Wouldn’t a woman have the right to defend her life with a doctor to thwart any percieved life threatening situations?

There are too many extremists willing to use the terrorist threat of murder to accomplish what they may feel is their God’s calling. Ashamed they will never be called upon by their God. Many religious tenents create the atmosphere of women as a secondary entity to man. maybe its from the fable of Adam giving up a rib to make Eve? Fact is men will never realize to birth or abort. Possibly through empathy he may get a glimpse.

Just a thought for the tormented of the faith. You know your old testamnet when your brittleness breaks in the wind for God then was a jealous God and very unforgiving. Where New Testament, Jesus forgave all.

How many embryos must die to firtilize a sterile woman with a baby?

When will they care as much for the born? And if they new that a woman was carrying the next Adolf Hitler, an atheist or a gay person. Would they approve of abortion or just what till it is born to water board Jesus into them?

These are terrorists. When they were demanding Americans to stand in courts of law with the 10 commandments of their religion on the wall in front of me. Killing the judge was nowhere to be found and never will be.

here’s a start.

We need to counter the “rare” meme, which has infected our side too, as in “safe, legal, and rare.” I want it safe and legal, and the main reason is that it never has been and never will be rare. I want fewer abortions because all procedures have risks. But abortion never will be rare.

I’d like to see a feminist website asking women to “come out” and say they’ve had abortions and tell their stories.

My response to the demonization of late-term abortions as something a wicked woman just decides to do sometime in the 7th or 8th month? I talk about my mother who had a late-term abortion when I was 7, and how glad I am that she did, because I needed my mommy, as did my 9-year-old brother, and my stepfather needed his spouse, and my mother needed her life. And she needed to get the safest procedure possible.

I also have been through multiple pregnancies and feel it would be cruel to ask a woman to carry a child to term that had no chance of survival. That some women do go ahead and have the full term child is their decision which I also honor. But it must be their informed choice and not imposed by law.

This man cannot understand that the procedure was not used to terminate just any old pregnancy and that it was typically used by women who figured out too late in the pregnancy that they didn’t want the baby and would prefer to have a dog or a BMW instead.

He said he had done his research; I, on the other hand, suggested he do his research somewhere other than the Heritage Fund website.

I’ve come to the conclusion that I cannot have a battle of wits with someone that is unarmed.

On a different note (Cb, maybe?)

That would “b” fine with me

I am both pro-life and pro-choice but I think people of good will on both sides of the equation could understand the mother’s decision to end it there. The alternative was to carry another month and face certain death then, as opposed to certain death at the time.

Does anyone want the government to be making this decision?