John Kerry’s Senate Committee hearing on the future of journalism evidently turned into a bunch of self-congratulatory wanking about how important newspapers are to our American way of life:
"High-end journalism is dying in America," testified David Simon, creator of HBO’s "The Wire," who wore an open-collar black sport shirt for the somber occasion.
Simon was invited to testify at a hearing on journalism because. . . well, because he created a cool TV show and is a snappy dresser, I guess:
But it was Simon, once a Baltimore Sun reporter, who struck the strongest blow for newspapers. Though scolding publishers for their "martyrology" and mismanagement, he spoke of how "aggregating Web sites and bloggers contribute little more than repetition, commentary and froth" and added: "The parasite is slowly killing the host."
As someone actively working to develop a viable financial model for gathering online news, what I really need in life is to be lectured by a guy who hasn’t worked as a journalist since 1995 and has never had any experience in online news. Someone go tell Marcy Wheeler she’s a parasite.
"The day I run into a Huffington Post reporter at a Baltimore zoning board hearing," added the casually clad Simon, "is the day that I will be confident that we have actually reached some sort of balance."
Simon seems to have reached the conclusion that any news organization that doesn’t cover the pie eating contests of Baltimore is woefully inadequate, those were the days, etc etc. I don’t recall anyone ever covering the Atlantic Yards as meticulously as Norman Oder, who has written quite thoughtfully on the subject of local online news coverage. Perhaps if the Atlantic Yards project moved to Baltimore, Oder would pass Simon’s litmus test.
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) had some complaints for Huffington. "For your audience, there’s not going to be a lot of stories about the cop that has been running the dice game on the side," she said. "The way you get those stories is by investing in people."
In the end, there’s nothing like being told by the Washington Post, a paper that’s only surviving because it owns the Kaplan Learning Centers, how to run a business:
"The future of quality journalism is not dependent on the future of newspapers," announced Huffington, whose Web site relies on free newspaper reporting. She scolded newspapers for having the nerve to want to charge money for their products.
But what won’t work — what can’t work — is to act like the last 15 years never happened, that we are still operating in the old content economy as opposed to the new link economy, and that the survival of the industry will be found by "protecting" content behind walled gardens. We’ve seen that movie (and its many sequels, including TimesSelect). News consumers didn’t like them, and they closed in a hurry.
If by "scolded" you mean pointed out that TimesSelect was an abysmal failure that the New York Times ultimately had to jettison, then I guess so. But since Arianna goes on to mention that an integral part of her revenue stream is advertising, which the Huffington Post very much charges for, it’s safe to say Dana Milbank just made the rest of it up.
John Kerry bats clean-up:
Kerry had difficulty understanding why "money goes to Google rather than the newspaper" and why it would be so "onerous" for the likes of Google and the Huffington Post to sit down with newspapers and figure out a more equitable arrangement. "I see cacophony without standards," Kerry said. "I see more and more people operating in public life with snippets, and I think that’s dangerous."
Right-o. A "cacaphony without standards?" Let’s review:
- "Group’s ad says Kerry lied" August 5, 2004 — USA Today
- "Let The Veterans Speak" August 6, 2004 – New York Sun
- "Kerry comrades have credibility on their side" August 20, 2004 — Boston Globe
- "Bush calls for halt to Swift Boat veterans’ ads" August 23, 2004 — MSNBC
- "Kerry’s Cambodia Whopper" August 24, 2004; Washington Post
- "Ex-President Bush Calls Charges of Swift Boat Group Compelling" August 30 , 2004 . — New York Times
- "Media double standard clear in coverage of Swift Boat ads" September 2, 2004 — Benjamin L. Ginsberg, Washington Post
- Navy Probes Kerry Medals September 3, 2004 — Fox News
- "Two Anti-Kerry Vets Tapped for VA Panel" September 3, 2004, Associated Press
- "Did Kerry write own report of disputed clash? " Chicago Sun-Times – October 1, 2004
- Unfriendly Fire: A Vietnam Vet Saw His Honor Under Attack, and Took the Fight to the Kerry Camp – October 2, 2004 Washington Post
As opposed to:
- Republican-funded Group Attacks Kerry’s War Record August 6, 2004 – FactCheck.org analysis
- "Survey of recent editorials"August 25, 2004, Media Matters for America
- "Nine more editorials" August 26, 2004, Media Matters for America
- "Swift Boat Veterans for ‘Truth’ v. The Truth" Eriposte analysis
- "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" – SourceWatch article
- "Who is Jerome Corsi, co-author of Swift Boat Vets attack book?" — Investigation by Media Matters for America
- And there’s my own small contribution to the oeuvre
It could have been an interesting and valuable panel, because a lot of people are struggling to figure out how we go forward, and it would have been nice to hear about some of the efforts they are making to develop a viable financial model for online news. But journalism isn’t migrating online due to some dastardly plot by Arianna Huffington, it’s happening because that’s where people want to get their news. They like being active participants in the process. The people involved in this panel didn’t quite seem to grasp that fundamental reality.
And BTW, what the hell was John Kerry thinking?