<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Apologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:02:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paz3</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909954</link>
		<dc:creator>paz3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909954</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;If this guy was a Democrat, the AP would be all over this story. Is it legal to mention AP?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, yes, so long as you remember that “AP” stands for “Apathetic Press.” Don’t they just phone it in these days?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If this guy was a Democrat, the AP would be all over this story. Is it legal to mention AP?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, yes, so long as you remember that “AP” stands for “Apathetic Press.” Don’t they just phone it in these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix Woman</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909943</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909943</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly.  The GOP/Media Complex in action.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.  The GOP/Media Complex in action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix Woman</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909942</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909942</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Heh!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix Woman</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909941</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909941</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No. Kidding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It shows both the laziness of the TradMed and their utter subservience to the Republican Party.  There’s a reason I refer to them as “the GOP/Media Complex”.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. Kidding.</p>
<p>It shows both the laziness of the TradMed and their utter subservience to the Republican Party.  There’s a reason I refer to them as “the GOP/Media Complex”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hackworth1</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909881</link>
		<dc:creator>hackworth1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 17:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909881</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing from the AP on Epstein? I’ll bet Olbermann will report it on Monday. If this guy was a Democrat, the AP would be all over this story. Is it legal to mention AP?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing from the AP on Epstein? I’ll bet Olbermann will report it on Monday. If this guy was a Democrat, the AP would be all over this story. Is it legal to mention AP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twain</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909874</link>
		<dc:creator>Twain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 15:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909874</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You really MUST stay current on the latest bling and stuff. You might miss an exciting article regarding Michelle’s arms ! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really MUST stay current on the latest bling and stuff. You might miss an exciting article regarding Michelle’s arms ! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foothillsmike</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909873</link>
		<dc:creator>foothillsmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 15:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Buchanon and Tancredo should have no difficulty replacing Epstein. KKK is on speed dial at the office.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buchanon and Tancredo should have no difficulty replacing Epstein. KKK is on speed dial at the office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STTPinOhio</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909872</link>
		<dc:creator>STTPinOhio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 15:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909872</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Angelina’s new tattoo&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Damn, I missed that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here I was thinking I was all current on the important issues, and that slipped through the cracks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Angelina’s new tattoo</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Damn, I missed that.</p>
<p>Here I was thinking I was all current on the important issues, and that slipped through the cracks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbl2</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909871</link>
		<dc:creator>cbl2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 15:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909871</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mornin’ Phoenix Woman and Firedogs,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drivin’ by, busy family week end.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Broadway Show while disaster looms ? at taxpayer’s expense you say  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadway.com/Condoleezza-Rice-Kicks-Up-Her-Heels-at-Spamalot/broadway_photos/517286&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;did the First Lady wear Pappagallos ??&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mornin’ Phoenix Woman and Firedogs,</p>
<p>drivin’ by, busy family week end.</p>
<p>Broadway Show while disaster looms ? at taxpayer’s expense you say  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.broadway.com/Condoleezza-Rice-Kicks-Up-Her-Heels-at-Spamalot/broadway_photos/517286" rel="nofollow">did the First Lady wear Pappagallos ??</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaltinWound</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909870</link>
		<dc:creator>SaltinWound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 15:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/31/all-apologies-2/#comment-1909870</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I assume Scarecrow would like the quote to mean “Latinas might have some unique experience worth bringing to the Supreme Court,” because that’s how Scarecrow represents the quote. I assume Phoenix Woman would like the quote to say something similar to what O’Connor said, since that’s how she represents it. In both cases, the only way the quote could come close to meaning what they want it to mean is with a clarification, which is what we got uyesterday. I really don’t see what the problem is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume Scarecrow would like the quote to mean “Latinas might have some unique experience worth bringing to the Supreme Court,” because that’s how Scarecrow represents the quote. I assume Phoenix Woman would like the quote to say something similar to what O’Connor said, since that’s how she represents it. In both cases, the only way the quote could come close to meaning what they want it to mean is with a clarification, which is what we got uyesterday. I really don’t see what the problem is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
