As reported earlier, Republican Jim Tedisco took the extraordinary measure of filing a motion with the Dutchess County Clerk that was designed to contest and stall certification of the results, should voters today chose Democrat Scott Murphy.
While campaign lawyers often pre-file papers for simple vote protection, Tedisco’s motion goes much, much further. Inside this document (PDF) are several humdingers, including:
On page 6: An order that whenever a poll-watcher challenges a voter that the elections clerks have to make a written record. (Unless or until that order is served at every polling place—and unless or until somebody notices that paragraph—it will be impossible to enforce.)
On Page 9: Plaintiffs seek a restraining order to prevent the certification of Murphy no matter how huge a win. (This paragraph was struck out by the court on the spot.)
Also, it has come to our attention that much of this petition has been copied and pasted directly from a complaint filed last year in New York City in the case of another contested election. The document cites Brooklyn cases—apparently, the Tedisco team was too lazy, too panicked, or too busy tweeting to look up relevant upstate case law.
(We are working on providing all of you with a full PDF for your own perusal, and will post a link when it is ready. PDF now available at the link above.)
As we mentioned, this is going to be a close race, and there is still time to help (polls are open until 9pm Eastern): Phone bank for Scott Murphy.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Look, it’s the Coleman tactic of trying to overturn election results in the courts. Welcome to the new GOP strategy against democracy.
Gee, why have elections if the GOP’ers go running to court. We should just give the seat to the Dem rightout and then give the Repukes something to really complain about.
Court just ruled heavily in Franken’s favor
http://oxdown.firedoglake.com/diary/4518
Minn Senate:
More from Big Orange here
forgive me the O/T Gregg
Got it here:
http://campaignsilo.firedoglak…..ecc-rules/
Holy crap! This is un-flipping-real.
Yeah, they appear to start with the presumption that every elected position is Republican by divine grace and therefore it is against all the laws of man and doG for a Dem to actually get the win and the votes HAVE to be tainted somehow.
shorter GOP strategy: heads I win, tails you lose.
Dugg right here — please join me!
so I say the court should DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
and after that, if this WORM tedisco wants to file any more of those court paper thingys, he has to crawl back to the same judge and BEG for the rifght to file another brief
that would cut the NUTS off of the court challenges the repuglitards LOVE so much
make these fucking idiots THINK before they file a suit, by making their first filing THEIR LAST
get it right the first time or FUCK OFF AND DIE
Oh lordy — Coleman spokesperson Bogus Ben Ginsberg is trying to deflect questions about how f-ed up Coleman’s case is now that the ECC has stomped on it.
Do remember that Ginsberg isn’t allowed to speak for Norm in court, so he, unlike Marc Elias, can say whatever fool thing pops into his head. Which is why, when Marc Elias says that the MN SC can issue a cert to Franken even if the Coleman folks appeal to the Federal level, and Ginsberg disagrees, know that Elias isn’t allowed to lie about the facts of the case because he, unlike Bogus Ben, is an officer of the court.
It’s a fascinating strategy, though: “Who, me? No, I’m not Coleman’s lawyer — I’m his liar!”
i’m back home from after volunteering for murphy all day & just called 3 ppl in his organization to ask about the lawsuit. was told they won’t be making any statements about it tonight.
more when i know more.
THANK YOU for the PDF!!
(just passed the link on)
Thanks for the update, gp, and thanks for the work in the field.
you are welcome–glad we could help
the newshour is covering the story, right after the story on the economic summit
A comment at the NYT suggests that there has been voter intimidation – again! – at Skidmore College
http://community.nytimes.com/a…..urney.html
This happened a few years ago in a local race. In a contest this close, blocking a relative handful of voters could be decisive.
One point: the New York state appeals court is divided into 4 “departments.” The Second Department is centered in Brooklyn, but it includes many other counties, including Dutchess County. Case law from the Appellate Division, Second Department governs all counties in the department. This is why the complaint cites to “Brooklyn” cases.