- POTUS in Europe
to study up on socialism. - This is nice for a change.
- 5-year high — right track/wrong track.
- Union busting, Fox style.
- Good news.
- I’ve been doing this all along.
Early Morning Swim: Special Jane on Shuster Edition |
|
| By: Blue Texan Tuesday March 31, 2009 4:45 am | |



17 Comments












Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Good Morning. CNN had a segment this morn about Waggoner’s golden parachute. While, they didn’t neccessarily support it they did point out that he’s worked for GM ‘his entire adult life’. Um…..as opposed to those UAW workers who only moonlighted there, I guess.
Wrt “good news”……..doesn’t it just make your heart sing to see a return to chucks of the best of our country being, well, ya know, actually “preserved” rather than destroyed?
Gosh, “elevating” Palin sounds like something that would be a violation of the Clean Air Act.
In the immortal words of Marty Peretz (mid 1980’s)
maybe if this country had less wilderness
we would appreciate it more.
By the way, who was that smart left-winger being allowed to speak on
GE-TV?Better hope Jeffrey Immelt doesn’t hear about it.
Morning BT – All the talk is about the UAW but the reality is that it was the bond holders who were not willing to come to the table.
Great job Jane. Thanks for posting the link, because I missed Jane’s appearance.
Waiting for us to pay them full face value. Let’s see if they can unload them in the next 60 days.
Morning, people. I missed this Kuchinich investigation yesterday.
They didn’t even call them retention bonuses either! Dividing up the loot after the theft.
I find it hard to understand why Hellhole hasn’t gotten wider play. It’s about how American prisoners are put into solitary confinement for extended periods of time and driven mad.
It’s good to know that Webb is doing something about this.
I thought it was about the ‘ascension of the Virgin.’ Oh, nevermind.
My biggest concern regarding the auto industry lies with the health of the parts suppliers should one or two of the 2.5 fail.
It has been an ignored aspect of the debate as of late. Little to no “supply chain” talk in the auto industry retool. In the initial auto bailout discussions, it was central.
Furthermore, Obama has not put enough money into infrastructure spending or in new technology spending to redirect jobs from the supply chain. Jane, if you are reading, where and when will this aspect get picked back up in the restructure picture?
The supply chain has been hung out to dry.
This was discussed this AM and it seems that if Chrysler goes down Ford is going to need federal assistance to keep its supply chain alive.
Lachman of AEI on cspan2, laying out a dismal economic scenario. Couldn’t argue with a bit of it.
This just seems ass-backwards. It makes more sense to sink the $$$ into making something out of GM and Chrysler than to “prop” up the supply chain until the market adjusts and the supply chain reorganizes. My guess is, without crunching numbers, it would be cheaper to prop up the 1.5 then the parts industry. Additionally, this is where some major dialogue with Canada must come into the picture.
Just guessing but I bet some smart economist who has been here for a visit might answer that better than my “guess”.
Obama and the auto team have been crickets on this huge concern. The supply chain is much bigger than written about and major industry sectors would fall apart. Many have been hit currently and have gone through big layoffs and the remaining employees are taking weeks of furloughs, with talks of more weeks of furloughs.
Many of these supply chain industries, supply our military, defense industry, healthcare, marine and housing industry.
Right now, we cannot afford to prop up that many industry sectors in the supply chain. Life support for the 1.5 of the 2.5 would be cheaper. Ask Krugman and prove me wrong.
Should be:
Ask Krugman and prove me right or wrong.
This from the Economist is worth reading the bigger picture of supply chain.
The sad part about this is, that this article just looks at the Tier I and II of the supply chain. Tier III and so on will be the bigger hits in reality, in terms of a cascade effect of unemployment.
This also has some good information too.
And here:
More here and here on supply chain concerns and ideas.