the moment (see my comment at 53) and then we run further and farther to the left with it on their dime.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And it should also tell us after shifting the conversation and taking possession of it, that we shouldn’t f*ck up and get greedy-stupid like the right did during Dubya’s eight years. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I swear no fealty to the Dem Party; to paraphrase what Eli Pariser said in 2004, I bought it, it’s mine, and I’m taking it back. The old schoolers aren’t giving up without a fight, but they are eventually going to lose this war for the soul of the Dem Party.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard Dean’s leadership at the DNC was evidence of progressives’ effort to hollow out the Dem Party and take it back to its progressive roots.</p>
<p>We haven’t given up on that, but like every movement — and you can even point to the Movement Conservatives as examples — has its ups and downs.</p>
<p>We’re not done taking back the party, as the same reasons exist now that existed four to five years ago. Dean asked his supporters in late November 2004: do we start a third party, do we take back the party, or should he simply run again? </p>
<p>The numbers are still not there for a successful third party.</p>
<p>Dean or a true progressive like him will not win without a sizable, solid progressive organization fully behind him and prepared to win.</p>
<p>By the numbers this means we still have to consider taking back the party in order to win.</p>
<p>This will only happen if we continue our efforts to weed out the corporatist interests within the Dem Party, primary their incumbents and support our own candidates. This is not a job which can happen in two or four years, as we’ve just proven to ourselves; it’s a lifetime commitment. </p>
<p>I’ll point to the Movement Conservatives again as an example: it took the corporatists and the Bible-thumpers 30-plus years to get to the eight years they had with George W. Bush. It took them that long to move their party far enough to the right that Republicans like William Milliken (Michigan’s former governor) looks like a centrist Dem, and forced moderate Repubs like Mitt Romney to backpedal on everything they’ve ever believed. In doing so, the right-wing encouraged the development of radical far right groups to widen the Overton Window, making their new center look appealing in comparison (Dubya looked sane compared to Buchanan or Pat Robertson in 2000, yes?)</p>
<p>This should tell us that we not only need to continue to hammer away on centrists; we also need to encourage those farther to the left than we are. This is our role, this is our groove for the next two presidential elections at a minimum. We take every opportunity like the backdoor organizing going on at the moment (see my comment at 53) and then we run further and farther to the left with it on their dime.</p>
<p>And it should also tell us after shifting the conversation and taking possession of it, that we shouldn’t f*ck up and get greedy-stupid like the right did during Dubya’s eight years. </p>
<p>I swear no fealty to the Dem Party; to paraphrase what Eli Pariser said in 2004, I bought it, it’s mine, and I’m taking it back. The old schoolers aren’t giving up without a fight, but they are eventually going to lose this war for the soul of the Dem Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912126</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912126</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Who is ‘just letting things happen’?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is ‘just letting things happen’?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912125</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912125</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It’s not so much that it’s ‘instant gratification’ as that some crazy people will destroy so much to increase their own gratification. A system which allows that is truly bizarre.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not so much that it’s ‘instant gratification’ as that some crazy people will destroy so much to increase their own gratification. A system which allows that is truly bizarre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912121</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Financial industry reform, health care reform, a Greener world, education reform, ending the Iraq occupation, ending Gitmo, hopefully catching al-Zawahiri and bin Laden, a better economy, more marriage equality, better individual &amp; family financial security&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You know, all the usual stuff you *don’t* get from Repubs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Financial industry reform, health care reform, a Greener world, education reform, ending the Iraq occupation, ending Gitmo, hopefully catching al-Zawahiri and bin Laden, a better economy, more marriage equality, better individual &amp; family financial security</p>
<p>You know, all the usual stuff you *don’t* get from Repubs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sporkovat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912070</link>
		<dc:creator>sporkovat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912070</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;no other corral, yet. out in the open, getting rained on.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no other corral, yet. out in the open, getting rained on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BooRadley</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912062</link>
		<dc:creator>BooRadley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912062</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;x3&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>x3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sponson</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912061</link>
		<dc:creator>sponson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912061</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;STTPinOhio pointed out the same thing I did, but earlier.  Again, folks, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/16/AR2005061601570.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here is Milbank’s true attitude toward progressives.&lt;/a&gt;  And this was in 2005, not “just after the world changed” in 2002, which seems to make a difference to some people (idiots).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STTPinOhio pointed out the same thing I did, but earlier.  Again, folks, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/16/AR2005061601570.html" rel="nofollow">here is Milbank’s true attitude toward progressives.</a>  And this was in 2005, not “just after the world changed” in 2002, which seems to make a difference to some people (idiots).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BooRadley</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912060</link>
		<dc:creator>BooRadley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912060</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Terrific comment, thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific comment, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larue</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912059</link>
		<dc:creator>Larue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/06/04/dana-milbanks-750-word-quota-and-the-future-of-progressive-activism/#comment-1912059</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“many people who are paying attention to what is really being done are never coming back into the (D) corral.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But what corral are they herding INTO? Cuz if there IS another corral, I sure wanna know about it. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m in agreement with most of your thoughts . . . I’m NOT sure how many are defecting the D Corral, nor do I know where they might be bedding down at night if not in the Dem Corral.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“many people who are paying attention to what is really being done are never coming back into the (D) corral.”</p>
<p>But what corral are they herding INTO? Cuz if there IS another corral, I sure wanna know about it. </p>
<p>I’m in agreement with most of your thoughts . . . I’m NOT sure how many are defecting the D Corral, nor do I know where they might be bedding down at night if not in the Dem Corral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.266 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 23:22:37 -->

