Except, of course, that after the last eight years, it’s all too believable.
As the US was preparing for and conducting the war in Iraq, a high ranking general in military intelligence and his staff prepared daily intelligence briefings for the senior DOD officials and the President. Every day, the report needed a cover sheet, and every day, they gave it one:
On this particular morning [April 10, 2003], it showed the statue of Saddam Hussein being pulled down in Firdos Square, a grateful Iraqi child kissing an American soldier, and jubilant crowds thronging the streets of newly liberated Baghdad. And above these images, and just below the headline secretary of defense, was a quote that may have raised some eyebrows. It came from the Bible, from the book of Psalms: “Behold, the eye of the Lord is on those who fear Him…To deliver their soul from death.”
This mixing of Crusades-like messaging with war imagery, which until now has not been revealed, had become routine. On March 31, a U.S. tank roared through the desert beneath a quote from Ephesians: “Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand.” On April 7, Saddam Hussein struck a dictatorial pose, under this passage from the First Epistle of Peter: “It is God’s will that by doing good you should silence the ignorant talk of foolish men.”
Unbelievable. A slideshow of some of the covers is here, and every one of them makes me sick. Every. Damn. One.
But it gets worse.
These cover sheets were the brainchild of Major General Glen Shaffer, a director for intelligence serving both the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the secretary of defense. In the days before the Iraq war, Shaffer’s staff had created humorous covers in an attempt to alleviate the stress of preparing for battle. Then, as the body counting began, Shaffer, a Christian, deemed the biblical passages more suitable. Several others in the Pentagon disagreed. At least one Muslim analyst in the building had been greatly offended; others privately worried that if these covers were leaked during a war conducted in an Islamic nation, the fallout—as one Pentagon staffer would later say—“would be as bad as Abu Ghraib.”
But the Pentagon’s top officials were apparently unconcerned about the effect such a disclosure might have on the conduct of the war or on Bush’s public standing. When colleagues complained to Shaffer that including a religious message with an intelligence briefing seemed inappropriate, Shaffer politely informed them that the practice would continue, because “my seniors”—JCS chairman Richard Myers, Rumsfeld, and the commander in chief himself—appreciated the cover pages.
Shaffer is yet another general who would have been better off leaving the preaching to the preachers. But if he’s going to mess around with religion, I suppose that entitles me to poke around in military intelligence for a moment.
The purpose of a military intelligence briefing is to present the best assessment of current threats to and opportunities for the US military as it goes about its business of protecting the nation. Using religion to sell intelligence assessments is an affront to both intelligence professionals and to people of faith — any faith — as well as to people who claim no faith at all. There is no reason at all for any kind of religious language in a briefing like this — none whatsoever.
No legitimate reason, that is.
I can easily imagine Stephen Cambone, David Addington, and Dick Cheney looking at one of these and saying "Here’s how to make the sale with the President on the war: dress up your intelligence briefings in religion. Appeal to his faith, and feed his certainty that God is on his side. Nothing will put him into a receptive mood faster."
Unbelievable.
But if this is what it took to get Bush’s undivided attention, I wish someone had put a report on Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, and the CIA secret detention programs on Bush’s desk with a cover that included this: "Remember those who are in prison, as though you were in prison with them; those who are being tortured, as though you yourselves were being tortured. –Hebrews 13:3".
Related posts:






Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Rumsfeld is evil to the core. And Bush isn’t any better, falling for this crap.
If you want smarmy to convince the prez to do what you want, have you ever heard tapes of Kissinger sucking up to Nixon?
I’m not offended by the suck up aspect, but they’re a foreign policy disaster, just as bad as the torture pics.
Unbelievable
I don’t think so.
We’ve never done anything like this. . .oh, wait, godless commies?
Sort of says it all.
Dear Mr President, we haven’t got a prayer on a mission like this.
OR
Dear Mr. President God says it’s okay to order our troops to murder innocents, based on lies.
Thank you for this, peterr. A terrible story.
I’m particularly irked that they used Ephesians 6, a favorite of mine.
And Bush is enough of a dipshit to fall for this, too.
Oh, and they’re a foreign relations disaster in precisely the way that U.S.ers won’t understand. The majority of the country would think it’s perfectly fine to pepper military documents with biblical quotes and won’t understand why people in the Muslim world would possibly be offended.
Bunch of double dippers. /s Using it, and falling for it.
I’ll bet they didn’t use Exodus 20:13.
Their mamas didn’t learn them their proverbs.
Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
Better it is to be of an humble spirit with the lowly, than to divide the spoil with the proud.
Too bad.
Seriously, that is too bad for all of us.
Peterr apologizes for not being here at present, but he will check back in later.
The Republicans exploited evangelicals to get their vote…It doesn’t surprise me that they would also exploit their zealotry within ranks in the pursuit of military policies, or backchannel similar sentiments to the waterhead-in-chief, as a stratagem of finessing him and playing to his Marianas Trench of subconscious fears.Crusaders, ho!
Those who place logical thinking beneath their religion deserve the benefits of neither.
The military has become it’s own right wing evangelical cabal. As offensive as these report covers are—and they truly are—it seems that Christian fundamentalism has filtered through every arm of our military. If you don’t fall in line with Christ, you don’t belong.
I wonder if anything at all is happening up and down the ranks to stop this kind of practice.
I wonder if they photoshopped smiling faces and halos before showing Jr. some patriotic torture photos.
Not just Muslims. People in Western Europe think Americans are religious yahoos.
Considering the GQ author wrote a glowing book about the Pentagon’s warmaking, I wonder if someone inside thought leaking these would help somehow? Truly heinous, and likely more awful than the torture photos when it comes to heart and minds. This proves to any Muslim that Bush waged a Christian war.
You mean like their Xtian missionary role?
Well, the U.S. hasn’t invaded Europe yet, so it’s not as important what they think. The U.S. regularly attacks Islamic countries (or has U.S. proxies do it).
Read the link at 19 if you need any more evidence that it’s a religious crusade.
I can easily imagine Stephen Cambone, David Addington, and Dick Cheney looking at one of these and saying “Here’s how to make the sale with the President on the war: dress up your intelligence briefings in religion. Appeal to his faith, and feed his certainty that God is on his side. Nothing will put him into a receptive mood faster.”
that and the cliff notes to the ‘left behind’ series.
gw thought he was a character in it. ’saving’ the world.
(and yes, i read them all, so i know.)
Here’s the original story about U.S. soldiers doing Xtian missionary work. It was on al Jazeera, which means that the whole Muslim world knows all about it, as they probably learned on al Jazeera about these memo covers today.
that’s part of it.
Not a new story.
Their mamas didn’t learn them their pronounsverbs.
heh.
The one with the passage from Isaiah 26 was cool wasn’t it? Was that tempting fate or not? The U.S. is the “righteous nation” entering these Iraqi gates. Those folks were wacky, that is for sure. For a Christian, I think that passage is about the endtimes, humble, righteous nation of the faithful just before the second coming and resurrection. Dude, talk about tempting fate and blasphemous pride.
But, whatever, if it feels good right now, go ahead, believe it.
If I had been the President, and some one had walked in with those cover sheets, I would have put a stop to it, found out how it happened, and had a little talk with everyone involved.
And even though I don’t particularly believe in that kind of thing, everyone involved would have had to do a day of prayer and fasting and gnashing of teeth. I would have demanded that they bring me their rent clothing.
I would have an intervention with the Xtians: “Ah, dude, did it ever occur to you that you might be a fricken heretic? I’d like to discuss that possibility with you.” But as President, would that be appropriate?
The AF Academy Xtianization has been going on for decades. I asked Charlie Brown, a BlueAmerica candidate who didn’t win, and an AF Academy graduate, whether it was so, and why. He said reports were accurate, but gave me a confusing answer as to why, having to do with being the newest academy, having identity issues, etc. I didn’t really get a clear idea why it turned out that way. I think foothillsmike’s son is a grad, so if he’s around he might want to chime in.
“Ah, dude, did it ever occur to you that you might be a fricken heretic?….But as President, would that be appropriate?
the president to whom you’re referring would first have to have had someone define the word “heretic” for him.
RE:”Dressing Up Intelligence Briefings with Religion”
BUSH TOLD CHIRAC: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East”
FROM THE ARTICLE “When God Spoke to Me”: …..During those private interviews, Jacque Chirac had purportedly confessed to the journalist some personal remarks regarding the faith of George W. Bush that seemed quite daunting. He told the journalist that the latter called him twice beseeching him basically, in the name of their common “spiritual faith”, i.e., “Christianity”, to join the collective effort of the coalition being formed to wage a preemptive war against Iraq. In his first telephonic call he reportedly said to Jacque Chirac: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East” and then added that “the biblical prophecies are being fulfilled”…..
ENTIRE ARTICLE – http://www.palestinechronicle……p?id=14890
Bush believed he was on a mission from his God, who made him president. His warmaking was his God’s work; he answered to a higher Father, not his pop. Having just watched Elizabeth: The Golden Years, I understand the warmaking bankruptcy of a religious fanatic. Spain was broke ten years after Philip deforested Spain to build the soon-sunk Armada. He was on a quest, as Elizabeth well saw, to bring the Inquisition to England.
Religious wars are the only wars, really — our twentieth century world wars and skirmishes will be seen by historians as the exception, with Bush’s wars a return to the norm.
Hmm… that AF “identity issues” is still causing problems.
After the other forces got their own logistics and close air support forces, the Air Force was about flyboy dogfights and blowing up the world.
And then, after the Cold War was over, blowing up the world is on the back burner. I guess that is having some weird psychological effects.
Wonder if the same thing is going on in the Russian nuclear missile forces?
“I do not have a tick in my hahr”
“Git it off me!! Git it offa meeee!!!!” “Oh good, that was a close one.”
707
Someone needs to ask Bob Gates if he stopped this practice, and if so, when and why?
Jesus Christ did not espouse violence…turn the other cheek…these people are not Christians…they act like the anti christ, cherry picking scriptures (mostly Old Testement) to justify their purposes.
Eye for an eye tooth for a tooth comes from the Bushco WH Isreali citizens.
A differnet crew under Obama but like minded just the same.
If Bush believed he should be a witness to Christ, which he did not, then the wars would have been stopped.
The Endless War was just posted by Thomas Ricks. Military Industrial Complez rules money for robber banksters and wars while poeverty grows widespread at home.
I’m not kidding about the character in the left behind series, even has a daughter.
It’s in Colorado Springs. Sound familiar? Focus on the Family is also HQ’ed there. Just a coincidence I’m sure.
“This proves to any Muslim that Bush waged a Christian war.”
Jewish War
According to House of War by James Carroll, it was Gorbychev who was responsible for the end of the Cold War, and Reagan wouldn’t even take yes for an answer in denuking disgussions. So if that assessment is accurate, I’d guess that the Russian military, all the way thru, is adjusting better than the U.S. And too, there’s something about losing that forces an adjustment.
Caption above the image of Sadam on Iraqi television
It’s God’s will that by doing good you should silence talk of foolish men
unbelievable.
I was being sarcastic. Of course the version of Christianity that these people espouse would have Jesus reeling.
As for the “eye for an eye” quote—one of my pet peeves—in a lawless crazy age, this practice was put into place to LIMIT the level of retribution allowable. It wasn’t intended to be a prescription for violence.
All of the blood and gore that has been done in the name of faith (of any kind) just makes me crazy. If the one thread that runs through all religious faiths is one form or another of the golden rule, then all faiths have failed miserably in their realization.
IIRC, Brown didn’t think that was important as a cause. There’s probably a good relationship now though. I don’t know anything about the subject, I’m just repeating a single conversation, so don’t take my word for any of this without another source.
If these Xtian fundies are heretics (and I believe that these Dispensationalist Fundies hankering for the Endtimes and agitating to get them started are heretics) then you can twist any text into an internally consistent maze of codewords that give you the meaning you want.
Jesus on the earth as a teacher of spiritual wisdom, brotherly love, and peace is SO previouis dispensation.
The &^%$!! Jews turned him down, so God called off that dispensation and now we have a new one. Jesus is the Warrior Christ coming back to divide the sheep from the goats, and he is gonna kick some hellacous A. And it is our job (as good Christians) to help him out and get things started.
A good Christian killing evildoers for Christ is not a contradiction in many of these peoples’ eyes.
The whole fundie thing has gone seriously off the rails over the last 30 years. Even Billy Graham is an old time fundamentalist who would not presume to act that way in God’s name. If that anecdote is true, I do believe that Graham told GW not to try to read God’s mind. But these people think that they can, and they talk like they know everything.
(Just so I do not start a religious/atheist flame war, I do not believe in that kind of mythological Christian dogma.)
If he believed this it was only because the people whispering in his ear were fluffing his ego to believe it and they pushed him along.
I find it hard to believe that he believed in anything other than his own ambition to be better than his daddy.
Ricks didn’t answer any of the Qs about The Long War, not mine, nor TCU. I asked directly, esp wrt SOFA, someone else asked about SOFA, and TCU asked wrt costs. Didn’t answer any of them.
For almost 300 years Christians refused to go into war for the Roman State, or any other. They were truly pacifists. The soldiers who converted were expected to resign from their participation in war. The use of such literature would have no grounding in true Christianity.
Eli’s torturing upstairs.
For these fundamentalists, the spiritual history of mankind is like a cardgame. God deals out a hand (a dispensation), and stupid mankind plays it wrong. So, God says, “dude, you messed up the hand again, so it is like over, and I should kill you, but I am gracious so I won’t. I will deal out another hand”).
So then God deals out another hand of another card game with different rules, which he announces as he is dealing.
Dang sarn it dingity dangitall if mankind does not mess up the next hand.
So, we are like on the sixth or seventh dispensation. Adam and Eve had one, Noah hand one, Abraham had one, etc.
The Xtian’s who are so “pro-Israel” really want to help start Armageddon. The Jews are on the hot seat now because they turned down the last dispensation (the “nice Jesus” dispensation). So, sometime into the Armageddon thing, the Jews, who have been preserved, get to choose to convert and go to heaven, or fall into the bottomless lake of fire.
If you define words just right and devise enough rules for textual interpretation, it is all there in the Bible, just staring at you plain as the noonday son.
I wonder if W ever turned the page, or if he just looked at the pretty covers.
Interesting comment”…limit retribution allowable”. As in, 9/11 we lost 3,000 so in biblical times we could have the head of 3,000?
Gaza bombing by our closest ally Isreal. Bombing Baghdad and other Iraq cities. Venomous hatred mongering and venting.
The chest bump at the Airforce Academy with Bush and a graduating cadet. “Bring it on” bush quote…drone bombing in Pakistan…
And the killing goes on and on and on…
in Biblical times, yes—at least in theory. Not that I would want to do the same now, but IF we were playing by those rules, we would have stopped the war long long ago.
I don’t know what it is in the human psyche that allows us to do such things to one another. It is beyond my ability to comprehend. And our society is fed one violent thing after another after another which both desensitizes us and glamorizes violent acts. I despair of it all.
Ricks said 15 years or maybe permanently locked in. (my guess is the put the wrong people in power for their long term purposes).
But somewhat agree with your ststement he answered the question skillfully with the art non answer). He did say he would keep preemptive attacks on the table if nukes are involved. That is the new talking point for more military build up.
Rumsfeld signed the PNAC letter asking Clinton for an invasion of Iraq.
See: http://www.newamericancentury……letter.htm
It’s only natural that Rumsfeld (PNAC) would try to make Bush feel holy about attacking Iraq in order to reinforce his resolve.
I’m thinking the Israeli right-wing nuts were helping pick out the appropriate battle cry. Their reward for the crusade? Not oil–
water from the Tigris and Euphrates.
Those briefings were for President Bush? For a minute I thought they were written with Sarah Palin in mind.
And I suspect that these same folks were misquoting the Koran to show that the Muslims were an evil people. In fact these quotes don’t really show or suggest what the are supposed to mean when placed within their context.
For example Ephesians 6 is all about obeying any earthly power without protest, since the battle is not with human earthly rulers, but with the evil spiritual entities in the realm of darkness. Even slaves are admonished to obey, without protest, their masters. And those Christians who hold slaves are not told to emancipate them, but to merely show mercy to ones slaves.
Then there are the tracts from Joshua 1. Those verses are essentially granting the Israelites the right to expel all the occupants of the lands of Canaan and the Amorites and Ammonites. And if one explores what happens in the upcoming verses its essentially genocide, rape, and pillage. In just the prior verse Moses had battled with the Kings of Sihon and Og, who resisted the armies of Israel from entering their kingdoms for fear that they would take from the hard earned crops of the farmers and the flocks of the shepherds. Moses did little to assuage such concerns, pointing out that this was precisely what they intended to do when they reached Canaan.
So what happened to Sihon and Og? The Israelites destroyed their armies in battle and the defenseless population was destroyed, even if there was “less than a tenth, burn the land”. Sixty cities were utterly razed, with all herds and treasure taken. Not a soldier was available to raise their hand to this…as they were wiped out on the field of battle.
One really wonders if such quote miners bother to actually read their Scripture? What would people think if the found that the quotes taken are clearly associated with verses about genocide?
This isn’t the only time that Republicans have weaponized Christianisty.
The Reagan Administration was helped into office by the Guatemalan far-right through illegal campaign contributions.
Israel taught them how to kill and oppress the Mayans, loaded em up with helicopters and setup an ammunitions factory. Republicans funnelled them money through USAID, although congress denied funding for weapons.
…
Meanwhile, Rios Montt surrounded himself with advisers, both North American and Guatemalan, from his Verbo church, and what appeared to be a loose coalition of right-wing fundamentalist organizations, most notably Pat Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network, began an extensive fundraising drive and also started sending volunteers to Ixil Triangle villages under military control. Rios Montt chose Love Lift International, the “relief arm” of Gospel Outreach, Verbo’s parent church, to carry the food and supplies purchased with the money raised. Verbo representatives, along with an older evangelical outfit, the Wycliffe Bible Translators (WBT/SIL,
Summer Institute of Linguistics, an organization whose CIA connections are long and impeccable and which has often been charged with involvement in massacres of indigenous peoples throughout the Americas),
Allow me to quote an ancient warning that seems particularly applicable to Bush crowd:
And what should be considered “good fruit”?
I’m not asking anybody here to believe any of this, but the next you get ahold of one of those wingnut Christians, ask them to compare those Enhanced Interrogation Techniques to Matthew 25.
Was your turn of that phrase intended or unintended?
Thanks William, that passage from Matthew 25 guided me to work overseas. It was kind of a to-do list.
Some of us in the US are not Christians, who are not/have not been thrilled.
Where are all those generals now? How many are still working in this Admin.?