Here David Rockefeller admits media collusion with his one world plans: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.

It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the light of publicity during those years.
But now the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.

The supra-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]

Rockefeller writes on page 405 of his memoirs: “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” (Activists Go Face to Face With Evil As Rockefeller Confronted)______________________________

“The Planned Collapse of America”,Peter Chamberlin,Online Journal

Found the link on google, so I’ll check it out: http://www.onlinejournal.com/a…..2715.shtml
Original study link is at http://www.skilluminati.com/re…..df_format/

In my #124 response to Ian, I left out this supporting link.
http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/20847

For a work of non fiction,from the same era-the 70’s -is a far more sobering projection of the blueprint for American society.

It is called :
“Changing Images of Man”,commissioned by the government and done by Stanford Research Institute.It is available on the net in PDF form;but, Online Journal has a really good piece about it entitled”The Planned Collapse of America”,by Peter Chamberlain.

There was a plan,a blueprint for whats coming down now-definitely worth a look,for sure.

What did you say in the past? That nothing is wrong with the economy? Oooh kaaay, then.

Is it too early to start looking for a challenger to Obama in ‘12? Dare I say it, a challenge from the left? I’m sure Hillary would have been much smarter and more decisive that Obama has been to this point. OTOH, can’t we do better than Hillary? I mean, I love her, but the men she relies on…are nearly the same as the ones Obama does – she’s just not as wet behind the ears. And what’s going to be left of the economy by ‘12?

My Obamabot friend has gotten over some initial “dissappointments” and is now flying high on O’s recent inspiring speech on the Persian new year, and his bland reassurances on the economy. “Inspiration” is the opiate of the masses who have no access the real stuff.

For a sports nut, Obama’s quite lacking in the clue bat department.

I just find it astounding that he’s apparently so isolated that he listens to Geithner, Summers et al. and their “version” of both the problem(s) and solution(s). No one else appears to make it into the room/onto his reading list.

Ive heard that Summers deliberately kept out the economically clueful, e.g., Krugman, Stiglitz, Roubini, Taleb, Galbraith, Baker, … Summers is the son of Paul Samuelson’s brother and Kenneth Arrow’s sister (i.e., both uncles are Nobel-leaurate economists), which might account for something.

Blogs challenge these narratives and threaten this structure. In the current crisis, the chance for a new system to emerge from the profoundly broken one is a fight between powerful, competing interests.

Obama’s economic & treasury officials give me no confidence that he will seize the phoenix because he sees neither the ashes extending in all directions nor the arsonists who burned down the forest and keep returning to the scene of the crime to pour more gasoline on the embers.

His concept governing for the public good is being tested for its depth and durability. Superficial rhetoric & careful PR coded to reassure Wall Street, or a commitment to real change? So far, I’ve seen the former, not the latter. We have less than one year before the 2010 election blood sports begin amidst a $3 billion a day deficit.

It is a small window with so much at stake.

So… the question then is how you think this paper money economy is going to play out. Inflation, deflation and a reboot of the money game that leads to Japanification are the three most likely outcomes, imo, but I’m still struggling with which one.

My best guess right now is a return to riptide inflation – deflation in some areas, inflation in others. But if there’s ever a panic and governments/people decide to flee the US dollar, we’re in for a world of hurt. Likewise, 10 trillion dollars, even if the velocity of money is through the floor, is a LOT of money. So hyperinflation is not out of the question.

Not very helpful, I guess. When I figure out how this is going to play out, I’ll let everyone know. If you think the money being thrown around will reboot the economy at least enough to get a lousy business cycle underway, great, high quality bonds are a decent place to be and there’s probably a buying opportunity for equities at some point in the next 9 months. If not… well, a garden would be a good investment, actually…

In terms of muni bonds specifically, I assume that if there are widespread defaults the administration will bail them out. So they’re /probably/ reasonably safe. /Probably/.

Being right means nothing in the world that Obama or most politicians and journalists inhabit. You and I have no right to be heard, no matter how good our records are. Krugman and Galbraith have a little bit of right, but only a little, after all, they’re not practical people, they just get things right more often than wrong.