Rising unemployment is triggering a new wave of foreclosures:
Economists refer to the current surge of foreclosures as the third wave, distinct from the initial spike when speculators gave up property because of plunging real estate prices, and the secondary shock, when borrowers’ introductory interest rates expired and were reset higher.
“We’re right in the middle of this third wave, and it’s intensifying,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com. “That loss of jobs and loss of overtime hours and being forced from a full-time to part-time job is resulting in defaults. They’re coast to coast.”
Those sliding into foreclosure today are more likely to be modest borrowers whose loans fit their income than the consumers of exotically lenient mortgages that formerly typified the crisis.
Economy.com expects that 60 percent of the mortgage defaults this year will be set off primarily by unemployment, up from 29 percent last year.
The wingnuts have turned this into their own little morality play with themselves at the center, as solid citizens taking responsibility for their personal finances as opposed to the pot-smoking hippie losers who took on mortgages they couldn’t afford. And then they all teabag each other.
The truth is that Americans made decisions about their financial future based on assurances by the Chairman of the Federal Reserve and others that the value of their homes would never go down, and believed that it was a safe place to concentrate their assets. Now the bubble has burst, their 401Ks are worthless, and they’re losing their jobs. They owe more money on their houses than they are worth, and walking away becomes not only a sane economic decision, but a matter of financial survival.
The Center for Responsible Lending (PDF) says that foreclosures on subprime loans through the end of 2009 will result in a decline in property value for homes in the surrounding areas of $352 billion, or an average of $8,667 per home. This will drive even more people underwater, and perpetuate the downward spiral–but bankruptcy judges can’t step in, write principle down to current value, and try to stem this thing because the little lizard wingnut brain can’t execute simple math.
Banks are counting on them, because they know eventually the government will have to step in and pay them off. That’s why they paid over $42 million to lobbyists who were working to defeat cramdown in 1Q 2009. They got a lot of help from simple minded wingnuts who don’t understand anything more complex then their selfish little lizard brains, and demagogues like Jon Tester who absolutely do know better. Add an administration that doesn’t have the courage to take them on and do what’s right for the economic security of the country and things just get worse from here.
The banks certainly do "own the place," but not without a lot of help.
Update: I see Atrios is there too: "If this is the third wave, then there will also be a fourth, when option ARM rates start recasting. Good thing the banksters got rid of bankruptcy cramdown, because we’ll get to bail them out again."
Related posts:
- Does MERS Registration and Mortgage Fractionalization Extinguish Mortgage Rights?
- NY Bankruptcy Court Wipes out MERS-Registered Mortgage; New Trend in Foreclosures?
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Les Leopold, The Looting of America
- The Next Big Taxpayer Bailout? IMF Could Get Hundreds of Billions for European Banks
- Surprise: No Jobs Means No Consumer-Led Recovery





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Well, maybe Jon Tester will be primaried? I’m so sick of the dems that act and vote like republicans. Will somebody please get the hook for Ben Nelson?
Nelson’s an anomaly, he’s in a state that would otherwise be totally red. Tester has no such excuse.
As long as it is more profitable for the pols to support the banksters as opposed to their constituents, they will continue to act the way they do.
I got laid off in Sept, found a new gig in Feb at 50% of my previous income. Been able to hold it together so far, but who knows for how long? Ask any wingnut how long they could hold it together after taking a 50% hit.
Lysander Spooner said that either the Constitution brought all this upon us or was powerless to prevent it. In either case, it was unfit to exist. That was in the antebellum period.
you want to know what’s amazing?
I was just listening to a 2004 braodcast of thom hartmann’s, he predicted these exact happenstances and they are happening almost as if by script
Yes, bring out the hook for that guy, jeez louise!
Did you see Crosstimbers comment at Christy’s this morning?
this is one of the reasons we need franken in the senate and pronto, his main theme is that elections need to be publicly funded
we really need to stop allowing these for profit corporations the ability to buy our law
Ha! Too funny.
Hey Twisted, hope you can keep it together. That is a blow.
Great post, but either you or the CRL you quoted was a bit sloppy implying most of the problem to date has been “subprime”. They may be subprime borrowers now, but for the most part they weren’t when they were given those loans. That feeling? That’s Tanta giving you the hairy eyeball from the great beyond for repeating that meme. Atrios just had a snit about it too.
OT
Cool pic of Michelle.
W.A.S.F.
Our only hope is that the constituents of these CongressCritters might be persuaded to use Enhanced Interrogation Techniques on their reps. back home.
W.A.S.F
.
Actually, the math their wingnut brains can execute involved counting the pieces of silver from the Mortgage Bankers Association (and that extends to Democratic/Blue Dog proto-wingnuts too).
It’s disgusting that our “representatives” have managed to forget us until election time, and spend the rest of their days being wined/dined/lobbied by the powerful and wealthy and then come back to us asking to be returned to the very offices that allow them to do us so much harm.
Will the landscape “change” as much as we all hoped with Obama? No, I think not… he’s a corporate Democrat who probably spent a good deal of the 90’s admiring the Clinton DLC model, and likely figuring a way to emulate it without the baggage of Bubba and Hill. Otherwise, why would he not use the power of the “bully pulpit” to stand against the Mortgate Bankers, Credit Card companies and others who are serving their own interests and not ours.
Republicans knocked America over, Corporate Democrats are kicking us while we’re down.
22 months after the housing bubble burst on August 9, 2007 and 8 1/2 months after the financial meltdown of September 15, 2008, not one of the fundamental problems that underlie these crises has been addressed in anything like a serious fashion.
In the face of increasing indebtedness, more homeowners underwater, increased numbers of foreclosures, does anyone think that a recovery is possible?
There remain workable, real world solutions to these and the other economic and financial problems surrounding the collapse but the window of opportunity is closing. Resources committed to stupid, wasteful, even corrupt programs are resources that won’t be available where they will be really needed.
And if you look around, the political leadership to enact these solutions is across the board absent. In other words, this looks to end badly.
Tester said this about cramdown after it was defeated:
How ignorant is that? It’s what comes of listening to lobbyists instead of actually learning about something new.
OT: Per Glenzilla this morning:
Just fuckin’ great!!!
And then the banks will start selling off all the foreclosed property and you can look at the bottom of the well for the “recovery”. the 4th wave.
Yes, see emptywheel.
Since an Military Enlistment Contract isn’t a deal, “Stop Loss” says the Government can keep you in the Military however long they wish-and they do. Social Security is apparently not a deal, we paid in our money every single pay check and now they want to change the deal for a second time, ignoring the fact if the Government would have ever intended to act in good faith there would be no Social Security “crisis”. They cheated us out of all that money we paid into the SS Trust Fund and Tester has the balls to tell me that a “Deal is deal”?
I’m not in as bad shape as you might think. My wife graduates from nursing school in December. Just need to hang in until then.
nonplussed, I thought this was clear by now. A deal is a deal if it benefits politicians. A deal is not a deal if it doesn’t.
Lives in the Balance
“because we’ll get to bail them out again” ; if that happens, you can kiss this nation’s AAA rating goodbye (if it’s not already gone by then) and find that the U.S. is in deed and fact a ‘banana republic’.
23 years later and what has changed? (rhetorical q)
The people who implied that housing values could keep going up forever (and that it was a good idea to use the house as a piggy-bank) are the same ones who also implied that the stock market would go up forever, and that profits would never end.
Liars, every f*cking one of them.
Who do they think will buy the houses and the stock, if we’re all unemployed or in minimum-wage or part-time jobs? There aren’t that many people with spare money out there any more, and they all have houses and stock accounts already.
I love it when banksters get all moral about “a deal’s a deal” as far as people supposed to pay their mortgages when the value of their home becomes less than their mortgage balance.
Why doesn’t this also apply to banksters? Why are WE giving them trillions of dollars? Why aren’t they living up to their own responsibilities? Why are they abandoning foreclosure proceedings against homeowners in areas like Detroit where houses are worthless, tossing the bills and the interest and the fines and penalties back on homeowners who couldn’t afford to make the payments on the homes in the first place. Because its less costly to the banksters in the long run to not live up to their obligations.
So why is it supposed to be different for individuals? Hey, individuals need to do the moral thing and live up to their contracts, but as far as banks, its just business as usual – you know, morality is for PEOPLE, not for corporations – corp’s are just about money, not morality – that’s just how it is, don’t you know that.
Somehow I think more and more formerly moral individuals are not going to agree with the banksters on this one.
Every dollar your house looses in value – because of deregulation,
every dollar more you pay for pharmacuticals – because of new IP legislation,
every dollar more you pay on credit card debt – because there are no limits on usury,
every dollar more you pay for gasoline – because of unregulated hedge speculation,
– Is in effect, a form of – UNREGULATED TAXATION – put upon the American people at the whim and exclusive benefit to the financial elite. Every time the government ignores its duty to regulate financial intercourse in the name of small government and low taxes, it is simply turning that function and ability over to someone else, who are more than willing to take up the slack. Every time the government ignores its duty to regulate financial intercourse in the name of small government and low taxes, it also removes transparency, accountability, representation, and possible recourse in lieu of what is paid out.
Every time the government ignores its duty to regulate the financial intercourse in the name of small government and low taxes – we get screwed.
The next wave of foreclosures will come when the states with underfunded budgets keep raising school and property taxes. My tax just went up 25% this year and already the state legislature is talking about raising it again. I don’t see my Social Security going up 25-50% to pay for this and for all the other rising bills (particularly utilities and food). A lot of old people out here (Pennsylvania) have their homes up for sale, hoping to get out before the cap on the electric company is removed in 2010. I’d do the same if I could figure out where I could afford to live but I’m afraid the entire country is going down the tubes.
Wow! That’s a great pic. Tres moderne chic.
When a lot of rich people start losing their corporate headquarters and malls and other properties bought with bad (or decent, but now underwater) loans I wonder what people like Tester will then say. Does it make any sense that someone (or group of partners) should lose the biggest investment of their lives to a bad or underwater mortgage any more than an individual should lose their home to the same kind of problem?
What if the rich can save all their second homes and their investment properties, but nobody can save their first home, their residence? Isn’t that insane?
When the rich come yelling to Congress about losing their properties, then I guess we’ll see Congress stand at attention and take their marching orders.
Wasn’t Tester one of those supported here or on Daily KOS or Both? I gave to the SOB, but never again.