Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism points to an article in the Financial Times saying that credit default swaps will probably cause GM to go into bankruptcy:
It only takes opposition by 10% of the bondholders to stymie an out-of-court restructuring of GM. The FT believes that there are enough bondholders who, via being net short GM bonds via credit default swaps, have good reason to block a negotiated outcome and force the automaker into bankruptcy. And that poses risk to the economy, since there are meaningful odds that the fast track solution of a 363 sale will be opposed successfully, producing uncertainty as to when GM will exit bankruptcy and putting further strain on the supply chain.
FDL was way ahead on this one. The NYT says it will be harder to demonize the CDS holders like the President did with Chrysler’s lender hold-outs, because most GM CDS holders probably bought long ago, before GM and its debt got into serious trouble.
Who wrote the protection and will have to pay? Representative Elijah Cummings asked Edward Liddy today if AIG wrote protection for GM debt. Jane captures the exchange:
Cummings: Did AIG write swaps to any creditors of Chrysler or GM?
Liddy: Beats me.
That’s what people mean when they say that the CDS market isn’t transparent. We also don’t know the holders of CDSs on GM debt, who stand to profit from bankruptcy at the expense of the workers and suppliers, and the taxpayers who have dumped billions into GM.
So, what should President Obama and Steven Rattner be doing? They need to know who wrote protection for GM bonds, and those entities need to be at the table right now, involved in the discussions. When GM files, the bondholders with CDSs will tender their bonds to the protection writers, and those holding naked GM CDSs will buy bonds in the open market to tender with their CDSs. The protection writers will be the new bondholders, and will have a seat at the table in the negotiations over the fate of GM, but in the very expensive and risky bankruptcy setting. Only negotiations right now give them some chance to protect themselves from the problems of a bankruptcy.
Somehow, I think Rattner can find out if he wants to know. The Wall Street Journal says he headed up the negotiations with Chrysler debtholders. His leverage was straightforward:
And if Chrysler had to liquidate, they and other lenders would have to try to recover their money by selling closed auto plants and other assets that are little in demand.
Mr. Rattner forced the issue during the spring negotiations. More than once, he told Mr. Lee: "You can have the company and run it or liquidate it."
…In the following days, the lenders began to realize their leverage was small and dwindling. Only the government had the ability or willingness to finance a bankruptcy reorganization of Chrysler, while also supporting its warranties and suppliers and recapitalizing Chrysler Financial. None of the lenders, some of which had consumer operations in the Midwest near Chrysler plants, had any desire to take over and liquidate the company.
Good to know Rattner is on the taxpayer’s side in this one.



15 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Hi and maybe, zed? This is just *sooooooo* bad. Anyone who designs games knows that whatever you put in, players will find things to do with it, and ways to cheat, that you could never have imagined. And our Congress took away all the rules. Criminal!
However, having one MOTU on the taxpayer side still doesn’t offer much confidence that the rest of the so-called MOTU have any clue or care about the end result of their actions. So long as they get their cash, it still looks like they’re just as happy seeing the world economy in the toilet.
“Cummings: Did AIG write swaps to any creditors of Chrysler or GM?
Liddy: Beats me.
That’s what people mean when they say that the CDS market isn’t transparent.”
That’s not about transparency, it’s about AIG keeping records and Libby asking one of his Business Units’ for a report. How hard is that? What’s Libby been doing to assess AIG’s risk to GM?
True. I think the only half-bad news is that the amount of money sitting on CDSs is in the range of $3bn, which is about 10% of the outstanding GM bonds. I can’t see whether there are bank loans that might be imperfectly hedged by an index of CDSs, but I don’t think that will be the decisive factor. The bonds are unsecured, which is a help.
Bankruptcy works so well. Today chrysler is booting aprox. 800 dealerships which will result in over 50,000 job losses.
Buyers of naked CDSs who then bought bonds should get either what they paid for the bonds or what the bonds are currently worth on the market whichever is less.
This is a point that needs to be made often. In a bankruptcy proceeding the judge is going to ask bondholders if they have a credible alternative to the government’s plan. They don’t know how to run an auto company and they won’t put more skin in the game so really the answer to this is no.
And seriously getting anything out of a government deal, even 10-15% is better than what they could do in a liquidation. You know anyone other than the government in the market for an auto plant that makes cars that can’t be sold?
There are Keynesian reasons for why the government should save the auto industry but as for bondholders, all they did was make a bad investment decision, one that they should not be rewarded for.
Even if Liddy really were only being paid a dollar, he is still being vastly overpaid.
All these job losses,foreclosures etc.And the politicians are just watching it all go up in flames.TRAGIC,to say the least.
I think it means these arrogant slugs don’t think they have to say anything about their boyz club.
Does our whole rotten situation end up being a desperate fight over who’s going to get paid for their naked CDSs’ before they’re finally all declared null and void?
If that’s the case, why not declare it so and be done with it.
The interesting thing about the naked CDSs is that they don’t affect the bankruptcy directly. The thing that matters is that bondholders who hold CDSs don’t need to cut a deal with the government for less than 100%, because if GM files bankruptcy, the CDS will pay them in full.
Holders of naked CDSs are at risk, because right now GM CDSs are really valuable, in the sense that there are prices quoted, but no guarantee that you could find a buyer. But, if a deal gets cut and no bankruptcy happens, they may find themselves with worthless promises. Generally, bankruptcy triggers the payment obligation. Without a bankruptcy, it isn’t clear that the CDS writer will have to pay. It depends on whether there is another trigger event besides bankruptcy.
If there is a bankruptcy, or some other trigger event, the protection writer of the GM CDSs will become a bondholder. That will happen because the holder of protection will most likely have to tender bonds in exchange for the payoff under the CDS. They will be able to participate in the bankruptcy, but they will just be part of the creditor group.
GM is going to go bankrupt by June 1. Even the CEO is all but conceding defeat.
Ford will be the last one standing…
“Beats me” sounds like code for “Fuck You”.
I’d cite him for contempt on the spot.
Is it possible that Fidelity Inv., the co. that holds and sends the auto workers retirement checks, retirement funds, and insurance, one of these bond holders? They deal with stocks. And I could certainly see why they would want to keep that quiet. I do not know and it has bothered me through the Crysler negotiations. Has any one checked this out? That would be just too creepy and morally wrong that holders of the auto workers retirement checks and retirement 401k’s were bargaining against them (and against GM) while holding their retirement money and retirement 401k’s.
Fidelity made those who held GM stock sell it last month. They also tried to get some to sell it last summer. Who the heck bought all those shares that Fid. had GM workers/retirees (and GM executives)sell at those low prices? Who bought them and why? 154 Million shares were sold April 27, 100 million May 12, 99 million May 13.
GM doesn’t owe anything to buyers of CDS protection…only the counterparty that sold the protection. So how can anyone protect GM from either party in a CDS contract? The buyers of protection, whether they are “naked” or not, still paid a quarterly premium to a counterparty…they entered into a contract. AIG blew up because it was that counterparty that sold CDS protection, and when the buyers of those contracts were in line for a payout from AIG, the company didn’t have enough capital to make good on their end.
Government manipulation of the markets have saved sellers of Bear Stearns CDS protection from having to pay up, but not those who sold protection on Lehman Bros.
IF the government orchestrates an end to GM that doesn’t trigger the default requirement on those contracts, it will just be a repeat of what happened w/ Bear…however it goes down, with our without the contracts paying out, it doesn’t matter in the grand scheme.
The economic decay and subsequent need to hawk US brand names and assets to foreigners…the loss of jobs and the loss of another piece of our manufacturing sector…that is the historically significant outcome here.
Shotgun blasts and waged fingers in the direction of something abstract and off to the side…like two parties betting on whether GM will default…is a genuine torch and pitchfork mob mentality. CDS swaps seem ripe for burning at the stake, or waterboarding perhaps…but in my opinion, if Gore had been chosen by the Supreme Court to be President instead of Bush, the final few years of stupidity that reigned supreme in the US auto industry may have been marked by a strategic change instead…