When Dick Durbin pitched his rant on the Senate floor about bankers who "own the place," he asked his colleagues whether they were going to listen to families facing job loss and bills they can’t pay, or the American Bankers Association.
The Senate takes up the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights this week, but that question has really already been answered. When the House Financial Services Committee held hearings on the bill, they invited Kenneth J. Clayton of the American Bankers’ Association to testify.
The ABA spent $2,140,000 on lobbying in the 1Q 2009:
| American Banker Association | $1,890,000 | Credit cards, Mark-to-Market Acctounting, Derivatives regulation, Executive pay caps, Cramdown, Tax havens |
| American Banker Association Securities | $20,000 | Credit cards, Real Estate brokerage |
| Butera & Andrews | $30,000 | Cramdown |
| Clark Lytle & Geduldig | $50,000 | Credit cards, Real Estate brokerage |
| Porterfield & Lownthal | $40,000 | Credit cards, Regulatory reform, Real Estate brokerage |
| Tassey & Associates | $30,000 | Credit cards |
| Glover Park Group | $80,000 | Credit Cards |
The ABA PAC also gave $520,000 in political contributions in 1Q 2009, much of it to members of the House Financial Services and Senate Banking Committee, so it’s little surprise they get to have their say in Committee hearings about what should and shouldn’t be done with regard to credit cards.
Tellingly, when the Credit Card Holders Bill of Rights was passed in the House, it did not contain caps on credit card interest rates.
Maybe that’s because there’ a group of people the committee didn’t hear from:
In March 2008, BofA and other big banks successfully prevented credit card customers from testifying at a hearing on Rep. Carolyn Maloney’s (D-NY) Credit Card Bill of Rights. The banks demanded that customers who had flown from all over the country sign waivers allowing their personal financial information to be revealed to the public before they could testify. They refused.
Those hefty political contributions apparently give banks the right to determine who the Committee will and will not hear from, and under what conditions they can testify.
BofA has received over $50 billion in TARP assistance, and will likely need more, but today they hiked their credit card transaction fees and have doubed the interest rates on many credit cards. As Kevin Drum notes, their justifications for things like retroactive rate hikes really make no sense. But unless there is an unlikely turn of events in the Senate, their right to do so will probably continue unabated.
(h/t Natasha)



30 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
We should get the customers to give their testimonies to Jane.
Jane, I think we might need a second organic journalism drive!
Thank you for you efforts!
Hi Jane! Boy,I wish I’d been a little more knowledgeable about the specifics of the credit card situation before we had our little sitdown with Dodd on Sunday. I almost felt like I’d show up at exams without studying. Next time, I’ll make sure I’m better prepared.
And it is not just credit cards. Because my credit card company/ies jacked up my interest rate to 27-29% and lowered my limits so they could charge me over the limit fees, BofA decided it would be in their best interest to jack up the rates on my equity loan! I still have to check my paperwork because I don’t think they can do this but, as of now, they did it anyway. Two kids in college, husband hanging onto his automotive job by the skin of his teeth, I’m hanging onto my media job by the skin of my teeth, credit card payments are now through the roof, and now this…So please consider this my very special thanks to the Financial Services and Banking committees and to all those lovely ABA-owned senators and representatives! You make me proud to be an American….f!@#$ers
“The banks demanded that customers who had flown from all over the country sign waivers allowing their personal financial information to be revealed to the public before they could testify.”
The only way to stop this bullshit – because Congress won’t do it – is to punish them with our pocketbooks. It’s the only way.
They don’t “get” any other message.
Actually the last two panelists from panel 2 represent such groups as ACORN, Consumer Federation of America, National Consumer Law Center, Americans for Fairness in Lending, Consumers Union and etc.
Looks like Rep. Maloney earned her five grand from the ABA, doesn’t it?
Thanks for keeping after this, Jane.
Oh, and look who else is on the hit parade:
Charles Dent (won against Sam Bennett last time, after he and the local paper smeared her for saying that Wachovia was in trouble): $1,000
Harry Reid: $2500
Dave Reichert (won against Darcy Burner after local paper smeared her): $2000 (in two $1000 contributions two weeks apart. Is there anything he does that isn’t fishy?)
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7117
Discouraging,
- Tom
Thanks so much for staying on this story Jane, as it is crystal clear example of how government defers its power to the economic elite. And belies the larger and misbegotten notion that less government equals more freedom. Because when the government removes itself from arbitrating social intercourse, the other powers of society; the church, the military, the financials, and the aristocracy – are more than happy to step in and assume the task. Or in other words, every time the government defers its authority to regulate, that authority to regulate is taken up by some other power network. As in the case of the credit card bill, when the government steps back the banks step up – and we become more controlled by the banks while being less controlled by the government. Which can can only mean one thing, less government does not mean more freedom.
Jane has been doing a yeowomen’s job or laying out the facts of how the critters are bought and paid for by special interests… remember that term????
The people don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell when these guys grease palms the way they do.
That makes the whole lot of them whores.
TERM LIMITS
The banks demanded? wtf?
I thought we were running this country…….
as if.
Well, it depends on what exactly you mean by “we”. *g*
Until we get Campaign Finance Reform, we’re not going to be able to stop this kind of thing. We need public campaign financing if we want to remove the corrosive influence of money on democratic processes. In order to get elected, politicians need to sell themselves to corporate sponsors, and after that they are no longer representing their constituents.
I’m part of the problem. firedoglake asks me for money, I charge a $100 contribution with my VISA bank credit card. firedoglake gets maybe $90 and change, VISA gets something, the bank gets the rest. If I don’t pay the bank off completely right away, that $100 contribution could cost me thousands. But it’s worth it if I’m part of the solution.
try TERM LIMITS it will limit the damage they can do. Of course it’s a tradeoff and we really need to get money completely out of politics and government, but until we do the TERM LIMIT will limit the BS pretty quick.
The entire system is rotten to the core. check out today’s video of Alan Grayson grilling the Federal reserve Inspector General. From the sounds of it, she hasn’t got a clue as to what the Fed is doing or where 9 trillion dollars has gone. One of Obama’s platforms was greater government transparency. I’d love to know where it is when it comes to the Federal reserve?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…..97934.html
DING! DING! DING! We have a winner. Campaign Finance Reform
siun has the news upstairs…
“Dozens” of Afghan Civilians Killed by US Air Strike
Raw Story:
Campaign finance reform. Term limits just mean the lobbyists pay for their whores for a shorter period of time.
Thanks Jane.
What we are seeing is that over a very long time span Congress has quietly created laws prob as amendments that has leaglized bribery.
Scarecrow’s diary promoted
Mike Allen Lets Frank Luntz Explain How Republicans Should Lie About Health Care Reform
deleted
Exactly how do we do that?
I would love to have a way of hurting them, I closed all my accounts but I don’t see how my “pocketbook” is going to make a difference.
Hey not to worry! The private equity firms are lining up to force the Fed to let them buy the banks.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/06/bus…..=1&hp
cut up the fornicating cards pay em off stop using them. live on what you make not they way you think you should be able to. until you stop buying into the fairytale they are going to own you. the first year’s gonna be rough but ya know what it can be done, i’ve done it. the question is how much is enough, do i really need the latest electronic toy or the latest whatever and the answer is no. as to the politicians they all in the moneyed interests pockets and only give a shit about you when it’s election time and will tell you whatever pretty lies it takes. my granddaddy had it right ain’t none of em fit to haul guts to the buzzards. vote for yourself with your money the hours and minutes of your life you spend to get it you can’t get back.
The insurance industry also owns Congress. Yesterday’s Senate hearing on health care reform was a joke. Only industry reps were allowed to testify.
Single-payer is “off the table” according to Baucus.
i’m actually being sued by capital one for not paying.
my lawyer’s trying to get them to settle by tellign them if we go to court, I will probably lose but I’ll be the most embarrassing defendant they ever deal with.
i’ll just keep asking the judge and their lawyers why uncle sam can’t bail them out loike everyone else. or to go ask arlen specter for the money (i dropped that one on one of their collection agencies.
fuck ‘em. in the end, we’re all dead anyway.
the only way i know of would get my comment deleted by the mods.