Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, speaking at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco today, said she would urge the House of Representatives upon its return next week to authorize an investigation into "what happened on Wall Street."
Pelosi, speaking to the Commonwealth Club of California, said she wants the panel to be modeled after the Pecora Commission, a bipartisan investigative body established by the U.S. Senate in 1932 to examine the causes and abuses of the Wall Street crash of 1929 and to prevent a repeat.
"They investigated what happened in the markets," including conflicts of interests and irregularities that set off such devastating effects on the U.S. economy, she said. When the commission issued its findings during the administration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, "they had tangible recommendations," she said, which helped generate widespread public support for major banking system reforms and new securities laws.
The Speaker has already discussed her proposal with Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner and expects to raise the matter with her House colleagues upon their return from spring district work period next week.
"People are very unhappy with these bailouts," particularly multimillion-dollar bonuses paid out to executives of failing firms like American Insurance Group, or AIG, that have received federal bailout funds, she said.
"Seventy five percent of the American people, at least, want an investigation of what happened on Wall Street," the Speaker said to applause from the audience.
"We’re going to have a commission… even if it is only in the House of Representatives," Pelosi vowed, saying it would allow Americans "to have a clearer understanding of how we got here – and the risk that’s been taken by the taxpayers in all this."
As Lambert writes today, "I post in haste, so Wikipedia:"
The Pecora Commission is the name commonly used to describe the commission established on March 4, 1932, by the United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs to investigate the causes of the Wall Street Crash of 1929. The name refers to the fourth and final Chief Counsel to the committee, Ferdinand Pecora.
The Pecora Commission initiated major reform of the American financial system. As Chief Counsel, Ferdinand Pecora personally examined many high-profile witnesses that included some of the nation’s most influential bankers and stockbrokers.
In 1939 Ferdinand Pecora published his memoirs that recounted details of the investigations. Titled "Wall Street Under Oath", Pecora wrote: "Bitterly hostile was Wall Street to the enactment of the regulatory legislation." As to disclosure rules, he stated that "Had there been full disclosure of what was being done in furtherance of these schemes, they could not long have survived the fierce light of publicity and criticism. Legal chicanery and pitch darkness were the banker’s stoutest allies."
Banksters beware!



78 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Sure, that’s going to happen. Fill the bowl with a little more opium and dream on.
That’ll be the day!
woohoo! thanks for the good news teddy. do ya think she will be successful in getting the house to go along?
How do we get on staff?
Another chance to white wash history and close the books on the shadow government. Warren Commission, Kean 911 Commission… yeah right now we now the truth.
We’re cooked.
This was apparently in answer to a question from the moderator at her speech, but the reporter mentions that Pelosi has spoken to Geithner, which makes me think she’s giving Barney Frank cover for a big announcement next week when they come back from work.
I think any of the ‘critters who are listening at home are catching hell. And that they will gladly go along with this idea to be able to tell constituents “we are doing something.”
I hope Sen Levin and Whitehorse are on that Commission.
What about Eliot Spitzer for lead counsel…? (Sorry attys, I have no clear sense of whether the etiquette involved in such an appointment, but Spitzer knows the territory.)
Thank all the forgotten gods and goddesses!
Pelosi’s gotta buck Rahm and Obama protecting this looting of America without ANY oversight.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the poor, the halt and the lame will be thrown under the bus with Obama’s new found “fiscal discipline”.
You know, there were a few signs at the tea parties, like “Repeal NAFTA” that I really had to agree with. Those protesters aren’t ALL complete morons. And didn’t President Mouth SAY he was going to do just that? HMMmmmmmmmm…..
This might turn out to be something worthwhile, but I’ll believe it when I see it. The last few months have taught me to always be cynical about politicians talking about taking the financial industry to task. It hasn’t happened yet, and there’s been plenty of reason already.
Dugg!! I sure hope this means a return to the Glass-Steagall regulations!! Of and a few Bangsters going to jail!!
Just based on what I’ve read previously from Teh Ted, I assumed his post was snark. You think he’s saying this is good news? I can’t tell.
Thanks for the Digg, nahant!
Another kabuki-like sternly worded letter? Will she walk her talk?
Jeez, it seems that she can do this and ignore Impeachment?
Pelosi just didn’t get enuff cash from the banksters last election cycle, I guess. She’s so lame. Between her and Harry Reid, they make about half a legislator, the ass-half.
You know, Nancy Pelosi very infrequently gets credit nowadays for saving Social Security from George Bush’s planned predation. Just imagine where we’d be right now without her tireless efforts to stop him in his tracks!
I wouldn’t necessarily expect a revived Pecora Commission — and it was Pelosi who made the historical reference — would be a whitewash. Asking for a 911 Commission, that’s one thing. Asking for a Pecora Commission, that’s another.
It all depends who is on it — Greider, Warren, Krugman, Roubini? — and how it’s staffed, I suppose.
My pleasure Teddy. How are things in the City?? Still chilly?
Nancy ,you war criminal ,investigate the big crash of our moral integrity with your unending cover of king george and the merry band of torturers.
I guess in this she took a hit in her war portfolio that’s why she’s demanding answers.
Maybe Nancy found her table & put something on it??
I’d like to think this will turn out to be another Pecora investigation. However, I’m more inclined to believe that Pelosi is doing her level best to placate the great unwashed who have been calling for Real Hearings. Throw them a bone and maybe they’ll shut up and go away. It makes me doubly suspicious that Geithner is already in the loop. Further, her statement that “We’re going to have a commission… even if it is only in the House of Representatives…” just doesn’t pass the smell test.
Now that the door has been opened, though, it is incumbent upon us to get pushy about it and start setting up an agenda and a witness list. Force the issue. No reason to let her (or anyone else) weasel on the deal.
Can anyone here imagine what would be uncovered if Dean Baker, or masaccio, or EW, or John Galbraith were on that staff…?
And here’s hoping Dorgan is on that committee!
thanks teddy.
bill black and his recommendations, “Jack Blum and Saul Wisenberg (Dem., Rep) as counsel. Hire Dick Newsom and Chris Seefer as your key investigators.” also elizabeth warren
and most important: not one politician. not one. and especially no one from congress.
open ended, subpoena power, and lots of money. independence on staff and everything else.
this is the standard. if this (or equivalent) is what pelosi means, then she’s serious. anything else, and she’s full of shit
i hope like hell she’s serious.
I’ll be making my calls in the a.m. Who staffs the commish will be telling regarding the level of committment. Spitzer’d be good. So would Krugman. Blue Dogs and/or corporatists will be evidence that this is just shut up and go away.
Seconded.
not politicians and not even macroeconomists.
experienced lawyers. prosecutor types like bill black (of s&l experience).
Nancy Pelosi is a relatively young Speaker (69) from a very safe district who heads a huge Democratic caucus that isn’t likely to shrink quickly anytime soon. She could, conceivably, be Speaker into the late twenty-teens. Are we really never to forgive her for enabling the Bush nightmare? Are we never to welcome her suggestions for unearthing the causes of the Bush economic mirable?
Will she always be a pariah here? I hope not, because she isn’t going anywhere soon. And we’d do best to encourage her better instincts, now that she’s recovered them.
inmvho
Setting up some Real Hearings will raise her stature in my book. On the other hand, if this turns out to be just another bullshit whitewash, she will have dug herself in deeper. Time will tell…
i’d rather let the investigators get their own experts. someone like bill black i think will know much better than us what and who is needed. imo, ,the important thing is to get someone like bill black to design the team and approach.
if anyone missed bill black’s visit to fdl, here is the thread:
http://firedoglake.com/2009/03…..iam-black/
check out how many times he calls for a Pecora investigation.
nancy dear you are a bit late. You see they have taken lots of trillions already and they have no intention of returning it, but thanks for making it look like you care, cuz we know you do. Luv and kisses xxxoooo
Now thats better don’tcha think??? /s
But is hard to forgive her for taking Impeachment off the table Teddy. She chose political party improvements instead of the rule of law.
just my opinion, but forgiveness is i process that includes an attempt at making amends. she gets forgiven when she’s earned it.
a real investigation – with bill black (or his designees) – would be a start on making amends.
we shall see what she does. words are not enough after so many lies.
It sounds like a good idea. But unless there is total Senate buy-in I doubt it will happen. And the rethugs in the Senate are the party of NO.
Not wanting to be a wet blanket, but it’s easy for Nancy to dream big dreams aloud when she knows it won’t really go anywhere. It gives her cover.
like Teddy, jmo, ymmv.
So, not snark?
Also why it’s nice to give people the benefit of the doubt, once in a while, maybe.
Still, just wondering.
she also facilitated immunity for the telcos and a really horrible modification to fisa. she has a lot of amends to make.
A corrupt and venal system but then, hey, maybe it can be “reformed.”
Snark really is in the eye of the beholder.
I wouldn’t deny anyone the potential entertainment my posts might provide.
Why should anything be only one thing or the other?
oh, and blank checks to bush’s wars.
Not sure about that eye of the beholder thing, but of course, it could be that.
Doesn’t have to be one thing or the other, you’re right. I was just trying to get a handle on your point, ’cause I was unsure.
Sorry.
No need to apologize!
Perhaps you are not the only one who is unsure.
skeptism, not cynicism.
we’ll know by her actions.
Perhaps. Just popped in to see what the hap is.
Back to my reading. Three Cups Of Tea. Can hardly put it down.
With the context/perspective of how other people live, I’m now calling my domicile the Trailer Palace.
Righteo.
Excellent idea!
Selise,
You are so right but don’t be disappointed because this is not going to be shedding light on the bad stuff.
How many times have we been led astray and believed that accountability would happen and never did?
I don’t think we’ll see it.
But I also think the economy will go to hell and we are only in the beginning of the end.
Agreed. This is about forensic accounting, not macroeconomics. Some forensic accountants are economists, but not all economists are… you get the idea.
Oh, and I read over the Stiglitz paper you cited in that discussion with perris and I. Despite my best efforts I couldn’t get back in there before the blog software shut us out, so I’m going to have to write a diary about it.
I think you were right. We were using the same words with different meanings, though the distinction is in the type of protectionism, which is what I’ll be pointing out when I get a chance. The short is you can institute punitive protectionist policies which harm global trade, such as perris’s predilection for incentivizing domestic car purchases through what amounts to a penalty on foreign auto-makers. That is what I view as protectionist. Controls on trade that are related to human rights and labor displacement support don’t fall under my definition of protectionist.
here’s the problem with the commision even if all intentions are sincere;
there is nobody to be on the commision, everyone is a banker or in the pocket of bankers
there is very little loyalty to this country once they get that kind of wealth, it’s take the money, cover your tracks, run for the hills
when bill black was here, peterr asked him who we should ask for to lead the commission.
black told us: Jack Blum and Saul Wisenberg counsel. Dick Newsom and Chris Seefer key investigators.
i’d also like to see black and elizabeth warren involved.
that’s six. if we can get them, they will know who else to get.
What perris said.
i look forward to your diary.
Perhaps Nancy’s staffer read my diary here on April 6, “We Need another Ferdinand Pecora to Grill the Banksters” http://oxdown.firedoglake.com/diary/4621
There were some very good suggestions for a modern day Pecora from the commenters. You need a crack prosecutor without a high profile was the consensus. But quite a few of us thought Elizabeth Warren should be on the commission.
Here’s Pecora:
that was a great diary. thanks!
can you make the movie?
i really can’t help but get a little excited about the possibility of a real investigation (i’m sure it’s obvious by the number of my comments. i should lay off the caffeine.)
yes, i know. call me charlie brown.
still i can’t help hoping.
because the hearings run by dodd and frank suck. seriously suck. and we so desperately need the real thing.
Torturing people & shredding the Constitution don’t seem worthy of her attention either. [I.e., supporting a “study commission” or whatever on these issues.]
“It’s difficult to find pundits who are consistently right. Usually, those who are associated with the move of the day enjoy their spot in the sun so much they overstay their time there long after the sun has moved on. But some analysts seem always to be consistently wrong. Aren’t they the most valuabe? Via today’s Lex
“Economist Harry Dent, having famously predicted in 2000 and again four years later that the Dow would reach 40,000 has just written a book called “The Great Depression Ahead.” “
It’s true Pelosi doesn’t get much credit. I don’t know how she could have gotten impeachment as the trial would have had to be held in the Senate and we all know the makeup of the 110th.
And now we got the Blue Dawgs who are pretty much as bad as the Repubs. so , we pretty much still have a 60/40 split to the right still….as you all know….I’m being pedantic a little bit here
it is more likely that dems across the country are getting an earful about this right now. We DFH’s are the only ones who have been complaining about torture and Constitution Confetti so we don’t have as large a populist voice. That would be my guess.
I think one could hardly blame you, the faint appearance that the system might actually work is often intoxicating.
The irony is, if the system were working… all those tea-baggers being made fun of wouldn’t have anything to be protesting.
The protests aren’t about the $$, these are the loony fringe people who hate Obama. The tea bagging was just the gimmick to get them out on the streets.
i’m not making fun of them (although happy to make fun of limbaugh and similar). why the hell would i make fun of someone, possibly in serious financial trouble, for protesting the state of the economy?
i probably disagree with almost of all of them about why we’re in the state we are, and what i think should be done about it. but i’m not going to make fun of them.
i’m pretty close to hating obama too.
Obama is no Bernie Sanders.
That’s right. I forgot that we were going to make a movie starring the modern day Gregory PecK.
well, you were going to make it and i was going to cheer to on. *g*
Good
Any boom-lowering should come from Congress anyway, and not the president. This crisis of confidence in our markets will only start to reverse once we let in the sunlight of public disclosure, and public disclosure and discussion of the people’s business is why Congress exists. The supposed efficiency and unity of purpose we derive from leaving the people’s business to a president who can work behind closed doors would actually be a detriment in this case. No one would have confidence that the criminal oligarchs had not simply bought their way out of paying the consequences behind those closed doors.
And we definitely need some boom-lowering. Hopefully the committee will lay on plenty of staff to prepare the appropriately large number of criminal complaints that will surely result from any candid and thorough investigation of our markets. Even if the administration reached the same result and jailed the same people, we don’t really want hundreds to thousands of these oligarchs, and that’s the scale we should be thinking, hustled off to prosecutions as the result of some Star Chamber run by the administration. Only the people’s representatives, acting in public, should be trusted with this task.
Pull the other one!
Criminal activity? Imagine all the perp walks from their Wall Street suites… like hundreds of them, thousands?
This was a big conspiracy. These crooks were backed up by their loyal minions and the big investors who pocketed the loot.
Lots of reports of Social Security pensioners among the teabaggers, so their complaints about socialism and welfare ring just a little hollow, yes.
Holy Crap !
wow. I’ll give her props hell yes. especially after I scanned the text and saw she used the actual ‘P’ word
p.s. Lambert deserves much of the credit for popularizing Pecora in left blogistan (Bill Black says as much) a fascinating character and I’d love to read his book.
OT:
As soon as the government was gone, mysterious European ships started appearing off the coast of Somalia, dumping vast barrels into the ocean. The coastal population began to sicken. At first they suffered strange rashes, nausea and malformed babies. Then, after the 2005 tsunami, hundreds of the dumped and leaking barrels washed up on shore. People began to suffer from radiation sickness, and more than 300 died.
” Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the UN envoy to Somalia, tells me: “Somebody is dumping nuclear material here. There is also lead, and heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury – you name it.” Much of it can be traced back to European hospitals and factories, who seem to be passing it on to the Italian mafia to “dispose” of cheaply. When I asked Mr. Ould-Abdallah what European governments were doing about it, he said with a sigh: “Nothing. There has been no clean-up, no compensation, and no prevention.”
At the same time, other European ships have been looting Somalia’s seas of their greatest resource: seafood. We have destroyed our own fish stocks by overexploitation – and now we have moved on to theirs. More than $300 million worth of tuna, shrimp, and lobster are being stolen every year by illegal trawlers. The local fishermen are now starving. Mohammed Hussein, a fisherman in the town of Marka about 62 miles south of Mogadishu, told Reuters: “If nothing is done, there soon won’t be much fish left in our coastal waters.”
This is the context in which the “pirates” have emerged. Somalian fishermen took speedboats to try to dissuade the dumpers and trawlers, or at least levy a “tax” on them. They call themselves the Volunteer Coastguard of Somalia – and ordinary Somalis agree. The independent Somalian news site WardheerNews found 70 percent “strongly supported the piracy as a form of national defence”. “
Immunity for the telecoms still has to go through court.
Elizabeth Warren on TDS tonight. Woot!
True true and to get legislation passed it helps to be considerate of many other views. A Sanders bill is a Sanders bill, but something Obama can get through all of Congress with good support is more likely to be ‘uniquely American’ — a mutt.
“And we’d do best to encourage her better instincts, now that she’s recovered them.”
Yer such an optimist. *G*
Hey, if it’s twue, it’s twue, I’ll be in line to cheerlead.
I’m with Selise @ 21, that’s a set agenda rallycry if I ever heard one.
If it proves not to be so twue, well, we have to move on to something else.
But I sure could use a shot of hope and a dose of real change . . .
So, how does the progressive blogosphere go about encouraging this commission making, and then, SCREAMING on how to staff it, and fund it for REAL change?
I’m all ears for this . . . and I’m desperate for some hope and real change.
After All, There’s THIS To Worry About, Too
I Can Haz Hope?
Geez, The Trickster is back?
I HATE that guy . . . makes shit all so COMPLIcated.
Please, hoss, just keep it simple, sister . . . ;-)
I was making reference to the litany of front page posts today and yesterday deriding these people and have dominated our FDL news-cycle. :-)
This ranks right up there in history’s chronicles of the little people’s struggles as Robin Hood and his Merry Men were in holding up rich people traveling thru Sherwood Forest.
I can’t glorify the poor people of Somalia as looting the rich to feed the poor.
I just don’t see it that way.
It’s a desperate act by desperate people taking something from others because they have nothing.
Solve their desperation, they might stop.
But until then, they are criminals. And should be held accountable as such.
To glorify them as anything else is absurd.
Yes, poverty breeds criminals. Desperation always does.
And Pretty Boy Floyd was a hero.
Maybe to Woody Guthrie . . . . and some farmers.
To others, he took their lives and savings held in banks and robbed THEM of their future.
One coin, two sides. Always.
Pirates they are not.
Desperate people trying to survive by taking shit from others, they are.
You want them to take YOUR shit, SanderO?
Either the sea’s are free, or they are not.
These putz’s think they are glorified . . . they’re petty ante crooks.
Now, the issue of waste dumping, and of other country’s trawling vessels depleting their fishing grounds?
That’s an issue . . . piracy is NOT a valid response to that issue.
It’s quite inappropriate to link the two, in my opinion.
But desperation creates desperate measures and that sells ad dollars.
Don’t mix the fact with the fiction I say . . . . ;-)
my apologies. i’ve missed a lot.
come on, jane…..
why do you censor this comment?
explain it to your audience.
well, i sure hope that she holds to that course.
somehow, though, i don’t think so. all those banksters being zionist jews.
but, if she is dedicated to that investigation, i recommend that she advocate the tracing of all those funds in bernie madoff’s control. how much of that lucre was transferred to israeli banks? banks with a secrecy edict as strict as, if not stricter than, switzerland’s?
because the question about madoff really is, at its heart, wasn’t he running a money laundry? where many american jews were having their undeclared cash transferred to secret israeli bank accounts?
to be sure, it would appear that there were victims of madoff looting, but how much of that might be fiction?
and lastly, what were bernie’s ties to the mossad, shin bet?
Just remember “no bombs for Monica” of course, that was Bosnia. Clinton DESTROYED Somalia….for it’s OIL and to put in a US puppet. When you’re starving, here pretty soon, you’ll do desperate things too, and prolly not worry too much about the “legal” aspects of your actions.