Melissa Bean proved she’s a worthy successor to Ellen Tauscher as head of the Wall Street-friendly New Democrat Coalition when she led the effort to insert a huge loophole in a bill that would have forced TARP recipients to stop paying "retention bonuses" as long as they were being supported by taxpayer dollars.
The bill, called the Pay Performance Act, passed the House on Wednesday. In its original form, it required all TARP recipients to make all bonuses performance based, and sought to put an end to the $1 billion in retention bonuses still to be paid out in July and September this year by AIG per an agreement they reached with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. In other words, AIG could only pay out bonuses if the company actually did well, and couldn’t be doling them out while the company was losing money and on taxpayer life support.
The GOP took to the floor of the House with rage, and couldn’t come up with a coherent reason to oppose it which masked their true intent — kill it on behalf of the banks. They fiercely denounced a provision in the stimulus bill that allowed the AIG bonuses to be paid in the first place, but then objected to this bill, which would have essentially removed that provision. As Barney Frank said, "What you have just heard is a denunciation of something that was done by the Congress a few weeks ago and a refusal to undo it. I have never seen people, Mr. Chairman, so attached to something they hate."
Freshman Alan Grayson, one of the bill’s co-sponsors, has some experience taking on entrenched corporate power — his background includes suing war profiteers. In a piece of must-see TV, Fox’s Neal Cavuto singled Grayson out for vitriol, calling him "Sweden in a suit." Grayson responded by saying "These are government owned banks. Is anybody upset that some bureaucrat sets compensation for people who work in the State Department or the Department of Transportation? Why are they complaining when we’re trying to put some kind of break on this vomiting of taxpayer money?"
It looked like it was going to be smooth sailing, but then Melissa Bean decided to give the Republicans a hand. Her New Democrat Coalition has an Executive Director, Adam Pase, who is a former bank lobbyist for predatory lenders and their members brag about their Wall Street backgrounds and their close ties to the banks. The banks didn’t want the bill to pass, and it looked like the Republicans wouldn’t be able to stop it. So, Bean offered up an amendment which allowed TARP recipients to get out from under the bill’s limitations if they had started paying their loans back.
Brad Sherman, known for being a genuinely fiscally responsible member of the House, objected (see YouTube). He said "it would allow a large number of companies to escape the effect of the bill without doing much more than making a few monthly payments of a very small amount." (His own bill, which would have capped executive compensation for TARP recipients at a million dollars, was never allowed on the floor.)
Bean’s amendment initially failed on a voice vote, but she called for a roll call vote — which allowed bank lobbyists to see exactly who did and didn’t vote for the bill. This time, the New Democrats and the Blue Dogs made good on their threats to join with Republicans to pass legislation. Sixty-three Democrats joined with 165 Republicans to pass the Bean amendment.
Score one for the banks.
I asked Brad Sherman how he felt about the amendment. He said, "I could agree to exempt financial institutions that pay back all of the federal money they received under the Troubled Assets Relief Program within a 12 or 24 month time frame. However, the amendment opens the possibility of agreements of far longer duration. It would allow agreements with even a 10 or 15 year term." It also doesn’t prevent banks from taking more TARP money to make payment on their loans.
The Pay Performance Act finally passed, but it will be interesting to see what happens with the rest of this year’s AIG retention bonuses. If the company uses this loophole to pay them, Melissa Bean will wear it around her neck.
One last sad, final note: one of the bill’s co-sponsors, Jim Himes, is a former Goldman-Sachs executive who got more campaign contributions from Goldman than any member of Congress not running for President last year, and his Chief of Staff is a former USB lobbyist. So it was really gratifying to see him co-sponsoring a bill that seemed to be something his big donors would oppose.
But in the end, Jim Himes — also a member of the New Democrat Coalition — joined with Bean and the Republicans to de-fang the bill.
Score another one for the banks.



86 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Her district lots of speculation in the housing market lots of people with adjustable home loans lots of bank hatred. She is vulnerable if her voters were to find out.
she needs to be GONE …ASAP
I gather Tauscher’s involved in this great giveaway as well, somehow too?
Why are they using “Democrat” instead of “Democratic?” I know I’m OT, but that just irks me.
Sorry. Carry on. :)
Melissa Bean – Open Secrets – donor pages
Bank lobbyists still have a great deal of influence in the Obama Washington.
Seems strange that so called fiscal conservatives would allow the banks to piss away huge sums of tax payer money
JUSTSAY NO TO BEAN
BEAN-NO
http://www.bean-no.org/sitebui…..beano1.jpg
send Beano to her office
This kind of thing should be conflict of interest if anything he should not vote on banking issues. I understand lobbyists pay for access to explain issues the people who pay them are concerned about. I also understand that after explaining these issues the congressman gets paid.
I would like Congress and their staffs to be required to research the issues themselves. Relying on paid lobbyists for one sided facts on an issue is hurting democracy.
A cap on election spending or better yet free advertising on tv and mandatory debates would be good.
yesterday congress, led by barney franks, succeeded in getting mark-to-market rule changed to mark-to-myth.
score another one for the banks.
here’s bernhard at MoA:
barney frank can bite me. all his faux outrage about bonuses is just a bright shiny object to distract us from the really big looting going on.
“Why are they using “Democrat” instead of “Democratic?” I know I’m OT, but that just irks me.”
I noticed the trend awhile back that’s the point , to irk!
so having te DeMOCRATS run congress,is INDEED as bad as the retugs,its really torches and pitchfork time…they suk
Now. Do i understand right that the banks can use TARP $$ to make these monthly payments? To ensure they’re allowed to pay bonuses to execs. For putting said banks intio the shitter making it necessary to take said TARP money in the first place?
They must be able to. Jeez.
o/t
per Attaturk’s heads up
The Iowa Supreme Court this morning unanimously upheld gays’ right to marry.
linky
also, there’s no requirtements at all as to how long or how much they must repay?
excellent. we had a sonic boom last saturday when the space shuttle came back. i just heard a similar noise. heads ’splodin’?
OH! Do I like that idea!!
It’s like the rubber stamps we sent to congress!!
Flood her office with bottles of Bean-o, back up a 40-foot trailer of Bean-o to one of her local offices.
I cannot believe this woman is soooooo stupid and completely unaware of the American public’s rage about the bonuses, a rage that crosses the aisle and transcends ideology. The bonuses are an affront to fairness — and fairness being one of the universal ethics and values, nearly every American can see and understand how unfair the bonuses are.
Apparently Ms. Bean needs some help with grokking the enormity of this problem; perhaps props will do the trick when words fail.
And somebody on the ground in her district had better be recruiting, grooming and funding a candidate to primary her sad, stupid ass.
That biteme list of yours is getting longer and longer. Are your rabies shots up to date?
Just got off the phone with Congresswoman Bean’s DC office.
A very young man answered. He snickered when I told him based on this post, I was very strongly considering contributing heavily to a primary campaign against the Congresswoman. I told him that I didn’t think this was funny. I told him that I thought the Congresswoman’s office would at a minimum appreciate knowing that this post had been published.
He replied that he did not want the name of the blog or the title of the post. He further stated that he did not read blogs, because they did not contain news. I had to request several times that he take down my name and address. I asked for his name and he refused to provide it. I informed him that the call was time stamped and that I was interested in seeing to it that the Congresswoman eventually learned his identity. He still refused to provide me with his name.
I will fax this thread to the Congresswoman’s office. I’ll use the time stamp on the thread to help their office determine who answered the phone. After speaking with this young man, I am even more committed to contributing heavily in a primary against the Congresswoman.
I used to like Frank, say 10 years ago. Don’t think so much of him anymore. Seems like he had balls then. he demonstarted the other day on this bill jane is talking about that he can use wit to amke a point and it used to be very enjopyable. to me anyway. not so much anymore.
I know the guy. His name? I. M. A. Scumbag.
No sane investor is going to touch American banks stocks after this the problem there are allot of nuts out there.
Who helps the average American? No one. We get no cost of living increases even as our bills go through the roof. Why? Because the very same people who rake it in with both hands demand that wages be kept down for the sake of “competitiveness”. I hate them with all my heart — every last one of them. There are no good ones.
Arrogant, huh?
Have to wonder if Rahm helped pick out office staff, and if he’s got his hand up Bean’s backside.
Does anybody recall who else was running for the Dem Party in Bean’s IL-08 district in 2002? I can’t recall and it looks like it’s an important piece of info now.
Also wonder what happened to Bill Sheurer, the independent who ran against her; he said during his 2006 run that Bean was too conservative. Spot on, buddy.
I bet he is from Crystal Lake or Cary lots of GOP level arrogance there and yes Melissa some of us here remember when it was Phil Crane’s seat. You are in a very Republican district a primary challenge from the left could exhaust your funding and sink you in the general election.
Playing best friends to banks taking away people’s homes in a district that had skyrocketing home values is not the way to make friends.
Brad Sherman is my rep. I’m going to call his office and say thanks. It’s still just 7:38 here now. Better yet, I’ll stop by his office when I’m out and about. Go Brad!
LOL. i’m fast approaching “¡Que se vayan todos!” (well, i still like bernie sanders so not quite yet).
here’s naomi klein (my bold):
i’ve had enough of corporate crony capitalism manipulated for the benefit of the few and to hell with the rest of the world (neo-liberalism in polite company).
Snickering at those who pay his goddamned salary. Wow. Just, wow.
2002 – wiki on IL-08
(still looking for Primary info)
The bank bail outs piss me off !
The bonuses given to those that fucked the banks up piss me off !
The Dems and Repukes in Congress piss me off !
I am one pissed off MoFo !!
WTF will it ever end?
i think you’ve touched on what probably bothers me the most. here is a really intelligent guy, with wit and political depth, using all the skills he has – not to help us, but to help the banksters.
worse really than someone who is genuinely batshit crazy and can’t help it.
not just banks.
I’m almost positive she had a challenger an anti war one I remember it as either her district or the next one over a female I liked her. Drawing a blank on the name though.
Maybe we should have term limits in Congress
The longer they serve the more likely they are to support the status quo
OK WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS?
bet you’re thinking of Christine Cegelis who ran against Tammy Duckworth (Rahm’s pick)in IL-06
Still can’t get a roll call of who voted for Bean’s amendment…
http://clerk.house.gov/cgi-bin…..number=180
Anyone know of a list of how the House members voted?
David Duke got more votes than Jesse Jackson did in the County? District? I got lost in the Woodstock government building looking for traffic court and saw the chalk board totals. They filmed Ground Hog day at the Woodstock sq.
I haven’t liked Frank since he showed absolutely NO sense of humor with Stephen Colbert on one of his episodes of “Better Know a District”. Franks was an asshole and it clearly shows through in his actual voting record.
On a slightly related note to the topic at hand (bonuses, criminal banks, etc), I actually received a handwritten thank you note from my local credit union president. I had written a letter to the editor in our local paper attacking the TARP, the big bank bailouts, and in particular, the banks that claimed to have been “profitable” during Feb and March and how the Bank of America CEO actually claimed that they didn’t need any more bailout.
I stated the fact that these banks were “profitable” ONLY because taxpayers had been covering their losses (and dividends and bonuses) in secret via the AIG bailout. That they we merely seeking to avoid receiving overt bailout money any longer because it came with (very weak and pathetic) strings attached, but that they were STILL getting loads of bailout bucks in total secrecy from AIG’s bogus bailout.
I then told readers that I had been a BoA customer since 1985 but had finally had enough of the theft and greed and had closed out my accounts and transfered all of it into a local credit union – and encouraged everyone else to do the same, explaining that if the government wont declare them bankrupt and quit funding them, then we the people can do so from below by taking away the deposits that are critical to bank functioning.
The credit union CEO apparently read the letter and responded to me with a “Thank you!” Sadly, it doesn’t translate into a higher interest rate on my savings account but I seem to have made a local friend in a reasonably high place.
gotta run…. don’t forget april 11. see you in the streets!
I see that Melissa Bean also has proposed legislation for federal as opposed to current state regulation of insurance companies like AIG. I have to wonder what is contained in that proposed piece of legislation? Further give-aways?
Bean is a gas.
Thanks very much for the background.
I’ve frequently called GOP offices to politely and respectfully register concern. They were always business like and professional. I’ve never encountered anything like this before.
question for Jane and other Inside Baseball types -
Will Grayson ‘out’ her and Pase for what they have done here ?
my limited understanding is that freshman critters are supposed to keep their mouths shut in these cases -
Thanks.
GO BUY some kidney beans…get a ziploc…write NO in big bold letters,sign it a progressiveAmerican,and put it in a small vanilla envelope,no plastic sides needed,ILL POST HER DEE CEE address…here we go,lets tell Keith,he will think its funny
SCREW tradition. I want some (all) freshmen congress types to demonstrate that they are NOT to be ignored, that they are NOT sock puppets for the ruling elite of the party, and that THEY are, de facto, the future of the party.
Jane characterizes it as another win for the banks. It can be more accurately characterized as another loss for us. As for torches and pitchforks, you’re dreaming. We won’t discuss non-violent possibilities. We don’t turn the lights out for earth day and we don’t show solidarity (a dirty word) with the screen writers. Maybe the criminal effort to adjust social security will get people mad enough. We need something huge. We think way too small for that.
Oxdown post about it Tell Geithner not to deregulate insurers
Beans a cheap whore
Top Industries
Congressman Melissa Bean 2007 – 2008
Campaign Finance Cycle:
Industry Total
Insurance $253,308
Securities & Investment $240,400
Lawyers/Law Firms $169,891
Real Estate $142,149
Women’s Issues $124,900
Leadership PACs $117,500
Pharmaceuticals/Health Products $106,907
Democratic/Liberal $99,638
Misc Finance $77,079
Commercial Banks $73,850
Building Trade Unions $70,000
Finance/Credit Companies $66,800
Retired $59,206
Pro-Israel $58,95
see my 5 above :D
WE HAVE TO….failure is not an option
I’ll put it up
good on ya,i havetogo to a funeral…mebbe she s in a better place…see ya in afew
attack peeps attak
Crane was a drunk despite being the oldest guy in the House he was passed over as committee chair by Newt I don’t think he was ever a committee chair he was so anti tax our district never seemed to get any money. Do you have any idea how drunk you have to be to not be a committee chair in a senority system?
Part of the District was Rummy’s I think when Rummy left Crane took over now then despite being a drunk for decades and getting us no money he still got reelected every year.
The GOP will target this District running as the candidate giving Bankers cash will not be popular. Nobody cares about home prices more than Suburban People. Nobody hates the bankers more than homeowners with declining property values.
On the plus side the Castle in Fox River Grove if its on sale should be a steal.
OK what do you have in mind?
The arrogance/cluelessness of the Burbs is Legend
Don’t we have Rahm to thank for her?
The first few months of the Obama administration with a Democratic Congress are exposing the sad truth about the Democratic Party. There are too many Mellissa Beans and Evan Bayhs, too many Summers and Geithners, and too few Graysons or Hilda Solis’.
What is to be done?
Will we always only have Wall Street reactionaires and New Democrats fighting it out for the power to exploit the people?
As we face the worse economic times since the depression, it’s time to grow for a workering class based progressive movement.
No more business Dems.
Hi Jane and Puppies.
Tough, depressing one to write, Jane. But thank you for the detailed rundown in livid colour. Yuck!
May I assume Dumslle Beanbag will not soon qualify for Blue America support, as in [when HEQQ freezes over!]? What numbskulls! This is their world too. Do they not believe in consequences? They’re acting like willful brats demanding all their Halloween candy at once, NOW! I hope they choke on it, figuratively, of course, being a pacifist and all….
I appreciate hearing about Sherman. A hero to root for, issue by issue, in the proscribed manner. Much of the rest of the gang – not so much. More like smash-and-grab purse-snatchers.
Who’s the “we?”
Yes, you’re right we won’t discuss violence. It’s understandably against the law. Simply from a tactical perspective, it would be stupendously stupid. We actually have a significant number of hunters here, but I’m very confident, we’re seriously deficient in non-hunting weaponry. As long as posse comiatatus holds, we’re fine.
Screen writer’s guild?? I thought Jane was all over that.
If you don’t think a topic is getting enough sunlight, post about it at Oxdown.
This is a marathon, not a sprint. There aren’t any “and they lived happily forever after.” It’s a grind and we need all the help and support we can get. We’re never going to be in a 100% agreement, but we have to hang together as a community.
:-0 That’s working class based.
I changed my mind from worker and working class and messed up both words.
Increase your monthly donation to FDL.
but an expensive date.
Belongs in a can, refried.
The usual suspects…
http://www.opensecrets.org/pol…..=N00024875
“This is their world too. Do they not believe in consequences?”
They’re incapable of grasping any sort of medium (let alone, long) range thinking. It is, as you said, childish “gimme my candy now!” behavior.
The best American Federal government money can buy. And buy. And buy.
This likely a preview of any Universal Single Payer HealthCare outcome.
DC DEMs will put in the fixes that private health insurance lobby wants in ways
that may not be viewable or stand up to any light of day but who cares?
Get what you pay for.
Democracy? Not so much as it is a dollarcracy.
Sad day for Middle America. Another one. Even the original language on “performance based pay” wasn’t enough. Top executives and their underlords, composed of HR and compensation gurus, SEC disclosure and labor lawyers, have spent more than two decades devising ways to escalate expectations about what constitutes “pay” while lowering expectations about what constitutes “peformance”. The two are largely divorced.
Where they’re not, and even low levels of performance aren’t met, or the exceptions to it don’t kick in, boards and comp committees grovel and claim “unexpected conditions” and make the bonus payments anyway.
This isn’t about what constituents want; it’s the opposite. It’s what campaign chairs want to get their boys and girls re-elected. It’s as constituent-based as Arkansas’ Sen. Lincoln’s scope of who constitutes “constituents”: the Walton family and about four others.
This is a war over resources, insiders versus outsiders. Blue Dogs are voting for insiders, despite their claim to the Democratic label. Let’s help them pay an electoral price and make them put on their real uniforms.
Doubt that will do it. One problem with blogs is people vent in comments section and think they are doing something.
Jumping Bean – as in when the banksters say jump . . .
I vent in comment sections, but I call and write reps – house, senate, speaker, SML, etal – on a regular basis. I’m respectful but I don’t sugar-coat my remarks, either. I also encourage people I know to do the same. These idiots need to know that they’re being watched and the more calls and letters they get – particularly when such communications are not part of an organized campaign – the more they become aware that there are actual real people that exist outside their cushy little bubble.
I think we have a candidate!
Link
http://www.democrats.com/primary-Melissa-Bean
They are the Muslims say you can support Jihad with Action, Money or Words. Words are ideas and emotions and all our words together are powerful.
I pay to his campaign.
Dupage County I’m one County North the Rolando Cruz case happened in Dupage County it led to the end of the Death Penalty in Illinois the political scandal destroyed the State GOP and got Obama elected Alan Keyes ran against him.
The entire GOP ticket seemed to be linked to scandal that year very entertaining.
mebbe we should see to it their mommies and daddies are dragged into family court and held accountable for their wayward brats.
good dawg, I think I’m serious. Might be some fun theater if nuthin’ else…. heh.
I gotta go fill s’more boxes. Back later, gang.
HEY! The big, used (3 generations and counting) dresser we nearly killed ourselves
dragginggently lifting out to the roadside yestidie, AND the nice sturdy toy box on at least its 5th go-round of family service: BOTH were promptly picked up and carted away by some kind soul yesterday. I hope their kiddies like their “like new” stuff! We are getting a huge kick out of our “roadside economy” gambit. On our fairly busy back country thoroughfare, travellers have quickly learned to check our driveway edge on the day AFTER garbage pickup, each week. Free stuff. Good, solid free stuff. Nice to know someone can use it, and not worry about being owned by the company store…After all, we got it free. Shouldn’t we pass on the favor? It’s only fair. I’m waiting like a big ole spider for our twp trustee to come griping over our “illegal continuous garage sale”, so I can personally inform the fella ’tis not, sir. Tis only free, and cleared from the drive within a day, without fail. What’s the harm, sir? Neat, clean, useful stuff. No junk. No kidding. ;->
You know more about this person maybe you could do a diary come election time I’m out of the district now and not up on the local news anymore.
Please read ShotoJamf’s #69. I wuz gonna jump on it, but he said it so much better than I ever could.
No. We don’t just vent here and pat ourselves on the back. How about you?
Dennis Cardoza(D-CA), Gregory Meeks(D-NY), Melissa Bean (D-IL) all added ammendments that nullify the restrictions on banks
i) if they received TARP money before the bill was passed
ii) if the TARP money received is under some vague, undefined quantity, which could be any amount, and
iii) as long as they make small payments on their TARP debt which may never result in paying back any significant quantities of their debt to US taxpayers. The majority of congress and the banks are screwing us coming and going, even after raging about how horrible it is and producing a bill will amendments that practically nullify it.
I’ve sent an e-mail to Time magazine about this, I ask you to consider doing the same to keep up National reporting on this hypocrisy.
Sorry I used to be one county North.
Although FDL and other sites deserve more respect that Bean’s minion displayed, I don’t see why you felt the need to cite Jane’s blog post in calling Bean’s office. It’s not the staffer’s job to be able to distinguish Jane Hamsher from Glenn Reynolds, although it is his job to behave respectfully. The amendment itself is public record.
On other matters, I just can’t get worked up over the use of “Democrat Party.” When our Dems act more democratically, maybe I’ll feel more insistent that they be called Democratic.
Finally, anyone who slights the Swedes in my home I will personally crush with my Ikea armoire. How can you not like the people who gave us cloudberries? Cloudberries, for chrissakes!
Ah, yes, Randi! That’s why the name Scheurer seemed so familiar and yet so unfamiliar — had seen two different first names attached to same last name over the last several years.
So, lots of questions:
– who’s the stronger candidate, Randi or Bill?
– did either Randi or Bill make efforts to contact Greens and Libertarians in that district?
– what about the unions, would they continue to back a progressive but non-Dem against Bean?
– what’s the lay of the land with the Dem Party in the district; are they happy/unhappy with Bean? can they be persuaded to sit on their hands in 2010?
– what about DCCC – can they be persuaded to sit it out until the primary is over?
– what about other progressive organizations, like MoveOn and DFA; do they have much of a presence which can muster against Bean?
And either of the Scheurers – will they swear to be the Bernie Sanders of IL, caucus with Dems when Dems are doing the progressive thing?
Got about 6 months to nail all this down and muster $100K-plus for Scheurer, too, which brings up another question: were they good fundraisers?
We have to hang together as a nation or as the progressive movement of this nation. We have to reach people outside this group and persuade them to do something legal, non-violent and meaningful such as stand outside their house or apartment at a given moment in time. If enough people respond the marathon can be over in a minute, but we must organize better. Persuading people to leave their computers to stand up to be counted will be the neatest trick of the week. As for violence, I’m not the one who suggested pitchforks and torches. We are not there yet provided we can think of and use meaningful, peaceful alternatives.
I don’t think letters to congresspeople and threats to not contribute ten bucks when banks contribute thousands will do it. We need the means to generate a national protest, one people can do in their communities and don’t have to bus to. I think writing to congresspeople is as effective as commenting on this blog. This is of course, a prediction. It could be the Dems will come to their senses and respond to the people who elected them. I don’t think so. Time will tell.
– who’s the stronger candidate, Randi or Bill?
Don’t know
– did either Randi or Bill make efforts to contact Greens and Libertarians in that district?
Don’t know CB12 @28
Not many non GOPers
the Rolondo cruz case, the Drivers license for cash scandal killed the state GOP Melissa heck any Dem needs a good economy to win that district.
– what about the unions, would they continue to back a progressive but non-Dem against Bean?
Maybe but Unions don’t have the pull in that district like they do elsewhere
– what’s the lay of the land with the Dem Party in the district; are they happy/unhappy with Bean? can they be persuaded to sit on their hands in 2010?
I think she is the first Dem to hold office in that district in decades so she is the democratic party. Look at Mchenry county college there might be a young Dems club there
– what about DCCC – can they be persuaded to sit it out until the primary is over?
Maybe if Rahm is distracted but not likely this district is GOP heaven it should be Blue Dog heaven if we get a Progressive elected here then we are allot stronger than I thought. I expect Rahm to defend this district like he did Tammy Duckworth.
– what about other progressive organizations, like MoveOn and DFA; do they have much of a presence which can muster against Bean?
No
And either of the Scheurers – will they swear to be the Bernie Sanders of IL, caucus with Dems when Dems are doing the progressive thing?
ask them
Got about 6 months to nail all this down and muster $100K-plus for Scheurer, too, which brings up another question: were they good fundraisers?
You can rise $100,000? I Don’t know if they are good fundraisers I can tell you they like rising property values
they hate taxes. Banks are taking away people’s homes causing real estate to drop. Melissa giving bankers their tax dollars for bonuses?
That will be real unpopular.
Interesting feedback, thanks for that. I’ll run through this again:
– who’s the stronger candidate, Randi or Bill?
Need to figure out which of the two had a better showing – Randi in the primary of 2002, or Bill in 2006, in terms of votes. Will tell us which of the two may be more viable; since both have run inside the last 3 terms, chances are good they have residual name cred built up on the ground. The challenge will be messaging – can they run on “Bean’s a corporate whore/I was f*cking right about your being sold out”? It’s a tough one to pull off.
– did either Randi or Bill make efforts to contact Greens and Libertarians in that district?
I ask this question because if they can get within MOE, these groups make a critical difference. Look at a similar suburban Michigan district; there’s nearly 20K voters who went Independent/Green/Libertarian, might be enough for a swing vote in a tight race. Also don’t know what IL’s voting requirements are like, whether these groups can vote in a primary as Dems, could make an even bigger difference.
– what about the unions, would they continue to back a progressive but non-Dem against Bean?
Again, depends on how you slice this; if they aren’t a sizable block, they can still make swing vote and they can bring both manhours and money to a campaign, particularly if they are helping removing Bean and her CAFTA-loving ways.
– what’s the lay of the land with the Dem Party in the district; are they happy/unhappy with Bean? can they be persuaded to sit on their hands in 2010?
I hear you about the ‘burbs thing, but I can point to two very similar districts in Michigan, MI-09 and MI-11. MI-09 was won this year by Democrat Gary Peters (who you’ve likely seen grilling banksters as part of the House Financial Subcommittee); his district has been one of those reliably “Reagan Democrat” districts, where they may have been white/blue-collar and white flight voters who went for God-guns-gays. MI-11 is a targeted race, with Republican Thad McCotter hanging on by the skin of his gruesome teeth in a district that has not seated a Democrat in 44 years. In both districts a progressive Democrat can win, but it takes a solid, effective candidate with adequate money and other support to do it. I feel certain IL-08 is very similar.
– what about DCCC – can they be persuaded to sit it out until the primary is over?
If there are enough other targeted races, they may stay out of it.
– what about other progressive organizations, like MoveOn and DFA; do they have much of a presence which can muster against Bean?
Again, we may be talking small numbers here, but they may have just enough organizing power to build the ground game. I see that Northside DFA has 359 members, not exactly puny numbers, might be able to find enough resources with DFA and MoveOn members combined.
– And either of the Scheurers – will they swear to be the Bernie Sanders of IL, caucus with Dems when Dems are doing the progressive thing?
Based on what I see on the internet, this isn’t even an issue.
– Got about 6 months to nail all this down and muster $100K-plus for Scheurer, too, which brings up another question: were they good fundraisers?
The test of a candidate’s viability with the state party and other larger, organized political groups is their ability to raise funds. If a Scheurer (or other progressive candidate) can pull together this much by Jan. 1, they may be able to attract other sources readily. Naturally, $1M would be a much better number with which to work.
Phew. That’s a lot to chew through, but there it is. I sure hope that the progressive community in IL-08 can coalesce and rally around a strong candidate soon, because I have a nasty feeling that Bean is going to continue to be an ugly lump under our mattress for the rest of this term.
You have plans very detailed plans I look forward to reading about this race:)