<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Come Saturday Morning:  Social Security is Safer than Your 401K</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:16:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTlil</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1900353</link>
		<dc:creator>CTlil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 04:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1900353</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Remove the cap on F I C A and we’ll and be able to reduce the 6.2 cents per dollar we, the majority, pay towards SS………….&lt;br /&gt;
“Social Security (FICA) Tax for Employees&lt;br /&gt;
The Social Security Administration (SSA) has announced that the Social Security taxable wage base will increase to $106,800 (up from $102,000 in 2008).  That means up to $4,800 more of an employee’s wages could be subject to the Social Security portion of the FICA tax for 2009.  The FICA tax rate will hold steady at 7.65% for 2009.  (The Social Security portion of the FICA rate is 6.2%; the Medicare portion is 1.45%.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FICA tax is composed of two portions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OASDI (Old Age, Survivors, Disability Insurance) or better known as the Social Security tax.  The 2009 FICA taxable wages are capped at $106,800 (up from $102,000 in 2008).  The maximum amount of Social Security taxes to be paid in 2009 will be $6,621.60 based upon this $106,800 cap.&lt;br /&gt;
Medicare (Hospital Insurance).  Medicare tax applies to all FICA taxable wages.  There is no cap for this tax.  The 2009 Medicare tax is computed as 1.45% of all FICA taxable wages.  For example, for FICA taxable earnings of $106,800, the Medicare tax would be $1,548.60.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Therefore, for the first $106,800 in FICA taxable earnings, employees will pay a combined tax amount of $8,170.20 ($6,621.60 + $1,548.60).  All FICA taxable earnings in excess of $106,800 will continue to be taxed at the rate of 1.45% for Medicare.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remove the cap on F I C A and we’ll and be able to reduce the 6.2 cents per dollar we, the majority, pay towards SS………….<br />
“Social Security (FICA) Tax for Employees<br />
The Social Security Administration (SSA) has announced that the Social Security taxable wage base will increase to $106,800 (up from $102,000 in 2008).  That means up to $4,800 more of an employee’s wages could be subject to the Social Security portion of the FICA tax for 2009.  The FICA tax rate will hold steady at 7.65% for 2009.  (The Social Security portion of the FICA rate is 6.2%; the Medicare portion is 1.45%.)</p>
<p>FICA tax is composed of two portions:</p>
<p>OASDI (Old Age, Survivors, Disability Insurance) or better known as the Social Security tax.  The 2009 FICA taxable wages are capped at $106,800 (up from $102,000 in 2008).  The maximum amount of Social Security taxes to be paid in 2009 will be $6,621.60 based upon this $106,800 cap.<br />
Medicare (Hospital Insurance).  Medicare tax applies to all FICA taxable wages.  There is no cap for this tax.  The 2009 Medicare tax is computed as 1.45% of all FICA taxable wages.  For example, for FICA taxable earnings of $106,800, the Medicare tax would be $1,548.60.</p>
<p>Therefore, for the first $106,800 in FICA taxable earnings, employees will pay a combined tax amount of $8,170.20 ($6,621.60 + $1,548.60).  All FICA taxable earnings in excess of $106,800 will continue to be taxed at the rate of 1.45% for Medicare.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wmd1961</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1900009</link>
		<dc:creator>wmd1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1900009</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Social Security is fixable and worth fixing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However - in 2016 receipts from payroll taxes will be less that expenditures on benefits. The “trust fund” will be needed. And this trust fund is a big IOU. The money needed to pay benefits in 2016 has to come from somewhere, most likely from increased payroll tax receipts (lifting the income tax may be enough). To actually use the “trust funds” would require other tax revenues. This could happen via productivity increases or higher general taxes or a combination.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social Security is fixable and worth fixing.</p>
<p>However &#8211; in 2016 receipts from payroll taxes will be less that expenditures on benefits. The “trust fund” will be needed. And this trust fund is a big IOU. The money needed to pay benefits in 2016 has to come from somewhere, most likely from increased payroll tax receipts (lifting the income tax may be enough). To actually use the “trust funds” would require other tax revenues. This could happen via productivity increases or higher general taxes or a combination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonD</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1900001</link>
		<dc:creator>RonD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1900001</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations, Loo Hoo! How’re you going to spend your time?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Loo Hoo! How’re you going to spend your time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonD</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1900000</link>
		<dc:creator>RonD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1900000</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;We win at the ballot box, not by focusing on Dem leadership.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I must respectfully disagree. We win at the ballot box by focusing on the leadership, as it is the leadership that sets the agenda, and without the implementation of an agenda that gives people something for which to vote, there will be no electoral victory.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We win at the ballot box, not by focusing on Dem leadership.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I must respectfully disagree. We win at the ballot box by focusing on the leadership, as it is the leadership that sets the agenda, and without the implementation of an agenda that gives people something for which to vote, there will be no electoral victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899999</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899999</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you have a party of inclusion you cannot crack the whip too hard. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This sounds like a great excuse not to do anything.  I guess since it is kind of gray and rainy here you could say I am feeling inclusive today.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When you have a party of inclusion you cannot crack the whip too hard. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>This sounds like a great excuse not to do anything.  I guess since it is kind of gray and rainy here you could say I am feeling inclusive today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lesserdevil</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899998</link>
		<dc:creator>lesserdevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899998</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh noes, not my kitteh’s num nums! Can has Social Security nao?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh noes, not my kitteh’s num nums! Can has Social Security nao?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldoilfieldhand</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899997</link>
		<dc:creator>oldoilfieldhand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899997</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks PW. I keep telling people that there is nothing wrong with SS. We just have to pay back the money to the fund entrusted to the government by the people from which the government borrowed. The integrity of the U.S. government is on the line here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks PW. I keep telling people that there is nothing wrong with SS. We just have to pay back the money to the fund entrusted to the government by the people from which the government borrowed. The integrity of the U.S. government is on the line here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899996</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899996</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Democratic politicians don’t do what you are advocating because they don’t want to.  As you point out, they have the votes to do what they want.  So I would suggest they are doing exactly what they want to.  Unfortunately for us, what they want is not a break with the Bush Administration but a continuation of it with a few modifications here and there but nothing major.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Escalate in Afghanistan&lt;br /&gt;
Drag out our leaving Iraq&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the banksters in control&lt;br /&gt;
Stick it to homeowners&lt;br /&gt;
Stick it credit cardholders&lt;br /&gt;
Transfer Guantanamo to Bagram&lt;br /&gt;
Keep military commissions&lt;br /&gt;
Use the state secrets argument&lt;br /&gt;
Continue domestic spying&lt;br /&gt;
Protect torturers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From where I’m sitting 90% of the Bush agenda still looks intact.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic politicians don’t do what you are advocating because they don’t want to.  As you point out, they have the votes to do what they want.  So I would suggest they are doing exactly what they want to.  Unfortunately for us, what they want is not a break with the Bush Administration but a continuation of it with a few modifications here and there but nothing major.</p>
<p>Escalate in Afghanistan<br />
Drag out our leaving Iraq<br />
Leave the banksters in control<br />
Stick it to homeowners<br />
Stick it credit cardholders<br />
Transfer Guantanamo to Bagram<br />
Keep military commissions<br />
Use the state secrets argument<br />
Continue domestic spying<br />
Protect torturers</p>
<p>From where I’m sitting 90% of the Bush agenda still looks intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OrganicGeorge</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899995</link>
		<dc:creator>OrganicGeorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899995</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If wishes were horses………&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What is that old Will Rodgers line; ”I don’t belong to any organized political party, I’m a Democrat”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When you have a party of inclusion you cannot crack the whip too hard.  There have been some notable exceptions in modern history such as L. Johnson but he had the southern Senators on his side until he pushed civil rights.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His quote was something along the line of: We’ve lost the South for a generation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the political reality that, as Rachel calls them, the ConservaDems are Republican lite.  It will take a couple of more election cycles to weed out the Blue dogs and elect more progressives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We win at the ballot box, not by focusing on Dem leadership.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If wishes were horses………</p>
<p>What is that old Will Rodgers line; ”I don’t belong to any organized political party, I’m a Democrat”</p>
<p>When you have a party of inclusion you cannot crack the whip too hard.  There have been some notable exceptions in modern history such as L. Johnson but he had the southern Senators on his side until he pushed civil rights.</p>
<p>His quote was something along the line of: We’ve lost the South for a generation.</p>
<p>This is the political reality that, as Rachel calls them, the ConservaDems are Republican lite.  It will take a couple of more election cycles to weed out the Blue dogs and elect more progressives.</p>
<p>We win at the ballot box, not by focusing on Dem leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noonan</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899994</link>
		<dc:creator>noonan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 15:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/16/come-saturday-morning-social-security-is-safer-than-your-401k/#comment-1899994</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This &lt;em&gt;can’t&lt;/em&gt; be true! We all know (because the voices on TV tell us) that government is the problem and we need to let the market be &lt;em&gt;freer&lt;/em&gt; to save ourselves!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <em>can’t</em> be true! We all know (because the voices on TV tell us) that government is the problem and we need to let the market be <em>freer</em> to save ourselves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.240 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 22:16:49 -->

