<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Geithner Plan: Outsource the Clean-Up to Hedge Funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:53:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmmm</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864207</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864207</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why &lt;em&gt;can’t&lt;/em&gt; the public value a given asset?  It’s called “selling a house” and it happens every day.  All you need to do is find a way to separate a house from its CDO pool upon default &amp; foreclosure, and then * poof * one less toxic mortgage in that CDO.  The CDO becomes less toxic and less risky and its value increases because the uncertainty’s been shed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why <em>can’t</em> the public value a given asset?  It’s called “selling a house” and it happens every day.  All you need to do is find a way to separate a house from its CDO pool upon default &amp; foreclosure, and then * poof * one less toxic mortgage in that CDO.  The CDO becomes less toxic and less risky and its value increases because the uncertainty’s been shed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robspierre</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864190</link>
		<dc:creator>robspierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864190</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It should mean “too complex to actually exist”. Whenever complexity is offered as a reason for not explaining, I smell fraud. Most things are complex only in the details. An expert that knows something about the domain can reduce it to patterns, formulae, or rules of thumb that make it clear how things work at a high level. I’ve had experts in topology, superconductivity, and quantum mechanics explain their life’s work in a few cogent sentences–like listening to Mr. Krugman. But con artists always argue that they can’t explain and that you would’t understand.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should mean “too complex to actually exist”. Whenever complexity is offered as a reason for not explaining, I smell fraud. Most things are complex only in the details. An expert that knows something about the domain can reduce it to patterns, formulae, or rules of thumb that make it clear how things work at a high level. I’ve had experts in topology, superconductivity, and quantum mechanics explain their life’s work in a few cogent sentences–like listening to Mr. Krugman. But con artists always argue that they can’t explain and that you would’t understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robspierre</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864178</link>
		<dc:creator>robspierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864178</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the hedge fund racket will have folded after all this, after most the cash is safely overseas. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I think that, if we wanted to get rich, you and I would have to cash out whatever is left in the IRA and put it into one of those NRA innovative financial instruments-–something large caliber that will impress the folks in the gated communities during “naked” foreclosures and car repossessions (if you are wondering, remember that a naked CDS lets you insure and collect on property that you don’t own). Now that the banks are where the money isn’t, we’d need to diversify.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the hedge fund racket will have folded after all this, after most the cash is safely overseas. </p>
<p>So I think that, if we wanted to get rich, you and I would have to cash out whatever is left in the IRA and put it into one of those NRA innovative financial instruments-–something large caliber that will impress the folks in the gated communities during “naked” foreclosures and car repossessions (if you are wondering, remember that a naked CDS lets you insure and collect on property that you don’t own). Now that the banks are where the money isn’t, we’d need to diversify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robspierre</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864169</link>
		<dc:creator>robspierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864169</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why hedge funds? Why not simply value the alleged assets? Because based on what you and your colleagues at FDL have written, it is pretty obvious that the entities involved–AIG, the investment banks, and now the hedge funds–have to keep the music playing so that no one stops and realizes that they’ve stolen all the chairs. As with any bankrupt business, there is money to be made as long as no one knows that the business is insolvent. So you need to kee up the appearnance of solvency for as long as possible, above all by keeping people away from the books.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The value of these “assets” when offered for sale is zero (or as close to it as does not matter). But the assets have been insured for lots more than zero using unregulated CDSs. As long as the assets aren’t fairly valued, the counterparties can collect on the insurance in the event of loss. So far we have a classic insurance fraud. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only in this case the insurers have no actual reserves to cover the CDSs (if I understood the revelations about AIG’s offshore reinsurance scam). So the idea is to get the taxpayers to pay hedge funds to buy the “assets” at the price on the insurance policies, thus sustaining the imaginary value of the asset and the imaginary solvency of the banks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The insurance scam is doubly good because the Treasury appears to be paying off the insurance without proof of its loss, much less proof of its value. Everybody Who Matters wins: the insured/counterparty gets paid and the asset still gets  sold at an inflated price so that the bank gets paid. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If, as rumor has it, CDSs were bought by the same hedgefunds that are being paid to profit from the asset sales and by the same banks that got TARP bailouts and profit from what the hedge funds will pay (using taxpayer money), then we are seeing a massively compouned fraud that makes loan-shark levels of compound interest look positively anemic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why hedge funds? Why not simply value the alleged assets? Because based on what you and your colleagues at FDL have written, it is pretty obvious that the entities involved–AIG, the investment banks, and now the hedge funds–have to keep the music playing so that no one stops and realizes that they’ve stolen all the chairs. As with any bankrupt business, there is money to be made as long as no one knows that the business is insolvent. So you need to kee up the appearnance of solvency for as long as possible, above all by keeping people away from the books.</p>
<p>The value of these “assets” when offered for sale is zero (or as close to it as does not matter). But the assets have been insured for lots more than zero using unregulated CDSs. As long as the assets aren’t fairly valued, the counterparties can collect on the insurance in the event of loss. So far we have a classic insurance fraud. </p>
<p>Only in this case the insurers have no actual reserves to cover the CDSs (if I understood the revelations about AIG’s offshore reinsurance scam). So the idea is to get the taxpayers to pay hedge funds to buy the “assets” at the price on the insurance policies, thus sustaining the imaginary value of the asset and the imaginary solvency of the banks.</p>
<p>The insurance scam is doubly good because the Treasury appears to be paying off the insurance without proof of its loss, much less proof of its value. Everybody Who Matters wins: the insured/counterparty gets paid and the asset still gets  sold at an inflated price so that the bank gets paid. </p>
<p>If, as rumor has it, CDSs were bought by the same hedgefunds that are being paid to profit from the asset sales and by the same banks that got TARP bailouts and profit from what the hedge funds will pay (using taxpayer money), then we are seeing a massively compouned fraud that makes loan-shark levels of compound interest look positively anemic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864141</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864141</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;But he is acting as if he’s been put in a round room and told to sit in the corner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some people say the Oval office was specifically designed to avoid the President being cornered. Ole.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But he is acting as if he’s been put in a round room and told to sit in the corner.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Some people say the Oval office was specifically designed to avoid the President being cornered. Ole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864140</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864140</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;the idea that we should just wait and see what the looters leave behind is preposterous.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Count the silverware! LOL&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the idea that we should just wait and see what the looters leave behind is preposterous.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Count the silverware! LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864139</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864139</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Instead of loaning money to hedge funds to buy the crap why not loan the money to “the taxpayers” to buy the crap.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s impractical, the public wouldn’t know how to value these assets, the public couldn’t sit on them and (what with all the whining I’m reading lately) I’m guessing the public would complain they’re being required to buy a pile of shit they can’t evaluate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The best subgroup of the public to buy these things are Wall St. firms who deal in such assets and understand better how to value these things and how much of their own assets to risk in buying them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is perhaps another reason the government isn’t simply buying them directly. We don’t think government is very good at business stuff, so Obama is simply saying we’ll stay away from that and let private firms do it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another thing is that if government bought them with treasuries that would inject a lot more debt than just underwriting the potential failures these private firms will face. Certainly that part of the results will be less than government taking it all on.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Instead of loaning money to hedge funds to buy the crap why not loan the money to “the taxpayers” to buy the crap.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It’s impractical, the public wouldn’t know how to value these assets, the public couldn’t sit on them and (what with all the whining I’m reading lately) I’m guessing the public would complain they’re being required to buy a pile of shit they can’t evaluate.</p>
<p>The best subgroup of the public to buy these things are Wall St. firms who deal in such assets and understand better how to value these things and how much of their own assets to risk in buying them.</p>
<p>This is perhaps another reason the government isn’t simply buying them directly. We don’t think government is very good at business stuff, so Obama is simply saying we’ll stay away from that and let private firms do it.</p>
<p>Another thing is that if government bought them with treasuries that would inject a lot more debt than just underwriting the potential failures these private firms will face. Certainly that part of the results will be less than government taking it all on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864137</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864137</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;We are avoiding putting a value on these assets because the value is declining with every passing moment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I doubt that. As time passes there are more mortgages being fixed and more walkaways (amounting to a refinancing as they buy a new house), so the bottom of the housing market is closer (with a definite value for houses) and not an infinite time away (where houses are valued at zero).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We are avoiding putting a value on these assets because the value is declining with every passing moment.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I doubt that. As time passes there are more mortgages being fixed and more walkaways (amounting to a refinancing as they buy a new house), so the bottom of the housing market is closer (with a definite value for houses) and not an infinite time away (where houses are valued at zero).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864136</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1864136</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Just watched Krugman, boy are we screwed
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Republicans have been in charge, so that’s no surprise.&lt;br /&gt;
Question is whether we can fix things and Krugman’s opinion is but one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Just watched Krugman, boy are we screwed
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Republicans have been in charge, so that’s no surprise.<br />
Question is whether we can fix things and Krugman’s opinion is but one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masaccio</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1863997</link>
		<dc:creator>masaccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/23/the-geithner-plan-outsource-the-clean-up-to-hedge-funds/#comment-1863997</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently Geithner figured this out his own self, from the Treasury &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/reports/ppip_whitepaper_032309.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;White Paper&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Institutions of all sizes will be eligible to sell assets under the Legacy Loans Program. To start the process, banks will identify to the FDIC the assets, typically a pool of loans, that they wish to sell. Assets eligible for purchase will be determined by the participating banking organizations, including the primary banking regulators, the FDIC, and the Treasury. &lt;strong&gt;In order to protect taxpayer dollars from credit losses, the FDIC will employ contractors to analyze the pools and will determine the level of debt to be issued by the PPIF that it is willing to guarantee.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Geithner figured this out his own self, from the Treasury <a href="http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/reports/ppip_whitepaper_032309.pdf" rel="nofollow">White Paper</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Institutions of all sizes will be eligible to sell assets under the Legacy Loans Program. To start the process, banks will identify to the FDIC the assets, typically a pool of loans, that they wish to sell. Assets eligible for purchase will be determined by the participating banking organizations, including the primary banking regulators, the FDIC, and the Treasury. <strong>In order to protect taxpayer dollars from credit losses, the FDIC will employ contractors to analyze the pools and will determine the level of debt to be issued by the PPIF that it is willing to guarantee.</strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.319 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 14:53:51 -->

