Penny Pritzker, the finance chair of the Obama campaign who is now a member of his Economic Recovery Advisory Board, has a somewhat different opinion on the Employee Free Choice Act than the President does.
She is joining together with other billionaires to fight bill, which would "make it easier for unions to organize hotels they own." She has "told the president she is opposed to the measure, known as card check, said a person familiar with the situation."
Pritzker ran committees that generated a record of more than $745 million for the Obama campaign plus $53 million for the inauguration.
[]
“The president and his supporters don’t agree on every issue, nor does anyone expect them to,” said White House spokesman Tommy Vietor. “But clearly many like Ms. Pritzker, who the president asked to serve on the President’s Economy Recovery Advisory Board, are supportive of his overall economic agenda.”
Fellow billionaire Lester Crowne explains that it is concern for workers rights, rather than rapacious greed, that motivates them:
Voting privately is “an American prerogative and shouldn’t be overturned,” said Crown, 83, whose family holdings include the Ojai Valley Inn & Spa in Ojai, California, and the Little Nell hotel in Aspen, Colorado. “The recommended legislation is absolutely the wrong thing to do.”
Pardon me for a moment here while I compose myself. I always get choked up when rich and important captains of industry take time from their busy schedules to think about the little people.
Workers at the Pritzkers’ Hyatt Regency in Santa Clara, California, initiated an organizing drive last year. Managers called meetings and told employees that joining a union could cost wages and benefits, said Rigoberto Gutierrez, 55, who has worked in room service there for 12 years.
“They tried to scare us,” he said. “They told us we could lose everything.”
Mr. Guitierrez probably just doesn’t understand that when a self-made woman like Penny Pritzker — who owes her fortune to inherited family wealth hard work and business savvy — wants to give him the benefit of her experience, he ought to be just a bit more grateful.
And what a superb history of business acumen Pritzker has demonstrated, particularly at Superior Bank:
Under Ms. Pritzker’s chairmanship, the bank "embarked on a business strategy of significant growth into subprime home mortgages," according to a 2002 report by the United States Treasury Department.
Its subsequent seizure by the FDIC was "one of the costliest savings and loan failures in a decade," said the New York Times. Details, details:
For years, Superior reported healthy profits and paid nearly $200 million in dividends to its owners. But the profits came through "flawed" accounting, while the dividends were made "without regard to the deteriorating" condition of Superior, according to a 2002 report by the FDIC. Several months after Superior’s collapse, the Pritzkers, without admitting wrongdoing, agreed to pay $100 million to the FDIC immediately and another $360 million over 15 years. Some of that money has been going to reimburse depositors.
This isn’t the first time Pritzker has disagreed with the President. She evidently "took note of Obama’s public statement on Feb. 9 that executives shouldn’t use federal bailout money for Las Vegas trips."
The Pritzker family’s plans to open a Grand Hyatt next year in Las Vegas next to the Bellagio? Pure coincidence.
Related posts:
- Chamber of Commerce’s “Buy an Economist” Health Care Strategy Identical to its Anti-Employee Free Choice Campaign
- Mopping Up Corporate Greed
- Reid, Wyden, Baucus Reach Agreement on Version of Free Choice Amendment
- Democratic Health Care Holdouts Worry the Rich Are Taxed Too Much
- George Will Shills for Senatorial Candidate Who Blames Nation’s Economic Problems on “Poor People”





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Thanks Jane! Satisfying to see that you are keeping an eye on hypocrites,be they Rep or Dem.
“The work ethic is not a traditional value. It is a Johnny-come-lately idea. In ancient times, work was considered a disgrace inflicted on those who had failed to amass a nest egg through imperial conquest, profitable marriage, or in forms of organized looting”
Barbara Ehrenreich
obviously billionaires and republicans (redundancy alert) have different ideas as to what the “green” in “The Green Movement” means.
like warren buffet?
I’m guessing Vegas will not give her the approvals she needs to build a hotel with gamboling unless she toes their line.
Still what idiot builds a hotel in Vegas now that the Gamboling business is off huge.
Home prices in Vegas dependent on casino, hotel workers are going down Vegas is or is close to being the worst housing market in the nation.
“Ms. Pritzker’s family is renowned for finding ways to avoid paying taxes on its wealth. The Pritzkers were pioneers in using tax loopholes to shelter their holdings from the Internal Revenue Service, and many of their dealings have never been made public.” [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pritzker
The Pritzkers own 80 percent of a partnership that holds a 15.6 percent stake in Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
http://blogs.suntimes.com/swee…..er_bl.html
Ask her what they pay those employees.
First Superior bank now Vegas hotel given her funny accounting at Superior why would anyone let her have a hotel? I assume there will be gamboling machines in the lobby if not a full casino?
People with her experience should be banned from Gamboling, CEO jobs, board of Director jobs etc.
Sure she did not admit any wrong doing but she still paid 460 million total that kind of thing as an investor is the last thing I want to read about in any company I invest in.
Funny how none of this gets reported on NPR.
460 million in fines and God knows how much in Lawyers, Accountants, Press Spin Doctor’s fees etc, seems to me that if Penny would just run an honest business she could afford to pay her workers more.
Oh you’re just like those people who had deposits at Superior still trying to get their money back from the FDIC.
Bitch, bitch, bitch.
Inherited Money like Penny’s normally goes GOP. Guys like Warren, George Soros the self made money types go our way for some reason.
I’m wondering just why did Penny support Obama did she need African American support in Illinois to get a law passed?
Well for one thing inherited money is usually lost squandered because it is not reinvested and the passion of the original wealth creator loses something as it is passed down. Look at Ford, Rockafeller, there are many examples. I guess I would say that Penny chose to support Obama, and work very hard to support him because she wanted the job and that was the best way for her to get one because she is very good at raising money. Buffet has great respect for Penny as well… From plunger’s article
“Buffett praises Pritzker’s management skills. His Berkshire Hathaway Inc. agreed in December to pay $4.5 billion for 60 percent of Marmon Holdings Inc., where Penny was a director from 2002 to ‘08.”
They never got their money back? I’m surprised McCain did not bring that up in the election.
The GOP can’t win if they refuse to go after Corrupt Dem money women out of fear of stirring up a class war against the rich.
A race war fine spying on peace groups fine.
I wonder if Sarah Palin had attacked Penny instead of that ex Weatherman guy McCain might have won?
Pictures of the Superior bank folks who got shafted would have threatened people’s confidence in Obama after the banking Crisis hit.
If the SEIU or any other labor-related entity wants to start listing “employee responsible products, hotels, and services,” and give a rating system along a 5-star lineup, I suspect that people other than myself would be very interested in referencing it for purchasing decisions.
FWIW, I’m now listening to Daniel Goleman’s “Ecological Intelligence” (he was the same author who penned “Emotional Intelligence”), and I’m about 3/8 of the way through — Goleman talks about how consumers make choices (I think it’s now called ‘neuroeconomics’).
Speaking from a ‘neuroeconomic’ perspective, if there were a reputable, credible entity that I felt was reliable in assisting me to determine which hotels treat their staffs well, which restaurant chains treat their employees with respect, then it seems like it would be kind of an “Angie’s List” to help guide travel, booking, and purchasing decisions.
Since the Pritzker’s of the planet are so enthralled with markets, why not use the markets — and some credible, handy 5-star criteria about how they treat their employees — to ’send a message’.
It could be something along the lines of Michelin Guides or Angie’s List, only based on ratings tied to employment quality.
Anyone know whether anything like that exists….?
It’s the core split in the Democratic Party: the Two Americas.
Neither Pritzker nor Crown ever were on our side, if our side is working people. They are the investment class, even if they supported Obama.
EFCA separates the progressives from the poseurs.
A bank account a tax free bond they are all investments the Bush family trust supposedly is big on tax free bonds but these are low return play it safe almost impossible to lose your money investments.
It takes work to run a company or select investments judgment and luck.
I think its the work that gets them.
Bush’s string of failed companies however suggest the inherited rich types like to play Pretend Work.
Its like Ghost Payrolling only you do it for the Prestige of pretending to work rather than the paycheck.
You can’t get a job in politics it seems without having had a job.
The “little people” would be better served if they could keep the likes of Pritzker, Soros, Buffett out of the Democratic party. Maybe we could have a Democratic Voters Free Choice Act so we could vote those misfits out of the party.
Thanks Jane. One of Penny’s stable of
oligopoliescash cows is the nation’s second largest credit bureau, Trans Union.I’m sure Penny doesn’t appreciate you posting about her, because that might lead to speculation about why there has been no anti-trust regulation against the credit bureaus and why they are not more tightly regulated.
My guess is her credit bureau really depends on credit card issuers for a significant portion of its net income. I bet she contributed heavily along with the other wolves you have already uncovered, who didn’t want cram down for Bankruptcy judges, interest rate caps on unsecured debt, …..
Siun has a new post ready for our perusal: Afghanistan: DOD Makes Excuses, CNN Rushes to Repeat the Spin
Sometimes, these days, I just…..feel like throwing up
liar, liar, jodhpurs on fire !
so she is pretty good cause she runs a lot and does a pretty good job for many things
Buffet I’d keep I disagree with him but he was right to tell Arnold he would have to raise taxes to fix the budget and it turns out he was right.
Soros I like I am unaware of any problems with him.
Penny considering that we are in a banking crisis is the biggest potential tea bagger bomb the GOP could use against us.
If the GOP attacked rich people that is
No I think she is an idiot who is protected from Darwin by money. like Bush these reverse Darwins protected by money breed despite being stupid because they are rich until such a time as they breed stupid enough to bring down governments, spend their trust funds etc.
Yes, at least as it relates to hotels. The Hotel workers union UNITE HERE maintains a website with information on hotels being boycotted for unfair treatment of workers:
http://www.hotelworkersrising.org/HotelGuide/
They’re still protecting their own interests, which are not remotely the same as those of us working stiffs.
We as a people are far better off if they took their billions and went back to their own side of the tracks.
They attacked (well sort of)Obama and biden, they are pretty rich if you ask me
The Bloomberg article on which Jane was riffing for this excellent piece also has an apt quote from labor historian Nelson Lichenstein:
“Labor-law reform gets right into the face of these
liberals who own a factory or a hotel,” where the card-check
provision would have its greatest impact, said Lichtenstein, the
historian.
Here’s the link to the full Bloomberg piece: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/…..A3G.MZZqIw
If he’s following the adage of “Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer,” that would explain his choice of financial advisers. If he agrees with them, he’ll be a one-term president.
Here’s what I’d say to those who claim that the private vote is the vital issue. I’d say, fine, you get a secret ballot. But there are some conditions:
1. If 50% of the workers sign cards asking for representation by a specific union, the secret ballot must be held within one week. To enable rapid elections like this, the NLRB will have election materials ready to go ahead of time, together with infrastructure for conducting elections online.
2. It is illegal to fire any employee during that week. An employee can be suspended for cause, but suspended employees still get to vote. Any new hire who wasn’t on the payroll when the card check passed 50% does not get to vote (no stuffing the ballot box with anti-union shills).
3. During that week, all meetings that the company holds with employees to discuss union matters must be recorded, so that they can be reviewed if there are any accusations that labor laws were violated.
If for any reason (holidays, etc) it makes sense to extend the week, the bans on firing employees and the recording requirements also extend.
And I would add that the union should have equal time to make its case, though I’m not sure about the best mechanism to achieve that. Perhaps those of you with labor organizing experience have ideas.
Gotta hand it to them. they played it smart. That “secret ballot” line really got traction.
Unionizing the Pritzker hotels won’t have any effect on her personal fortune, and I doubt she gives a damn about EFCA. She has bigger fish to fry with the Obama administration. I just wish I knew what they were.
She owns a private cartel called a CREDIT BUREAU.
Ain’t nobody (except the Jane Hamshers of the world) gonna dare to criticize the owner of Trans Union.
May not affect her fortune very much, but it very much offends her sensibilities. Not to mention her family. They didn’t get to be gazillionaires because they believe in sharing.
Please explain why “card check” is necessary? What is the problem with a secret ballot? Is there some injustice in a secret ballot?
More and more I am getting this sense from,the administration and the Dems in charge,there seems to be a lot of the Left hand dosen’t know what the Right hand is”trying”to do.
True story.
When I lived in Chicago, I moonlighted for a while as house manager for one of the smaller live theaters. The owner had set up a comped visit for Ms. Pritzker and some friends (shilling to find investors), but forgot to inform the box office staff. This was a hugely popular show and was sold out most nights, including the one when she and her friends showed up. The theater manager, after explaining the problem to her, managed to find them some seats in a section we were not using for that show because of poor sight lines.
About a third of the way through the show, she came out to the lobby complaining about her (free!) seats and demanding that we reseat her party. Both I and the box office explained to her that we could not do so as the show was sold out. She insisted that there were empty seat in the house and those should be given to her party. We again explained that those seats were in fact sold and that, by law, we could not give them to her. She then proceeded to throw a 30 minute tantrum in the middle of the theater lobby that would have embarrassed a 4 year old. She just barely missed being ejected from the theater for disruptive behavior.
Card check is necessary because a real game changer is necessary if unions are going to regain a meaningful place in the economy. The current system is broken and fiddling with it around the edges won’t change much.
Doing away with the secret ballot (in most cases) was chosen as a tactic by labor because labor recognizes that the secret ballot is not now, and never has been, an expression of democracy in the work place (when was the last time your employer asked for an employee vote in any important business decision?). Instead, the secret ballot is a way for employers to gain an advantage over union organizing efforts. It appears at this stage that an emphasis on card check was a tactical mistake.
The goal is to increase unionization. We need a game changer to get there. If it is not card check, we need to find another means.
Too bad Obama was considering her for a cabinet post. that is a HUGE indicator of naivete. Hope he gets over that.
how dumb of you not to give her those seats because she’s rich. if she was a poor shlub like me, hopefully you would have ignored that silly law for a minute. with her, it could have done good for the company. in this case, bowing to the law in the particular safe circumstance is the issue not necessarily her behavior.
One other point on your question, frederic:
Not everybody in the labor community thinks that card check is necessary, or that it will be a game changer in labor organizing. EFCA was a legislative proposal conceived and approved by the old gray heads of the labor movement, and they were able to achieve a consensus of support among the different unions and key political figures. That was a lot work, and there has always been a very keen sense that labor must present a united front on this, because the Chamber of Commerce and their allies (including some Dem congresscrittters) will jump on any chance to divide and conquer.
Why, apart from having rich friends, is a woman like this “advising” a “progressive” president? I want everyone who claimed this man is a liberal to line up and start apologising. When you’re done, you can send your condolences to the Afghans and Pakistanis he has had murdered in your name.